ライフサイエンスコーパス: conventional method

1 h much improved temporal resolution than the conventional method.

2 grity of the extracted DNA as opposed to the conventional method.

3 erhauser effects, which were not found using conventional method.

4 r purity of wild type HBc particles than the conventional method.

5 ules that would hardly be producible through conventional method.

6 s were well agreed with that obtained with a conventional method.

7 e the same achievements as those of the 24-h conventional method.

8 sphincterotome and contrast injection as the conventional method.

9 n a higher quality of the libraries than the conventional method.

10 nd agrees well with values obtained from the conventional method.

11 a sensitivity and resolution beyond that of conventional methods.

12 "unlocking" novel compounds inaccessible by conventional methods.

13 Detection (NPD) feature, and comparisons to conventional methods.

14 tly method compared to DNA and protein based conventional methods.

15 pared to only a 0.06 dB median decrease with conventional methods.

16 pen registered reports in comparison to more conventional methods.

17 nd orientations, which is not possible using conventional methods.

18 t easy to synthesize as 2D materials through conventional methods.

19 e DENV with a low sample volume, compared to conventional methods.

20 th soil-gas characterization collected using conventional methods.

21 esponse that is difficult to achieve through conventional methods.

22 nd three times the imaging speed compared to conventional methods.

23 e determined by more laborious and expensive conventional methods.

24 nts within 2-5 min compared with 4-5 h using conventional methods.

25 cumbersome sample preparation procedures in conventional methods.

26 als classified as H. pylori uninfected using conventional methods.

27 ds the correction area to nine times that of conventional methods.

28 ignals are comparable to those measured with conventional methods.

29 mplifies the synthesis procedure compared to conventional methods.

30 r organisms that are difficult to culture by conventional methods.

31 h, 75 to 80% less than the time required for conventional methods.

32 new tool to identify organisms undetected by conventional methods.

33 of important collections, unconceivable with conventional methods.

34 ted states that is too fast to resolve using conventional methods.

35 ay meningitis/encephalitis panel compared to conventional methods.

36 egetable oil is investigated and compared to conventional methods.

37 meningitidis carriage isolates compared with conventional methods.

38 ctures is often too complex to profile using conventional methods.

39 ts, but can be challenging to genotype using conventional methods.

40 subdomains that have not been classified by conventional methods.

41 0-fold improvement in measurement speed over conventional methods.

42 unized animals that could not be obtained by conventional methods.

43 , Y. pestis, and B. pseudomallei compared to conventional methods.

44 candidates that are hard to achieve through conventional methods.

45 that have previously eluded targeting using conventional methods.

46 /g) and flavonoids (0.97 +/- 0.11 mg/g) than conventional methods.

47 tection limits comparable with those of most conventional methods.

48 presence of multiscale features, and defies conventional methods.

49 tistically rigorous manner not possible with conventional methods.

50 ore complex structure than those obtained by conventional methods.

51 ally greater number of motor units than with conventional methods.

52 Results were compared to oils obtained by conventional methods.

53 enable to structural and kinetic analysis by conventional methods.

54 roducts that would be difficult to access by conventional methods.

55 that would not otherwise react via existing conventional methods.

56 e (p = 1.38 x 10(-6)) and would be missed by conventional methods.

57 i contacts, a result that is not possible by conventional methods.

58 en and agrees well with values obtained from conventional methods.

59 nt intermediates that are not accessible via conventional methods.

60 occur on much faster timescales compared to conventional methods.

61 equent in-depth characterizations by various conventional methods.

62 mpared the results to experimental data from conventional methods.

63 insertions at random sites achieved through conventional methods.

64 specially those which may not be feasible by conventional methods.

65 an effective eDNA capture method compared to conventional methods.

66 MAR performs with the same high accuracy as conventional methods.

67 g cells, performing unimaginably better than conventional methods.

68 uced to about 30 min, as opposed to hours in conventional methods.

69 ion showing a 3- to 25-fold improvement over conventional methods.

70 the depth of tissue that can be imaged using conventional methods.

71 ifferentiation (CD) protein normally used in conventional methods.

72 evels within the Ti6246 matrix compared with conventional methods.

