ライフサイエンスコーパス: corneal astigmatism

1 h EL are flatter and have a higher degree of corneal astigmatism.

2 owest anterior chamber depth and the largest corneal astigmatism.

3 sions made during cataract surgery to reduce corneal astigmatism.

4 patients with scleral-buckle-induced regular corneal astigmatism.

5 fective treatment for cataract patients with corneal astigmatism.

6 vantage of being independent of both CCT and corneal astigmatism.

7 PDCT showed no significant correlation with corneal astigmatism.

8 entage of cataract patients with preexisting corneal astigmatism.

9 removal and who have significant preexisting corneal astigmatism.

10 there were no long-term changes of anterior corneal astigmatism.

11 al power and low repeatability for posterior corneal astigmatism.

12 (P < .001) created a 2.0 D error in anterior corneal astigmatism.

13 or keratometry (-5.87 +/- 0.26 D), posterior corneal astigmatism (-0.26 +/- 0.15 D), axial length (AL

14 terior keratometry (-5.87 0.26 D), posterior corneal astigmatism (-0.26 0.15 D), axial length (AL; 23

15 time of cataract surgery to correct moderate corneal astigmatism (1.5-3D) in a community hospital ove

16 months), maximum keratometry (12.3 months), corneal astigmatism (14.8 months), central corneal thick

17 Mean CCT was 585 +/- 149 mum and mean corneal astigmatism 5.5 +/- 3.8 diopters.

18 0.26 to 0.27 +/- 0.29 logMAR; P <.001), and corneal astigmatism (8.69 +/- 2.72 to 3.92 +/- 2.13 diop

19 patient with scleral-buckle-induced regular corneal astigmatism and a patient with keratoconus follo

20 relaxing incision) in patients with regular corneal astigmatism and age-related cataracts.

21 An increase of >=1 diopter in corneal astigmatism and curvature parameters and a >=2%

22 An increase of 1 diopter in corneal astigmatism and curvature parameters and a 2% re

23 AXL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), anterior corneal astigmatism and spherical equivalent in treated

24 laser lens surgery on anterior and posterior corneal astigmatism and total corneal refractive power (

25 ormed formulas that only considered anterior corneal astigmatism and was similar to formulas like the

26 visual acuity, higher order aberrations and corneal astigmatism, and no correlation with corneal den

27 sing visual loss due to increasing irregular corneal astigmatism, and the quality of life declines in

28 rd deviation of the pre-operative calculated corneal astigmatism angle, reported by the keratometer,

29 s are effective in neutralizing pre-existing corneal astigmatism at the time of cataract surgery and

30 Not correcting corneal astigmatism at the time of cataract surgery will

31 Toric IOLs may correct for preexisting corneal astigmatism at the time of surgery.

32 ge of 73.6 years (range: 46 to 90 years) and corneal astigmatism between 1.5 to 3D were included.

33 In patients with cataract and corneal astigmatism, bilateral toric IOL implantation re

34 ICRS decreased corneal astigmatism by 27% and corneal coma by 5%, but o

35 Unfortunately, postoperative corneal astigmatism commonly occurs and can produce sign

36 nificantly flatter and with higher degree of corneal astigmatism compared to patients without EL (Kme

37 vs. case 42.75+/-1.64, P<0.05) and anterior corneal astigmatism (control 1.03+/-0.57 vs. case 1.82+/

38 ic IOLs that did not receive any intentional corneal astigmatism correction.

39 such as higher order aberrations as well as corneal astigmatism, densitometry and pachymetry.

40 To compare corneal astigmatism derived from total corneal refractiv

41 he T7-T9 subgroup (excluding 1 outlier whose corneal astigmatism doubled after surgery) than in the T

42 of (LRI) in correcting pre-existing moderate corneal astigmatism during cataract surgery in settings

43 RI) were used widely to correct pre-existing corneal astigmatism during cataract surgery, they have b

44 or all corneal powers and for simK and total corneal astigmatism for both analyzers.

45 n with VKC were >6 times more likely to have corneal astigmatism >2 diopters in their worse eye (odds

46 The prevalence of corneal astigmatism >2.00 D was lower in the 1- to <2-ye

47 The prevalence of corneal astigmatism (>/= 1 DC) also did not differ signi

48 stics, including the quality and quantity of corneal astigmatism, health of the ocular surface, and o

49 However, no IOP measures correlated with corneal astigmatism if sutures in situ or less than 1 ye

50 In group 1, mean corneal astigmatism improved from -5.84 +/- 3.80 diopter

51 e and safe method for the correction of high corneal astigmatism in complicated cases with different

52 Corneal astigmatism in eyes with childhood glaucoma was

53 Irregular corneal astigmatism in keratoconus or scleral-buckle-ind

54 on can be an effective method for correcting corneal astigmatism in patients with vitreoretinal disea

55 that refractive astigmatism must equal total corneal astigmatism in these patients, accuracy of the c

56 r according to the magnitude of preoperative corneal astigmatism into 3 categories: 0.75 D or more to

57 aract surgery to address moderate degrees of corneal astigmatism is a safe, reliable and predictable

58 Corneal astigmatism is an eye characteristic that can af

59 Corneal astigmatism is common.

60 When the steep axis of posterior corneal astigmatism is not vertically orientated, the us

61 The prevalence of refractive astigmatism and corneal astigmatism is stable between 6 and 7 years and

62 Corneal astigmatism J0 was different (p = 0.01) for the

63 The ICC for posterior corneal astigmatism magnitude using the Galilei was 0.62

64 ) and other visual outcomes in patients with corneal astigmatism (maximum allowable up to 3.0D) at po

65 Measuring total instead of anterior corneal astigmatism may therefore decrease the residual

66 nalysis showed no significant difference for corneal astigmatism measurements (P = .84).

