ライフサイエンスコーパス: contact angle

1 microtubule interactions, depending on their contact angle.

2 s wetting is typically described in terms of contact angle.

3 d long range interactions to the macroscopic contact angle.

4 ot spread completely but exhibit an apparent contact angle.

5 equally probable at approximately 40 degrees contact angle.

6 which results in meshes with a high apparent contact angle.

7 atio of the nanostructures and the intrinsic contact angle.

8 characterized macroscopically by the droplet contact angle.

9 contact area from variations in the dynamic contact angle.

10 ps, correlates with an increased macroscopic contact angle.

11 luated using, XRD, SEM, TEM, FT-IR and final contact angle.

12 ghness, the splashing ratio, and the dynamic contact angle.

13 represent the measurement accuracy of large contact angles.

14 n energies of single H2O molecules and water contact angles.

15 ate diagram as a function of the two surface contact angles.

16 nds on the sum of the two individual surface contact angles.

17 lic, surfaces form thin films with near-zero contact angles.

18 maintaining easy condensate removal and low contact angles.

19 a millimetric-sized droplet and measure its contact angles.

20 thickness was measured in vitro with varying contact angles.

21 ibers has superhydrophilic properties (water contact angle = 0-20 degrees ) and the pure water flux w

22 SNZVI-1 particles were hydrophobic (contact angle = 103 +/- 3 degrees ), while the other mat

23 e highly hydrophobic PEDOTF-TFAB film (water contact angle 133 degrees ) is stable over time and can

24 The superhydrophobic properties (water contact angle: 136 +/- 5 degrees ) of the PEDOT-C14 SC p

25 o reagent yields a superhydrophobic surface (contact angle 151 degrees ).

26 itania tubes are superhydrophobic with water contact angles 163 +/- 1 degrees (advancing) and 157 +/-

27 , N2, was nonwetting with a smaller range of contact angle 24 degrees < theta < 68 degrees .

28 Water contact angles (7.5 degrees +/- 0.7, 22.8 degrees +/- 1.

29 uspended graphene exhibits the highest water contact angle (85 degrees +/- 5 degrees ) compared to pa

30 During the spreading phase, the dynamic contact angle achieves an asymptotic maximum value, whic

31 In that case, the condition of constant contact angle along the three-phase contact line can onl

32 The contact angle analysis and UV-Vis spectroscopy confirmed

33 the interaction between a sessile droplet's contact angle and a quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) is

34 oelectron spectroscopy, X-ray reflectometry, contact angle and cell adhesion studies.

35 FTIR-ATR, contact angle and electrochemical measurements were used

36 ate plays a decisive role in determining the contact angle and nucleation barrier, which were found t

37 We quantitatively recover the dynamic contact angle and provide a mechanism for stick-slip mot

38 Considering the variation of contact angle and surface tension with pore size improve

39 from linearity are observed, increasing the contact angle and the vapor pressure above their values

40 plets during compression indicates that both contact angle and total area of the water-oil interfaces

41 As shown by contact angle and transmission electron microscopy (TEM)

42 ed area, warping in frames due to changes in contact angle and varying resolution with depth.

43 Contact angle and XPS measurements postderivatization in

44 This conclusion was further confirmed by contact angle and XPS measurements.

45 ectron microscopy (SEM), Raman spectroscopy, contact angle and zeta potential measurements.

46 ate, yet the other desired properties of low contact angles and high nucleation densities for high he

47 collective role and relative significance of contact angles and module wavelength on hydrodynamic ins

48 ility of the bubble allows us to measure the contact-angle and perform in-situ imaging of the contact

49 Fluorescence microscopy, contact angle, and energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) measure

50 investigated using AFM, optical microscopy, contact angle, and FTIR.

51 a macroscopic wetting transition from finite contact angles ( approximately 10 degrees ) with to near

52 th high (bottom left) and low (bottom right) contact angle are observed.

53 mined experimentally, on the molecular scale contact angles are hardly accessible.