73 h throughput, a challenging combination with conventional methods.

74 ons were achieved in a shorter time than the conventional methods.

75 surement savings exceeding million-fold over conventional methods.

76 oss subjects, it may not be detectable using conventional methods.

77 th limited observations in comparison to the conventional methods.

78 with far fewer false-positives compared with conventional methods.

79 Method 2 had the strongest correlation with conventional method 1 (r = 0.98) and values similar to m

80 an be summarized in four categories: (1) non-conventional methods, (2) structures incorporating seven

81 r paper had a sensitivity similar to that of conventional methods (4.9% versus 5.7%; P = 0.33).

82 y patterns, inability to control bleeding by conventional methods, administration of a large volume o

83 ng results in approximately half the time of conventional methods, allowing its results to be used th

84 t 580 times shorter when compared to using a conventional method and a 10 mm BBO probe.

85 accuracy of IOL power determination using 2 conventional methods and 2 new technologies: the Haigis-

86 to disprove transmission events indicated by conventional methods and also to reveal otherwise unsusp

87 dy of Adolescent to Adult Health, we applied conventional methods and coarsened exact matching to ass

88 dragit S100(R) (ES100)) polymers by suitable conventional methods and electrospraying for all polymer

89 ssay showed superior sensitivity compared to conventional methods and excellent specificity for the d

90 shows strong agreement (kappa of 0.92) with conventional methods and increased serotype assignment (

91 f a combinatorial testing approach including conventional methods and new technologies for evaluation

92 notubes, nanohorns, graphene, etc.) when non-conventional methods and techniques, such as microwave i

93 In this review, we discuss conventional methods and tools used to control oxygen co

94 ii) the performance of the assay compared to conventional methods, and (vi) the reproducibility of ch

95 cause of measurement inaccuracy inherent in conventional methods, and show that all differentiated b

96 Compared to conventional methods, APC-ms facilitates several-fold gr

97 and in vitro approaches in combination with conventional methods appears to be an effective strategy

98 and sensitive devices to analyse DON as the conventional methods are complex and time-consuming.

99 few tens to a few hundred nanometers, where conventional methods are insufficient.

100 reasing importance of molecular testing when conventional methods are limited.

101 The conventional methods are mainly based on the volumetric

102 These conventional methods are not adequate for characterizati

103 I, to cardiac imaging is desirable; however, conventional methods are poorly suited for cardiac imagi

104 RVA can complement or replace current and/or conventional methods as a hardness descriptor.

105 Conventional methods as well as the more recently propos

106 aster alternative for browning monitoring to conventional methods, as well as useful key indicators f

107 This conventional method assumes that the sample returns to a

108 good agreement with those obtained using the conventional method at a concentration level of 150 mug

109 y enhancer-promoter architecture better than conventional methods at a lower sequencing depth and wit

110 the bacteremia cases from the NB-PC group by conventional methods: Bacteroides spp. (30%), Clostridiu

111 clearing caused tissue swelling (compared to conventional methods), but this swelling was shown to be

112 ave the same fold as those transcribed using conventional methods, but they greatly simplify the inte

113 Our iBAR approach outperforms the conventional method by producing screening results with

114 timum ultrasound-assisted method compared to conventional method by the pseudo-first order model.

115 AR exhibits clear efficiency advantages over conventional methods by requiring significantly less ove

116 nd 39%-56% for conventional imaging (65% for conventional methods combined) in the entire patient gro

117 Conventional methods, comparing the concentration of cho

118 he PEC assays showed better sensitivity than conventional methods, covering a wide range of potential

119 PTB by both Xpert MTB/RIF assay and standard conventional methods (culture and direct smear microscop

120 article provides a comprehensive overview of conventional methods, current trends and advances in fun

121 provides some distinct benefits compared to conventional methods currently used for QC testing of pr

122 e and compared with an analog prepared using conventional methods (DA-TOC).

