ライフサイエンスコーパス: coronary angiogram

1 evascularization (ie, abnormal postoperative coronary angiogram).

2 lar Health (LURIC) study (2579 patients with coronary angiograms).

3 tal during 1986-2015 with at least 1 post-HT coronary angiogram.

4 Flt-1 in 791 HF patients undergoing elective coronary angiogram.

5 ronary flow velocity reserve assessment, and coronary angiogram.

6 sion could not help in the decision of early coronary angiogram.

7 ng cardiovascular risk factor assessment and coronary angiogram.

8 ITA grafted to the LAD and had an evaluable coronary angiogram.

9 ogram), scintigraphic perfusion defects, and coronary angiogram.

10 who would, therefore, benefit from emergent coronary angiogram.

11 The patient who developed an MI had a normal coronary angiogram.

12 cipients at the time of their routine annual coronary angiogram.

13 rdiac positron emission tomography scans and coronary angiograms.

14 ain in patients with hypertension and normal coronary angiograms.

15 ry flow reserve abnormalities despite normal coronary angiograms.

16 wenty-two patients had 91 DSE studies and 45 coronary angiograms.

17 n 7 patients without risk factors and normal coronary angiograms.

18 on of 15:1 lossy JPEG compression to digital coronary angiograms.

19 opment of chest pain in patients with normal coronary angiograms.

20 43 786 diagnostic LHC procedures; 97.3% were coronary angiograms.

21 otal occlusions (CTO) occur in nearly 20% of coronary angiograms.

22 r three years of follow-up (30 percent fewer coronary angiograms, 15 percent fewer coronary angioplas

23 FFR(angio) measured from the coronary angiogram alone has a high sensitivity, specifi

24 Patients in group A and B had a normal coronary angiogram and a coronary flow reserve (CFR) of

25 delivery, in spite of a normal pretransplant coronary angiogram and good pancreas function.

26 ome because patients have generally a normal coronary angiogram and left ventricular dysfunction, whi

27 g data exist regarding the benefit of urgent coronary angiogram and percutaneous coronary interventio

28 e SS is a purely anatomic score based on the coronary angiogram and predicts outcome after PCI in pat

29 ll patients 18 years or older who received a coronary angiogram and transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE

30 sted of 298 unrelated patients with positive coronary angiograms and controls were 138 unrelated heal

31 cluded 988 consecutive patients who had both coronary angiograms and echocardiographic examinations i

32 ccess and transfemoral access for diagnostic coronary angiograms and percutaneous coronary interventi

33 e clinical characteristics, imaging results, coronary angiograms and revascularization outcomes were

34 se BAV registry (n=600, n=231 with available coronary angiogram) and compared with the frequency of C

35 ercise stress test, computerized tomographic coronary angiogram, and cardiovascular magnetic resonanc

36 positive stress test result (n=67) underwent coronary angiogram, and significant coronary artery dise

37 ostic test for obstructive CAD with invasive coronary angiogram as a reference standard.

38 These data suggest that using the coronary angiogram as the arbiter for the presence of LV

39 was presence of coronary culprit lesions on coronary angiograms as analyzed by independent intervent

40 baseline, early postoperative and follow-up coronary angiograms, as well as a subset of 47 patients

41 e-transplant screening with a stress test or coronary angiogram associated with any difference in maj

42 went a 64-slice coronary computed tomography coronary angiogram at the time of phlebotomy, on average

43 CAV was present in 17 (46.0%) reference coronary angiograms, at a median of 1.9 years before CCT

44 s prospectively whether patients with normal coronary angiograms but with impaired myocardial blood f

45 Although an emergency coronary angiogram (CAG) is recommended for patients who

46 Using Computed Tomography Coronary Angiogram (CTCA) data from 127 patients without

47 pants were recruited and classified based on coronary angiogram examination as control (n = 105) and

48 Compression of digital coronary angiograms facilitates playback of images and d

49 Coronary angiograms from 350 patients randomized to the

50 Coronary angiograms from 39 patients undergoing coronary

51 To examine this, we obtained posttransplant coronary angiograms from a group of patients bridged wit

52 Coronary angiograms from patients with asymptomatic AECG

53 igh negative predictive value of a normal CT coronary angiogram, however, may be useful for reliable

54 k of dissection propagation with an invasive coronary angiogram, improved CT scanner parameters, and

55 erformed by abdominal ultrasonography before coronary angiogram in 612 consecutive patients.

