ライフサイエンスコーパス: comparative sequence analysis

1 other artiodactyl species (cow and pig) for comparative sequence analysis.

2 r nearly matches the structure determined by comparative sequence analysis.

3 us in RNA secondary structures determined by comparative sequence analysis.

4 ved regions of biological importance through comparative sequence analysis.

5 s and paralogous genes and as a resource for comparative sequence analysis.

6 didates that are currently being revealed by comparative sequence analysis.

7 ucleotide microarrays, chemical mapping, and comparative sequence analysis.

8 enzymes could not be identified solely using comparative sequence analysis.

9 parable to the best accuracies achievable by comparative sequence analysis.

10 lex secondary structure model predicted from comparative sequence analysis.

11 ious phylogenies provide great resources for comparative sequence analysis.

12 uster containing the structure determined by comparative sequence analysis.

13 he genomic level we initiated a multispecies comparative sequence analysis.

14 tools, to determine base pairs supported by comparative sequence analysis.

15 From comparative sequence analysis, 216 SNPs and 30 InDels we

16 To facilitate multispecies comparative sequence analysis, a robust and scalable str

17 structure and protein structure levels using comparative sequence analysis across vertebrates.

18 integrating experimental mapping data into a comparative sequence analysis algorithm for secondary st

19 Comparative sequence analysis allows us to identify pote

20 ction by missense variants is predictable by comparative sequence analysis alone.

21 Comparative sequence analysis also revealed regions of e

22 Comparative sequence analysis also revealed that sequenc

23 acids, mostly tyrosines, were identified by comparative sequence analysis and changed individually t

24 -structural model of this motif, inferred by comparative sequence analysis and comparison with nuclea

25 el of the CVB3 5'NTR, generated primarily by comparative sequence analysis and energy minimization, s

26 phasizes the basepairs that are supported by comparative sequence analysis and establishes minimal se

27 Here we present comparative sequence analysis and experimental data supp

28 Comparative sequence analysis and experimental DNA bindi

29 We used comparative sequence analysis and free energy calculatio

30 This phenomenon is usually detected via comparative sequence analysis and has been reported for

31 Comparative sequence analysis and structure comparisons

32 es were predicted by structural modeling and comparative sequence analysis and tested by introducing

33 Using comparative sequence analysis and transgenic-mouse exper

34 The predictions were based on comparative sequence analysis and, in some cases, on the

35 emphasis of base pairs that are supported by comparative sequence analysis, and a tabulation of tmRNA

36 Using expressed sequence databases, comparative sequence analysis, and experimental verifica

37 of chemical probing, RNA structure modeling, comparative sequence analysis, and functional assays to

38 ctive pressures requires far fewer data than comparative sequence analysis, and it measures selection

39 een identified, as assessed by multi-species comparative sequence analysis, and provide evidence for

40 between probes in various CaM-IQ complexes, comparative sequence analysis, and the previously determ

41 s; SeqComp and FamilyRelations, programs for comparative sequence analysis; and NetBuilder, an enviro

42 ses, thereby increasing the probability that comparative sequence analysis approaches will reveal the

43 Comparative sequence analysis based on the published cry

44 Comparative sequence analysis between SymL and GroEL was

45 This work demonstrates the power of comparative sequence analysis between the two Ciona spec

46 iple independent target regions (Multiplexed Comparative Sequence Analysis) by employing base-specifi

47 stributions with the structures predicted by comparative sequence analysis (comparative structures).

48 nd have been applied to gene identification, comparative sequence analysis, comparative gene mapping

49 By performing a comparative sequence analysis coupled with biochemical a

50 rcuitry within which Elf-4 operates, we used comparative sequence analysis coupled with chromatin imm

51 As the opportunities to perform comparative sequence analysis emerge, it is important to

52 Here, we demonstrate how comparative sequence analysis facilitates genome-wide ba

53 Comparative sequence analysis for 10 bovine breeds deriv

54 Comparative sequence analysis for 10 bovine breeds revea

55 of the utility of rigorous computational and comparative sequence analysis for refining gene structur

56 To do so, we perform comparative sequence analysis for the single- and double

57 Comparative sequence analysis has become an essential co

58 Comparative sequence analysis has enabled the annotation

59 he archael, eucaryal, or mitochondrial RNAs, comparative sequence analysis has established that these

60 Comparative sequence analysis has evolved as an essentia

61 Comparative sequence analysis has facilitated the discov

62 Comparative sequence analysis has successfully predicted

63 ity of the human SRP19 protein by the use of comparative sequence analysis, high-stringency structure

