1 ariable and dynamic, a lesson gleaned from a
comparative genomic analysis.
2 twelve other related filamentous fungi using
comparative genomic analysis.
3 in this study using Illumina sequencing and
comparative genomics analysis.
4 Carpediemonas membranifera and carried out a
comparative genomics analysis.
5 based on SLAF-seq and used them to perform a
comparative genomics analysis.
6 models for each related organism used in the
comparative genomics analysis.
7 illance metadata and novel data derived from
comparative genomics analysis.
8 for TE accumulation at XGFs by performing a
comparative genomic analysis across 20 aphid genomes, co
9 Using
comparative genomic analysis,
an orphan nine-gene cluste
10 introduces a new probabilistic framework for
comparative genomic analysis and demonstrates its utilit
11 Comparative genomic analysis and experimental verificati
12 though equivalent DC have been identified by
comparative genomic analysis and functional studies in h
13 A bioinformatics approach combining
comparative genomic analysis and gene expression studies
14 Through
comparative genomic analysis and ribosome profiling we h
15 Both
comparative genomic analysis and selective sequencing of
16 102) using a computational protocol based on
comparative genomics analysis and mining experimental da
17 We employed a
comparative genomic analysis approach using the 28 isola
18 Comparative genomic analysis at imprinted domains is eme
19 We here present the results of a
comparative genomic analysis between a bovine mastitis-a
20 genome to 10.4-fold coverage and performed a
comparative genomic analysis between C. albicans and Sac
21 ce genome by a variety of methods, including
comparative genomic analysis between cereal species and
22 th in African children; however, there is no
comparative genomic analysis between colonizing and inva
23 Comparative genomic analysis between tambaqui and zebraf
24 Comparative genomics analysis between rambutan and lyche
25 We performed
comparative genomics analysis between the woody perennia
26 son of the present/absent gene matrix (i.e.,
comparative genomic analysis [
CGA]) identified a candida
27 cing of multiple related species followed by
comparative genomics analysis constitutes a powerful app
28 Here, we have used locus-wide
comparative genomic analysis coupled with chromatin immu
29 Comparative genomic analysis demonstrated conserved synt
30 Comparative genomic analysis demonstrated that the type
31 Herein,
comparative genomic analysis divided hpEurope into two g
32 The results of this
comparative genomics analysis emphasize the importance o
33 Comparative genomic analysis finds that the taxonomies a
34 systems has vastly expanded as the result of
comparative genomic analysis,
followed by experimental v
35 Our study highlights the power of
comparative genomic analysis for identifying species and
36 These data illustrate the power of
comparative genomic analysis for the study of human dise
37 c diversity of Campylobacter, we conducted a
comparative genomic analysis from a collection of 67 C.
38 rate and specific alignments are crucial for
comparative-genomics analysis,
from inferring phylogeny
39 ustrates the power of using a combination of
comparative genomic analysis,
gene expression studies, a
40 Comparative genomic analysis has found an unprecedented
41 Comparative genomic analysis has led to the discovery of
42 Comparative genomic analysis has revealed limited strain
43 In this study, whole-genome sequencing and
comparative genomic analysis identified a unique Ent tri
44 Our
comparative genomic analysis identified an expansion in
45 Comparative genomic analysis identified genes that were
46 Our
comparative genomic analysis identifies chromosome-level
47 Comparative genomics analysis identifies lipopolysacchar
48 Here
comparative genomic analysis illustrates that UP-1s and
49 A
comparative genomics analysis implicated the enigmatic f
50 Comparative genomic analysis,
including pseudogene and s
51 However,
comparative genomic analysis indicated (i) that certain
52 Comparative genomic analysis indicated that angiosperms
53 Comparative genomic analysis indicated widespread functi
54 The wheat-rice
comparative genomics analysis indicated that gene evolut
55 axis scaffolding proteins CheV and CheW, and
comparative genomic analysis indicates a likely recent e
56 Comparative genomic analysis indicates H24L5A's similari