54 Lower contact angles are observed for lipids on completely de-

55 s (FeS and FeS(2) ) on hydrophobicity (water contact angles) are consistent with density functional t

56 lystyrene microdroplets, with nonequilibrium contact angle, are placed on solid self-assembled monola

57 heterogeneously on Ag nanoparticles we find contact angles around 15 degrees compared to 90 degrees

58 speed imaging is used to extract the dynamic contact angle as a function of the spreading speed for t

59 PDMS-PEG-modified PDMS samples showed contact angles as low as 23.6 degrees +/- 1 degrees and

60 e first direct experimental determination of contact angles as well as contact line curvature on a sc

61 For the lack of an identifiable contact angle at small scales, we introduce a droplet's

62 nd that the conventional theory predicts the contact angle at the global minimum if the droplet size

63 model that relates the catalyst volume, the contact angle at the trijunction (the point at which sol

64 Unlike Young's equation, which specifies the contact angles at the junction of two fluids and a (rigi

65 the in situ wettability, the distribution of contact angles, at the pore scale in calcite cores from

66 mproved surfaces were characterized by using contact angle, atomic force microscopy (AFM) and Fourier

67 AMs and characterization using ellipsometry, contact angle, atomic force microscopy (AFM), grazing an

68 In this regime, the contact angle becomes ambiguous, and a scalable metric f

69 We further find that near a critical point (contact angle being ca. 153 degrees ) the bulk thermal r

70 ree energy minimization and predict that the contact angle between the two liquids in the aerosol dep

71 t a fluid interface, with a size-independent contact angle between the undeformed surface and the par

72 oil increased ultimate tensile strength and contact angle but decreased elongation at break, moistur

73 le measurements, adhesion could increase the contact angle by a factor of 3.

74 modes suggest the possibility of tuning the contact angle by adjusting the surface texture.

75 pe (SEM), quartz crystal microbalance (QCM), contact angle (CA) and attenuated total reflectance-Four

76 y of the modified surface were determined by contact angle (CA) measurement, Fourier transform infrar

77 ated electrode have been characterized using contact angle (CA) measurements, cyclic voltammetry (CV)

78 IRS), spectroscopic ellipsometry (SE), water contact angle (CA), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

79 se petal property, could rise 72% in surface contact angle (CA).

80 r than approximately 100 nm, the equilibrium contact angle can be accurately predicted from the surfa

81 While in macroscopic systems the contact angle can be determined experimentally, on the m

82 The obtained microscopic contact angles can be attributed to negative line tensio

83 mniphobic surface, we discover their dynamic contact angles can be measured with a consistent accurac

84 Measurements of droplet contact angles can be used to estimate the energy of ena

85 found to be directly related to the apparent contact angle change (Deltatheta) of the ILs.

86 All tested ILs showed greater apparent contact angle changes with AC voltage conditions than wi

87 very was seen for the sample with an average contact angle close to 90 degrees , with an intermediate

88 ydration repulsion we find a narrow range of contact angle combinations where the surfaces adhere at

89 th FA monitoring, we show that the cell body contact angle controls the onset of force generation and

90 Furthermore, contact angle data indicated that the 3DP bio-carriers w

91 The surface water contact angle decreased by 100%, the carbon content decr

92 sity improved from 81.52% to 96.90%, and the contact angle decreased from 81.08 degrees to 46.56 degr

93 Contact angle decreased substantially upon target amplif

94 c as well as hydrophobic peptides when their contact angle decreases below theta approximately 50 deg

95 hould mimic that of a liquid droplet, with a contact angle determined by surface tensions.

96 -ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), water contact angle, ellipsometry, and atomic force microscopy

97 in a superoleophobic coating with hexadecane contact angles exceeding 155 degrees and tilt angles of

98 chemistry, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, contact angle, fluorescence microscopy, and atomic force

99 proteins to an oil-water interface (lowering contact angle), followed by time-dependent amplicon form

100 Addition of lipids always decreases the contact angle for all liquid tested, except for water.

101 e wetting surfaces with the hallmark of zero contact angle for water droplets).