123 tein-pathogen interactions were validated by conventional methods, demonstrating that the MPA is an i

124 nal from undiluted serum samples compared to conventional methods, demonstrating the immense potentia

125 cities of 150 and 50, respectively, with the conventional method detecting approximately 19000 featur

126 However, conventional methods determining TPC are costly and labo

127 tandard for bacteremia diagnosis is based on conventional methods developed in the mid-1800s-growth o

128 Conventional methods divide Ediacaran macrofossil locali

129 relation to their antioxidant activity using conventional methods (DPPH and FRAP assays) and correlat

130 ignificance artificially inflated when using conventional methods due to over-fitting.

131 (+) T cells are rarely detectable ex vivo by conventional methods during chronic hepatitis C virus (H

132 gy represents an important complement to the conventional methods employed for the synthesis of TAEs,

133 he extraction time was around 1 min, whereas conventional methods employed to perform this kind of ex

134 l for efficient biomaterial engineering, but conventional methods fail to evaluate heterogeneous popu

135 However, conventional methods fail to retain biomolecular informa

136 that can uniquely estimate parameters where conventional methods fail.

137 In contrast to the conventional method for analyzing the DOR data, which us

138 Os obtained using the Us with respect to the conventional method for both early and late ripening sta

139 es demonstrated very good agreement with the conventional method for both rest (mean difference: -0.0

140 The conventional method for creating targeted contrast agent

141 The results agreed with those of the conventional method for different kinds of vinegars, wit

142 focused beam across a field of view, is the conventional method for performing high-quality ultrasou

143 traoperative blood loss when compared to the conventional method for the release of ankylosis of temp

144 A conventional method for the synthesis of C-P bonds invol

145 It complements the conventional methods for analysis of the electromagnetic

146 Conventional methods for analyzing PG composition are co

147 Conventional methods for analyzing point mutations, e.g.

148 Conventional methods for antibiotic detection, e.g., liq

149 enerally spread rapidly among swine, and the conventional methods for antigenic characterization requ

150 Conventional methods for assaying drug metabolism (e.g.,

151 Conventional methods for BPA exposure assessment rely on

152 l data--improvements that go undetected when conventional methods for comparing ensembles are used--a

153 re, the regioselectivity is complementary to conventional methods for cyclopentenone synthesis.

154 ions and inversions are important in cancer, conventional methods for detecting DNA rearrangements re

155 Conventional methods for detecting pharyngeal carriage o

156 There are several conventional methods for detection of microcystins.

157 Whole-genome sequencing should replace conventional methods for detection of nosocomial S. aure

158 Conventional methods for determining HMF are cumbersome

159 Conventional methods for evaluating epigenetic modificat

160 ntration of furfural in the hydrolysate, the conventional methods for furfural recovery are energy-in

161 ogy may be preferred over nanotechnology and conventional methods for high expected benefits and low

162 Conventional methods for IgA N- and O-glycosylation anal

163 e are in agreement with those acquired using conventional methods for immunoglobulin detection, indic

164 Conventional methods for inferring FOI estimate a time-a

165 The various conventional methods for its diagnosis are laborious and

166 Conventional methods for modeling isotopic distributions

167 e devices could be a valuable alternative to conventional methods for monitoring fermentation process

168 However, conventional methods for natural extraction or chemical

169 d microfluidic devices are not standardized, conventional methods for performing batch measurements o

170 ific and social developments have challenged conventional methods for protecting privacy.

171 Using conventional methods for pulmonary drug administration,

172 However, conventional methods for relating either individual vari

173 However, conventional methods for sequencing proteins, such as ma

174 Conventional methods for single-cell genome sequencing a

175 However, their small size challenges the conventional methods for structure characterization.

176 This kind of reactive systems challenges conventional methods for successfully processing corresp

177 Some deficiencies in conventional methods for testing this product encourage

178 molecules offer an attractive alternative to conventional methods for the analysis of the absolute co

179 (kappa, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95 to 0.98) with the conventional methods for the detection of ETEC, Vibrio,

180 ighlight the conventional as well as the non-conventional methods for the detection of these inflamma

181 nsitive, specific and comparable to standard conventional methods for the diagnosis of PTB.

