ライフサイエンスコーパス: competitor

1 es a better fit to the data than its closest competitor.

2 can invade an established population of its competitor.

3 false predictions compared to the next best competitor.

4 in1, a contractile ring ABP, as another Fim1 competitor.

5 ding temperature to diverge from that of its competitor.

6 or survival in the presence of the perceived competitor.

7 ult in the exclusion of all but the dominant competitor.

8 -rate selection without the use of exogenous competitor.

9 ompete for a second carcass against a virgin competitor.

10 es in the shared habitat against a bacterial competitor.

11 ition kinetic experiments using sulfite as a competitor.

12 sence or presence of calcium that acted as a competitor.

13 compound produced by one microbe to kill off competitors.

14 e prey that is largely inaccessible to their competitors.

15 stem elongation to enable plants to overtop competitors.

16 n but exploit external products generated by competitors.

17 Most bacteria use toxins to exclude competitors.

18 can protect against invasion by low-density competitors.

19 rticularly rapidly dissociating low-affinity competitors.

20 r than its more specialized state-of-the-art competitors.

21 their niche breadths even in the face of few competitors.

22 at predation reduced the influence of strong competitors.

23 of colicin production with the need to repel competitors.

24 seen experimentally for both DNA and protein competitors.

25 duce antimicrobials to inhibit the growth of competitors.

26 ighter control of type I error rate than its competitors.

27 en their niches, in response to having fewer competitors.

28 the correct word among semantically related competitors.

29 with neighboring prokaryotic and eukaryotic competitors.

30 coexist sympatrically with high densities of competitors.

31 to identify comparatively more DEGs than its competitors.

32 ulse and in response to the presence of some competitors.

33 mediate and long-term risk posed by dominant competitors.

34 rk examines the coexistence of just pairs of competitors.

35 energy landscape and geometric nature of the competitors.

36 al activities against the potential saprobic competitors.

37 cess to fluid flow and redirect resources to competitors.

38 redominant species can emerge from a pool of competitors.

39 deaths unrelated to disease or treatment as competitors.

40 d by extracorporeal infusion of PBUT binding competitors.

41 surprisingly good, easily beating all of the competitors.

42 ns of susceptible genes than do the existent competitors.

43 adaptive social defence against predators or competitors.

44 e ions was demonstrated using common ions as competitors.

45 ibronectin and vitronectin, respectively, as competitors.

46 ty certainty in the face of more promiscuous competitors.

47 tal signals to give it an advantage over its competitors.

48 mpact of warming on competition with current competitors.

49 ial food (proto-farming) and defense against competitors.

50 ess often rests upon the ability to break up competitors.

51 and from bacteriocins produced by microbial competitors.

52 ten mediated by agonistic encounters between competitors.

53 -the-art performance and outperforming their competitors.

54 on that selection occurred in the absence of competitors.

55 with elevation regardless of the presence of competitors.

56 part in how the brain selects a target among competitors.

57 o effect from changes in number of potential competitors.

58 ttracting mates and/or intimidating same-sex competitors.

59 nical weight patterns of great interest than competitors.

60 connectivity and the relative abundances of competitors.

61 oductions will frequently encounter resident competitors.

62 sticated mechanisms to inhibit the growth of competitors(1).

63 quality: 1) visual exposure to predators and competitors, 2) density of predation refuges and 3) subs

64 displacement results from the coevolution of competitors [7, 8].

65 They also compare favorably against their competitors across multiple synthetic data scenarios.

66 The extent known-competitor adsorbates decrease target-adsorbate removal

67 culpin (Cottus asper), a fish that is both a competitor and a predator of the stickleback [10].

68 dent, varying with medium, plasmid status of competitor and levels of environmental mercury.

69 nd 59 mainland lizard species, and estimated competitor and predator richness at the localities where

70 hes than mainland species, how it relates to competitor and predator richness, and the nature of the

71 Dietary niche breadth was unrelated to competitor and predator richness, on both islands and th

72 st their growth to the size of their closest competitor and raise the possibility that similar plasti

73 he results show that the removal of demersal competitors and benthos by trawling can change the diets

74 plant commensal bacterium to antagonize its competitors and broadly implicates NAD(P)(+)-hydrolyzing

75 times overshadow the importance of deterring competitors and claiming territory.

76 I have also been fortunate with regard to competitors and collaborators, particularly because, whe

77 with indiscrete anecdotes about your former competitors and collaborators.

78 would dominate an ecosystem, displacing any competitors and collapsing biodiversity to only a singul

79 esources and risks, pathogens and predators, competitors and cooperators.

