ライフサイエンスコーパス: colectomy

1 rmediate (duodenal polyposis) and worst (pre-colectomy).

2 1 years (pulmonary resection) to 78.2 years (colectomy).

3 123 (31%) anti-TNFalpha therapy, and 25 (6%) colectomy.

4 s according to the need for elective partial colectomy.

5 ciated only with variation in use of MIS for colectomy.

6 with intravenous corticosteroids, underwent colectomy.

7 icare expenditures for laparoscopic and open colectomy.

8 th care costs for many operations, including colectomy.

9 percent of clopidogrel-treated patients with colectomy.

10 t hip fracture repair and not after elective colectomy.

11 rged to a nonhome destination after emergent colectomy.

12 t (>/=18 years) patients undergoing elective colectomy.

13 th ulcerative colitis have increased risk of colectomy.

14 associated with a 50% reduction in SSI after colectomy.

15 on and costs up to 1 year following elective colectomy.

16 f 170,789 patients who were readmitted after colectomy.

17 cific postoperative complication rates after colectomy.

18 f stay (LOS), and readmission after elective colectomy.

19 ived adjuvant chemotherapy within 90 days of colectomy.

20 motherapy for colon cancer within 90 days of colectomy.

21 long-term immunosuppressant therapy or total colectomy.

22 st varied from 27% for cystectomy to 40% for colectomy.

23 mends full bowel preparation before elective colectomy.

24 nterostomy closure to 5.3% for open subtotal colectomy.

25 ased infectious complications after elective colectomy.

26 t-level factors associated with variation of colectomy.

27 years of age or older who underwent elective colectomy.

28 time between robotic, laparoscopic, and open colectomy.

29 oglobin, hematocrit, and albumin may predict colectomy.

30 en patients undergoing minimally versus open colectomy.

31 slow-transit constipation may necessitate a colectomy.

32 are needed to optimize patient selection for colectomy.

33 sumption between minimally invasive and open colectomy.

34 factors explaining variation in MIS use for colectomy.

35 ctiveness of open, laparoscopic, and robotic colectomy.

36 igh-grade dysplasia or colorectal cancer) or colectomy.

37 f CRN (inclusive of low-grade dysplasia) and colectomy.

38 sked VTE chemoprophylaxis failures in 18% of colectomies.

39 ; mainly segmental bowel resections and hemi-colectomies.

40 on cancer patients treated with laparoscopic colectomies.

41 t-free chemoprophylaxis in 18% (736/4086) of colectomies.

42 access and 573,435 for non-critical access; colectomy, 10,198 for critical access and 577,680 for no

43 s: laparoscopic colectomy 6% versus 8%, open colectomy 11% versus 14%, laparoscopic proctectomy 13% v

44 day readmission rate for patients undergoing colectomy (12.1% vs 14.1%; P < .001) and hip replacement

45 cular abscess (12.0% vs 9.7%; P < .001), and colectomy (13.5% vs 11.5%; P < .001).

46 cement [42 313]; breast lumpectomy [18 018]; colectomy [14 074]; coronary artery bypass graft surgery

47 t study of Medicare beneficiaries undergoing colectomy (189229 patients at 1876 hospitals), coronary

48 286 ileocecal resections (48%), 118 subtotal colectomies (19%), 134 ileal pouch-anal anastomoses (21%

49 The analysis included 31,191 colectomies, 2,670 cystectomies, 1,514 pancreatectomies,

50 f SSIs were 5.4% for appendectomy, 12.1% for colectomy, 2.8% for hysterectomy, and 1.7% for prostatec

51 at a different hospital (AAA repair: 40.5%; colectomy: 25.8%; hip replacement: 32.5%; and pancreatec

52 cant but attenuated difference persisted for colectomy ($34,949 vs $30,352; P < 0.001).

53 erwent subtotal colectomy or total abdominal colectomy, 354 (14.3%) underwent total proctocolectomy w

54 lung resection (22.3% MIS), partial or total colectomy (39.1%), enterolysis (19.0% MIS), ileostomy (9

55 (inclusive of stoma related to the elective colectomy), 4.0%; medical therapy, 1.6%].

56 Of 25481 patients who underwent colectomy, 4160 were included in the study (laparoscopic

57 Of 25481 patients who underwent colectomy, 4160 were included in the study.

58 st vs highest LOS mode ($26482 vs $29250 for colectomy, $44777 vs $47675 for CABG, and $24553 vs $279

59 ystectomy 2.2% vs. 0.65%, P < 0.001; partial colectomy 5.5% vs. 2.8%, P < 0.001; appendectomy 0.58% v

60 ; P < 0.001), and $19,147 more expensive for colectomy ($51,893 vs $32,746; P < 0.001).

