戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ce the abundance of pathogens (parasites and coliforms).
2 e transfer resistance, enabling detection of coliforms.
3  potential for real field detection of fecal coliforms.
4 ibited a high selectivity towards the tested coliforms.
5 eatments yielded better control of the total coliforms.
6  total dissolved solids, and total and fecal coliforms.
7 ing XL1-Blue and K12 strains, as examples of coliforms.
8 o the inhibition of lactic acid bacteria and coliforms.
9 detecting species of Vibrio, enterococci and coliforms.
10  were taken for the presence of translocated coliforms.
11 her species of Bacteroides and gram-negative coliforms.
12 ere detected in all samples, including total coliforms.
13 nd 0.38 mean log(10)MPN fewer thermotolerant coliforms (95% CI: 0.14, 0.62; p = 0.002), compared to l
14 ll rivers showed levels of E. coli and total coliforms above the maximum limit according to Internati
15 lly collected grab samples to test for total coliform and E. coli throughout supply cycles at 11 site
16 ases in the inside region in 2018-2019 total coliform and Enterococcus monthly means that were 9 and
17                                    Few total coliform and no E. coli were detected when water was del
18 wastewater also improved substantially, with coliform and total microbial counts reduced by 81% and 1
19 res of 10 and 20 degrees C overnight for the coliforms and AR bacteria, and buffered peptone water at
20  freezing, whereas limited or no recovery of coliforms and AR-bacteria was detected.
21 s study compared the abundance of FIB (Total coliforms and E. coli) and the Bacteroidales (HF183 mark
22 estimation using coliforms, especially fecal coliforms and E. coli.
23 genously present in wastewater such as fecal coliforms and enterococci showed that 1-log reduction co
24 e community of Zambia for detection of total coliforms and Escherichia coli in drinking-water samples
25 ) were spread across 18 genera, comprised of coliforms and opportunistic pathogens.
26 -14 days prior to sampling and between total coliforms and rainfall 8-14 or 0-14 days prior to sampli
27 sources, monitoring of enterococci and fecal coliform, and measurement of chemical and physical water
28 fter treatment, (2) absence of E. coli/total coliforms, and (3) establishment of a CT-factor sufficie
29 ease of Escherichia coli, enterococci, total coliforms, and dissolved chloride from solid dairy manur
30 scherichia coli accounted for 34.5% of fecal coliforms, and Enterococcus faecalis accounted for 32% o
31                                       Faecal coliform antibiotic sensitivities were analysed, and cha
32 here was no increase in community-associated coliform bacteraemia admissions associated with reduced
33 mitted to hospital with community-associated coliform bacteraemia associated with a primary care stew
34     In contrast, changes in resistance among coliform bacteraemia were more modest.
35 icrobials/classes among community-associated coliform bacteraemia.
36 d birds had higher Lactobacillus and lowered coliform bacteria counts, as compared to the control tre
37  were always present while staphylococci and coliform bacteria disappeared after 30 and 90 days, resp
38 up to 6 log CFU g(-1) at the end of storage, coliform bacteria disappeared.
39 ethod had any appreciable impact on virus or coliform bacteria disinfection by ozone; however, the us
40              Cells in a cloned population of coliform bacteria exhibit a wide range of swimming behav
41 and rotavirus from synthetic test waters and coliform bacteria from contaminated spring, tap, and gro
42 , which was shown to eliminate COD and total coliform bacteria in less than 4 h of treatment.
43 aNDM-1 abundances, other AR genes (ARG), and coliform bacteria in sediments and water column samples
44 14 days post-challenge, the number of SE and coliform bacteria in the cecum and liver of colistin and
45 e swabs, and mixed cultures of C. jejuni and coliform bacteria were tested.
46 strate the effectiveness of ozone for virus, coliform bacteria, and spore forming bacteria inactivati
47  fungal pathogens, baker's yeast, and common coliform bacteria, and uncover the following patterns.
48    This farming system drove surges in fecal coliform bacteria, disturbing amphibian skin bacterial c
49 The presence of mesophilic aerobic bacteria, coliform bacteria, Escherichia coli and Salmonella were
50  solution in lowering the parasitic eggs and coliform bacteria, three composting units (Unit 1, Unit
51  a multimeric signalling complex employed by coliform bacteria.
52 lakia (RPMP), a rare disease associated with coliform bacterial infection of the kidney and character
53 re poorly associated with plate count faecal coliforms, but flagged up by the MinION screening method
54 regulation of pathogenic E. coli and for the coliform cell-counting test.
55                                              Coliform colonies from children whose stools were submit
56                                     However, coliform colonization occurred whether lactobacilli prod
57 ified that over the years, groundwater fecal coliform concentration (2002-2017, -2.56 +/- 0.06%/year)
58 bservably greater Escherichia coli and fecal coliform concentrations in streams with wild pigs, thoug
59 increased with higher median household total coliform concentrations.
