コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ate analysis identified donor age >40 years, coronary artery bypass, and no aspirin after LT as indep
3 on (20.6% versus 11.5%, P=0.03) and previous coronary artery bypass graft (22.1% versus 11.0%, P=0.01
4 I (24.3% versus 28.3%, P=0.001), or previous coronary artery bypass graft (4.6% versus 7.2%, P<0.001)
6 ercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) are an unintended co
7 coronary artery disease (LMCAD) treated with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or percutaneous coro
8 cutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) routinely exclude pa
10 e (CAD) had improved long-term outcomes with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery compared wit
11 orary drug-eluting stent (DES) compared with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery in patients
13 his study is to compare HCR and conventional coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery medium-term
14 ts aged 60 years or older undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery or combined
15 ss of coronary revascularization with either coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery or percutane
16 gnosis and a greater prognostic benefit from coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery than those w
20 tal knee or hip arthroplasty; spine surgery; coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery; and craniot
22 ies: abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (AAA), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), colectomy, or hip r
23 Individuals who underwent colon resection, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), lung resection, or
24 atients who underwent colectomy/proctectomy, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), pancreaticoduodenec
25 with low risk of immediate complications, or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), with improved long-
26 nce intervals, 1.02-1.03; P<0.001), previous coronary artery bypass graft (OR, 1.44; 95% confidence i
27 rcutaneous Coronary Intervention - PCI - and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft - CABG) among groups of pop
28 ive, high-risk cardiac surgery (ie, combined coronary artery bypass graft [CABG] surgery and valve re
29 elines recommend surgical revascularization (coronary artery bypass graft [CABG]) over percutaneous c
30 theterization followed by treatment (ie, 128 coronary artery bypass graft [CABG], 150 percutaneous co
32 dergone cardiothoracic intervention, such as coronary artery bypass graft and valve replacement surge
36 an skeletal muscle biopsies from a cohort of coronary artery bypass graft patients treated with eithe
37 missions Database for patients who underwent coronary artery bypass graft repair with and without LAA
40 er medical therapy alone (63% versus 21%) or coronary artery bypass graft surgery (81% versus 7%).
41 s (SVGs) occlude during the first year after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) despite aspi
42 h (SCD) in patients with heart failure after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) has not been
43 New-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) is associate
45 total of 60 patients with CAD indicated for coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) were include
48 , 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-0.67), coronary artery bypass graft surgery (n=1077; hazard rat
49 ast lumpectomy [18 018]; colectomy [14 074]; coronary artery bypass graft surgery [6378]) by an in-ne
50 However, there is paucity of data comparing coronary artery bypass graft surgery against newer gener
51 nd CSCs were isolated from vein leftovers of coronary artery bypass graft surgery and discarded atria
52 (with percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery as appropriate) plu
53 ,402 multivessel disease patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery between January 1,
56 without acute coronary syndromes or previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery in periods before (
57 had diabetes mellitus and underwent isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery or percutaneous cor
58 ischemic stroke, and revascularization with coronary artery bypass graft surgery or percutaneous cor
59 ntly more complex, both clinically (previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery prevalence, 48% ver
60 artery (RA) can improve clinical outcomes in coronary artery bypass graft surgery remains unclear.
61 nts with no acute coronary syndrome/no prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery that were rated as
62 iabetes [ejection fraction >50%]) undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery was obtained by sub
64 tal, we analyzed 253 287 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery, 7.0% of whom recei
65 aring percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and differences in
66 uitable collaterals, no smoking, no previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and left anterior
68 harvesting (EVH) should be standard care in coronary artery bypass graft surgery, but vein quality a
69 al Health Insurance Database associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery, myocardial infarct
70 ut lower rates of multivessel disease, prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery, prior MI, and smok
73 death, angiogram-confirmed angina pectoris, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, stents, and angiop
75 who underwent cardiac interventions, such as coronary artery bypass graft surgery, were also included
84 phically confirmed angina (1.91; 1.59-2.29), coronary artery bypass graft surgery/coronary angioplast
85 mained at higher risk for repeat procedures (coronary artery bypass graft surgery: 10.7% versus 6.8%,
86 for target vessel or target lesion failure (coronary artery bypass graft surgery: 8.9% versus 3.9%,
87 ive atrial fibrillation within 30 days after coronary artery bypass graft was 2 of 30 patients (7%) i
88 acute coronary syndromes patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft were prospectively screened
90 trial that enrolled patients with a previous coronary artery bypass graft who had developed at least
91 death resulting from CVD, heart failure, or coronary artery bypass graft) over a 26-year median foll
92 ation (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft) was performed during index
93 farction, unstable and stable angina, recent coronary artery bypass graft, and peripheral arterial di
94 resection, abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, coronary artery bypass graft, aortic valve replacement,
95 1 patients aged 60 years or older undergoing coronary artery bypass graft, aortic valve surgery, mitr
96 underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, coronary artery bypass graft, or colon resection for neo
98 tes of PCI failure or complication requiring coronary artery bypass grafting (0.67 [0.56-0.79], P<0.0
99 lectomy (189229 patients at 1876 hospitals), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (218940 patients
100 after the procedure between on- and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (n = 6; low SOE),
101 ending within 90-days of discharge following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and aortic valve
102 n with percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and its long-term
103 acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and history of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are at high risk
104 re, and coronary artery disease suitable for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are at higher ris
105 Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are considered re
106 ved ejection fraction in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are limited and i
108 omly assigned to undergo off-pump or on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) at 12 centers in
109 nd MV replacement and repair with or without coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) between 2007 and
110 tality by race group for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) between 2011 and
111 coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) compared with asp
112 telet therapy (DAPT) in patients who undergo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) following acute c
114 h left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been the stan
115 ts with multivessel coronary artery disease, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has shown long-te
116 ercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with
117 st-generation paclitaxel-eluting stents with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with
118 mited data regarding long-term results after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in young adults.