102 design parameters that predict the measured contact angles for a liquid droplet on a textured surfac

103 ethod provides direct measurement of dynamic contact angles for AFM tips and can also be taken as a g

104 o investigate how cells select particular MT contact angles for bundling, we used an in vitro reconst

105 Measurement is more difficult for dynamic contact angles, for which theoretical profiles do not fi

106 hydrophilic or hydrophobic depending on the contact angle formed by a water droplet.

107 tion of 8 and 32 PVs, decreasing the average contact angle from 134 degrees (oil wet) to 85 degrees (

108 hydrophobicity also led to greatly enhanced contact angle from 35.6 degrees for the pristine MAPbI(3

109 fection, utilizing smartphone measurement of contact angle from oil-immersed droplet LAMP reactions.

110 degrees ) to strong hydrophilic (i.e., water contact angles from 30 to 40 degrees ) surfaces, renderi

111 this is from (near) hydrophobic (i.e., water contact angles from 70 to 100 degrees ) to strong hydrop

112 rmed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and contact angle goniometry on model, planar silicon substr

113 y electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and contact angle goniometry, and at the molecular level, by

114 ed spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, contact angle goniometry, and X-ray diffraction were use

115 UV photoelectron spectroscopy, ellipsometry, contact angle goniometry, differential pulse polarograph

116 Using water contact angle goniometry, it is shown that all adlayers

117 city methods, thermogravimetric analysis and contact angle goniometry, next to more traditional metho

118 nolayers were characterized by ellipsometry, contact angle goniometry, polarization modulated IR refl

119 Superhydrophobic surfaces display water contact angles greater than 150 degrees in conjunction w

120 result, these films exhibit advancing water contact angles greater than 160 degrees, dramatically di

121 tact these surfaces must have large apparent contact angles (greater than 150 degrees) and small roll

122 iple Wenzel wetting states with the apparent contact angles >0 degrees .

123 Superomniphobic surfaces display contact angles >150 degrees and low contact angle hyster

124 superoleophobic coatings display hexadecane contact angles >150 degrees with tilt angles <5 degrees

125 the superhydrophobic coatings display water contact angles >160 degrees with tilt angles <2 degrees

126 The difficulty of measuring very large contact angles (>150 degrees) has become more relevant w

127 ur analysis, we conclude that changes in the contact angle have an effect on the frequency response o

128 ose ester fatty acid (w/w wet base)) had low contact angle, high spread coefficient onto banana surfa

129 ocarbons, crude oil and blood), maintain low contact angle hysteresis (<2.5 degrees ), quickly restor

130 " surfaces have demonstrated that minimizing contact angle hysteresis (CAH) is the key criterion for

131 aCA) greater than 150 degrees along with low contact angle hysteresis (CAH) not only towards probing

132 The contact angle hysteresis and the adhesion force that res

133 ergy barrier of pinning which can induce the contact angle hysteresis as a function of geometric fact

134 demonstrated that display one of the lowest contact angle hysteresis values ever reported - even wit

135 display contact angles >150 degrees and low contact angle hysteresis with essentially all contacting

136 pplications: limited oleophobicity with high contact angle hysteresis, failure under pressure and upo

137 neously possess characteristics of low water contact angle hysteresis, low friction and mechanical ro

138 ter than 150 degrees in conjunction with low contact angle hysteresis.

139 ynthesized to examine the individual role of contact angles in connecting lateral Rayleigh-Taylor wav

140 Both theta(||) and theta( ) contact angles increase as the period (0.3- to 1-mum) in

141 The contact angle increased up to 175% and 38% as 3% (v/v) o

142 The brine contact angles increased from initial values near 0 degr

143 of the composite films, as measured by water contact angle, increased after the two homogenization tr

144 film thinning, water droplet formation, and contact angle increases within single pores.

145 Contact angles indicated a shift to strongly water-wet,

146 Dynamic changes in liquid/wall contact angles indicated that the processes of embolism

147 these two regimes in terms of the advancing contact angle is governed by an interplay of wettability

148 The static contact angle is increased when a bubble is applied.

149 d graphene is hydrophobic and that its water contact angle is similar to that of graphite.

