戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 th vestibular schwannomas and candidates for cochlear implantation.
2      The patient subsequently underwent left cochlear implantation.
3 chlear receptor and neural potentials before cochlear implantation.
4 mpanying the hearing loss and the effects of cochlear implantation.
5 re deafened and continuing until the time of cochlear implantation.
6 cimens obtained from the patients undergoing cochlear implantation.
7 ined from 3 children and 5 adults undergoing cochlear implantation.
8  issues in the fields of adult and pediatric cochlear implantation.
9 er speech perception in young children after cochlear implantation.
10 aryngology or hearing research, and never in cochlear implantation.
11 much of the observed variation in outcome of cochlear implantation.
12 n or patient-reported outcome measures after cochlear implantation.
13 ldren aged 9 years old or younger undergoing cochlear implantation.
14  a standalone therapy or in combination with cochlear implantation.
15 idates, and 623 candidates (89.9%) underwent cochlear implantation.
16 amily had an ideal hearing restoration after cochlear implantation.
17 interpretations of successful outcomes after cochlear implantation.
18 ) improved statistically significantly after cochlear implantation.
19          The CIQOL-35 Profile instrument and cochlear implantation.
20                The intervention consisted of cochlear implantation.
21 human cochlea, with evident consequences for cochlear implantation.
22 pment of real-time feedback systems to guide cochlear implantation.
23 le prediction of hearing preservation during cochlear implantation.
24 meeting pure tone audiometric thresholds for cochlear implantation, 311 already had a cochlear implan
25 evere or profound deafness, is restricted to cochlear implantation, a procedure that requires surviva
26 ground Histopathologic studies reported that cochlear implantation, a well-established means to treat
27          Geographic variability in pediatric cochlear implantation across hospital referral regions i
28 afness, was used to examine how deafness and cochlear implantation affected the synaptic organization
29                                      Earlier cochlear implantation among children with bilateral seve
30 s, a clinical standard that generally avoids cochlear implantation and enables natural acoustic heari
31 sociated with differences in access to early cochlear implantation and suggest the need to invest in
32 ary to identify patients at risk for delayed cochlear implantation and understand targets for interve
33  diagnosis of SSD for which they underwent a cochlear implantation, and (3) with at least 1 outcome o
34 pure tone audiometric threshold criteria for cochlear implantation are currently not appropriately re
35                                    Bilateral cochlear implantation attempts to increase performance o
36 er a 3-year period in children who underwent cochlear implantation before 5 years of age (n = 188) fr
37 who completed vestibular assessment prior to cochlear implantation between January 1, 2009, and Decem
38 icits in the auditory cortex for which early cochlear implantation can effectively compensate.
39 gs can guide future research efforts, refine cochlear implantation candidacy criteria, and aid in fam
40                          Since the advent of cochlear implantation, candidacy criteria have slowly br
41 ith CIs from the Childhood Development After Cochlear Implantation (CDaCI) study from hospital-based
42 matory foreign body response (FBR) following cochlear implantation (CI) can negatively impact CI outc
43                                              Cochlear implantation (CI) of the deaf ear is an effecti
44 The present study directly demonstrates that cochlear implantation does not interfere with the normal
45                                 EXPOSURE(S): Cochlear implantation (early and late).
46 nuary 2018, patients with at least 1 year of cochlear implantation experience underwent temporal bone
47 the US Food and Drug Administration approved cochlear implantation for children with single-sided dea
48 stematic review and meta-analysis found that cochlear implantation for children with SSD was associat
49 s highlight the critical importance of early cochlear implantation for preserving neural health and o
50 device use rates among children who received cochlear implantation for SSD.
51 standing of cross-modal plasticity following cochlear implantation has been restricted due to incompa
52                                              Cochlear implantation has successfully restored the perc
53                             The criteria for cochlear implantation have broadened, and promising outc
54  analyses, greater residual hearing prior to cochlear implantation, higher ratings of parent-child in
55  older adults with severe hearing loss after cochlear implantation; however, few of these studies, to
56 ciodemographic factors associated with early cochlear implantation (ie, before age 2 years).
57            To summarize the current state of cochlear implantation in children.
58 h optogenetic tools, and may help to improve cochlear implantation in humans.
59 conducted in a pediatric referral center for cochlear implantation in Paris, France, using medical re
60 highlights the unique challenges involved in cochlear implantation in the very young child, specifica
61                                              Cochlear implantation is a surgical alternative to tradi
62            These findings suggest that early cochlear implantation is associated with normal grammar
63                                              Cochlear implantation is highly effective at improving h
64 earing loss at risk for MCI, suggesting that cochlear implantation is not contraindicated in cochlear
65  detection of new bone formation (NBF) after cochlear implantation is possible by using ultra-high-sp
66                         The outcome of adult cochlear implantation is predicted positively by the inv
67                    However, the decision for cochlear implantation is rarely based on vestibular func
68                                  At present, cochlear implantation is the only option for profound he
69                          For these patients, cochlear implantation is the only treatment option.
70 here hearing aids no longer provide benefit, cochlear implantation is the treatment of choice with ex
71                                        Early cochlear implantation likely improves hearing-related ou
72 r medical and surgical procedures, including cochlear implantation, may benefit older adults.
73                                              Cochlear implantation offers hearing and vocational bene
74                                         Poor cochlear implantation outcomes are seen in some patients
75 tified as having a stronger correlation with cochlear implantation performance than RW-ECochG-TR, alt
76  factors demonstrated weak correlations with cochlear implantation performance, and performance in no
77                                       During cochlear implantation, perilymph and plasma were sampled
78 een made in understanding outcomes following cochlear implantation, predicting performance remains a
79 ing positive for cognitive impairment before cochlear implantation, preoperative screening can be use
80 he current body of literature indicates that cochlear implantation prior to 1 year of age is both saf
81                                              Cochlear implantation produces remarkable results in pos
82 erstand targets for interventions to improve cochlear implantation rates among children.
83 y found significant variability in pediatric cochlear implantation rates in California.
84 ions, nonpatent external auditory canals, or cochlear implantation revision surgery.
85                          Children undergoing cochlear implantation showed greater improvement in spok
86 ccounting for comorbidity-for example, after cochlear implantation, some deaf children develop spoken
87 ement, such as physical therapy for CBVL and cochlear implantation strategy.
88                                       Future cochlear implantation studies should consider these vari
89 s led to the development of the soft-surgery cochlear implantation technique.
90                                      Because cochlear implantation, the current therapy for profound
91                 Among 182 children receiving cochlear implantations, the median (IQR) age was 3 (1-5)
92 normal-hearing guinea pig cochleae underwent cochlear implantation through a cochleostomy without sig
93    We developed an animal model of bilateral cochlear implantation to study neural ITD sensitivity fo
94                                              Cochlear implantation was associated with an improvement
95                               Younger age at cochlear implantation was associated with significantly
96 adults with severe hearing loss eligible for cochlear implantation was included.
97 t from complete vestibular assessment before cochlear implantation, which would support early and ada
98 ateral sensorineural hearing loss undergoing cochlear implantation with 6- or 12-month postoperative
99                                              Cochlear implantation with the Slim Straight Electrode a
100          Purpose To assess NBF in vivo after cochlear implantation with ultra-high-spatial-resolution
101 tertiary referral center for hearing loss or cochlear implantation, with moderate-to-profound congeni

 
Page Top