119 (DM) and multivessel coronary disease (MVD), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is superior to pe
123 unclear whether revascularization by either coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous c
125 d data on outcomes of patients with previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) presenting with S
130 arization and reduced survival with off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery compared
131 cutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery in the EX
132 omized trial data support the superiority of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery over perc
134 isease) trial demonstrated that, on average, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was superior to p
135 th from randomized trials that have compared coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with percutaneous
136 the current outcomes of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with prior surgic
137 regate costs: 30% in Colectomy (COL), 22% in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), 19% in Total Hip
138 nal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair, colectomy, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), hip or knee repl
139 percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), on long-term out
140 cular (LV) biopsies from patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), only the activat
149 inically significant bleeding not related to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG; major, minor, or
150 CABG from the European Multicenter Study on Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (E-CABG) registry betwee
151 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.60-0.69) or coronary artery bypass grafting (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95%
152 tio, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.59-0.79]; P<0.0001) and coronary artery bypass grafting (hazard ratio, 0.61 [95%
153 ment (HFpEF(AVR), n=5; and HFrEF(AVR), n=4), coronary artery bypass grafting (HFpEF(CABG), n=5; and H
154 -main disease who underwent primary isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (MAG, n = 5580; LITA+SVG
155 ty of Thoracic Surgeons composite rating for coronary artery bypass grafting (STS-CABG), and Centers
156 y (1.85; 95% CI, 1.33-2.58) and lowest after coronary artery bypass grafting + mitral valve surgery (
157 ith CAD requiring surgical intervention (CAD-coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG]) and those who di
158 (percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI] or coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG]) or optimal medic
159 on adjusted OR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.73 to 0.75) (coronary artery bypass grafting adjusted OR: 0.61; 95% C
160 no clear guidelines on the use of the RA in coronary artery bypass grafting after its catheterizatio
161 s showed that a higher number of years since coronary artery bypass grafting and >1 target saphenous
162 cribes 20-year results of RA grafts used for coronary artery bypass grafting and the effects of RA re
166 s should be maximized in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting because they have excell
167 oderate and 174 (1.87%) TIMI major/minor non-coronary artery bypass grafting bleeding events occurred
170 ly enrolled 113 patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting for cross-sectional stud
171 ternal mammary artery (BIMA) conduits during coronary artery bypass grafting have better long-term su
173 ring treatment that has been shown to reduce coronary artery bypass grafting in a blinded, randomized
174 alysis of the GOPCABE trial (German Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Elderly Patients) rev
175 ns about competitive flow and the benefit of coronary artery bypass grafting in intermediate LAD sten
176 ial infarction is an indication for emergent coronary artery bypass grafting in patients not amenable
177 antly higher risk of mortality and emergency coronary artery bypass grafting in patients treated by n
179 ader spectrum of patients who are undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting in routine practice.
