戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ons were required after at least 3 months of conservative therapy.
2 levels can be reduced in the short term with conservative therapy.
3 ld be reserved for patients nonresponsive to conservative therapy.
4 ed in a better relief of symptoms compare to conservative therapy.
5 4%) in the QOL compare to their status after conservative therapy.
6 pared with those initially treated with more conservative therapy.
7 dences with the appropriate antimicrobial or conservative therapy.
8 admission were compared with those receiving conservative therapy.
9 I) who received either immediate invasive or conservative therapy.
10 ill always be patients who do not respond to conservative therapy.
11 rome and causalgia that did not improve with conservative therapy.
12  age 35 yrs., 65% male) with CNSNP underwent conservative therapy.
13 predict spontaneous remission, thus favoring conservative therapy.
14 t options for patients who do not respond to conservative therapy.
15 cts present for >=7 days after failing prior conservative therapy.
16 ther facility, and she did not to respond to conservative therapy.
17  sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor to conservative therapy.
18 rformed for low back pain without history of conservative therapy.
19 n all patients with FI refractory to maximum conservative therapies.
20 e ways to enhance the effectiveness of these conservative therapies.
21 al treatment for persistent symptoms despite conservative therapies.
22 ere no different in revascularization versus conservative therapy (30% versus 19%; P=0.06 and 23% ver
23     Treatment typically begins with empiric, conservative therapies aimed at resolving detrusor insta
24 mplementation of VA-ECMO versus an initially conservative therapy (allowing downstream use of VA-ECMO
25                   Initial treatment included conservative therapy alone (N = 7), CC (N = 3), SEMS (N
26 d for patients treated with fibrinolytic and conservative therapies and those who received no treatme
27 ial management: (1) revascularization versus conservative therapy and (2) percutaneous coronary inter
28                              Therefore, more conservative therapies are recommended for symptomatic i
29 ing choice of a "wait and see" strategy with conservative therapy, avoiding high-risk cholecystectomy
30                 Although it may resolve with conservative therapy, colonoscopic decompression is some
31                  The hematuria resolved with conservative therapy consisting of bed rest and hydratio
32 h continuous positive airway pressure versus conservative therapy (CT) on well-being, mood, and funct
33 uding consideration of conventional therapy (conservative therapy, dialysis and transplantation), new
34                                              Conservative therapies do not offer sufficient symptom r
35 minimally invasive option in FI treatment if conservative therapies fail.
36                                         When conservative therapy fails, endovascular procedures may
37 atients (including the elderly) receive more conservative therapy for cardiovascular diseases, even t
38                                              Conservative therapy for fecal incontinence improves con
39 ning, a higher PSA threshold for biopsy, and conservative therapy for men receiving a new diagnosis o
40 e aggressive therapy group compared with the conservative therapy group was 2.5 (95% CI 1.5-4.0).
41                                        Fluid-conservative therapy has also increased ventilator-free
42     In an effort to preserve renal function, conservative therapy has evolved from complex open surge
43 ould be reserved for those patients for whom conservative therapy has failed.
44 d MR imaging rates for low back pain without conservative therapy in either Medicare or commercially
45  mitigate the poor prognosis associated with conservative therapy in patients with post-MI MR.
46  injections followed by sulfasalazine versus conservative therapy in patients with recent-onset oligo
47          Initial treatment should consist of conservative therapy in the form of support or immobiliz
48 fficacy of these interventions compared with conservative therapies is lacking.
49                                              Conservative therapy is effective in most donors and sho
50                                        Fluid-conservative therapy led to a 15% greater decline in ang
51 r 10 years, children and adults who received conservative therapy lost at least 5 lines of median BCV
52               Patients who do not respond to conservative therapies may undergo open or endoscopic ca
53                                              Conservative therapy may be successful but refractory he
54 ence of cellulitis and decreased reliance on conservative therapy modalities post-operatively.
55 ex [ODI] score 41-80) who were refractory to conservative therapy, on stable pain medications, had no
56 y imaging who did not receive any additional conservative therapy or epidural steroid injections, for
57 e patients were given a choice of continuing conservative therapy, or surgical treatment.
58 osture parameters as potential predictors of conservative therapy outcomes in patients with chronic n
59                 The relief of symptoms after conservative therapy predicts better outcomes of surgica
60                                        Fluid conservative therapy preferentially lowers plasma angiop
61            In patients who are not helped by conservative therapy, recent studies have demonstrated t
62      Formation of new leiomyomas after these conservative therapies remains a substantial problem.
63                                              Conservative therapies should be used when appropriate.
64       These findings suggest that success of conservative therapy should be considered as an indicati
65 sidered as an indication, and the failure of conservative therapy should not be an indication to surg
66 cutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus conservative therapy stratified by vessel flow at presen
67 e therapy or for progressive disease despite conservative therapy, surgical treatment is safe and eff
68                                  Traditional conservative therapy targets the central theory of migra
69 ts who remain persistently nephrotic despite conservative therapy that a more aggressive therapeutic
70 etermine Cost of Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative Therapy-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Ischemia
71                Affected eyes received either conservative therapy [topical medications (n = 363)] or
72 r worsening symptoms despite several days of conservative therapy, treatment includes anticoagulation
73 o-obstruction who have not had a response to conservative therapy, treatment with neostigmine rapidly
74                                        Early conservative therapy was associated with lower costs, ev
75                                              Conservative therapy was associated with spontaneous hea
76                                        Early conservative therapy was independently associated with 2
77                                 In the past, conservative therapy was the only option available to th
78                  Patients who improved after conservative therapy were more than 15 times more likely
79 orectal physiology studies, and responses to conservative therapy were reviewed.
80  intractable back and leg pain refractory to conservative therapy, who consented, were screened.
81 patient's mobility and daily activities, and conservative therapy with bracing and narcotic analgesic
82                                              Conservative therapy with diet modification and octreoti
83 eatments are applied stepwise, starting with conservative therapy with simpler treatments when feasib