ライフサイエンスコーパス: cognitive domain

1 egree of change from 12 to 72 months for any cognitive domain.

2 gicity did not contribute to variance in any cognitive domain.

3 entia (fvFTD) may reflect impairment in this cognitive domain.

4 nt and lagged within-subject effects on each cognitive domain.

5 a for cognitive function improvement in each cognitive domain.

6 ponds to the effect of 6 years aging on this cognitive domain.

7 veraged to compute composite scores for each cognitive domain.

8 Most participants had at least 1 impaired cognitive domain.

9 working memory, a related but non-numerical cognitive domain.

10 respectively) completed 12 tests covering 6 cognitive domains.

11 f atrophy influence decline across different cognitive domains.

12 ate summary measures of global cognition and cognitive domains.

13 n Aphasia Battery-Revised and tests of other cognitive domains.

14 omputerized CogState battery that assessed 5 cognitive domains.

15 odic memory are the most frequently affected cognitive domains.

16 e transient cognitive impairment in multiple cognitive domains.

17 ogical measure and performance on other MCCB cognitive domains.

18 tion and accelerated decline across multiple cognitive domains.

19 , resulting in more rapid decline in several cognitive domains.

20 ATCV-1 proteins and had decreases in certain cognitive domains.

21 with performance decrements across multiple cognitive domains.

22 memory (P = .03), and visuospatial (P = .02) cognitive domains.

23 of cortical networks that influence multiple cognitive domains.

24 s, with consequences for sensory, motor, and cognitive domains.

25 iated with postoperative changes in specific cognitive domains.

26 performance tests in common that assessed 5 cognitive domains.

27 n and to explore specificity with respect to cognitive domains.

28 with decreased executive function and other cognitive domains.

29 reate a measure of global cognition and five cognitive domains.

30 on between Lp(a) and performance in specific cognitive domains.

31 which includes five measures assessing four cognitive domains.

32 ntal factors to influence specific executive cognitive domains.

33 ral brain damage and lower scores in various cognitive domains.

34 guage function but relative sparing of other cognitive domains.

35 of brain regions supporting memory and other cognitive domains.

36 endence of age-related deficits in different cognitive domains.

37 -function relationships within other complex cognitive domains.

38 ional outcomes, including motor, sensory and cognitive domains.

39 egions may relate differentially to distinct cognitive domains.

40 nt formal testing of performance in multiple cognitive domains.

41 ariance in other developmental disorders and cognitive domains.

42 of the variation in performance in specific cognitive domains.

43 duced FA) was negatively correlated with all cognitive domains.

44 an accurately discriminate between different cognitive domains.

45 itive measures representing at least 2 other cognitive domains.

46 and third, to determine the most vulnerable cognitive domains.

47 ilar cognitive trajectories across different cognitive domains.

48 vocal, and few studies have examined several cognitive domains.

49 ates of cognitive decline across a number of cognitive domains.

50 bjects, LLD patients performed poorer in all cognitive domains.

51 on but may have synergistic effects on other cognitive domains.

52 d standardized testing may measure different cognitive domains.

53 chological test battery assessing a range of cognitive domains.

54 gical tests measuring performance in several cognitive domains.

55 ments showed progressive decline in multiple cognitive domains.

56 ld dementia and deficits in memory and other cognitive domains.

57 e control has a broad impact across multiple cognitive domains.

58 proximately 10% of variance in each of seven cognitive domains.

59 lain differential ageing trajectories across cognitive domains.

60 etworks widely implicated in supporting many cognitive domains.

61 could be fruitfully applied to a variety of cognitive domains.

62 as better function in multiple higher-order cognitive domains.

63 s the shared variation in performance across cognitive domains.

64 hy ageing has disparate effects on different cognitive domains.

65 l subregions have specialized roles in other cognitive domains.

66 are also associated with low scores in most cognitive domains.

67 ognition in multiple species and in multiple cognitive domains.

68 ubset completed standard NP assessment for 8 cognitive domains.

69 y unstable response patterns across multiple cognitive domains.

70 acute antidepressant treatment on a range of cognitive domains.

71 D, affecting sensorimotor, as well as higher cognitive, domains.

72 14.6% of children had low ECDI scores in the cognitive domain, 26.2% had low socioemotional scores, a

73 ecline by multiple indicators in two or more cognitive domains, a significantly higher rate than in t

74 In analyses of cognitive domains, AD pathology (p = 0.006), PHFtau tang

75 hort-/intermediate-term memory function, the cognitive domain affected earliest during LOAD progressi

76 Careful separation of the cognitive domains affected by nicotinic stimulation has

77 better performance in the executive function cognitive domain after 36 months in apolipoprotein E (AP

78 adverse associations of tibia lead in 3 of 7 cognitive domains after adjustment for age, sex, race/et

79 on (P < 0.001), decline in all five specific cognitive domains (all P-values < 0.001), and to fluctua

80 as associated with widespread effects across cognitive domains, although these additional association

81 rment following systemic therapy in selected cognitive domains among some older patients with cancer.