182 nsive, rapid, and streamlined alternative to conventional methods for the etiologic diagnosis of infe

183 MDomics was significantly more powerful than conventional methods for the identification of drug resi

184 Conventional methods for the identification of gastroint

185 raying produced more favourable results than conventional methods for the synthetic polymers, resulti

186 Conventional methods for urinary HP analysis based on li

187 Conventional, methods for assigning C/Zr to samples are

188 Ultrasonic-assisted extraction, comparing to conventional method, had greater efficiency for the extr

189 nificantly higher SUVRs in comparison to the conventional method in almost all regions of interest.

190 ct RNFL thickness performed similarly to the conventional method in good quality images and better in

191 mode of action of drugs is a challenge with conventional methods in clinical trials.

192 e in THB was more than twice as sensitive as conventional methods in detecting N. meningitidis (13.2%

193 self-reports and that ML methods improve on conventional methods in developing such models.

194 es have emerged as potential alternatives to conventional methods in miRNA quantification.

195 onal neural networks (CNN) have outperformed conventional methods in modeling the sequence specificit

196 normal method (CvN method) to be superior to conventional methods in stratifying AML patients with ab

197 horoidal nevi and was in full agreement with conventional methods in the evaluation of the area of ch

198 Infections were diagnosed by conventional methods in the first season and by multiple

199 We compared our method with conventional methods including minfi, limma and limma co

200 we observe additional features, not seen by conventional methods, including extensive lipid droplets

201 ed, the cellular contents were analyzed with conventional methods, including fluorescence, enzymatic

202 was substantially broadened contrary to the conventional methods introducing solely the azide anion

203 The results were validated by a conventional method involving solvent extraction of beta

204 Monitoring of actinides with sophisticated conventional methods is affected by matrix interferences

205 ate compared to SrTiO(3) grown on silicon by conventional methods is enabled by a self-regulated grow

206 Yet delivering monoclonal antibodies using conventional methods is impractical due to high costs.

207 gDNA extraction using conventional methods is laborious.

208 sequencing exhibits longer read lengths than conventional methods, less GC bias, and the ability to r

209 ssing value imputation is more accurate than conventional methods like multiple imputation and compar

210 The results indicate that conventional methods may be complemented by state-of-the

211 e time to diagnosis of influenza compared to conventional methods (median turnaround times of 1.7 h v

212 Unlike conventional methods, native MS can resolve individual l

213 This technique takes only 4-6 h whereas the conventional methods need around 24 h for the same.

214 autonomous control problems in which neither conventional methods nor human intervention suffice, off

215 A conventional method of annotating a protein sequence is

216 Conventional method of calculating the optical potential

217 If used for rodent control in place of the conventional method of poison, macaques could provide an

218 The conventional method of Xe delivery by inhalation is not

219 fferent event classes can be extracted, when conventional methods of analysis fail.

220 rief introduction to sepsis, followed by the conventional methods of diagnosis and bio-sensing.

221 Conventional methods of HBV detection are time consuming

222 While conventional methods of nanocarrier-mediated drug delive

223 ation development, our algorithm outperforms conventional methods of network inference.

224 Conventional methods of quantifying stress (cortisol lev

225 n of proteins in single cells that surpasses conventional methods of quantitating total diffuse fluor

226 The limitations of conventional methods of structural biology for fibril ch

227 SCs also confer considerable advantages over conventional methods of studying human diseases.

228 However, conventional methods often lead to heterogeneous PEGylat

229 he enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) conventional method (p-value of < 0.05) showed that this

230 dern analytical methods have advantages over conventional methods (particularly when some data are mi

231 as long been used for this purpose; however, conventional methods perform poorly when applied to data

232 Conventional methods produced (89)Zr-DFO-Bn-NCS-onartuzu

233 Conventional methods rely on annotation of polyA sites;

234 is a particularly useful example because the conventional method requires temperatures up to 300 degr

235 tation of the DMN log-likelihood function by conventional methods results in instability in the neigh

236 splittings that are too small to probe with conventional methods.Silicon quantum dots provide a prom

237 Compared with conventional methods, single-molecule real-time (SMRT) D

238 sickle cells in blood samples as analyzed by conventional method (standard microscope).

239 accurate prediction model and outperformed a conventional method such as Cox regression (concordance

240 h developed MFC biosensor were comparable to conventional methods such as colorimetric, flame atomic

241 A number of conventional methods such as colorimetric, spectrophotom

242 rest for treating high salinity water, since conventional methods such as reverse osmosis have increa

243 itric acid; Re background reduction requires conventional methods such as sub-boiling distillation.