61 scores, EQ-5D, or SF-6D scores; frequency of colectomy (55 [41%] of 135 patients in the infliximab gr

62 In all, we captured 31,587 colectomies, 5608 colorectal cancers (CRCs) 6608 cholecy

63 neurysm repair ($60456 vs $23261; P < .001), colectomy ($56787 vs $22853; P < .001), pulmonary resect

64 n each of the operative groups: laparoscopic colectomy 6% versus 8%, open colectomy 11% versus 14%, l

65 tory to corticosteroids, in reducing risk of colectomy, (6) optimal dosing regimens for intravenous c

66 Among 45,714 colectomies, 68.1% were performed using an MIS approach.

67 rate was 9.4% after AAA repair, 13.6% after colectomy, 7.5% after hip replacement, and 16.3% after p

68 l pouch-anal anastomoses (21%), 23 segmental colectomies (8%), and 18 abdominoperineal resections (4%

69 ciclosporin group; p=0.223); or mean time to colectomy (811 [95% CI 707-912] days in the infliximab g

70 s for appendectomy (3.8% vs 7.0%; P < .001), colectomy (9.3% vs 15.0%; P < .001), hysterectomy (1.8%

71 (4.1%) underwent AAA repair; 29 388 (22.9%), colectomy; 91 168 (71.2%), hip replacement; and 2276 (1.

72 Among elective colectomies, a focus of surgical quality-improvement ini

73 for a subtotal colectomy or total abdominal colectomy, a total proctocolectomy with end ileostomy, o

74 A caseload of 168 colectomies across 3 years was required to achieve a rel

75 hed on 31 statements regarding predictors of colectomy, acute severe colitis (ASC), chronically activ

76 owing: colonic perforation, toxic megacolon, colectomy, admission to an intensive care unit for cCDI,

77 lpha (TNFalpha) agents, immunomodulators, or colectomy among those initially treated with intravenous

78 Total annual costs for elective colectomies amounted to >$1.7 billion: 11.3% was due to

79 sidered 98,713 patients in 540 hospitals for colectomy and 206,812 patients in 414 hospitals for hip

80 Of these, 77% underwent colectomy and 23% underwent proctectomy.

81 Colectomy and CRC history represented the largest effect

82 for ulcerative colitis (UC) with concurrent colectomy and Crohn disease (CD) with concurrent small b

83 f disease at the time of IRA, indication for colectomy and having received immunomodulative agents be

84 urgical site infection (SSI) after segmental colectomy and is part of the World Health Organization's

85 patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic colectomy and meeting rigorous criteria for ambulatory s

86 821 Medicare enrollees underwent an elective colectomy and met inclusion criteria.

87 Patients who underwent segmental colectomy and sustained a period of intraoperative hypot

88 r total knee and hip replacement, $6,700 for colectomy, and $11,400 for lung resection).

89 had cancer, 31% IBD; 49% underwent LAR, 27% colectomy, and 14% proctocolectomy.

90 plication, including 2 cases of megacolon, 1 colectomy, and 22 intensive care unit (ICU) admissions.

91 tic resection, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, colectomy, and appendectomy.

92 ortic aneurysm repair, pancreatic resection, colectomy, and appendectomy.

93 -moderate disease activity, with low risk of colectomy, and are managed by primary care physicians or

94 Extensive colitis, a high prevalence of colectomy, and chronic and continuous symptoms of IBD oc

95 eatectomy, pulmonary resection, hepatectomy, colectomy, and cystectomy) between 2010 and 2012 were id

96 pair, open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, colectomy, and hip replacement.

97 pair, open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, colectomy, and hip replacement.

98 ntation, more emergent admissions at time of colectomy, and lower survival relative to privately insu

99 riation exists regarding an MIS approach for colectomy, and most of the total variation is attributab

100 ere selected: cholecystectomy, appendectomy, colectomy, antireflux, and bariatric.

101 tric bypass (RYGB), cholecystectomy, partial colectomy, appendectomy, and hysterectomy.

102 Minimally invasive colectomies are increasingly popular options for colon r

103 Surgical site infections (SSI) in colectomy are associated with increased morbidity and co

104 Laparoscopic and robotic colectomy are more cost-effective than open resection.

105 poorly understood; indications for elective colectomy are unclear.