82 t predictors were in the motor, imaging, and cognitive domains: an increase of one SD in total motor

83 hould attempt to use multiple tests for each cognitive domain and feature populations from ethnocultu

84 critically reviewed and tabulated by study, cognitive domain and follow-up period, with particular e

85 een diet scores and cognitive change in each cognitive domain and for the global score.

86 ing 19 neuropsychological tests from which 5 cognitive domain and global summary scores were derived,

87 n association appeared to exist depending on cognitive domain and SiN target or masker assessed.

88 bserved in 79% MCI with deficits in multiple cognitive domains and 31% amnesic MCI.

89 e used to construct composite scores for six cognitive domains and a global cognitive score.

90 than nonanthracycline regimens on particular cognitive domains and brain network connections.

91 We also assessed multiple cognitive domains and compared findings with outcomes at

92 the contribution of the striatum across many cognitive domains and contexts.

93 seemingly disparate findings across multiple cognitive domains and could provide a unified account of

94 ole of self-care confidence between specific cognitive domains and heart failure self-care.

95 hearing loss to impaired performance across cognitive domains and increased risk for dementia diagno

96 dard deviation below normative means in >/=2 cognitive domains and neurocognitive symptoms).

97 tients with type 2 diabetes mellitus but the cognitive domains and patient groups most affected have

98 tistical approach is applicable across other cognitive domains and provides a key to understanding ti

99 ser portions of covariance between the other cognitive domains and schizophrenia were also found to b

100 tween men and women and how it varies across cognitive domains and subjective dimensions has not been

101 episodic and working memory but not in other cognitive domains), and it was elevated in those who dev

102 le HbA1c measurement at baseline, 1 test per cognitive domain, and potential geographic confounding o

103 rformed between 18F-AV-1451 binding and each cognitive domain, and we used the Biological Parametric

104 neuropsychological battery assessed multiple cognitive domains, and a cocalibrated confirmatory facto

105 which mazes should be utilized to test these cognitive domains, and control measures to be used.

106 ever, efficacy varies across populations and cognitive domains, and little is known about the efficac

107 T is efficacious on global cognition, select cognitive domains, and psychosocial functioning in peopl

108 We used only one test to represent cognitive domains, and though a prototypical one, we nev

109 Mild impairment in multiple cognitive domains appears to represent a more advanced d

110 ease and magnetic resonance variables, which cognitive domains are most vulnerable, the influence of

111 regions predicting individual differences in cognitive domains are predominantly located in regions o

112 z scores were calculated and clustered into cognitive domains as follows: episodic and working memor

113 gimens may have nonspecific effects on other cognitive domains as well as certain patient reported ou

114 ic memory, but the interaction between these cognitive domains as well as the extent to which they re

115 s of BD is unclear, but many of the affected cognitive domains, as well as neuroanatomical abnormalit

116 in largely unknown for a variety of critical cognitive domains, as, for example, risky decision makin

117 r of genomic copies at the 16p11.2 locus and cognitive domains assessed in 62 deletion carriers, 44 d

118 ted with reduced performance across multiple cognitive domains at baseline and year 3 as well as decr

119 association between LDL-C variability and 4 cognitive domains at month 30 in 4428 participants of PR

120 PFC interneuron-driven gamma oscillations in cognitive domains at the core of schizophrenia.

121 al tests were categorized according to eight cognitive domains: attention, executive functioning, inf

122 s clinical remission outcomes, on a range of cognitive domains: attention, response inhibition, execu

123 brain activation in response to stimuli in 3 cognitive domains between individuals with BD and health

124 symptom onset, and/or impairment in multiple cognitive domains but not episodic memory.

125 he PFC specifically produces deficits in the cognitive domain, but does not give rise to PFC-dependen

126 itative differences are apparent across many cognitive domains, but are especially obvious in episodi

127 nces contributed substantially to all of the cognitive domains, but intelligence and working memory w

128 ted for overall cognitive function and eight cognitive domains by calculating standardized mean diffe

129 ent studies indicate that impairments in two cognitive domains characterize the cognitive abnormaliti

130 ody pathology to dementia, global cognition, cognitive domains, cognitive decline and fluctuations in

131 cantly steeper slopes across all three fluid cognitive domains compared with non-carriers, especially

132 n or performance in any of the five assessed cognitive domains, compared with the non-hallucinators.

