ライフサイエンスコーパス: competition experiment

1 cantly more reactive than Rawal's diene in a competition experiment.

2 the endoperoxide of dimethylanthracene in a competition experiment.

3 itive advantage to tumor cells in an in vivo competition experiment.

4 h different levels of TF expression and in a competition experiment.

5 rming alpha-bungarotoxin (alpha-Bgt) binding-competition experiments.

6 ucture (XANES) spectroscopy and by phosphate competition experiments.

7 each pair of hydron donors is evaluated from competition experiments.

8 aused nonspecific binding of the drug during competition experiments.

9 The first evidence is derived from competition experiments.

10 cleophiles was directly investigated through competition experiments.

11 ding specificity was demonstrated by in vivo competition experiments.

12 mpromises the interpretation of conventional competition experiments.

13 n the setting of UTI, particularly in direct competition experiments.

14 probed by peptide membrane array and antigen competition experiments.

15 linear free-energy relationship studies, and competition experiments.

16 [Pt(CH(3))(a(7)-PhobPBu)(dppe)][BPh(4)] from competition experiments.

17 d FGF.FGFR complex binding to heparin in the competition experiments.

18 relative to a continuous food environment in competition experiments.

19 isothermal titration calorimetry and calcium competition experiments.

20 ess their affinities indirectly via solution competition experiments.

21 wild-type NU14 and showed reduced fitness in competition experiments.

22 ands were able to achieve full inhibition in competition experiments.

23 of 5'-dA were determined from time-based and competition experiments.

24 here n = 1-3] have been compared in internal competition experiments.

25 ch antibody binding was abrogated in peptide competition experiments.

26 f these interactions was verified by peptide competition experiments.

27 ABA(B)R1b transcripts, consistent with decoy competition experiments.

28 nmodified helicase has been characterized in competition experiments.

29 complexed proteins during the titration and competition experiments.

30 s tended to predominate over the WT in mouse competition experiments.

31 as demonstrated by the NMR and fluorescence competition experiments.

32 ent ring the site of exclusive reactivity in competition experiments.

33 brium constants (K) were determined from NMR competition experiments.

34 e surface, both of which were established by competition experiments.

35 ular reaction over the intermolecular one in competition experiments.

36 st interaction of the import process through competition experiments.

37 metabolic switching, and a fitness defect in competition experiments.

38 ecular character of this transfer, including competition experiments.

39 ild-type vacuoles requires PI3P, as shown in competition experiments.

40 investigated through truncation studies and competition experiments.

41 uity of this last step by means of a set of "competition" experiments.

42 In competition experiments, a 50%:50% mixture evolved to 70

43 Competition experiments along with DeltaG(re)(double dag

44 irmed their colonization phenotypes by using competition experiments and by determining the dose requ

45 h histone fold interactions as determined by competition experiments and by high density histone pept

46 Competition experiments and computational studies sugges

47 did not inhibit HCR/A entry into neurons in competition experiments and did not bind SV2, the protei

48 ally, electrophoretic mobility shift assays, competition experiments and DNase I footprints were perf

49 ormed electrophoretic mobility shift assays, competition experiments and DNase I footprints.

50 ormed electrophoretic mobility shift assays, competition experiments and DNaseI footprints, which sug

51 Competition experiments and equilibrium binding measurem

52 f the new reactions, we have studied various competition experiments and ESI-MS and 3D Mid-IR-ATR spe

53 ent study is highly specific as confirmed by competition experiments and extremely sensitive with det

54 ptor binding site on the RBD as suggested by competition experiments and further supported by site-di

55 ally related substrates is evaluated through competition experiments and kinetic assays using LC-MS t

56 reduced binding affinities were confirmed by competition experiments and led to proportional decrease

57 Moreover, competition experiments and mutational analysis revealed

58 At high Si(OH)(4), competition experiments and nonsaturability indicated up

59 Competition experiments and release of (15) NH3 suggest

60 Competition experiments and surface plasmon resonance an

61 In this study we have used growth competition experiments and TaqMan real-time PCR detecti

62 The CAHB hypothesis was supported by competition experiments and the finding that weak acid a

63 Competition experiments and the role of the acid additiv

64 We use truncation constructs, peptide competition experiments, and chimeric secretin-GLP1 rece

65 ctivity of the donors was investigated using competition experiments, and some but not all were found

66 olid-state thermodynamic measurements, anion competition experiments, and X-ray structural analysis.