106 ticulitis, accounting for death and elective colectomy as competing events.

107 Among 8139 elective colectomies at 113 hospitals, LOS increased with decreas

108 is episodes for patients undergoing elective colectomy at 1 of 49 participating hospitals (2010-2013)

109 tients surviving to discharge after emergent colectomy at 3012 hospitals, 46.7% were discharged to a

110 ng gastrectomy, pancreaticoduodenectomy, and colectomy at a 2000-bed urban medical center in Taipei,

111 Medicare enrollees undergoing an elective colectomy at a large tertiary care hospital between Janu

112 nt pancreaticoduodenectomy, hepatectomy, and colectomy at a single academic institution between Septe

113 Sensitivity analyses suggest robotic colectomy becomes cost-effective at $100,000/QALY if rob

114 the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative-Colectomy Best Practices Project.

115 2005 (n = 19,714) and patients who underwent colectomies between 1998 and 2002 (n = 807).

116 edicare beneficiaries who underwent emergent colectomy between 2008 and 2010.

117 eneficiaries undergoing laparoscopic or open colectomy between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2012

118 nt of colon inflammation and higher rates of colectomy, but were not associated with development of a

119 Black/minority patients undergoing a colectomy, CABG, or lung resection who lived in highly s

120 ence, 30% of patients scheduled for elective colectomy can be managed in an ambulatory setting.

121 ty score analysis was used to match elective colectomy cases based on primary exposure variable-full

122 The study population consisted of all colectomy cases in the American College of Surgeons Nati

123 ational Surgical Quality Improvement Program colectomy cohort from 2011 to 2012 was performed to exam

124 oportionate share of aggregate costs: 30% in Colectomy (COL), 22% in coronary artery bypass grafting

125 orse and more costly outcomes after elective colectomy compared with patients with CC but better than

126 ients undergoing minimally invasive and open colectomy consume similar amounts of opioid after discha

127 ive either 6 months of adjuvant FOLFOX after colectomy (control) or perioperative FOLFOX for 4 cycles

128 res [abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair, colectomy, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), hip o

129 edicare beneficiaries who underwent elective colectomy, coronary artery bypass grafting, abdominal ao

130 Open colectomy cost more and achieved lower QOL than robotic

131 From the societal perspective, robotic colectomy costs $745 more per case than laparoscopy, res

132 Patients undergoing colectomy, cystectomy, esophagectomy, gastrectomy, hyste

133 procedures-abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, colectomy, cystectomy, prostatectomy, lung resection, to

134 ational Surgical Quality Improvement Program colectomy data (July 2014-December 2015) and 13 novel ER

135 urgical Quality Improvement Program-targeted colectomy data initiated in 2012 capture information on

136 Rates of colectomy did not differ significantly between patients

137 onal inpatient database was reviewed for all colectomy discharges from 2010 to 2011.

138 A total of 81,622 colectomy discharges were evaluated: 44% emergent and 56

139 prior standard for proceeding with elective colectomy following 2 episodes of diverticulitis is no l

140 was used to study emergently performed open colectomies for a primary diagnosis of C difficile colit

141 The patient underwent to colectomy for a medical refractory disease and the histo

142 dy period, 504 patients underwent a curative colectomy for a stage II OCC.

143 ive care unit admission after positive test, colectomy for C. difficile infection, or death within 30

144 bdominal aortic aneurysm repair (n = 69207), colectomy for cancer (n = 107647), pulmonary resection (

145 sex, and race-adjusted rates of laparoscopic colectomy for each HRR.

146 f consecutive patients undergoing ambulatory colectomy for malignant or benign disease.

147 Some patients can require colectomy for medically refractory disease or to treat c

148 variation in the utilization of laparoscopic colectomy for Medicare patients with colon cancer, sugge

149 hic variation in utilization of laparoscopic colectomy for patients with colon cancer.

150 iding evidence for the practice of deferring colectomy for patients without persistent symptoms or mu

151 y, safety, and reproducibility of outpatient colectomy for selected patients.

152 Conversely, colectomy for severe acute colitis was associated with d

153 However, IRA could be discussed after colectomy for severe acute colitis, or in patients naive

154 pouch-anal anastomosis is recommended after colectomy for UC, IRA is still performed.

155 f ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) failure after colectomy for ulcerative colitis (UC).