80 irectly via influxes of predators, prey, and competitors and indirectly by vectoring nutrients, energ

81 We can show that Shaker outperforms its competitors and is able to predict high quality SHAPE an

82 tween benefit gained by inhibiting sensitive competitors and loss due to an increased contribution to

83 ned by the combination of visitation by both competitors and potential mates.

84 ply their impressive heat tolerance to avoid competitors and predators.

85 m, however, contending that promiscuous male competitors and the risk of cuckoldry limit the scope fo

86 mall molecules targeting Plk1 are mainly ATP-competitors and, therefore, are known to elicit side eff

87 olyze lignocellulose and repel eventual food competitors and/or cheaters.

88 cts to reduce the fitness inequality between competitors and/or strengthen negative frequency depende

89 erent types of perturbations affecting their competitors (and hence their tendency to cross talk) can

90 ability increases the dominance of superior competitors, and intraspecific niche variation reduces s

91 agement among colleagues, collaborators, and competitors; and significant democratization of research

92 of the type VI secretion system (T6SS) of a competitor annuls the responses to competition, indicati

93 sistence of large communities of interacting competitors are lacking.

94 from defending a key resource from microbial competitors are likely to evolve behaviours to control o

95 <= 5), particularly when phosphate and other competitors are present in relatively low concentrations

96 latedness is homogeneous and encounters with competitors are rare.

97 t communities when niche differences between competitors are small and variation in the direct effect

98 h mechanism, the oxo-anions, both target and competitors, are ranked in terms of adsorptive attractio

99 terplay between density and frequency of the competitors as well as on the concentration of resources

100 Research on how competitors assess (i.e., gather information on) fightin

101 d RO6924963 were identified as high-affinity competitors at the (3)H-T808 binding site on native tau

102 MOB1A or addition of NTE peptides as binding competitors attenuated YAP1 recruitment to and phosphory

103 d by the presence of competitors, but by the competitors' attractiveness as well.

104 ion systems to interact with host organisms, competitor bacteria, and the environment.

105 undergo "facilitated dissociation," in which competitor biomolecules from solution enhance molecular

106 is broadly regulated by the concentration of competitor biomolecules in solution.

107 the result of competition with their primary competitor, blowflies.

108 reaction and likely inhibits bacterial niche competitors but not R. solanacearum.

109 vior is not only impacted by the presence of competitors, but by the competitors' attractiveness as w

110 retion system (T6SS) that kills neighbouring competitors by translocating unique toxic effector prote

111 n the one hand, simple models of interacting competitors cannot produce the stable persistence of ver

112 s to resources and protection, derogation of competitors, causes of breakups, and patterns of remarri

113 be narrower in the presence of interspecific competitors, causing a species' optimal breeding tempera

114 Phage infection kills competitor cells and bits of their DNA are occasionally

115 Consequently, the delivery of Tas1 into competitor cells drives rapid accumulation of (p)ppApp,

116 function primarily as a means of eliminating competitor cells.

117 genes, and wild-type cells exposed to 'super-competitor' cells with mutation in the Salvador-Warts-Hi

118 The activities of these competitors collectively create conditions that are incr

119 positive frequency-dependent growth rates of competitors), combined with small fitness differences (d

120 between climate (seasonal precipitation) and competitor densities result in steep differentials in su

121 ous way this occurs is when predators reduce competitor densities.

122 pprovals, new off-label indications, and new competitors did not influence the annual cost change rat

123 lary (ecological release) posits that, after competitors disappear from a region, species that were p

124 fluorescence-labeled DNA in the presence of competitor DNA duplexes, including Egr-1 decoys.

125 eases the feasibility of restoring degraded (competitor-dominated) systems, particularly if combined

126 In this work, we propose to infuse a competitor drug into the extracorporeal circuit that inc

127 The competitor drug was infused at constant rate.

128 Competitor drugs with longer half-life further reduce th

129 tion state of individual target memories and competitors during retrieval.

130 he extant literature has ignored the role of competitors' dynamic movements on a focal actor's result

131 Predators have a key role shaping competitor dynamics in food webs.

132 typically used as a substrate to study such competitor dynamics, network structure can instead be in

133 followed by a further injection of DNA as a competitor, either in a plasmid or in chromosomal DNA, c

134 s aerobic and other high potential metabolic competitors evolved.

135 y intransitive communities comprising strong competitors exhibited a negative relationship.