150 ion and adsorption resistance as the surface contact angle is varied.

151 t line-fraction model to explain the droplet contact angles, liquid evaporation modes, and depinning

152 /- 277 nm, with hydrophilic characteristics (contact angle < 90 degrees ), a melting point of 58 degr

153 Water contact angles, material swelling, polymer degradation t

154 eous biosensing reaction, confirmed by water contact angle measurement and cyclic voltammetry.

155 sed method and mathematic models for dynamic contact angle measurement are presented.

156 An additional complementary contact angle measurement exhibits a monotonic decrease

157 urfaces normally inaccessible by traditional contact angle measurement techniques.

158 de AFM tips are investigated through dynamic contact angle measurement using a nano-Wilhelmy balance

159 neous wettability characterization (from the contact angle measurement) and appropriately large so th

160 nning electron microscopy, profilometry, and contact angle measurement) were used to characterize the

161 d using atomic force microscopy (AFM), water contact angle measurement, grazing-angle attenuated tota

162 spensions, a result that was consistent with contact angle measurements also performed on the samples

163 l surfaces were studied using static pendant contact angle measurements and captive advancing/recedin

164 ization of acrylic acid as verified by water contact angle measurements and FT-IR analysis.

165 s of H and O-NDs by Atomic Force Microscopy, contact angle measurements and protein adsorption sugges

166 On the basis of contact angle measurements and surface characterization,

167 The modified surfaces were characterized by contact angle measurements and X-ray photoelectron spect

168 um layer were evaluated through static water contact angle measurements and, thereby, the effective r

169 While easy to implement, contact angle measurements are semiquantitative and cann

170 Our contact angle measurements indicate that a graphene mono

171 electron micrographs, visual inspection, and contact angle measurements of the pellicles, we defined

172 Dynamic contact angle measurements of these compounds were taken

173 licity of these films has been documented by contact angle measurements over PEDOT(PSS)-coated Au, GC

174 Contact angle measurements revealed strong lipid adheren

175 Contact angle measurements revealed that the DOM adlayer

176 Water contact angle measurements suggested that the hybrid den

177 be considered to understand a wide range of contact angle measurements that cannot be fitted with a

178 then be performed in a facile manner through contact angle measurements using the Cassie equation.

179 ate the mechanisms, zeta potential and water contact angle measurements were conducted.

180 Results from contact angle measurements with mineral oil and surfacta

181 In advancing/receding contact angle measurements, adhesion could increase the

182 s by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), contact angle measurements, and atomic force microscopy

183 reflection-absorption infrared spectroscopy, contact angle measurements, and electrochemical impedanc

184 flexural strength and modulus measurements, contact angle measurements, and water sorption/solubilit

185 , quartz crystal microbalance, ellipsometry, contact angle measurements, atomic force microscopy, and

186 ng both X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and contact angle measurements, enabling the calculation of

187 racterized by Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM), Contact angle measurements, Fourier transform infrared (

188 ayer formed was inferred by a combination of contact angle measurements, FT-IR spectroscopy, SEM, EDX

189 reflection-absorption infrared spectroscopy, contact angle measurements, lateral force microscopy, an

190 t mechanisms were investigated using in-situ contact angle measurements, oil ganglia distribution ana

191 xadecanethiol and hexadecaneisocyanide, with contact angle measurements, X-ray photoelectron spectros

192 re characterized by a battery of techniques: contact angle measurements, X-ray reflectivity, X-ray ph

193 aner graphene features as confirmed by water contact angle measurements.

194 substrate added charge carrier density using contact angle measurements.

195 ctroscopy, atomic force microscopy (AFM) and contact angle measurements.

196 ic acid, a result that was verified by water contact angle measurements.

197 y (FTIR), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and contact angle measurements.

198 g X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and contact angle measurements.

199 ies of plant surfaces were monitored through contact angle measurements.

200 oscopy-energy dispersive X-ray analysis, and contact angle measurements.