156 n, $105259 [IQR, $87335-$126541]), and total colectomy for ulcerative colitis (WIQR, $24497; median,

157 eumonectomy, esophagectomy, gastrectomy, and colectomy) for a primary cancer between 2008 and 2012.

158 CD) with concurrent small bowel resection or colectomy from 2000 to 2013.

159 Patients who underwent nonemergent colectomy from 2012 to 2013 were identified from the The

160 nts who underwent minimally invasive or open colectomy from 43 hospitals.

161 lt patients who underwent elective segmental colectomy from January 1, 2005, through December 31, 200

162 who underwent elective laparoscopic or open colectomy from January 1, 2010, through December 31, 201

163 SSIPK-) of 1760 patients undergoing elective colectomy from January 2013 to March 2017.

164 rvational study of adult patients undergoing colectomy from January 2017 to May 2018 in the Michigan

165 the rectum/pouch, duodenal polyposis and pre-colectomy groups, respectively.

166 tegorized according to the procedure volume (colectomy: >=80 cases/yr, proctectomy: >=35/yr, esophage

167 ed diverticulitis, the incidence of elective colectomy has increased dramatically in the last 2 decad

168 t greater odds of dying within 30 days after colectomy, heart valve repair/replacement, or abdominal

169 These patients are at high risk for colectomy, hospitalization, corticosteroid dependence, a

170 cholecystectomy HR 1.89, P < 0.001; partial colectomy HR 1.49, P < 0.001; appendectomy HR 1.45, P <

171 ulcerative colitis were at increased risk of colectomy (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.83) compared to nev

172 n codes were obtained on patients undergoing colectomy, hysterectomy, and knee and hip replacement pr

173 ll-cause 30-day mortality and a composite of colectomy, ICU admission, and/or death attributable to C

174 betes, heart failure) undergoing an elective colectomy in a multipayer national administrative databa

175 grafting, hip replacement, back surgery, or colectomy in IDS-affiliated hospitals compared with thos

176 evidence supporting the use of laparoscopic colectomy in patients with cancer has led to dramatic in

177 We aimed to define the risk of CRN and colectomy in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases a

178 ons of UC or the drugs used to treat it) and colectomy in patients with moderate to severe UC compare

179 ine based on 3 or more episodes for elective colectomy increased concurrently with a benchmarking and

180 Emergency/urgent colectomy increased from 7.1 to 10.2 per 100,000 (P < 0.

181 Elective colectomy increased from 7.9 to 17.2 per 100,000 people

182 life-threatening complications and emergency colectomy is particularly high among those patients hosp

183 high risk of IRA failure, particularly when colectomy is performed for refractory disease.

184 Laparoscopic colectomy is safe and effective in the treatment of many

185 sion), rectal or ileal pouch polyposis after colectomy (longest projected time), and duodenal polypos

186 sed hospital quality for patients undergoing colectomy, lower extremity bypass, or all surgical proce

187 ences in outcomes between laparoscopic right colectomy (LRC) with intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosi

188 nee replacements) or nontargeted procedures (colectomy, lung resection, abdominal aortic aneurysm rep

189 ancreatectomy, partial or total gastrectomy, colectomy, lung resection, and cystectomy for cancer fro

190 09 Medicare data on beneficiaries undergoing colectomy, lung resection, or coronary artery bypass gra

191 stent with a National Quality Forum-endorsed colectomy measure.

192 Minimally invasive colectomy (MIC) is an increasingly common surgical proce

193 parotomies (mp = 27), and 17.4% of segmental colectomies (mp = 15) recorded as unsupervised during th

194 tients undergoing appendectomy (n = 97,780), colectomy (n = 118,407), hysterectomy (n = 26,639), or r

195 ic colectomy (n = 152,575; median = 4), open colectomy (n = 137,462; median = 7), laparoscopic procte

196 g median day of discharge were: laparoscopic colectomy (n = 152,575; median = 4), open colectomy (n =

197 1,422), pulmonary resection (n = 93,056), or colectomy (n = 277,619) from 2009 to 2012.

198 re beneficiary beneficiaries who underwent a colectomy (n = 88,778, 29.6%), CABG (n = 109,564, 36.6%)

199 r safe adaptation of this approach from open colectomy (OC) is occurring among surgeons.

200 Nevertheless, rebleeding requiring subtotal colectomy occurred between 5 h and 6 days after the proc

201 inversely associated with readmission after colectomy (odds ratio [OR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.79-0.93) but

202 ned to improve processes of care surrounding colectomy operations.