136 hly intransitive communities comprising weak competitors exhibited a positive diversity-function rela

137 d either because niche differentiation among competitors facilitates stable coexistence or because eq

138 models of a guild of ecologically equivalent competitors feeding on a single resource to explore when

139 b, which explains why infliximab is a better competitor for endogenous IgG1 in G1m3,-1 allotype-beari

140 By using recombinant FH19-20 as a competitor for FH and measuring erythrocyte lysis and de

141 o extract heme from Hb-Hp, and it was a poor competitor for Hb-Hp binding to CD163.

142 Correspondingly, Bet v 1 was the more potent competitor for IgG1 binding to Mal d 1 in post-rBet v 1

143 with high Cu(I) affinity, they are potential competitors for a copper ion bound in a copper drug.

144 o CCR5, weak modulators of CCL4 binding, and competitors for CCL5 binding.

145 may explain why parasitized gobies are poor competitors for refuges.

146 At times predators or competitors for resources and shelters, anthropogenic tr

147 /toxins into eukaryotic hosts or prokaryotic competitors for survival and fitness.

148 ries of heterocyclic diamidines as efficient competitors for the HOXA9/DNA interaction through bindin

149 ible to colonization by latent opportunistic competitors found within their microbiome, thus exacerba

150 Although spontaneous (i.e., competitor-free) dissociation shows a strong salt depend

151 he sensor displaces the tethered fluorescent competitor from the binding protein and disrupts fluores

152 e densely packed biofilm structures displace competitors from surfaces.

153 s a strong shift in taxonomic relatedness of competitors, from interactions between species of differ

154 dator, we experimentally staged invasions by competitors (green anoles, Anolis smaragdinus) and/or ne

155 leaves and low leaf lamina density, whereas competitors had traits associated with higher survival,

156 However, clear coevolution between plant competitors has been rarely documented.

157 wed negative frequency dependence, with both competitors having significant fitness advantages when i

158 ) and hippuric acid (HIPA) and their binding competitors, ibuprofen (IBU), furosemide (FUR) and trypt

159 icantly more at named target images when the competitor images were semantically unrelated (e.g., mil

160 licitly include the induction profile of the competitor in the model, we are able to estimate yeast T

161 T8 and MtWD40-1, as RH1, thereby acting as a competitor in the regulatory complex and exerting opposi

162 ias in nonpregnant macaques and was a weaker competitor in tissues.

163 The number of potential competitors in a region did not explain the geographic d

164 sist VBNC induction and become dominant over competitors in changing environments.

165 pulating selection imposed by heterospecific competitors in experimental ponds, we demonstrate that (

166 in competition binding assays with unlabeled competitors in order to demonstrate their suitability fo

167 uality or by modeling anxiety about same-sex competitors in place of status anxiety.

168 hat outperforms state-of-the-art image-based competitors in predicting the sequences of fixations mad

169 g clusters and decreased attacks on outgroup competitors in the Bonobo condition versus the Chimpanze

170 bacteriaceae with a growth advantage against competitors in the inflamed gut.

171 Microcin-producing EcN limits the growth of competitors in the inflamed intestine, including commens

172 cquisition, and moreover, by denying iron to competitors incapable of using the siderophore-iron comp

173 imed to adapt to eventual shading from plant competitors, include a reduced accumulation of carotenoi

174 e range of mechanisms to harm and kill their competitors, including chemical, mechanical and biologic

175 nst type VI secretion system (T6SS)-wielding competitors, including physical barriers, genetically en

176 But large competitors induced a contrast-gain change, even when th

177 nts, we describe how the size and ecotype of competitors influence somatic growth rate, whilst contro

178 The effect of binding competitor infusion on fractional removal of PBUT was th

179 Pre-dialyzer infusion of PBUT binding competitors into the blood stream can increase the HD re

180 th small fitness differences (differences in competitors' intrinsic growth rates and sensitivity to c

181 ompeting species, eventual extinction of one competitor is effectively guaranteed in isotropic enviro

182 trophic impacts of invasive fauna on native competitors is equivocal.

183 riation in the direct effects experienced by competitors is large, but empirical tests are lacking.

184 etween plants, pollinators, and co-flowering competitors is unknown.

185 However, without competitors, L. picturatus survival was greater at high-

186 The identity of the binding competitor leads to different qualitative trends, motiva

187 ors might promote the ability of subordinate competitors (like wild dogs) to move through areas that

188 ars to be resilient to climate change and so competitor matching cannot be implicated in the observed

189 Competitor matching will arise where the phenology of sy

190 orks, those in which there is no single best competitor, may ensure species coexistence.

