ライフサイエンスコーパス: concordance rate

1 ble than common variants (30.3% reduction in concordance rates).

2 lter most improved the genome-wide biallelic concordance rate.

3 predictions can never exceed identical twin concordance rates.

4 ria for interpretation of interim PET and on concordance rates.

5 however, extended biopsy schemes may improve concordance rates.

6 etween study groups and different factors on concordance rates.

7 win sets, both individuals had PBC (pairwise concordance rate, 0.63).

8 zone were detected in six of eight patients (concordance rate, 0.75; 95% confidence interval: 0.40, 0

9 meat at the 5-y follow-up than at baseline (concordance rate: 39%; kappa-value: 0.10; 95% CI: 0.07,

10 breast density on prior mammograms (overall concordance rate, 73% [95% CI, 71%-75%] for higher vs 77

11 iopsy confirmed BK polyomavirus nephropathy (concordance rate 99%).

12 e estimated by comparing family-based cancer concordance rates among ethnic groups.

13 ages and with the secondary aim of measuring concordance rates among reviewers using the same 5-point

14 Proband-wise concordance rates and biometric modeling were used to an

15 We estimated heritability and concordance rates and conducted genome-wide association

16 Probandwise concordance rates and correlations in liability were cal

17 Concordance rates and heritability estimates for spontan

18 weighting were used to estimate probandwise concordance rates and heritability of the diagnoses of S

19 The positive- and negative-result concordance rates and overall concordance of BD-MRSA and

20 Concordance rates and sibling risk ratios were used as i

21 The positive concordance rate, negative concordance rate, and judgment concordance rate between

22 e, transition-to-transversion (Ti/Tv) ratio, concordance rate, and pathological variant detection rat

23 military care, private sector care had lower concordance rates (aOR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.62-0.64).

24 The concordance rate between buccal and tumor genotype was 1

25 Overall, we found a 98.8% concordance rate between DHPLC and sequence analyses.

26 ate, negative concordance rate, and judgment concordance rate between DropScreen ST-1((R)) and Immuno

27 assurance study was undertaken to define the concordance rate between immunohistochemistry (IHC)/fluo

28 The primary outcome was concordance rate between minimally invasive and conventi

29 The concordance rate between the 2 pipelines was 88.73%.

30 Repeat testing produced a final 100% concordance rate between the two master mix preparations

31 The concordance rate between Truenat and Xpert-Ultra was hig

32 he detection rate of prostate cancer and the concordance rates between bGG and sGG in patients underg

33 The concordance rates between FBB and FMM were 94.4% (101/10

34 s, mainly because of the large difference in concordance rates between monozygotic and dizygotic twin

35 We observed high concordance rates between our platform and other genotyp

36 ability for clinical testing by showing high concordance rates between paired cfDNA and FFPE clinical

37 Concordance rates between WES directly called diplotypes

38 ted that the two assays have similar overall concordance rates but may have different roles as potent

39 Concordance rates did not change for longer imaging dura

40 d age conversion gives a rate similar to the concordance rate for Canadian monozygotic twins.

41 The concordance rate for carriage did not differ significant

42 fter a cardiovascular intervention, both the concordance rate for change in mean AP and the ability t

43 The concordance rate for HIV DNA PCR-negative and -positive

44 The modest concordance rate for leukemia in identical twins ( appro

45 The concordance rate for methanogen carriage was significant

46 The proband-wise concordance rate for monozygotic twins was double that o

47 Similarly, the concordance rate for treatment-related viral clearance w

48 Concordance rates for ADHD were greater for monozygotic

49 Concordance rates for anti-CCP antibodies among ASPs wer

50 The present study examined probandwise concordance rates for attention deficit hyperactivity di

51 Concordance rates for guidelines with lower-level eviden

52 In contrast, concordance rates for low ABI values (ABI< or =0.9) for

53 ommon (0.1-2% prevalence) and that have high concordance rates for monozygotic twins (30-50%) and hig

54 r siblings versus the general population and concordance rates for monozygotic versus dizygotic twin

55 The casewise concordance rates for mutations were calculated to asses

56 judicated cardiovascular events in MESA, the concordance rates for myocardial infarction, stroke, and

57 The lifetime prevalence and probandwise concordance rates for temperance board registrations wer

58 was equivalent to that of HC2-M; the overall concordance rates for the detection of chlamydia and gon

59 9% of concordant genotypes, and improved the concordance rate from 98.53% to 99.69%.

60 P conversion rates of approximately 90% with concordance rates >99.6% and completeness levels >98% fo

61 r triallelic sites containing only SNVs, the concordance rate improved from 97.68% to 99.80%.