57 A
comparative genomic analysis indicates that the family o
58 Comparative genomic analysis indicates vertebrate expans
59 Our
comparative genomics analysis indicates that Cen8 was fo
60 In a
comparative genomics analysis,
it was observed that the
61 Comparative genomic analysis localizes human RAB38 to th
62 Comparative genomic analysis may be undertaken at differ
63 Based on
comparative genomic analysis of >6,000 sequenced bacteri
64 Through
comparative genomic analysis of 12 Thermoplasmata metage
65 Comparative genomic analysis of 129 and C57BL/6J mouse s
66 Through
comparative genomic analysis of 15 marsupial genomes, bo
67 Comparative genomic analysis of 17 Drosophila species re
68 Here, I present a
comparative genomic analysis of 250 MGII genomes, provid
69 Here we perform a
comparative genomic analysis of 271 strains of conjuncti
70 Comparative genomic analysis of 28 S. Newport strains (i
71 Comparative genomic analysis of 47.2 kb of microsatellit
72 A new study reports
comparative genomic analysis of 52 geographically divers
73 Comparative genomic analysis of 56 plant genomes identif
74 Comparative genomic analysis of a serotype 1/2b strain s
75 Comparative genomic analysis of a wild-type strain of th
76 A
comparative genomic analysis of BMCSI 3 with annotated g
77 s increases, there is increasing emphasis on
comparative genomic analysis of closely related organism
78 We conducted a
comparative genomic analysis of ECM fungal host speciali
79 pecifically identify H. haemolyticus Through
comparative genomic analysis of H. haemolyticus and NT H
80 sh HBVs, which allow the first comprehensive
comparative genomic analysis of hepadnaviruses from four
81 Comparative genomic analysis of important signaling path
82 Comparative genomic analysis of Marchantia-associated P.
83 Comparative genomic analysis of mouse genomic Icos seque
84 Comparative genomic analysis of mouse L-R mammary gene e
85 Our results demonstrate that
comparative genomic analysis of multiple closely related
86 Comparative genomic analysis of N. cadamba with Co. cane
87 Here we report
comparative genomic analysis of nine isogenic iPSC lines
88 A recent
comparative genomic analysis of O. oeni PSU-1 with other
89 Finally,
comparative genomic analysis of over 100 U. ornatrix spe
90 Comparative genomic analysis of p53-targets in mouse and
91 Here, through a
comparative genomic analysis of replication origins and
92 We have conducted a
comparative genomic analysis of several olfactory recept
93 show for the first time that it also enables
comparative genomic analysis of strain variation in a pa
94 Here we conducted a
comparative genomic analysis of TCSTs in 53 genomes of 1
95 Comparative genomic analysis of the 2024 B3 genomes, alo
96 and the mitogenome evolution, we performed a
comparative genomic analysis of the 2831 vertebrate mito
97 Comparative genomic analysis of the accessory genome of
98 Here, we present a
comparative genomic analysis of the cis-regulatory map o
99 Thus,
comparative genomic analysis of the expanded assemblage
100 Comparative genomic analysis of the human LMOD1 and LMOD
101 We carried out a large-scale
comparative genomic analysis of the MCP signaling and ad
102 Here,
comparative genomic analysis of the MIPs was performed t
103 A recent
comparative genomic analysis of the mouse clade B cluste
104 antibiotics administered to the patient, and
comparative genomic analysis of the various intestinal E
105 We performed
comparative genomic analysis of their source loci (PHAS)
106 Comparative genomic analysis of these strains and M. lep
107 Comparative genomic analysis of this group, which we nam
108 It is anticipated that
comparative genomic analysis of this strain with other n
109 Comparative genomic analysis of two Bifidobacterium anim
110 Comparative genomic analysis of upstream sequences shows
111 The integrated data has been used in
comparative genomic analysis of x-ray induced cell death
112 In this review we present a comprehensive
comparative genomics analysis of endoflagellar systems i
113 Here we performed a systematic
comparative genomics analysis of human disease-causing m
114 n changes and candidate genes of interest by
comparative genomics analysis of MPNST versus benign les
115 The
comparative genomics analysis of strain ZYK(T) implies t
116 ack of tools for both small- and large-scale
comparative genomics analysis of tRNA sequence features.