60       Of tap water samples, 97% showed fecal coliform contamination (mean level, 175 cfu/100 mL).
61 m water treatment plants revealed that fecal coliform contamination occurred both before and after tr
62 Chenab River fish had a significantly higher coliform count (p < 0.05).
63              No elevated turbidity values or coliform counts and no Cryptosporidium oocysts were foun
64 ate counts, total coliform counts, and fecal coliform counts compared with the Gefersa water treatmen
65 eriologic standards during harvest and fecal coliform counts in water samples were within acceptable
66 ) of faecal material, viability of eggs, and coliform counts were evaluated.
67 ntly lower heterotrophic plate counts, total coliform counts, and fecal coliform counts compared with
68 r effluent also showed a 4.38 MLRV in viable coliforms during treatment.
69 ida spp (72%), with lower reductions for the coliforms (E. coli 57% and Klebsiella 49%).
70  correlations with each other and with total coliforms, E. coli, enterococci, and biochemical oxygen
71 ociated (first 2 days of hospital admission) coliform (Escherichia coli, Proteus spp., or Klebsiella
72 cultured facultative anaerobes such as fecal coliforms, Escherichia coli, or enterococci have been us
73             Several microbial targets (total coliforms, Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., and Entero
74 further support to risk overestimation using coliforms, especially fecal coliforms and E. coli.
75         The inactivation of indigenous fecal coliforms (FC) in SEW was also measured.
76 ride (Cl(-)), organic matter (OM), and fecal coliforms (FC) with remote-sensing derived indicators, i
77                     Here we quantified fecal coliforms (FC), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae
78 repeated freezing and thawing, on indigenous coliforms, fecal streptococci, and antibiotic-resistant
79                           Minimal changes in coliform flora were found during rifaximin therapy.
80                        Changes in intestinal coliform flora were studied.
81 ure also increased noncoliform and decreased coliform Gram-negative gut bacteria.
82 ore resistant to long-term freezing than the coliform group.
83                                              Coliforms growth was inhibited at pH 2 even at the absen
84                                        Total coliforms, human Bacteroides (HF183), and pepper mild mo
85 main important to assess viability of faecal coliforms in disinfected water sources.
86 ssing the association between thermotolerant coliforms in drinking water and diarrhea: an analysis of
87  Hg), antinutrient phytic acid and hazardous coliforms in rice bran was investigated.
88              We quantified E. coli and fecal coliforms in samples of stored drinking water, child han
89  in India, showed a complete inactivation of coliforms in the discharged effluent (Mean Log removal V
90 copy (EIS) cytosensor for early detection of coliforms is introduced for the first time.
91 1 levels significantly correlated with fecal coliform levels (r = 0.61; p = 0.007).
92 eir etiologic agents and a substantial fecal coliform load can enter surface, drinking and recreation
93 nce order: Salmonella spp. < E. coli < total coliforms &lt; Enterococcus spp.
94 uction of 27% E. coli and 24% thermotolerant coliforms mean counts.
95 d a significant (P < 0.05) decrease in total coliforms, meeting minimum allowable limit in Unit 2 and
96 thod to enumerate E. coli and thermotolerant coliforms most probable number (MPN).
97 he fruit was heavily contaminated with fecal coliforms; no Salmonella Typhi was isolated.
98                                        Total coliform occurrence was 1.5 times and Escherichia coli w
99 total aerobic value of 4.85 log cfu/g, total coliform of 1.26 log cfu/g and grow potential value of <
100 , biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), and fecal coliform pollution from human excreta for 108 LMICs.
101                                  We screened coliform-positive tap water samples (n = 483) from publi
102     A negative correlation was found between coliform removal and estrogen concentration in nonaugmen
103 nal implications for SSFs (such as impairing coliform removal).
104  range) BOD, nitrogen, phosphorus, and fecal coliforms, respectively, are removed by existing sanitat
105 d effectively in preview of the parasitic or coliforms' spill over to the community.
106 cent Escherichia coli target, as a surrogate coliform, to catholyte where a rapid kill rate was obser
107 red in seawater (Enterococcus species, fecal coliforms, total coliforms) were strongly associated wit
108 , particularly as measured by thermotolerant coliform (TTC) bacteria, a WHO-approved indicator of dri
109 esence of Escherichia coli or thermotolerant coliforms (TTC) were included provided they associated r
110 rinking water was assayed for thermotolerant coliforms (TTC), an indicator of faecal contamination.
111  the largest log reduction in thermotolerant coliforms (TTCs) ( - 0.66 log10 TTC most probable number
112     The most substantial reduction in faecal coliforms was observed in Unit 3 (from 2.6 log10 to 1.3
113 at the levels of aerobic plate counts, total coliform, water activity, moisture contents, total volat
114 ne residual (FCR) and Escherichia coli/total coliforms were measured 1-24 h after treatment.
115 Enterococcus species, fecal coliforms, total coliforms) were strongly associated with incident illnes
116 ibited the growth and development of QMAFAM, coliforms, yeast and mold in experimental cheese sa mple

 
Page Top