67 A series of competition experiments are examined where the effects o

68 For this reason, pairwise competition experiments are the current "gold standard"

69 that when the same solutes that were used in competition experiments are used to probe changes accomp

70 This is further demonstrated by competition experiments as well as by the results of Fuk

71 ic studies were performed, including various competition experiments as well as reactions with isotop

72 In the competition experiment at ERalpha the compounds displaye

73 This diversity has not been evident from competition experiments because of steric interference e

74 A competition experiment between calix[4]arene-bis(benzocr

75 A competition experiment between the five- and six-membere

76 Competition experiments between 8-anilino-1-naphtalene s

77 Competition experiments between common amine nucleophile

78 ichness of the set of molecular targets from competition experiments between distinguishable ligands,

79 It was first determined in competition experiments between DNA and RNA that histone

80 pf for intestinal colonization, we performed competition experiments between E. coli O157:H7 and an i

81 First, using data from competition experiments between kin discriminating strai

82 sively screen individuals and then run sperm competition experiments between males that differ specif

83 Competition experiments between primary R5 and X4 HIV is

84 Competition experiments between S. caprae and MRSA demon

85 Competition experiments between substituted styrenes and

86 We validated these findings through in vivo competition experiments between T6S+ Vibrio cholerae and

87 Competition experiments between these inhibitors and ace

88 Competition experiments between two different terminal a

89 Competition experiments between WT and an DeltansiR4 KO

90 However, in competition experiments between wt and DeltafliC strains

91 -OFF bacteria showed no fitness advantage in competition experiments carried out in immunodeficient M

92 In ligand competition experiments, cell surface-bound TSG-6-hyalur

93 Competition experiments confirm that all of the nonnatur

94 se of the phthalocyanine-bombesin conjugate, competition experiments confirm the involvement of the G

95 Direct competition experiments confirmed that three out of four

96 Competition experiments demonstrate rapid and reversible

97 Competition experiments demonstrate that additions of al

98 Crosslinking and competition experiments demonstrate that ComK- and ComS-

99 Competition experiments demonstrate that SH2 domains who

100 A systematic mutational analysis and competition experiments demonstrate that the lateral sit

101 Competition experiments demonstrated no distinct autoant

102 Nevertheless, acceptor competition experiments demonstrated that D520 has a gre

103 Competition experiments demonstrated that E. coli had a

104 Competition experiments demonstrated that free heparin a

105 Furthermore, competition experiments demonstrated that the binding of

106 Competition experiments demonstrated that the C- and N-t

107 Metal competition experiments demonstrated that the transporte

108 Direct binding and competition experiments demonstrated that this selectivi

109 Growth competition experiments demonstrated that viruses incorp

110 The proposed mechanism was supported by competition experiments, deuterium labeling studies, and

111 Moreover, a series of amide competition experiments establish selectivity principles

112 Competition experiments establish the relative rates of

113 A competition experiment established that the reaction inv

114 rate scope, high functional group tolerance, competition experiments, gram-scale synthesis, and kinet

115 However, competition experiments have shown that tethering the hy

116 rmalization analysis (VTNA) and isotopologue competition experiments, have been carried out.

117 Competition experiments identified a peptide that inhibi

118 ntly, the value of k(1) was estimated from a competition experiment in which the effect of GW0385 on

119 A competition experiment in which the flanking sequences o

120 me system was assessed using mixed infection competition experiments in a mouse model.