133 estigate how atrophy patterns and non-memory cognitive domains contribute to memory impairment.

134 Impairment in one or more cognitive domains could have important effects in the da

135 Correlations showed that all cognitive domains declined with age.

136 a for amnestic MCI: 87 had memory plus other cognitive domain deficits and 21 had pure memory deficit

137 ely impaired patients with memory plus other cognitive domain deficits, rather than those with pure a

138 atial navigation and long-term memory, major cognitive domains dependent on hippocampal function, hav

139 cored lower than the healthy controls on all cognitive domains (eg, intelligence quotient [IQ], 76 [s

140 estimate -0.10 [SE 0.04], p=0.0096) and four cognitive domains (episodic memory -0.10 [0.04], p=0.017

141 R(R) Dementia Staging Instrument and in five cognitive domains (episodic memory, attention/working me

142 on is associated with performance in another cognitive domain-episodic memory-that is also highly vul

143 on of language but relative sparing of other cognitive domains, especially memory.

144 g performance, as two potentially vulnerable cognitive domains essential in everyday life functioning

145 e showed better cognitive performance in the cognitive domain executive functions and processing spee

146 included measures of global cognition and 2 cognitive domains (executive functioning and memory), as

147 y fractional anisotropy (FA) and three broad cognitive domains (fluid intelligence, processing speed,

148 functions but relative preservation of other cognitive domains for at least the first two years of di

149 se functional networks correspond with broad cognitive domains; for example, the Default-mode network

150 nt change in cognitive performance for eight cognitive domains from baseline to 12- and 72-month foll

151 r's disease, expanding knowledge of affected cognitive domains from male and female mice of three str

152 ression model with a latent process for each cognitive domain: global cognition (Mini Mental State Ex

153 comprehensive meta-analysis of all impulsive cognitive domains has yet to be conducted.

154 The CNVs do not all affect the same cognitive domains, hence the cognitive deficits that dri

155 trong association with impairment in several cognitive domains highlights the clinical relevance of w

156 s on the integration of multiple sensory and cognitive domains, however the networks subserving this

157 the number of microbleeds and the number of cognitive domains impaired (r = 0.44, P = 0.03).

158 decline after 36 months in the visuospatial cognitive domain in APOE varepsilon4 allele non-carriers

159 ese limitations, we assessed a wide range of cognitive domains in a large sample (N=100) of 14- to 16

160 nal integrity of brain circuits and multiple cognitive domains in a non-aversive way, here we exposed

161 t with VCID elicits deficits across multiple cognitive domains in both sexes.

162 case-control studies examining the following cognitive domains in Gambling Disorder or in at-risk (pr

163 tes heightened impulsivity across a range of cognitive domains in Gambling Disorder.

164 l learning is one of the most widely studied cognitive domains in neuroscience.

165 of interest (ROIs), is associated with these cognitive domains in normal adults and adults with mild

166 extent of impairment in social and nonsocial cognitive domains in patients with bipolar disorder comp

167 te matter injury to dysfunction in different cognitive domains in patients with multiple sclerosis ha

168 ate items is limited and restricted to a few cognitive domains in the goldstandard revised version of

169 a, 10 tests were selected to represent seven cognitive domains in the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Bat

170 t that a weakened link between emotional and cognitive domains in the psychopathic brain may combine

171 kers were associated with a broader range of cognitive domains in women compared to men with HIV.

172 ementia; lower and more rapid decline in all cognitive domains including episodic memory and fluctuat

173 y childhood onset of dysfunction in multiple cognitive domains including socio-emotional function, sp

174 ocognitive deficits manifest across multiple cognitive domains, including executive function and spee

175 ng frequently demonstrates deficits in other cognitive domains, including language.

176 formance in a wide variety of linguistic and cognitive domains, including morphological agreements su

177 ubsequent decrease in performance in several cognitive domains, including ones involving recognition

178 lied hippocampus was an advantage in several cognitive domains, including verbal list learning and gl

179 implicated in poorer performance in several cognitive domains, including working memory (WM).

180 a reduction of one SD in Stroop word score (cognitive domain) increased risk by 2.32 times (1.88-2.8

181 eliciting expected N400 responses from each cognitive domain independently.