201 g surfaces were assessed using water droplet contact-angle measurements, and scaled in the order O >

202 s ) with subtle but important differences in contact angles observed between the surfaces.

203 and that a concurrent decrease in the water contact angle occurs when these contaminants are partial

204 By controlling the contact angle of (1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorooctyl) trichloros

205 polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) with a static contact angle of 112.4 degrees for water.

206 the visible light region with a static water contact angle of 165 degrees and a sliding angle lower t

207 MPa) and hydrophobicity (with a sessile drop contact angle of 40.5 degrees ) have also been character

208 of 95 degrees +/- 5 degrees and pure HG with contact angle of 42 degrees +/- 2 degrees .

209 ability between the extremes of pure FG with contact angle of 95 degrees +/- 5 degrees and pure HG wi

210 in a hydrophobic PPy-PFOS film with a water contact angle of 97 +/- 5 degrees , which effectively pr

211 Clarifying the factors that control the contact angle of a liquid on a solid substrate is a long

212 dynamics model to reproduce the experimental contact angle of a macroscopic mercury droplet on graphi

213 onsistent with this hypothesis, we observe a contact angle of a soft silicone substrate on rigid sili

214 For water on a support having a contact angle of about 60 degrees , the first 35 predict

215 This nanopattern was used to increase the contact angle of aqueous solutions on the surface of the

216 We measure the microscale receding contact angle of each bridge and show that the Gibbs cri

217 a simple analytical equation to compute the contact angle of liquid-liquid droplets should have broa

218 The contact angle of mercury in a circular pore increases ex

219 We find that the contact angle of model atmospheric aerosols is rarely hi

220 The simulations reveal that the size and contact angle of stationary nanobubbles increase with th

221 s growth by changing the shape, position and contact angle of the catalytic droplet.

222 The contact angle of the hydrophilic film-coated PDMS surfac

223 ink and the carrier solvent which alter the contact angle of the ink on the substrate and limit the

224 vative surface chemistry helps to reduce the contact angle of the novel membrane by at least a 48% an

225 We demonstrate that the apparent contact angle of these meshes dictates the rate at which

226 drophilic multi-wall carbon nanotubes with a contact angle of theta = 9.88 degrees , compared to the

227 beads: lag times correlated negatively with contact angle of water and degree of protein adhesion (s

228 The contact angle of water droplet on phosphorene exhibits a

229 th increasing number of graphene layers, the contact angle of water on copper gradually transitions t

230 Contact angle of water on esters' pelleted surface incre

231 ophobicity is characterized by computing the contact angle of water on flat interfaces and the desorp

232 Moreover, the contact angle of water on strained phosphorene is propor

233 y was assessed over 4 weeks by measuring the contact angle of water on the surface.

234 Overall, the contact angle of water on this electrospun surface is 11

235 reated surface, and its correlation with the contact angle of water.

236 e and temperature on the surface tension and contact angle of water/vapor and oil/gas systems, by whi

237 Contact angles of acetonitrile-water solutions were meas

238 Here, we show that the water contact angles of freshly prepared supported graphene an

239 The contact angles of Hastalex surfaces (85.2 +/- 1.1 degree

240 issue to the limit by investigating dynamic contact angles of liquids with an extremely small capill

241 The dynamic contact angles of the AFM tips were calculated from the

242 cle stiffness dynamically by controlling the contact angles of the cylinders.

243 X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and contact angles of water.

244 The observed static water contact angles of ZnO NRs samples were 103 degrees +/- 3

245 n surface temperature, surface roughness, or contact angle on any surfaces tested.