67 Standard and total corneal astigmatism measurements differ significantly fr

68 tigmatism in these patients, accuracy of the corneal astigmatism measurements was defined as the vect

69 well as with Cassini, the accuracy of total corneal astigmatism measurements was higher than that of

70 easurements was higher than that of anterior corneal astigmatism measurements.

71 For total and corneal astigmatism, modeling showed dominant genetic ef

72 PPCA); Barrett Toric with measured posterior corneal astigmatism (MPCA); EVO Toric PPCA; EVO Toric MP

73 .1%]), maximum keratometry (n = 76 [27.4%]), corneal astigmatism (n = 55 [19.9%]), back mean keratome

74 on the findings of this case report, include corneal astigmatism (not specific), diffuse corneal thin

75 ion criteria were previous ocular surgeries, corneal astigmatism of >1.5 diopter (D), ocular patholog

76 gery and refractive lens exchange, irregular corneal astigmatism of >1.5 diopter, and ocular patholog

77 tudy, patients with age-related cataract and corneal astigmatism of 1.0 to 3.0 diopters measured with

78 For corneal astigmatism of 1.00 D or more to less than 1.25

79 +/- 0.31 D vs 41.75 +/- 0.28 D, P < .01 and corneal astigmatism of 1.68 +/- 0.16 D vs 1.13 +/- 0.14

80 iduals with bilateral cataract and bilateral corneal astigmatism of at least 1.25 diopters (D) who we

81 ferring children who have at least 2.25 D of corneal astigmatism or acuity worse than 20/63 on two at

82 regardless of the magnitude of preoperative corneal astigmatism or axis orientation.

83 eening with referral thresholds of 2.25 D of corneal astigmatism or inability to read a 20/63 Lea sym

84 had uncorrected low vision from VKC-induced corneal astigmatism or keratoconus, only 1 child was vis

85 r LT (P = .440), angle kappa (P = .216), and corneal astigmatism (P = .103).

86 ulas: Barrett Toric with predicted posterior corneal astigmatism (PPCA); Barrett Toric with measured

87 (Predicted-PCA))) and the measured posterior corneal astigmatism (PRA((Measured-PCA))) options.

88 ric calculator using the predicted posterior corneal astigmatism (PRA((Predicted-PCA))) and the measu

89 with age-related senile cataract and regular corneal astigmatism ranging from 1.50 to 3.00 diopters,

90 anterior, Pentacam total, and Cassini total corneal astigmatism, respectively.

91 lude incision placement on the steep axis of corneal astigmatism, single or paired peripheral corneal

92 standard keratometry astigmatism (KA), total corneal astigmatism (TCA), and predicted refractive asti

93 l power (44.17 +/- 1.70 diopters [D]), total corneal astigmatism (TCA; 1.11 +/- 0.87 D), mean posteri

94 rneal power (44.17 1.70 diopters [D]), total corneal astigmatism (TCA; 1.11 0.87 D), mean posterior k

95 yes were more asymmetric in axial length and corneal astigmatism than eyes without aniso-astigmatism.

96 ased corneal thickness, and greater anterior corneal astigmatism than patients who needed only one PR

97 yes with 1.25 D or more to 1.50 D or less of corneal astigmatism, the odds increased 4.70-fold and 10

98 The magnitude of corneal astigmatism, the tolerance of the IOL to this as

99 IOL types in each eye), and at what level of corneal astigmatism they prefer toric lenses.

100 Notably, respondents have a low corneal astigmatism threshold for toric lenses.

101 Search words included astigmatism, corneal astigmatism, toric IOLs, alignment, and IOL calc

102 Corneal astigmatism, uncorrected distance visual acuity

103 SENTATION: Two patients with myopia and high corneal astigmatism underwent cataract operation with to

104 LRI was determined based on the pre-existing corneal astigmatism using online calculator.

105 igmatism (95% CI, 37%-55%) and 42% to 61% of corneal astigmatism variance (95% CI, 8%-71%), with addi

106 Preoperatively, mean (SD) corneal astigmatism was 2.02 (0.95) D and 2.00 (0.84) D

107 The prevalence of corneal astigmatism was assessed by obtaining infant ker

108 Corneal astigmatism was calculated based on standard ker

109 spectively, if the total instead of anterior corneal astigmatism was measured.

110 95% CI, 48-70, of 12- to 13-year-olds), but corneal astigmatism was predominantly with-the-rule (80%

111 tistically significant reduction in the mean corneal astigmatism was recorded from 2.05 +/- 0.45D pre

112 The magnitude of mean corneal astigmatism was significantly lower in the 1- to

113 Corneal astigmatism was with-the-rule (WTR) in 91.4% of

114 The prevalence and mean amount of corneal astigmatism were higher than reported in non-Nat

115 Anterior and total corneal astigmatism were measured with the Pentacam HR (

116 spherical equivalent, total astigmatism, and corneal astigmatism were recorded.

117 While levels of refractive astigmatism and corneal astigmatism were similar, refractive astigmatism

118 of 28 patients with co-existing cataract and corneal astigmatism were studied before and after simult

119 coefficients between anterior and posterior corneal astigmatisms were associated with Blur, being 0.

120 There is a high prevalence of refractive and corneal astigmatism which is associated with ametropia.

121 tly with-the-rule and highly correlated with corneal astigmatism, which was also with-the-rule.