203 ients with advanced UC treated with elective colectomy or medical therapy.

204 nd most common reason overall (10.3%), after colectomy or proctectomy (18.1%), ventral hernia repair

205 fection (SSI) overall (19.5%) and also after colectomy or proctectomy (25.8%), ventral hernia repair

206 esentative operations: bariatric procedures, colectomy or proctectomy, hysterectomy, total hip or kne

207 was not associated with better outcomes for colectomy or proctectomy.

208 [37.6%]; P = .02) but not among those in the colectomy or proctocolectomy cohorts.

209 of these recommendations on use of elective colectomy or rates of emergency surgery remains undeterm

210 Among these, 950 (38.4%) underwent subtotal colectomy or total abdominal colectomy, 354 (14.3%) unde

211 Procedural Terminology codes for a subtotal colectomy or total abdominal colectomy, a total proctoco

212 i-TNF agent use among patients who underwent colectomy or total proctocolectomy and experienced no si

213 lished in adults for severe CDI resulting in colectomy or transfer to ICU have not been shown to corr

214 selected all patients who underwent elective colectomy or urgent hip fracture repair in French hospit

215 s low SVI county was 10-20% higher following colectomy (OR 1.1 95%CI 1.1-1.2) or CABG (OR 1.2 95%CI 1

216 ng patients from high SVI counties following colectomy (OR 1.1 95%CI 1.1-1.3), CABG (OR 1.4, 95%CI 1.

217 o [OR], 0.52 [95% CI, 0.48-0.58]; P < .001), colectomy (OR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.55-0.61]; P < .001), hyst

218 d severe CDI (intensive care unit admission, colectomy, or death attributable to CDI within 30 days o

219 (AAA), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), colectomy, or hip replacement were identified using 100%

220 is process measure in patients who underwent colectomies over 18 months at 36 hospitals in a statewid

221 r postdischarge care use ($4011 vs $5083 for colectomy, P < .001; $6015 vs $6355 for CABG, P = .14; a

222 < .001) or readmissions ($2606 vs $2887 for colectomy, P = .16; $3175 vs $3064 for CABG, P = .67; an

223 onary artery bypass surgery, oesophagectomy, colectomy, pancreatectomy, cholecystectomy, ventral hern

224 After colectomy, patient outcomes were not negatively impacted

225 dical record data obtained on diverticulitis colectomy patients across a Healthcare Network-wide Colo

226 The study population included 14,745 colectomy patients in 169 hospitals.

227 We identified 4531 colectomy patients with a major potentially modifiable c

228 ed the role of complications in FTR rates in colectomy patients.

229 -rescue (FTR) after anastomotic leak (AL) in colectomy patients.

230 ta from a multicenter trial of 320 segmental colectomy patients.

231 Of the 244129 colectomies performed during the study period, 126284 (5

232 This is the largest series of colectomies performed for C difficile colitis in the lit

233 Emergent colectomy performed for C difficile colitis is associate

234 A colectomy perioperative care bundle in Michigan is assoc

235 Proctectomy and colectomy procedures compared across open, laparoscopic,

236 ords (2005-2008) for all patients undergoing colectomy procedures in the American College of Surgeons

237 ux-en-Y gastric bypass), colorectal surgery (colectomy, proctectomy), or hiatal hernia surgery (parae

238 Patients who underwent colectomy, proctectomy, esophagectomy, gastrectomy, panc

239 1, p < 0.001) and for patients who underwent colectomy/proctectomy (C-statistic 0.73, 95%CI 0.72-0.74

240 RAI-A was a fair predictor of mortality for colectomy/proctectomy patients (C-statistic 0.74, 95%CI

241 f 283,545 patients, there were 178,311 (63%) colectomy/proctectomy, 38,167 (14%) pancreaticoduodenect

242 etrospective study of patients who underwent colectomy/proctectomy, coronary artery bypass graft (CAB

243 the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative Colectomy Project.