182 he findings into the major categories of the cognitive domains investigated, considering sample chara

183 We conclude that performance in the social-cognitive domain is equally impaired in male and female

184 nal compensation is well documented in other cognitive domains, it is presently unclear whether it ca

185 uncertain brain connectivity features in the cognitive domains, it remains challenging to quantify fu

186 owing to different methods to assess SDB or cognitive domains, making it difficult to draw conclusio

187 Data suggest that the social cognitive domain may be an important target for linking

188 n neuropsychological tests covering multiple cognitive domains may clarify the cognitive effects of C

189 asures as well as measures of mood, specific cognitive domains (memory, attention, and language), mot

190 In this study we investigate four key cognitive domains (mentalizing and emotion perception, e

191 The cognitive domains most frequently affected were attentio

192 Identifying cognitive domains most vulnerable to decline should guid

193 ssociated with lower performance in specific cognitive domains, most notably perceptual speed, separa

194 We used five cognitive domains (motor, processing speed, working memo

195 These differences across cognitive domains need to be further investigated, by co

196 ect pre-morbid individual differences in the cognitive domain of interest.

197 The cognitive domain of spelling does not take place at the

198 ovided measures of accuracy and speed on the cognitive domains of abstraction and mental flexibility;

199 The cognitive domains of attention, working memory, and IQ w

200 B score (R=0.52, P=0.033), as did individual cognitive domains of attention/vigilance, verbal learnin

201 is common but may not preferentially impact cognitive domains of episodic memory, attention, working

202 and examined each biomarker's relation with cognitive domains of episodic memory, executive function

203 p = 0.025, OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.07-1.30) and cognitive domains of major mental illnesses (g-score p =

204 nsive neurocognitive tests that included the cognitive domains of memory, attention, and executive fu

205 tients had significantly lower scores in the cognitive domains of nonverbal intelligence, nonverbal m

206 ns jointly influencing schizophrenia and the cognitive domains of reaction time and verbal-numerical

207 Importantly, performance in specific cognitive domains of the task did not correlate with dif

208 As a result, constraints used in different cognitive domains often have nothing in common.

209 For the other cognitive domains, only verbal abilities differed betwee

210 mins had no significant effect on individual cognitive domains or global cognitive function or on cog

211 ngle supramodal mechanism common to multiple cognitive domains or modality-specific mechanisms idiosy

212 hought to be involved in processing in these cognitive domains, or involve possible compensatory proc

213 successful test performance across multiple cognitive domains (p < 0.05).

214 However, the specific cognitive domains particularly vulnerable to inflammator

215 ded correlations with measures from multiple cognitive domains, particularly declarative and working

216 odules predominantly coactivated by specific cognitive domains (perception, action, and emotion, resp

217 However, in specific non-social cognitive domains, performance within ASC depends on sex

218 Performance in 4 cognitive domains (perseveration, working memory, fluid

219 These cognitive domains pertain to memory and executive functi

220 These results suggest that these two cognitive domains play different roles in bipolar disord

221 n unadjusted analyses, lower scores on all 3 cognitive domains predicted poorer medication adherence

222 When adjusting for the other cognitive domains, processing speed at age 8 (odds ratio

223 Overall cognition, individual cognitive domains, psychosocial function, and activities

224 ric condition often linked to dysfunction of cognitive domains regulating impulsive behavior.

225 tests assessing inhibition and set-shifting, cognitive domains related to freezing.

226 nks/day) showed superior performance in many cognitive domains relative to abstainers.

227 t contribute to disruption of this important cognitive domain remain unclear.

228 een white matter disruptions and deficits in cognitive domains remains poorly understood.

229 ch rats and mice are comparable in these two cognitive domains remains unclear.

230 ence, but persistence or recovery across all cognitive domains remains underresearched.

231 Specifically, the cognitive domains represented verbal learning and memory

232 Regarding relative impairment across the two cognitive domains, results revealed a significant group-

233 sociation between PARKIN mutation status and cognitive domain scores and UPDRS-III scores.

234 ciations among salivary cortisol metrics and cognitive domain scores in an urban adult population.

235 N were significantly associated with several cognitive domain scores transdiagnostically.

236 Cognitive domain scores were calculated from executive,

237 notype was found to be associated with worse cognitive domain scores, with evidence of associations i

238 d the longitudinal relationships between key cognitive domains, selected a priori based on their asso

239 f the theory, to two of Heyes' four exemplar cognitive domains, selective social learning and imitati

240 llustrates that the cerebellum can influence cognitive domains.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The cerebellum,

241 0.23) (11 studies, n=858) nor each of eight cognitive domains (SMDs=-0.03 to 0.11) (n=367-940) in th

242 od to promote skill learning across multiple cognitive domains, spanning executive functions, working

243 r CMBs was associated with impairment in all cognitive domains such as attention, language, visuospat

244 s that these structures are involved in more cognitive domains such as language processing.