64 Comparative sequence analysis identified 33 novel SNPs,

65 Canine to human comparative sequence analysis identified 49 transcripts

66 of mutant aptamers, S1 nuclease probing, and comparative sequence analysis identified a simple, 45 nt

67 Long-range comparative sequence analysis identified conserved nonco

68 Comparative sequence analysis identifies regions of the

69 an, 55 months) were analyzed by longitudinal comparative sequence analysis in 8 patients progressing

70 ctional boundary determination and extensive comparative sequence analysis (including reselection of

71 These insights, together with comparative sequence analysis, indicate that tens if not

72 These results, coupled with prior comparative sequence analysis, indicate that this active

73 A comparative sequence analysis indicated that COP8 is hig

74 Comparative sequence analysis indicated that many of the

75 Comparative sequence analysis indicates that spartin sha

76 sites of tertiary interactions inferred from comparative sequence analysis, indicating that these mut

77 A common assumption in comparative sequence analysis is that the sequences have

78 matic; a sensitive new assay using automated comparative sequence analysis may be helpful.

79 structure prediction methods and indeed any comparative sequence analysis method.

80 e available for analysis and of contemporary comparative sequence analysis methods, highlighting both

81 These RNAs were identified using comparative sequence analysis methods, which also reveal

82 Using comparative sequence analysis, mutagenesis, biochemistry

83 Comparative sequence analysis of 170 closely related ent

84 Comparative sequence analysis of 3'-terminal structural

85 Based on primate comparative sequence analysis of 37 unique duplication-t

86 Comparative sequence analysis of 56 related receptors su

87 Comparative sequence analysis of a 38-kb segment reveals

88 Transposon mutagenesis and comparative sequence analysis of active clones identifie

89 Comparative sequence analysis of animal plasmins vs. clo

90 By performing a comparative sequence analysis of autosomal genes that ar

91 Comparative sequence analysis of both BnaABI1 promoters

92 Comparative sequence analysis of C. elegans and Caenorha

93 Comparative sequence analysis of candidate genes in the

94 Using comparative sequence analysis of characterized GSTs of t

95 Comparative sequence analysis of colicin E3 and cloacin

96 Complete comparative sequence analysis of cosmids from both loci

97 Here, we report the results of comparative sequence analysis of dissimilatory sulfite r

98 inish the human genome sequence, complicates comparative sequence analysis of duplicon families, and

99 Comparative sequence analysis of each of the four genes

100 Comparative sequence analysis of HS I between human and

101 Comparative sequence analysis of human SRP54 with homolo

102 ate that microarray-based assays allow rapid comparative sequence analysis of intra- and interspecies

103 Comparative sequence analysis of IS50 transposase-relate

104 Through comparative sequence analysis of kindlin-2 and kindlin-3

105 Comparative sequence analysis of mammalian phospholipase

106 consensus approach to bacterial typing using comparative sequence analysis of multiple genetic loci a

107 In this study, comparative sequence analysis of NDPS1 and zFPS enzymes

108 Comparative sequence analysis of OAS, poly(A)-polymerase

109 Comparative sequence analysis of orthologous HS genes fr

110 novel cochlear gene, designated OTOR, from a comparative sequence analysis of over 4000 clones from a

111 Using comparative sequence analysis of pRA1 and pRAx with rece

112 Comparative sequence analysis of SRY 5' regions in mamma

113 Comparative sequence analysis of the 915-bp sic gene in

114 Comparative sequence analysis of the avirulent P2 strain

115 in mouse ZIC2 were mimicked and secondly, a comparative sequence analysis of the C-terminal was carr

116 variants among these pathogens, we performed comparative sequence analysis of the donor sites, as wel

117 Comparative sequence analysis of the entire genomes of t

118 A comparative sequence analysis of the human and mouse FGF

119 Comparative sequence analysis of the isolated ribozymes

120 Comparative sequence analysis of the mouse and human SOX

121 Comparative sequence analysis of the three homoeologous

122 Comparative sequence analysis of this group I intron sub

123 unctional experiments applied to DsbD, and a comparative sequence analysis of Trx-fold proteins to de

124 Comparative sequence analysis on a genomic scale has ope

125 lysis Tool (GOAT) is a program that performs comparative sequence analysis on ordered gene lists from

126 g partners on a molecular level and focusing comparative sequence analysis on the pathway-specific re

