コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 x-based niche partitioning, and sex-specific coadaptation.
2 t of the host species, indicating virus-host coadaptation.
3 ective forces that generate parent-offspring coadaptation.
4 from the disruption of nuclear-mitochondrial coadaptation.
5 two antagonists during rapid and reciprocal coadaptation.
6 confirmation of synchronous plant-herbivore coadaptation.
7 s that feeding preferences have driven their coadaptation.
8 phyte morphology, which provides evidence of coadaptation.
9 ing fitness to facilitate parental-offspring coadaptation.
10 ssurance (Baker's contention) and multilocus coadaptation (Allard's argument) are two distinct hypoth
11 often coexist in the same host, resulting in coadaptation among several phylogenetically distant geno
12 mutualism has occurred through strict-sense coadaptation and cospeciation between pairs of fig and w
13 bolites underlies adaptive immune microbiota coadaptation and promotes colonic homeostasis and health
15 with caution, as they may disrupt Y-autosome coadaptation and/or inadvertently unbridle mother's curs
17 s on the neo-X indicates a pattern of active coadaptation apparently initiated by X-linked transmissi
18 itation and maternal behaviour show signs of coadaptation as they are negatively correlated between m
19 apidly within few generations, (ii) temporal coadaptation at the phenotypic level is found in paralle
20 fication has resulted from a long history of coadaptation between microbes and hosts (heritable facto
21 y the parasite, thus intensifying continuous coadaptation between symbionts in a tripartite arms race
22 s work provides insights into the process of coadaptation between the human immune system and a rapid
27 the presence of gene interactions that favor coadaptation can also favor the evolution of genomic imp
30 "shared proteins" has evolved and how their coadaptation enables cross-talk at the molecular level r
31 odels, we discover that SLIT2-ROBO1-mediated coadaptation facilitated the implantation and outgrowth
32 I prolyl-tRNA synthetase (ProRS), functional coadaptations have occurred in going from the bacterial
34 oethological correlates underlying fly-yeast coadaptation in two drosophilids with distinct habitats.
35 r, the spread of adaptation (i.e., degree of coadaptation) in tonotopically organized regions of audi
36 We further provide evidence that maternal coadaptation is critical to EVT-induced decidual transfo
38 this process, in combination with autosomal coadaptation, may drive genetic and phenotypic divergenc
39 patibilities (i.e. disruption of cytonuclear coadaptation) might contribute to the speciation process
40 n) or even to coexist with each other (i.e., coadaptation) might have the potential to sustainably en
41 complementarily, which is consistent with a coadaptation model of imprinting evolution, a model pred
42 uggest that the two ProRS groups may reflect coadaptations needed to accommodate changes in the opera
44 mediated chromosomal rearrangement, and high coadaptation of both male genes and cis-regulatory seque
45 ust catalytic function in different ways, or coadaptation of different steps' properties in pathways;
46 like properties but are heavily dependent on coadaptation of hosts, which continuously evolve to supp
47 control, showing that there is antagonistic coadaptation of maternal and paternal effects on distinc
50 oning, whereas the latter concentrate on the coadaptation of parental supply and offspring demand.
51 ansion are repeatedly converted into precise coadaptations of feather development and carotenoid acco
52 tional RNA code can vary in evolution due to coadaptations of the contacts between aminoacyl-tRNA syn
54 Physiological evidence of ejaculate-female coadaptation, paired with a promiscuous mating system, m
55 ir pups has recently been claimed to support coadaptation rather than the kinship theory of genomic i
57 The sexual antagonism and maternal-offspring coadaptation theories view genomic imprinting as a mecha
58 thermore, as predicted by maternal-offspring coadaptation theory, offspring signaling is negatively g
61 ting plants and was able to demonstrate that coadaptation through coevolution of coexisting species i
62 c-induced selection mediated host-microbiome coadaptation, ultimately leading to a new host genome-mi
63 e observations suggest divergent mitonuclear coadaptation underpins cryptic differentiation in this s
64 h evolutionary adaptation and coevolutionary coadaptation were disentangled in a crop system through
65 actions often favor the evolution of genetic coadaptation, where beneficially interacting alleles evo
67 We propose that core microorganisms undergo coadaptation with their plant host, notably in response
68 ignatures of morphological and physiological coadaptation with their pollinators involving terpenoid-