245 also a contributing factor to impairment in cognitive domains such as memory and perceptual reasonin

246 is model and its application to other social cognitive domains such as Theory of Mind are discussed.

247 Impairment in cognitive domains such as working memory and behavioral

248 rs except B12 itself were related to several cognitive domains, such as episodic memory and executive

249 that psychosis-related deficits in distinct cognitive domains, such as verbal fluency and working me

250 is an acquired loss of cognition in multiple cognitive domains sufficiently severe to affect social o

251 ognitive function was impaired in 4 of the 6 cognitive domains tested (median global T-scores: 50.8 v

252 ed with reduced cognitive performance on all cognitive domains tested and with a heavy focus on DM, C

253 andard deviations better (p = 0.006) on this cognitive domain than those exceeding all risk factor gu

254 eported greater cognitive dysfunction in all cognitive domains than both norms and the comparison can

255 Working memory represents a core cognitive domain that is impaired in schizophrenia for w

256 gration is reorganized due to expertise in a cognitive domain that largely involves audiovisual integ

257 redictive model of HF outcomes by only using cognitive domains that are most predictive.

258 atients (20-25%), particularly in vulnerable cognitive domains that include memory.

259 efined by a significant decline in 1 or more cognitive domains that interferes with a person's indepe

260 emonstrated that repeated losses in the same cognitive domain, that is, successive changes from bette

261 For component cognitive domains, the association with (pooled) SiN per

262 ggested that rTPJ is implicated in divergent cognitive domains, the demonstration of an involvement i

263 eeping with findings in other behavioral and cognitive domains, the response to an increase in presum

264 e administration and treatment confirmation, cognitive domains to be tested and which mazes should be

265 > .05), but the contribution of the specific cognitive domains to coding task performance differed si

266 mittee evaluated more than 90 tests in seven cognitive domains to identify the 36 most promising meas

267 ation of information processing in different cognitive domains to reach the capacity-limited consciou

268 er treatment (mean duration: 2.3 y) in the 4 cognitive-domain trials (1340 individuals); Mini-Mental

269 ed homocysteine concentrations by 28% in the cognitive-domain trials but had no significant effects o

270 The present study sought to characterise cognitive domains underlying a large test battery and fo

271 Changes in global cognition and specific cognitive domains up to 1 year post-TAVR were evaluated.

272 NP effects were most pronounced in cognitive domains vulnerable to MS: IFNbeta-1a had a sig

273 impairment in memory and at least one other cognitive domain was associated with greatest risk for p

274 de in any brain region and impairment in any cognitive domain was identified.

275 In the former, impairment in a single cognitive domain was observed in 40%, with the same numb

276 Concomitant impairment across multiple cognitive domains was common.

277 ntly depressed children performed in various cognitive domains was performed.

278 nitive test battery (10 measures assessing 7 cognitive domains) was administered to 34 participants w

279 ognitive monitoring can operate on different cognitive domains, we ignore whether it involves a singl

280 , but those with impairment in more than one cognitive domain were more likely to progress or remain

281 Performance deficits in particular cognitive domains were associated with disproportionate

282 udy of dementia-free individuals, only a few cognitive domains were associated with established LOAD

283 re associated with PIM, and whether specific cognitive domains were associated with imaging biomarker

284 Multiple cognitive domains were evaluated at midday and late afte

285 osite score (primary outcome) and individual cognitive domains were evaluated.

286 verse associations between tHcy and multiple cognitive domains were observed for individuals aged 60

287 variables from clinical, psychophysical, and cognitive domains were related to change in symptoms usi

288 t effect on self-care maintenance, the other cognitive domains were unrelated to self-care.

289 arison subjects on both social and nonsocial cognitive domains, whereas both groups differed from sch

290 s associated with lower function in multiple cognitive domains, whereas HS without TDP-43 did not hav

291 hildhood social class was significant in all cognitive domains, whereas within-pair estimates were at

292 Aging is accompanied by changes in multiple cognitive domains, which can impact older adults' abilit

293 identified performance deficits in all three cognitive domains, which were associated with regionally

294 was associated with lower performance in all cognitive domains, while higher estimated verbal intelli

295 in the LTI(+) vs the LTI(-) group in 6 of 7 cognitive domains with statistical significance reached

296 ger associated with performance in the other cognitive domains with the exception of visual learning.

297 thin brain regions known to subserve these 2 cognitive domains, with Met allele carriers having small

298 d mice allows for the assessment of multiple cognitive domains within the same testing environment.

299 Met allele carriers vs Val homozygotes) on 5 cognitive domain z scores and magnetic resonance imaging

300 SANS) total scores and change in the average cognitive domain z scores.