246 gas atmospheres, a large change in the water contact angle on the as-prepared LIG surfaces has been o

247 Local alteration of the contact angle on the nanopillar arrays by LBL films crea

248 r true portable detection, in which the high contact angle pinning of the droplet makes this format r

249 of 502 +/- 150 nm, and the tensile strength, contact angle, porosity, water vapor permeability and wa

250 on of time, vapor temperature, and substrate contact angle, providing us optimized SNR performance fo

251 g to wetting throughout the pore space, with contact angles ranging 25 degrees < theta < 127 degrees

252 h respect to the obtained (1)H NMR, GPC, and contact angle results, the possibility for further degra

253 spectroscopy (EIS), X-ray diffraction (XRD), contact angle, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), atomi

254 XRD, contact angle, SEM, AFM and SECM studies revealed that t

255 In situ measurements of contact angles showed that CO2 varied from nonwetting to

256 effect of a surface, we have also conducted contact-angle simulations of water on self-assembled mon

257 ilica diameter and concentration on membrane contact angle, sliding angle, and MD performance were in

258 ctroscopy (EIS), atomic force microscopy and contact angle studies.

259 electrodes have been characterized by using contact angle surface analysis, oxygen influence, and te

260 Contact angle tests on a model cellulose surface showed

261 e with a striking dependence on the apparent contact angle that can be explained by this displacement

262 are provided in the literature, and provides contact angles that cannot be accurately determined with

263 fluids that wet the surface (small intrinsic contact angle), the expression can be simplified to a si

264 se torsional travelling waves to control the contact angles, thereby imposing a desired spatio-tempor

265 the PCL fibers lend a local hydrophilicity (contact angle theta=74 degrees ) for sufficient sub-micr

266 act angle (theta(||)), average perpendicular contact angle (theta( )), drop width (W), and drop lengt

267 Here, we report that the equilibrium contact angle (theta(DIB)) between a pair of droplets is

268 Average parallel contact angle (theta(||)), average perpendicular contact

269 Here, the contact angle (theta) at the CO(2)-brine-mineral interfa

270 ribing the measured relationship between the contact angle (theta) of a water droplet applied to the

271 tions to measure the microscopic analogue of contact angle, Theta(c), of aqueous nanodrops on heterog

272 superhydrophobic and superoleophobic, i.e., contact angles (thetaCA) greater than 150 degrees along

273 Water contact angle titrations demonstrate interfacial pKa shi

274 We found that this maximum dynamic contact angle, together with the liquid properties, the

275 apped between the solid and oil) with a high contact angle (top left) or in the Wenzel state (top rig

276 zed to form a hydrophobic material with high contact angle up to 147 degrees that floats on the surfa

277 tically enhance the effect and lead to water contact angles up to 70 degrees in the presence of Ca(2+

278 The contact angle used in the Fletcher model is identified a

279 The measurements of contact angles using three probe liquids suggested that

280 nt in the hydrophilic properties, especially contact angle values of the films.

281 ies have produced anisotropic wetting, where contact-angle variations in different directions resulte

282 Contact angle was found to decrease during the CO(2) pha

283 The contact angle was measured at hundreds of thousands of p

284 (SEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), water contact angle (WCA) measurement and UV-vis titration.

285 bility of the flow cell over a wide range of contact angles, we find that increasing the substrate's

286 es in temperature, microroughness, and water contact angle were analyzed.

287 ng surface tension, interfacial tension, and contact angle were measured.

288 while the other materials were hydrophilic (contact angles were 18 +/- 2 degrees and 36 +/- 3 degree

289 onal Wenzel and Cassie-Baxter models of drop contact angles were developed for isotropic random 2D ro

290 Tar-aqueous interfacial tensions (IFTs) and contact angles were measured, and column flushing experi

291 images of droplet LAMP reactions, and their contact angles, were evaluated.

292 egree of wettability is then captured by the contact angle where the liquid-vapor interface meets the

293 nanoscale induces a local change in dynamic contact angles which manifests as a smooth and continuou

294 tcher model is identified as the microscopic contact angle, which can be directly obtained from heter

295 IV and RSV CA assemblies have very different contact angles, which may reflect differences in the cap

296 h water gives rise to a linear dependence of contact angle with respect to composition, in agreement

297 Here an equivalent condition, increasing contact angle with temperature, is found necessary for o

298 d approach teaches how to measure very large contact angles with consistent accuracy when any of the

299 s of brine flooding.We found a wide range of contact angles with values both above and below 90 degre

300 approximately 10 degrees ) with to near-zero contact angles without divalent cations.