56 , AND PARTICIPANTS: The Emergency vs Delayed Coronary Angiogram in Survivors of Out-of-Hospital Cardi

57 s similar to what is usually expected from a coronary angiogram in the present cohort.

58 ipant change between base-line and follow-up coronary angiograms in the percent stenosis measured by

59 ng the study period, 1078 underwent emergent coronary angiogram (median age: 59.6 years, 78.3% males)

60 85-1.08), P = 0.48), while reducing invasive coronary angiograms (n = 5,720 (16%) versus 8,183 (14.9%

61 ng plasma lipids and indices of quantitative coronary angiograms obtained at baseline and 2.5 years a

62 Coronary angiograms obtained five years following revasc

63 lossy compression, a degradation of digital coronary angiograms occurs that results in decreased dia

64 The coronary angiograms of 425 patients with HCM (mean age 6

65 We retrospectively studied the coronary angiograms of 882 siblings with CAD from 401 fa

66 ith VAD and compared them to post transplant coronary angiograms of a non-VAD cohort.

67 We reviewed the medical histories and coronary angiograms of all adults <40 years of age who u

68 or older) men (54%), with either an abnormal coronary angiogram or prior MI (71%).

69 ssing creatinine values, no or an incomplete coronary angiogram, or previous dialysis.

70 , 1-, 2-, or 3-vessel disease) obtained from coronary angiograms performed no more than 1 day after t

71 access PtDA for eligible patients undergoing coronary angiogram procedures reduces decisional conflic

72 Up to 20% of all coronary angiograms reveal coronary chronic total occlus

73 In 90 patients with coronary angiograms, RT-3D had a sensitivity of 87.9% in

74 Annual coronary angiograms, serial endomyocardial biopsies, and

75 f patients with angina-like chest pain whose coronary angiograms show no evidence of obstructive coro

76 aution is warranted in the interpretation of coronary angiograms that have been subjected to lossy JP

77 In patients with clinical indications for coronary angiogram, the presence of NAFLD is associated

78 mong patients referred for their first x-ray coronary angiogram, three-dimensional coronary magnetic

79 The DJS was calculated from the coronary angiograms to quantify the myocardium at risk.

80 study included 54 patients who underwent CT coronary angiogram using a multidetector row CT scanner.

81 Coronary artery disease was graded from coronary angiograms using the Gensini score.

82 Atherosclerosis change on 2-year coronary angiograms was evaluated by a consensus panel a

83 increase in fluoroscopy time for diagnostic coronary angiograms (weighted mean difference [WMD], fix

84 ients receiving Impella 2.5 during admission coronary angiogram were identified.

85 996 through November 2010 with pretransplant coronary angiogram were included in our study.

86 Patients undergoing emergent coronary angiogram were included.

87 supported with Impella 2.5 during admission coronary angiogram were included.

88 Base-line and follow-up coronary angiograms were analyzed by quantitative corona

89 The coronary angiograms were analyzed using quantitative cor

90 Coronary angiograms were assessed by a technician blinde

91 Serial coronary angiograms were assessed for development, sever

92 Preoperative coronary angiograms were evaluated for collaterals, whic

93 Coronary angiograms were independently read by 3 reviewe

94 Fasting plasma lipids and quantitative coronary angiograms were obtained at baseline and 2.5 ye

95 plasma lipids were measured and quantitative coronary angiograms were obtained at baseline and 2.5 ye

96 All coronary angiograms were reevaluated blinded for postres

97 Coronary angiograms were retrospectively reviewed and se

98 2 without coronary risk factors) with normal coronary angiograms were studied.

99 perators performed 506 consecutive immediate coronary angiograms with primary angioplasty when approp

100 onary artery disease was evaluated by annual coronary angiograms with side-by-side comparisons.

101 Patients undergoing coronary angiogram within 4 mo after SPECT myocardial pe

102 ise testing for suspected CAD and then had a coronary angiogram within 90 days.

103 in, abnormal exercise treadmill test, normal coronary angiogram without other causes of microvascular

104 ith higher kerma-area product for diagnostic coronary angiograms (WMD, fixed effect: 1.72 Gy.cm(2), 9

105 s that NAFLD screening in patients requiring coronary angiogram would identify high-risk patients and