121 In this study, using mixed-infection competition experiments in a mouse respiratory model, in

122 Using competition experiments in a murine model of colonizatio

123 Examination of a series of competition experiments in combination with analysis of

124 Using competition experiments in continuous cultures grown in

125 o acid resistance were then compared through competition experiments in ex-germ-free mice that were e

126 This was confirmed by competition experiments in isogenic TP53-WT and TP53-nul

127 High CB(2)R specificity was demonstrated by competition experiments in living cells expressing CB(2)

128 Furthermore, competition experiments in mice showed that WT GBS exhib

129 mutant was used with the wild-type strain in competition experiments in mouse models to examine the c

130 Using pooled competition experiments in nutrient-limited chemostats f

131 mase antibiotic resistance gene using growth competition experiments in the absence of antibiotic.

132 pecificity was carried out using a series of competition experiments in the liver.

133 NA cleavage for one of the hairpin DNAs, and competition experiments in which the diminution of cleav

134 Competition experiments (in 68% DMSO/phosphate buffered

135 c acid esters was established in a series of competition experiments, in which two thioglucoside and/

136 Competition experiments indicate equivalent selectivity

137 Congruently, competition experiments indicate that EB1 can bind to F-

138 Kinetic competition experiments indicate that further oxidation

139 However, DNA binding competition experiments indicate that human Tdp1 binding

140 Competition experiments indicate that Pdcd4 prevents ca.

141 In addition, competition experiments indicate that the dissociation r

142 Competition experiments indicate that volatile anestheti

143 Competition experiments indicated an overlap of GAG and

144 Surprisingly, competition experiments indicated that individual Plin5

145 Competition experiments indicated that this interaction

146 For R8, the electrophysiological and competition experiments indicated the existence of two d

147 Competition experiments involving catalytic hydrogenatio

148 ffinity ligands employing a new calorimetric competition experiment is described.

149 From competition experiments, it was observed that the bindin

150 t hypothesis is supported by our optogenetic competition experiments: iterative spatial comparisons o

151 LFERs, Rehm-Weller estimations of DeltaGET, competition experiments, KIEs, fluorescence data, and DF

152 eling studies, kinetic measurements, kinetic competition experiments, kinetic isotope effects, and hy

153 boron-catalyzed processes are explored using competition experiments, kinetics, and catalyst structur

154 In competition experiments, mature thiolase did not affect

155 ients, flow cytometry of synovial cells, and competition experiments measuring enrichment of CXCR2-ex

156 Competition experiments monitored by ITC and fluorescenc

157 gth of the neutral ligands was determined by competition experiments monitored by NMR spectroscopy.

158 The competition experiment of 10 + 9b over 10 + 31a-c reveal

159 mation of the phenotype was established in a competition experiment of wild-type and a markerless bep

160 Competition experiments of different antibiotics with (3

161 uch results, together with those obtained in competition experiments of FA versus Eu(3+) subset2 and

162 Intramolecular competition experiments of triaryl azides suggested the

163 APP using various ISVAID-derived peptides in competition experiments on both female and male mouse an

164 es were investigated in vitro by binding and competition experiments on FAP-transfected HT-1080 (HT-1

165 Homologous (epibatidine) competition experiments on total (surface and intracellu

166 However, in competition experiments, one chimera of each variant pai

167 requires the validation of the hits through competition experiments or orthogonal biophysical techni

168 Direct competition experiments, pairwise or between all 3 alkan

169 Competition experiments performed with beta-hydroxy alde

170 Competition experiments performed with the pC peptide, w

171 However, analyses of binding data (Lyn) and competition experiments (PLCgamma2) suggest that these b

172 [n]uril (CB[n]), where n = 6-8, using 1H NMR competition experiments referenced to absolute binding c

173 However, competition experiments require distinct markers, making

174 In addition, competition experiments require that competing strains b

175 Specific binding, as shown by competition experiments, requires the phosphorylation of

176 Both radioligand binding and cellular cross-competition experiments reveal a competitive relationshi

177 Deuterium labeling and competition experiments reveal that the reductive radica

178 Deuterium labeling and competition experiments reveal that the reductive radica

179 Competition experiments reveal that wild-type Ku binds d

180 th parameters showed only minor differences, competition experiments revealed a clear pattern: 7-8 co