180 ary surgical AVR with or without concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting in Sweden between 1995 a
181 Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in the treatment of unpr
182 ostoperative atrial fibrillation (pAF) after coronary artery bypass grafting is a common complication
184 of a third arterial conduit in patients with coronary artery bypass grafting is not associated with h
185 n (HCR) combines minimally invasive surgical coronary artery bypass grafting of the left anterior des
186 ied, having a primary diagnosis of emergency coronary artery bypass grafting or valve replacement, an
187 as built upon a hierarchical segmentation of coronary artery bypass grafting procedures and a cued-re
189 issions Reduction Program formula using only coronary artery bypass grafting readmissions with a 3% m
192 retrospective analysis of 47 984 consecutive coronary artery bypass grafting surgeries performed from
194 nnaire (SAQ) and angiographic findings after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG) are lacki
195 cutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG) on mortal
196 us Vein Graft Patency in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery) investigated wh
198 We randomly assigned 304 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting using BITA to either in
199 ween percutaneous coronary interventions and coronary artery bypass grafting using either coronary co
202 , patient-level mortality rates for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting were consistently lower
203 ndomized clinical trial, patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with an internal mammary
204 th low ejection fraction who were undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary byp
205 o 40% and scheduled for isolated or combined coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary byp
206 who underwent primary, isolated multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting with the left internal t
207 studies comparing the long-term outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting with the use of 2-arteri
208 tus by percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting within 7 days of the ind
209 with multivessel disease who are undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting without increased mortal
210 eficiaries who underwent elective colectomy, coronary artery bypass grafting, abdominal aortic aneury
211 primary percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, and medical therapy, re
212 l artery (RA) is a commonly used conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting, and recent studies have
213 jury in percutaneous coronary interventions, coronary artery bypass grafting, and reperfused acute my
214 ubgroup analysis of patients undergoing only coronary artery bypass grafting, and results were simila
215 impact on the function of RA grafts used in coronary artery bypass grafting, and there is now compre
216 cohort study included patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting, and/or aortic, mitral o
217 spanic, and Asian Medicare beneficiaries for coronary artery bypass grafting, colectomy, total hip ar
218 er 30, 2018: total knee or hip arthroplasty, coronary artery bypass grafting, colectomy, ventral hern
219 lve replacement and aortic valve replacement+coronary artery bypass grafting, extensive updating usin
220 ve criteria: a history of previous PCI or of coronary artery bypass grafting, or documentation of ang
221 nditions, and in-hospital procedures such as coronary artery bypass grafting, percutaneous coronary i
222 oviding a treatment recommendation, that is, coronary artery bypass grafting, percutaneous coronary i
225 f 283,131 patients who were readmitted after coronary artery bypass grafting, to 142,142 (83.2%) of 1
226 Secondary end points included emergency coronary artery bypass grafting, vascular complications,
227 utaneous coronary intervention, or equipoise coronary artery bypass grafting-percutaneous coronary in
228 their performance to predict adjudicated non-coronary artery bypass grafting-related GUSTO (Global Us
252 coronary artery disease that was amenable to coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) and who had a lef
253 ral internal thoracic (mammary) arteries for coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) may improve long-
256 porary drug-eluting stents, as compared with coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG), in patients with
259 ronary chronic total occlusions (CTOs) after coronary artery bypass grafts (CABGs) is higher than in
261 e invasive management in patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafts presenting with non-ST ele
262 cardiac surgery, especially the presence of coronary artery bypass grafts, is thought to preclude pe
264 utaneous coronary intervention (28%), urgent coronary artery bypass surgery (27.5%), maternal mortali
265 rovide recommendations for optimal timing of coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) in patients with n
266 s coronary intervention (PCI) With Taxus and coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG)] score is a decisi
267 ry revascularization (HCR) combines arterial coronary artery bypass surgery (most commonly minimally
268 y intervention in patients with a history of coronary artery bypass surgery (PCI-CABG) is limited and
270 lacks and 136,362 whites undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass surgery at 663 Society of Thoraci
271 X]; NCT00114972; Evaluation of XIENCE Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left
272 2007) and EXCEL (Evaluation of XIENCE Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left
273 andomized EXCEL (Evaluation of XIENCE versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left
274 andomized EXCEL (Evaluation of XIENCE versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left
276 hes), and EXCEL (Evaluation of XIENCE versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left
277 ry in the EXCEL (Evaluation of XIENCE versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left
278 e SYNTAX scores.(Evaluation of XIENCE versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left
279 The EXCEL trial (Evaluation of XIENCE Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left
281 high SYNTAX (TAXUS Drug-Eluting Stent Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for the Treatment of Narr
282 the SYNTAX (TAXUS Drug-Eluting Stent Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for the Treatment of Narr
283 YNTAX Study: TAXUS Drug-Eluting Stent Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for the Treatment of Narr
284 YNTAX Study: TAXUS Drug-Eluting Stent Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for the Treatment of Narr
285 have reported that black patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery had worse outcomes than w
287 rhythm was performed in 185 patients during coronary artery bypass surgery of whom 13 had a history
290 of procedural mortality and morbidity after coronary artery bypass surgery were higher among black p
294 the readmitted patients, 13% had PCI, 2% had coronary artery bypass surgery, and 3% died during the r
295 se of previously cannulated RAs as grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery, and there are no clear g
298 eripheral vascular disease, absence of prior coronary artery bypass surgery, angina, low body mass in
299 ng percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass surgery, or valve surgery be refe
300 acute myocardial infarction hospitalization; coronary artery bypass surgery; heart valve repair/repla