191 cies, serving as both foundation species and competitors, mediating the diversity and dispersal poten

192 h areas that are unfavorable due to dominant competitors might promote the ability of subordinate com

193 DP.AlF(X) and ADP.MgF(X), being resistant to competitor nucleosome over a 24-h period.

194 , in the presence of a temporarily-ambiguous competitor object (e.g. a "teapot with stars on").

195 inding protein is labeled with a fluorescent competitor of the analyte using SNAP-tag in conjugation

196 gellates grow at one third the rate of their competitors of equivalent size, such as diatoms [1].

197 can influence their effectiveness as low-MW competitors of protein binding.

198 Small-molecule competitors of protein-protein interactions are urgently

199 or capturing target guests selectively among competitors of similar size, shape, and charge.

200 nd various taxa in Squamata, one of the main competitors of the temporal niches of the ancestral mamm

201 or, antiterminator or terminator function by competitor oligonucleotides in vitro and by mutations in

202 ict the impact of adding a chain-capper or a competitor on the length of the cooperative supramolecul

203 competition with functionally similar native competitors on the dietary niche breadths of invasive sp

204 that they could limit subsequent mating with competitors or hasten post-reproductive demise, thus dec

205 ms, particularly if combined with culling of competitors or stock enhancement of adult predators.

206 ively) compared with members with FCOIs with competitors (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.78-1.44; P = .72 and OR

207 their environment, prevent predation, defeat competitors, or communicate.

208 to visitation and scent marking by potential competitors (other male pumas) and potential mates (fema

209 esults demonstrate the benefits of excluding competitors out-weigh the incentives associated with a f

210 dapted to resource limitation was a superior competitor over a wide range of size pairings.

211 ive review of competition between target and competitor oxo-anions to sorb on commonly used, nonselec

212 el tracers necessary for profiling unlabeled competitors, particularly rapidly dissociating low-affin

213 asive forb, Alliaria petiolata, and a native competitor, Pilea pumila, may affect their long-term coe

214 he elimination of specific contaminants from competitors poses a significant challenge.

215 The latter involves infusing a binding competitor pre-dialyzer, which competes with PBUTs for t

216 is sensitive to variation in female quality, competitor presence and competitor relatedness, which is

217 rmation about differences in female quality, competitor presence/absence and competitor relatedness.

218 those of others, including potential mates, competitors, prey and predators.

219 often assume that trait differences between competitors promote diversity, empirical evidence connec

220 binding geometry and the extrinsic factor of competitor protein concentration.

221 ound proteins are susceptible to invasion by competitor proteins in solution.

222 onds because it requires an extrinsic factor-competitor proteins-rather than a specific intrinsic mol

223 STBound combined with GI (the top performing competitor) provided improved performance over all indiv

224 When compared to competitors, realistic simulations suggest that FIQT is

225 n in female quality, competitor presence and competitor relatedness, which is consistent with a kin-s

226 ale quality, competitor presence/absence and competitor relatedness.

227 te information regarding their own and their competitors' resource holding potential (RHP) in escalat

228 ions screened as putative FSC hypo- or hyper-competitors, respectively.

229 eory, we found that relative nonlinearity in competitors' responses to temperature fluctuations maint

230 This occurs because the binding by protein competitors responsible for the facilitated dissociation

231 t to which higher-affinity cells eliminating competitors restricts clonal diversity is unknown.

232 During clinical responses to the m(7)G-cap competitor ribavirin, eIF4E is mainly cytoplasmic.

233 width of fishes is also related to prey and competitor richness suggesting that, at a local level, c

234 f the HIV-1 genome in the presence of excess competitor RNA.

235 Studies using various competitor RNAs with modifications to S1 RNA oligonucleo

236 the focal actor's positive projection of the competitor's future rank, which, in turn, increases the

237 onally, 4 experimental studies reveal that a competitor's positive momentum results in the focal acto

238 uations, we examine how positive change in a competitor's rank-that is, positive status momentum-affe

239 cide from those that were simply killed by a competitor's toxin.

240 Interspecific interactions and competitor sensing are among the main biotic factors aff

241 erves as a tuning mechanism: the presence of competitors shifts and sharpens the Ca2+ frequency-depen

242 mographic studies of contact regions between competitors should greatly improve our ability to unders

243 Intriguingly, the introduction of competitor sites can transform a unimodal mRNA distribut

244 ngle gene copy shares it's TFs with multiple competitor sites, the mRNA variance as a function of the

245 ve independent of the strength and number of competitor sites.