181 ro phosphorylation assays and phosphopeptide competition experiments revealed a phosphorylation at Se

182 A series of competition experiments revealed a preference of the rea

183 Competition experiments revealed about 30% inhibition of

184 Surface plasmon resonance solution competition experiments revealed affinity constants of 2

185 Competition experiments revealed isoform-specific differ

186 er, labeling with DCCD as well as Na(+)-DCCD competition experiments revealed only one binding site f

187 Moreover, cell-free assays and competition experiments revealed preferential binding of

188 (1) H NMR competition experiments revealed that CB[7]6 is among th

189 Competition experiments revealed that pTRS1 preferential

190 Competition experiments revealed that SCF(betaTrCP) form

191 Competition experiments revealed that the 11th armadillo

192 The results of competition experiments revealed that the relative rate

193 Competition experiments revealed that these two sites ar

194 Promoter competition experiments revealed that, in addition to LS

195 This enabled competition experiments revealing that the motor program

196 A series of competition experiments shed further light on the mechan

197 Our laboratory competition experiments show that bicA + sbtA genotypes

198 Competition experiments show that CBM28 modules do not c

199 Competition experiments show that insertion occurs more

200 Moreover, toxin competition experiments show that KCBhyb midguts lacking

201 Competition experiments show that other amino acids and

202 Competition experiments show that Tat and Rev can effect

203 Competition experiments show that Tb(3+) binds to the sa

204 Competition experiments show that the COX3 5'UTL and aI5

205 In vitro evolution and competition experiments show that they readily accumulat

206 Competition experiments showed a markedly lower competit

207 ere selected against in all populations, our competition experiments showed that antibiotics signific

208 Additionally, competition experiments showed that EcTEBP recognizes an

209 Genetic and in vivo competition experiments showed that sequence conversion

210 Competition experiments showed that STAT6 and C/EBPbeta

211 Competition experiments showed that substitution at the

212 Fitness profiles and growth competition experiments showed that the E138K/M184I muta

213 Competition experiments (solvent swaps) provide insights

214 In tissue competition experiments, subtype C isolates could compet

215 Competition experiments suggest much slower substrate as

216 Competition experiments suggest that HOPS bound to the H

217 tions from the Michaelis-Menten model in DNA competition experiments suggested an interaction with DN

218 Ionic-competition experiments suggested that the nature of nfG

219 HDAC6 mRNA in intact cells and in vitro, and competition experiments suggested that the proteins occu

220 Competition experiments supported that finding and showe

221 do this, we designed a novel intramolecular competition experiment that allowed us to measure the in

222 Competition experiments that employed monovalent ligands

223 g, tryptophan fluorescence measurements, and competition experiments that Syk activation by CLEC-2 is

224 In C(4) organic carbon-inorganic carbon competition experiments, the (12)C-labeled C(4) products

225 In competition experiments, the DTACs blocked estradiol-sti

226 In intermolecular competition experiments, the influence of carbon-based g

227 Consistent with the results from the LuxP competition experiments, the LsrB-deficient strain deple

228 In competition experiments, the parent strain efficiently o

229 From competition experiments, the rate constant for H atom ab

230 Through peptide competition experiments, the region between Cys(165) and

231 Through competition experiments, the relative rate constants of

232 In ethylene +1-pentene competition experiments, Ti-C0-Cr(SNS) yields 5.5% n-pro

233 We also used competition experiments to determine approximate rate co

234 ibe pre-steady-state kinetic and nucleophile competition experiments to examine RF contributions to t

235 Here, we use SSB-Ct peptide variants in competition experiments to examine the roles of individu

236 use a stochastic model, with data from viral competition experiments, to analyze the effect of fitnes

237 Finally, competition experiments typically consider only the end-

238 wild-type sequences and were unaltered in a competition experiment using I and III isomer substrates

239 of the peptide analogue 22 was confirmed by competition experiment using pure EGF protein.