62 e genetic component is suggested by a higher concordance rate in monozygotic (28%) versus dizygotic (

63 eral population (lambda s), and an increased concordance rate in monozygotic compared to dizygotic tw

64 Acute leukemia has a high concordance rate in young identical twins and in infants

65 that chlamydia prevalence,organism load, and concordance rates in couples decrease with age, and orga

66 be adequately explained by the high ratio of concordance rates in monozygotic (MZ) twins versus sibli

67 ences on the development of IBS by comparing concordance rates in monozygotic and dizygotic twins to

68 bution of these disorders as well as the low concordance rates in monozygotic twins suggest that a co

69 Epidemiological studies, particularly concordance rates in twin pairs and siblings, strongly i

70 s yielded moderate monozygotic and dizygotic concordance rates, in contrast to mothers' reports, whic

71 Increased monozygotic versus dizygotic twin concordance rates indicate that heredity, not just share

72 The low concordance rate is consistent with the low penetrance d

73 that a lower limit of 0.5 for the replicate concordance rate is needed in order to be certain of tru

74 The positive concordance rate, negative concordance rate, and judgmen

75 t imputation accuracy with a median genotype concordance rate of 0.97.

76 The low concordance rate of 33% in monozygotic twins demonstrate

77 in 31 ovarian cancers by both methods, for a concordance rate of 81%.

78 iew, 32 reached agreement, for a post-review concordance rate of 84% (118/140 variants).

79 MRM detection by the ASR was confirmed at a concordance rate of 90.9% by Sanger sequencing of a clin

80 mary tumor and matched metastasis revealed a concordance rate of 94% compared with 63% for likely pas

81 atched (11 positive and 198 negative) with a concordance rate of 97.7%.

82 d 74 out of 75 allelic pairs with an overall concordance rate of 99% compared with conventional typin

83 The concordance rate of bone metastases between (18)F-NaF an

84 sus-derived reference diagnosis, the overall concordance rate of diagnostic interpretations of partic

85 Concordance rate of EBV positivity was evaluated among 3

86 The concordance rate of evaluable SLNs by technetium Tc 99m

87 The concordance rate of high frequency oscillations sources

88 , monozygotic (MZ) twins with PD displayed a concordance rate of only about 20% despite their shared

89 The concordance rate of PBC in identical twins is among the

90 The concordance rate of PD in pairs of dizygotic twins is si

91 The probandwise concordance rate of SZ is 33% in monozygotic twins and 7

92 e not correlated (r = 0.14; p > .05) and the concordance rate of the direction of change in cardiac o

93 The concordance rate of variant classification of each varia

94 s to either the genus or species level, with concordance rates of 89.7% and 87.4%, respectively, to p

95 t agreement, negative percent agreement, and concordance rates of 92.9%, 86.7%, and 88.3%, respective

96 Strong concordance rates of 98% in ventilation and 89% when the

97 The concordance rates of classification were only 47.7% (ver

98 The concordance rates of different types of CHD vary widely.

99 GG upgrade, downgrade, and concordance rates of each targeting approach were compar

100 ian training in SDM did not result in higher concordance rates overall but may have benefitted some s

101 Concordance rates per MOLEM class were 88.6% (class I),

102 ial effect on concordance between pipelines (concordance rate ratio: 0.11~0.92; Wald tests, P < 0.001

103 Concordance rates, sensitivity, specificity, positive pr

104 Sequencing data exhibited high concordance rates to pre-existing genotyping data (> 99.

105 Of the 21 recommendations tested, the concordance rate was 100% for 3 recommendations and <50%

106 ling failure rate was 16.7%, and the imaging concordance rate was 100%.

107 here were two or more recurrences, the exact concordance rate was 55%.

108 The concordance rate was 68% (39 out of 57 images).

109 The global score concordance rate was 81%.

110 The concordance rate was 95%.

111 The overall PXM prediction/PXM result concordance rate was 99.7% based on PXMs attributed to h

112 for a single individual, the overall result concordance rate was greater than 95%, with less than 1.

113 sally insured population, the IDSA guideline-concordance rate was high at 91.0% with higher rates in

114 variance among unrelated individuals, while concordance rates were 0.64 (95% confidence interval [CI

115 Concordance rates were 96.6% (476/493; kappa = 0.91), 97

116 The concordance rates were 98.8%, 98.9% and 95.5% for exons

117 lts were compared, the positive and negative concordance rates were 99.2% (122/123) and 89.5% (94/105

118 Concordance rates were calculated and parametric models

119 The IDSA guideline concordance rates were calculated as the number of patie

120 For all species examined, the concordance rates were not significantly different (P >

121 Exact concordance rates were particularly high for isolated at

122 ractory multiple myeloma, we observed a high concordance rate with FISH for del17p, a risk defining C

123 measured using DropScreen ST-1((R)) and the concordance rate with ImmunoCap((R)) was evaluated, targ

124 splicing assay (MaPSy), which showed an 81% concordance rate with splicing in patient tissue.

125 , TP53 (88%), and CDKN2A/B (22%), with a 91% concordance rate with their tumor of origin.

126 We demonstrate that high concordance rates with HapMap calls can be achieved with

127 The concordance rates with the single base extension referen

128 ared to 99.4% for genomic DNA) and excellent concordance rates with their corresponding genomic DNA s

129 ing step, we have obtained higher genotyping concordance rates, without requiring large sample sizes.