コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 v for computed radiography and 0.027 mSv for conventional radiography).
2 ondral bone that have not been apparent with conventional radiography.
3 used techniques of intravenous urography and conventional radiography.
4 ecific morphological changes not depicted by conventional radiography.
5 osteoarthritis (OA) has relied primarily on conventional radiography.
6 Traditionally, knee OA is diagnosed using conventional radiography.
7 normalities that were not clearly defined at conventional radiography.
8 all airways (< 2 mm), which are invisible in conventional radiography.
9 ss of presence of osteolytic bone lesions on conventional radiography.
10 Average costs (in 2001 dollars) were $44 for conventional radiography, 126 US dollars for 1.5-T rapid
12 tion was 0.43 mGy (range, 0.01-22.5 mGy) for conventional radiography, 4.3 mGy (range, 0.01-43.9 mGy)
13 e of cardiac imaging in 1975 was centered on conventional radiography and angiography, but, in the pa
15 rochanteric bursa complex were injected, and conventional radiography and MR imaging were performed.
18 nclusions regarding cost differences between conventional radiography and rapid MR imaging were robus
19 Gy for computed radiography and 0.16 mGy for conventional radiography), and the effective doses were
20 maging modalities, such as the barium enema, conventional radiography, and ultrasound, play a much mo
21 techniques, such as computed tomography and conventional radiography are of no significance in the d
22 n patients with calcific tendonitis by using conventional radiography as a reference and offers bette
23 MR imaging are roughly three times those for conventional radiography but about half those for conven
24 all rapid MR imaging times exceeded those of conventional radiography but were less than those of con
25 Skull base fractures that cannot be shown by conventional radiography can be clearly imaged by high-r
26 e unsafe for clinical applications.Keywords: Conventional Radiography, Computer Application-Detection
28 isions of hip prostheses are increasing, and conventional radiography (CR) is a primary tool for mana
34 underwent clinical and radiologic follow-up (conventional radiography, fluoroscopy, CT, or MRI) betwe
35 sonography, a modern imaging technique, with conventional radiography for the detection of erosions i
37 CT showed better diagnostic performance than conventional radiography in diagnosing hip prosthesis lo
39 ing was limited mainly to the performance of conventional radiography, including barium esophagograph
41 : Artificial Intelligence, Chest Radiograph, Conventional Radiography, Lung Nodule, Mass Detection(C)
42 of the same order of magnitude as those for conventional radiography (median: 0.012 mSv [95% CI conf
43 Paget disease is diagnosed economically with conventional radiography, MR imaging is well suited for
46 ) sites, patients were randomized to undergo conventional radiography or rapid MR imaging of the lumb
47 s, Ultrasound, Mammography, CT, Angiography, Conventional Radiography Published under a CC BY 4.0 lic
50 ds: Thorax, MR-Imaging, Staging, PET/CT, CT, Conventional Radiography, Sarcoidosis, Thoracic Imaging,
53 enteroclysis for small-bowel assessment, and conventional radiography still have a role, despite the
54 ratification and THA planning tool.Keywords: Conventional Radiography, Surgery, Skeletal-Appendicular
55 iologists and outperformed GradCAM.Keywords: Conventional Radiography, Thorax, Diagnosis, Supervised
56 ptimal quality, safety, and equity.Keywords: Conventional Radiography, Thorax, Ethics, Supervised Lea
57 arkers for an emerging abnormality.Keywords: Conventional Radiography, Thorax, Feature Detection, Sup
59 Preliminary data suggest that, compared with conventional radiography, tomosynthesis may also improve
61 ning can apply to imaging modalities such as conventional radiography, US, and MRI, most attention to