240 Competition experiments using a copper chelator revealed

241 In competition experiments using equal inocula of a norB or

242 In contrast, competition experiments using gel shift assays suggest t

243 Competition experiments using increasing amounts of (R)-

244 Competition experiments using increasing ethanol concent

245 Competition experiments using isotopic substitution reve

246 tures of the amine reactants are employed in competition experiments using polar solvents, such as DM

247 In addition, competition experiments using strains with different cir

248 Competition experiments using Zn2+ were used to determin

249 A pairwise competition experiment was performed with peripheral blo

250 A series of relative rate and competition experiments was performed, and the degree of

251 In a series of competition experiments we showed that a peptide corresp

252 ta-analysis, a series of field surveys and a competition experiment, we aimed to determine the causes

253 Using an in vitro sperm competition experiment, we demonstrate that female ovari

254 Using in vitro competition experiments, we assayed the fitness of eleve

255 ed on NMR assignments and bicinchoninic acid competition experiments, we demonstrate that Cu interact

256 Using aquaria-based competition experiments, we describe how the size and ec

257 In a range of single-molecule DNA competition experiments, we found that the resistance of

258 In competition experiments, we identify sigma(W) as a key f

259 a series of in vitro sperm manipulation and competition experiments, we show that rapid changes in s

260 Through competition experiments, we show that the most active sy

261 Field-based competition experiments were conducted at the southern l

262 Competition experiments were performed between mutants t

263 To assess which GLUT, hexose competition experiments were performed.

264 In the competition experiments where only the natural bacterial

265 barrier potentially participate, as well as competition experiments where the potential contribution

266 ce of hundreds of mutations in a single bulk competition experiment, which can give a direct readout

267 fects were further explored with a series of competition experiments, which confirmed that binding to

268 mate of complexity from a 100 x100 matrix of competition experiments, which is clearly feasible in hi

269 In a competition experiment with the shorter "periacene" pery

270 In standardized competition experiments with [(3)H]adenosine, P2 transpo

271 Competition experiments with a substrate (pNPP) and iodo

272 ) protein affinities have been obtained from competition experiments with bathocuproine disulfonate o

273 Competition experiments with both para- and meta-substit

274 The validation of the assay was achieved by competition experiments with both peptide and nonpeptide

275 Competition experiments with both PTS1 and PTS2 proteins

276 Surface plasmon resonance and competition experiments with duplex DNA and other G-quad

277 rmed chrysophaentin A binds to FtsZ, and NMR competition experiments with GTPgammaS showed chrysophae

278 In this study, we used competition experiments with known CD46 ligands, CD46-sp

279 gen stalks of MBL and L-ficolin, as shown by competition experiments with MASP-3.

280 ization and growth is countered in long-term competition experiments with matrix-secreting V. cholera

281 Furthermore, competition experiments with mice showed that wild-type

282 Competition experiments with mixtures of two olefins ind

283 Competition experiments with other free fatty acids and

284 Both survival and competition experiments with outbred CD1 mice demonstrat

285 obe reactions were carried out, specifically competition experiments with p-substituted styrenes, ste

286 nt DC from bone marrow precursors ex vivo in competition experiments with physiological levels of E2.

287 Using invasion and competition experiments with plasmid mutants we explicit

288 Competition experiments with previously characterized an

289 Competition experiments with synthetic peptides and site

290 Competition experiments with TAT-fused WASP peptides sug

291 Competition experiments with the cognate ligand, FSH, in

292 rate constants kappaobs) were collected from competition experiments with the faster reactions of 2 i

293 Competition experiments with the H2OCbl(+)-coordinating

294 d species (Brassicaceae), soil analyses, and competition experiments with their phylogeny to reconstr

295 Using homologous and heterologous competition experiments with unlabeled chemokine analogs

296 n-RNA association constants were obtained in competition experiments with untagged RNA.

297 Competition experiments with various alcohols and electr

298 Competition experiments with water-soluble isoprenyl mon

299 tants exhibited decreased fitness in vivo in competition experiments with wild-type bacteria.

300 idly eliminated 1-7 days post-inoculation in competition experiments with WT.