246 rlaps with the disappearance of their sister competitor species O. nancyi (the organ-pipe Orbicella).

247 arget can be rendered invisible by a salient competitor stimulus presented in the other eye.

248 use antibiotics to suppress non-beneficial, competitor strains, and (iii) provide resources that onl

249 instead be interpreted as a signature of the competitor strategies, yielding competition dynamics on

250 ical studies and adopted a semi-quantitative competitors, stress-tolerants, ruderals (CSR) classifica

251 ing different concentrations of selenate and competitor sulfate.

252 while there is an optimal strategy in a two competitor system, three competitor systems have no such

253 l strategy in a two competitor system, three competitor systems have no such solution; the introducti

254 ct endopeptidases from the host or microbial competitors, T. forsythia possesses a serpin-type protei

255 peting for a second carcass against a virgin competitor than females that had cared for a large brood

256 that had cared for a small brood were better competitors than virgin females that had no prior access

257 e was synthesized to serve as an immobilized competitor that overcame constraints imposed by the deep

258 the effects of changing interactions between competitors that co-occur today.

259 ir performance was strongly reduced by novel competitors that could migrate upwards from lower elevat

260 tely captures short-term dynamics of the two competitors that have been observed empirically and we u

261 s: The medium ground finch diverged from its competitor, the large ground finch, during a severe drou

262 To discriminate against abundant competitors, the Nramp metal-binding site should favor s

263 tive communication ties with direct resource competitors, they may achieve positive gains in reef fis

264 Plants detect proximity of competitors through reduction in the ratio between red a

265 ial weapon that allows for direct killing of competitors through the translocation of proteinaceous t

266 ation or the covalent probe can be used as a competitor to develop noncovalent drug candidates.

267 that T. tabaci is an intrinsically superior competitor to F. occidentalis, but its competitive advan

268 them to hit the market as a serious low-cost competitor to silicon based solar cell technologies.

269 lines in the UK, A. bipunctata is a superior competitor to the intraguild predator H. axyridis.

270 Our framework outperforms its competitors to correctly identify pathways relevant to t

271 ch make digital imaging devices as excellent competitors to field-monitoring instruments and sophisti

272 edict that diet specialists will be superior competitors to generalists.

273 bacteria undergo cell lysis to release anti-competitor toxins [1-5].

274 rans-T(m) also reduces the efficiency of its competitor trans-T(p) by sequestering trans-T(p) in a he

275 reate conditions under which the loss of one competitor triggers the loss of others, we lack the know

276 The IMVT outperformed its competitors under comprehensive simulations of normality

277 ize/maize) or faba bean (maize/faba bean) as competitors under five levels of phosphorus (P) supply,

278 The equivalence of competitors varied over fivefold, dependent on size and

279 ighlights the tension between their roles as competitors versus collaborators with the human host.

280 ibrio cholerae, we show how killing adjacent competitors via the Type VI secretion system (T6SS) prec

281 Thus, M45-encoded RHIM competitor, viral inhibitor of RIP activation, sustains

282 ble to the participant, compared to when the competitor was mutually available to the participant and

283 faster to select the target object when the competitor was only available to the participant, compar

284 nduced a contrast-gain change, even when the competitor was split between the two eyes.

285 teria are unable to precisely identify their competitors, we argue that toxin regulation primarily re

286 h both the size and the eye-of-origin of the competitor were manipulated.

287 ith the native state, putrescine2+ is a weak competitor when the ratio of the excess Mg2+ (which neut

288 ely undisturbed by the presence of potential competitors when antigens expressed in the same tissue w

289 se antibiotics as weapons to kill or inhibit competitors, whereas a recent alternative hypothesis sta

290 moderate concentrations of non-specific RNA competitors, which considerably delay the Cas9/sgRNA com

291 hythmic information to individually identify competitors, which facilitates navigation within the soc

292 40,000 cells), SHARP runs faster than other competitors while maintaining high clustering accuracy a

293 e played by the T6SS, dealing death to local competitors while simultaneously creating conditions pot

294 ge, and (ii) this evolutionary change in one competitor, while not changing the coexistence outcome,

295 e antimicrobial peptides, killing pathogenic competitors, while S. epidermidis itself proved highly r

296 titions is negatively impacted when facing a competitor with positive momentum.

297 ding the impacts of dogs as predators of and competitors with native wildlife.

298 rests, but N-fixing trees can also be strong competitors with non-fixing trees, making it unclear whi

299 logical overlap between nonnative and native competitors, with potentially large, but poorly tested,

300 irus, which provides an advantage over viral competitors within host cells.