117 etic maps, physical mapping, gene isolation,
comparative genomics, analysis of quantitative trait loc
118 plications of Bambus: support for finishing,
comparative genomics, analysis of the haplotype structur
119 A systematic
comparative-genomic analysis of promiscuous domains in e
120 Comparative genomic analysis offers a powerful approach
121 Through
comparative genomic analysis,
one Red mutant PA1r was fo
122 Comparative genomic analysis predicts that intron 0 is p
123 Our cross-species
comparative genomic analysis provides unique insights in
124 quence annotations, biochemical pathways and
comparative genomic analysis results such as synteny blo
125 t with specific, long-term host association,
comparative genomic analysis revealed a deep divergence
126 Comparative genomic analysis revealed a high frequency o
127 Comparative genomic analysis revealed differences among
128 examination of trans-splicing patterns, our
comparative genomic analysis revealed diverse molecular
129 Comparative genomic analysis revealed karyotypic and syn
130 Comparative genomic analysis revealed multiple Runx2 (Ru
131 Furthermore,
comparative genomic analysis revealed putative Rrn5p, Rr
132 Comparative genomic analysis revealed that enterobacteri
133 Comparative genomic analysis revealed that evolutionary
134 Comparative genomic analysis revealed that in the four r
135 Comparative genomic analysis revealed that many of the b
136 Moreover, our
comparative genomic analysis revealed that the genomes o
137 h other insect-associated Wolbachia strains,
comparative genomic analysis revealed that wWil has a hi
138 A
comparative genomics analysis revealed the enrichment of
139 Comparative genomic analysis reveals an exceptionally la
140 Our
comparative genomic analysis reveals high conservation o
141 Comparative genomic analysis reveals that all serovars e
142 However,
comparative genomic analysis reveals that these species
143 Moreover,
comparative genomics analysis reveals that a greater num
144 Comparative genomics analysis reveals that the nerfin-1
145 Comparative genomic analysis sheds light on flagellar ev
146 Comparative genomic analysis show that all sequenced alp
147 Comparative genomic analysis showed differences in sever
148 Our
comparative genomic analysis showed that important chees
149 Comparative genomic analysis showed that two NOG1 copies
150 as testosteroni, and Sphingopyxis alaskensis
Comparative genomic analysis shows that, in Enterobacter
151 ynamics in fungi, we conducted a large-scale
comparative genomic analysis spanning the Cryptococcus g
152 Comparative genomic analysis strongly indicates that gen
153 Our preliminary
comparative genomic analysis suggests that Hp0267 repres
154 Comparative genomic analysis suggests that some of these
155 A
comparative genomic analysis suggests that the reduction
156 Comparative genomic analysis suggests that this region c
157 This
comparative genomics analysis suggests a high degree of
158 Comparative genomics analysis suggests the presence of a
159 Here we show by
comparative genomic analysis that this fundamental cellu
160 In this
comparative genomic analysis,
the sequences of the 9 gly
161 ur study provides a large-scale family level
comparative genomic analysis to address genomic changes
162 In this study, we apply
comparative genomic analysis to characterize the DosR re
163 In addition to the coding regions, we used
comparative genomic analysis to identify conserved nonco
164 To explore this, we performed
comparative genomic analysis to identify vertebrate orth
165 Here, we used
comparative genomic analysis to investigate the evolutio
166 In this study we used a
comparative genomic analysis to predict two additional g
167 nthetic enzyme-coding genes, and facilitates
comparative genomic analysis to study the evolutionary c
168 We used
comparative genomics analysis to identify a cluster of o
169 Our
comparative genomic analysis uncovers that the majority
170 Comparative genomics analysis unravels lineage-specific
171 omic underpinnings of CHKi hypersensitivity,
comparative genomic analysis was performed between hyper
172 Therefore,
comparative genomic analysis was performed to prioritize
173 Comparative genomics analysis was carried out among zoys
174 In this study, a
comparative genomics analysis was performed to identify
175 Using
comparative genomic analysis we identified the molecular
176 Upon
comparative genomic analysis,
we found higher within-ST
177 Through
comparative genomic analysis,
we identified the ortholog
178 Through
comparative genomic analysis,
we revealed that the exten
179 Comparative genomic analysis with a focus on methylotrop
180 A
comparative genomic analysis with Drosophila melanogaste
181 Comparative genomic analysis with Human Microbiome Proje
182 hospital in Abu Dhabi, UAE, and conducted a
comparative genomic analysis with previously reported bl
183 Comparative genomic analysis with related diploid specie
184 Comparative genomic analysis with the type strain DSMZ10
185 By combining the results of
comparative genomic analysis with those of genetic studi
186 Furthermore,
comparative genomics analysis with six field corn genome