244 The elective colectomy rate for diverticulitis more than doubled, wit

245 The colectomy rate was significantly higher in patients with

246 Administration of MBP/OABP before elective colectomy reduces the incidence of SSI.

247 dures (ie, ventral incisional hernia repair, colectomy, reflux surgery, bariatric surgery, and hyster

248 gement of the retained rectum after subtotal colectomy remains an important issue even in the era of

249 Bowel preparation before elective colectomy remains controversial.

250 tients (n = 345 surgeons) undergoing partial colectomy reported a risk-adjusted complication rate of

251 Laparoscopic colectomy results in a significant reduction in health c

252 Elective colectomy seemed to be associated with improved survival

253 Decisions to proceed with colectomy should be made based on consideration of the r

254 Colectomy should not be delayed in this setting.

255 These 7 procedures included partial colectomy, small-bowel resection, cholecystectomy, opera

256 relevant to long-term treatment of elective colectomy, stratified differences in risk-adjusted incre

257 ational Surgical Quality Improvement Program Colectomy Targeted Participant Use Data File for 2012 an

258 December 31, 2013, who were included in the Colectomy-Targeted American College of Surgeons National

259 Patients from the 2012 Colectomy-Targeted American College of Surgeons National

260 ndectomy, ventral hernia repair, and partial colectomy), the proportion of Zwisch ratings (n = 357) i

261 were no liver metastasis during the primary colectomy, the features of liver imaging can impose char

262 patients who underwent laparoscopic and open colectomy, the key drivers were a reduction in costs fro

263 ve confirmed infectiveness of drainage after colectomy, there is still a controversy after rectal sur

264 With the exception of MIS colectomy, there were no differences in the patient demo

265 t majority of surgeons do not perform enough colectomies to generate a reliable surgeon-specific comp

266 tal episode spending ranged from $18,712 for colectomy to $38,054 for esophagectomy.

267 l episode spending in the lowest tertile for colectomy to $5,706 (CI95% $5,506 to $5,906) or 16.1% of

268 varied from 25.2% (range, 6.6% to 100%) for colectomy to 71.2% (range, 8.3% to 100%) for pancreatect

269 for acute kidney injury undergoing elective colectomy to a minimum urine output target of 0.2 mL/kg/

270 ends do not support the practice of elective colectomy to prevent emergency surgery.

271 went abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair, colectomy, total hip arthroplasty, and pancreatectomy.

272 ciaries for coronary artery bypass grafting, colectomy, total hip arthroplasty, hip fracture repair,

273 al pouches (surgically created resevoirs) in colectomy-treated patients with ulcerative colitis (UC)

274 Yet adjusted rates of laparoscopic colectomy utilization varied from 0% to 66.8% across 306

275 ndergoing 4 surgical procedures (2008-2009): colectomy, ventral hernia repair, abdominal aortic aneur

276 throplasty, coronary artery bypass grafting, colectomy, ventral hernia repair, lower extremity vascul

277 rd methods, patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy (vs open) had lower total Medicare expenditure

278 cteristics, patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy (vs open) still had lower Medicare expenditure

279 The rate of laparoscopic colectomy was 2.2% (878/38,264) for 1996, 2.7% (1175/42,

280 The ambulatory rate for colectomy was 30.5%.

281 Elective colectomy was associated with improved survival compared

282 Combined MBP plus OABP before elective colectomy was associated with reduced SSI, which ultimat

283 Robot-assisted colectomy was equivalent in most clinical outcomes to LC

284 h immunosuppressant (IS) and anti-TNF before colectomy was independently associated with IRA failure

285 In both models, laparoscopic colectomy was more frequently cost-effective across a wi

286 queried for scheduled admissions in which a colectomy was performed for neoplastic, diverticular, or

287 A total of 1737 colectomies were performed (2010-2016): mean age 59.9 ye

288 The risks of hospitalization and colectomy were compared between groups using unadjusted

289 ng death, intensive care unit admission, and colectomy, were observed in the laxative and no laxative

290 to CDI, including death, ICU admission, and colectomy, were observed in the laxative and no laxative

291 tis, there was no difference in the need for colectomy when comparing current smokers to never smoker

292 and disease extension over time may predict colectomy, whereas primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC)

293 OS and in-hospital mortality of laparoscopic colectomy, which suggests that the choice of hospital af

294 AL is a common complication after colectomy with a relatively high FTR rate.

295 xamined all patients who underwent segmental colectomy with anastomosis from 2008 through 2010 partic

296 ce to support primary anastomosis vs sigmoid colectomy with end colostomy.

297 ic operations with medium variation; and MIS colectomy with high variation.

298 drink to all patients scheduled for elective colectomy, with the goal of improving patient compliance

299 The primary outcome was death or colectomy within 90 days after the index test.

300 Adoption of OABP before elective colectomy would reduce SSI without effecting LOS.