244 loys prepared for microscopic observation by conventional methods, such as electro-polishing and room

245 interpretation of in vivo experiments since conventional methods, such as in situ hybridization and

246 Mo in ammonium diuranate samples, where the conventional methods suffer from the loss of Mo.

247 y the SDAE-based CADx algorithm over the two conventional methods, suggesting that deep learning tech

248 Conventional methods that are used to estimate tumor siz

249 nderestimation (crude distillation units) of conventional methods that overlook three-level coupling.

250 stry represents an attractive alternative to conventional methods that require stoichiometric quantit

251 Though it is an improvement over conventional methods, this multistep procedure has not t

252 Compared to the conventional methods, this novel uncaging system require

253 In comparison to conventional methods, this technology is much less labor

254 models efficiently and more effectively than conventional methods through detection of hidden pattern

255 nerally, Luria-Bertani (LB) agar colony is a conventional method to evaluate the photodynamic effect.

256 Conventional methods to analyse power use closed-form so

257 l and millions of cells per sample; however, conventional methods to analyze data are subjective and

258 Conventional methods to analyze genomic data do not make

259 Conventional methods to assess local activation time (LA

260 Conventional methods to determine the aggregation number

261 Conventional methods to determine the kinetic parameters

262 Conventional methods to diagnose and monitor chronic kid

263 Conventional methods to discern adeno-associated virus (

264 Conventional methods to engineer electroconductive hydro

265 Conventional methods to identify HBEC in bronchoalveolar

266 ave remained opaque given the limitations of conventional methods to interrogate the order and mechan

267 t these limitations, we used microarrays and conventional methods to investigate rejection in 703 uns

268 As conventional methods to preserve cardiac cell viability

269 The advantage of IF compared to conventional methods to quantify interaction in microsco

270 Conventional methods to quantify urban FFCO(2) emissions

271 Conventional methods to study this reaction are not sens

272 ance gain and cost saving in comparison with conventional methods to targeted surveillance.

273 ency increases into the terahertz range, the conventional methods used by existing networks become pr

274 However, conventional methods used for tracking the variability o

275 their diagnostic value, there have been many conventional methods used in detection of miRNAs includi

276 otential for superior data quality, than the conventional methods used in most research labs currentl

277 Because of their toxicity and resistance to conventional methods used in mycotoxin degradation, deve

278 The turnaround times for conventional methods used to detect Mycobacterium tuberc

279 ntly different from those obtained using the conventional method using a sample volume of 400 muL ins

280 xtracts from orange peels were obtained by a conventional method using acetone and, an alternative me

281 cy was obtained in comparison with that in a conventional method using glass slides.

282 e results compare favourably well with other conventional methods using combined experimental and num

283 Compared with conventional methods using redundant cross-linking react

284 The HMF amount which was measured by the conventional method was found to be dependent on the sam

285 Using conventional methods, we diagnosed rejection in 205 biop

286 ilk samples by the optical sensor and by the conventional method were not statistically different (al

287 ies of nanostructures that cannot be made by conventional methods were developed.

288 This differs from conventional methods where dilutions are achieved by tra

289 This is in contrast with conventional methods where high transfer efficiency can

290 The proposed method was compared to conventional methods which employ one or two extraction

291 esent in too low numbers to be detected with conventional methods, which poses a particular challenge

292 y contain many more pores than those made by conventional methods, which severely deteriorates their

293 nd 90-fold times faster separation time over conventional methods while maintaining comparable resolu

294 atasets, BPSC performs well against edgeR, a conventional method widely used in bulk-cell RNA-sequenc

295 In comparison with the conventional method with simulated stars, this method ut

296 n average, in contrast to comparison between conventional methods with variations on the order of 1-2

297 We compared the performance of conventional methods with WGS for strain typing clinical

298 s it a simpler and more rapid alternative to conventional methods, with sensitivity and accuracy simi

299 xpensive process to synthesize ZnO-NPs using conventional methods without the use of sophisticated eq

300 iques have shown certain advantages over the conventional methods working in reciprocal space.