戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 e displacement of a ligand in an equilibrium competition binding experiment.
2 ystems lacking GABAB receptors and performed competition binding experiments.
3 increased affinity for neuropilin-1 based on competition binding experiments.
4 ity of nonphoto-CIDNP-polarizable ligands in competition binding experiments.
5 o human ACKR3, as measured in [(125)I]CXCL12 competition binding experiments.
6 ation spectroscopy assay for saturation- and competition-binding experiments.
7                                           In competition binding experiments, acetylcholine completel
8                                              Competition binding experiments against [(125)I-Tyr(4)]B
9 u-NeoBOMB1 were also synthesized and used in competition binding experiments against [(125)I-Tyr(4)]B
10 at CXCR4, we furthermore report their use in competition binding experiments and confocal microscopy
11 s, was further characterized by quantitative competition binding experiments and DNA mutational analy
12                  In silico docking analysis, competition binding experiments, and downstream assays w
13             Saturation binding isotherms and competition binding experiments are consistent with the
14                                           In competition binding experiments, atrial natriuretic pept
15                                              Competition binding experiments between 9H2 and PVR reve
16                                  Independent competition binding experiments confirm that TIP47 inter
17                                              Competition binding experiments demonstrated that SpORC
18                                              Competition binding experiments employing [3H]colchicine
19  determining the DNA binding affinities, and competition binding experiments further characterized th
20  mobility shift assays, together with ligand competition binding experiments, have demonstrated the i
21                                 Heterologous competition-binding experiments indicated that Cry1Ea do
22 -1alpha to bind either F-actin or aa-tRNA in competition binding experiments is also consistent with
23                                        Using competition binding experiments, it was possible to dete
24                                           In competition binding experiments, LTB4 was the most poten
25                                              Competition binding experiments of myosin subfragment (S
26                                              Competition binding experiments reveal that (dbd)Fos-Jun
27                                              Competition binding experiments revealed a guanine nucle
28 ly binding at the catalytic site, and ligand competition binding experiments revealed no competition
29                               Saturation and competition binding experiments revealed that coexpressi
30                                              Competition binding experiments revealed that HMG-1 enha
31                                              Competition binding experiments showed 2 different bindi
32                                              Competition binding experiments showed that ATE+31 does
33                                           In competition binding experiments SMRT displaced NotchIC f
34 erein described is applicable to equilibrium competition binding experiments such as radioligand assa
35                              ELISA assay and competition binding experiments suggest that this depend
36                      Fluorescence anisotropy competition binding experiments suggest that TWINKLE has
37                                              Competition-binding experiments suggested the antibodies
38                                           In competition binding experiments, the interaction of vMIP
39 -delta1 to evaluate the feasibility of using competition binding experiments to identify specific lip
40                                           In competition binding experiments two derivatives (13 and
41                                              Competition binding experiments using 125I-ET-3 and unla
42                                              Competition binding experiments using 65 different subst
43 and-receptor binding in living HEK293 cells, competition binding experiments using commercially avail
44                                              Competition binding experiments using either [(125)I]GLP
45                                           In competition-binding experiments, V2 outcompetes SGS3 for
46                                   In further competition binding experiments, we identified 12 compou
47                                              Competition binding experiments with [(3)H]NKA were perf
48                                              Competition binding experiments with both MCHR isoforms,
49 orinated spy molecules allows one to perform competition binding experiments with high sensitivity wh
50                      We have used reciprocal competition binding experiments with mutant substrates a
51                                              Competition binding experiments with radioligand [3H]-(+
52  in separate heterocomplexes with hsp90, and competition binding experiments with the PP5 TPR domain