127 Comparative sequence analysis on three Coffea genomes/su

128 determining a secondary structure either by comparative sequence analysis or by the interpretation o

129 Long-range comparative sequence analysis/phylogenetic footprinting

130 Long-range comparative sequence analysis provides a powerful strate

131 Comparative sequence analysis revealed 33 conserved nonc

132 Comparative sequence analysis revealed a hypervariable r

133 Comparative sequence analysis revealed a total of 139 po

134 A comparative sequence analysis revealed differences and s

135 f homologous wheat genome locations based on comparative sequence analysis revealed numerous chromoso

136 Comparative sequence analysis revealed that HcDppIVA is

137 Comparative sequence analysis revealed that similar prot

138 Comparative sequence analysis reveals 92-96% nucleotide

139 Comparative sequence analysis reveals a coordinated set

140 Comparative sequence analysis reveals several noteworthy

141 Comparative sequence analysis reveals that four distinct

142 t harboring leucine-967, in conjunction with comparative sequence analysis, reveals that Vps54 has a

143 igher plants was constructed on the basis of comparative sequence analysis, secondary structure predi

144 Further comparative sequence analysis showed a number of conserv

145 Comparative sequence analysis showed SIAH-mediated prote

146 Comparative sequence analysis showed that human and rat

147 Comparative sequence analysis showed that residues 28 to

148 Comparative sequence analysis showed that the AgRP-ATP6V

149 Comparative sequence analysis shows that HipA is a membe

150 However, comparative sequence analysis specifically targeting che

151 e that uses a combination of free energy and comparative sequence analysis strategies.

152 IS6110 insertion site mapping and comparative sequence analysis strongly suggest a stepwis

153 Comparative sequence analysis suggested that SHFV ORFs 2

154 Comparative sequence analysis suggests that a subset of

155 Comparative sequence analysis suggests that fish CDKN2X

156 Comparative sequence analysis suggests that six genes in

157 Although comparative sequence analysis suggests that the 3' untra

158 rved between C. elegans and C. briggsae, and comparative sequence analysis supports the importance of

159 sures, to the secondary structure derived by comparative sequence analysis than that derived by the Z

160 Here, we show, using comparative sequence analysis, that some of those bacter

161 ity, the FCT regions of 13 strains underwent comparative sequence analysis, the gene content of the F

162 Together with comparative sequence analysis, these findings yielded a

163 e combined computational gene prediction and comparative sequence analysis to characterize an approxi

164 ture prediction was used in combination with comparative sequence analysis to construct models of fol

165 pertoire for each sequenced strain and use a comparative sequence analysis to deduce the least polymo

166 on by combining free energy minimization and comparative sequence analysis to find a low free energy

167 To facilitate the practical application of comparative sequence analysis to genetics and genomics,

168 dispar, and Entamoeba invadens, we performed comparative sequence analysis to identify and map all cl

169 neration curated proteome resource that uses comparative sequence analysis to predict constraint and

170 ghput sequencing (HTS) enhances the power of comparative sequence analysis to reveal details of how R

171 rinting, kinetic dissection of reactions and comparative sequence analysis to show that in self-splic

172 151,503 nt in 955 structures? determined by comparative sequence analysis was assembled to allow opt

173 ne protein 1 (LMP-1) in benign conditions, a comparative sequence analysis was done using samples fro

174 Comparative sequence analysis was employed to assess a p

175 uences were collected from multiple species, comparative sequence analysis was performed and software

176 Therefore, comparative sequence analysis was performed to search fo

177 Comparative sequence analysis was used to explore the se

178 Here, comparative sequence analysis was used to identify a sub

179 Multispecies comparative sequence analysis was used to identify conse

180 Comparative sequence analysis was used to reconstruct th

181 Finally, to facilitate comparative sequence analysis, we implemented several en

182 Using expression profiling and comparative sequence analysis, we show that selective ge

183 Secondary-structure models based on comparative sequence analysis were derived to characteri

184 This approach is independent of comparative sequence analysis, which has been the primar

185 This combination of long-range comparative sequence analysis with a high-throughput tra

186 Here we combine comparative sequence analysis with a modeling approach t

187 mouse genomic sequence from this region and comparative sequence analysis with HSA 21 and HSA 22 nar

188 ; (iii) combine a novel in silico method for comparative sequence analysis with in vitro functional a

189 Comparative sequence analysis with the functional alpha-

190 some-fission event as well as the results of comparative sequence analysis with the orthologous human

191 Comparative sequence analysis within the coding regions

192 Comparative sequence analysis yields a topological model