戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 v for computed radiography and 0.027 mSv for conventional radiography).
2 ondral bone that have not been apparent with conventional radiography.
3 used techniques of intravenous urography and conventional radiography.
4 ecific morphological changes not depicted by conventional radiography.
5  osteoarthritis (OA) has relied primarily on conventional radiography.
6    Traditionally, knee OA is diagnosed using conventional radiography.
7 normalities that were not clearly defined at conventional radiography.
8 all airways (< 2 mm), which are invisible in conventional radiography.
9 ss of presence of osteolytic bone lesions on conventional radiography.
10 Average costs (in 2001 dollars) were $44 for conventional radiography, 126 US dollars for 1.5-T rapid
11                                       For 23 conventional radiography, 27 rapid MR imaging, and 38 co
12 tion was 0.43 mGy (range, 0.01-22.5 mGy) for conventional radiography, 4.3 mGy (range, 0.01-43.9 mGy)
13 e of cardiac imaging in 1975 was centered on conventional radiography and angiography, but, in the pa
14                                              Conventional radiography and MR imaging were performed i
15 rochanteric bursa complex were injected, and conventional radiography and MR imaging were performed.
16         The ASD was imaged and sized by both conventional radiography and MRI.
17                                              Conventional radiography and pre- and postcontrast T1-we
18 nclusions regarding cost differences between conventional radiography and rapid MR imaging were robus
19 Gy for computed radiography and 0.16 mGy for conventional radiography), and the effective doses were
20 maging modalities, such as the barium enema, conventional radiography, and ultrasound, play a much mo
21  techniques, such as computed tomography and conventional radiography are of no significance in the d
22 n patients with calcific tendonitis by using conventional radiography as a reference and offers bette
23 MR imaging are roughly three times those for conventional radiography but about half those for conven
24 all rapid MR imaging times exceeded those of conventional radiography but were less than those of con
25 Skull base fractures that cannot be shown by conventional radiography can be clearly imaged by high-r
26 e unsafe for clinical applications.Keywords: Conventional Radiography, Computer Application-Detection
27                                While current conventional radiography costs exceed reimbursement, cur
28 isions of hip prostheses are increasing, and conventional radiography (CR) is a primary tool for mana
29                                    Keywords: Conventional Radiography, CT, MR Imaging, PET/CT, Soft T
30                                    Keywords: Conventional Radiography, CT, Percutaneous, Cardiac, Vas
31                                    Keywords: Conventional Radiography, CT, Pulmonary, Thorax, Lung, P
32                     The utilization rate for conventional radiography decreased 13.7%, while that of
33 g depicted 136 (79%) acute abnormalities and conventional radiography depicted 39 (23%).
34 underwent clinical and radiologic follow-up (conventional radiography, fluoroscopy, CT, or MRI) betwe
35 sonography, a modern imaging technique, with conventional radiography for the detection of erosions i
36                                     Although conventional radiography has traditionally been the stan
37 CT showed better diagnostic performance than conventional radiography in diagnosing hip prosthesis lo
38                   MR imaging was superior to conventional radiography in the evaluation of pre- or pa
39 ing was limited mainly to the performance of conventional radiography, including barium esophagograph
40                                      Initial conventional radiography is relatively insensitive in th
41 : Artificial Intelligence, Chest Radiograph, Conventional Radiography, Lung Nodule, Mass Detection(C)
42  of the same order of magnitude as those for conventional radiography (median: 0.012 mSv [95% CI conf
43 Paget disease is diagnosed economically with conventional radiography, MR imaging is well suited for
44                               In contrast to conventional radiography, MRI can directly visualize the
45          Because of the suspected diagnosis, conventional radiography of the skeleton was performed.
46 ) sites, patients were randomized to undergo conventional radiography or rapid MR imaging of the lumb
47 s, Ultrasound, Mammography, CT, Angiography, Conventional Radiography Published under a CC BY 4.0 lic
48                                              Conventional radiography reimbursement was 44 US dollars
49                                     Although conventional radiography remains the gold standard for a
50 ds: Thorax, MR-Imaging, Staging, PET/CT, CT, Conventional Radiography, Sarcoidosis, Thoracic Imaging,
51                                    Keywords: Conventional Radiography, Segmentation Supplemental mate
52                                    Keywords: Conventional Radiography, Skeletal-Axial, Thorax, Experi
53 enteroclysis for small-bowel assessment, and conventional radiography still have a role, despite the
54 ratification and THA planning tool.Keywords: Conventional Radiography, Surgery, Skeletal-Appendicular
55 iologists and outperformed GradCAM.Keywords: Conventional Radiography, Thorax, Diagnosis, Supervised
56 ptimal quality, safety, and equity.Keywords: Conventional Radiography, Thorax, Ethics, Supervised Lea
57 arkers for an emerging abnormality.Keywords: Conventional Radiography, Thorax, Feature Detection, Sup
58                                    Keywords: Conventional Radiography, Thorax, Trauma, Ribs, Catheter
59 Preliminary data suggest that, compared with conventional radiography, tomosynthesis may also improve
60                     It can be diagnosed with conventional radiography, ultrasound, or magnetic resona
61 ning can apply to imaging modalities such as conventional radiography, US, and MRI, most attention to
62                    In the first few decades, conventional radiography was the diagnostic modality for
63                                              Conventional radiography was the most utilized imaging t
64           The sensitivity and specificity of conventional radiography were 22% and 94% and of MRI wer