ライフサイエンスコーパス: coronary artery stenosis

1 y artery calcium score (CACS) for predicting coronary artery stenosis.

2 in the diagnosis of left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis.

3 in the normal heart and in the presence of a coronary artery stenosis.

4 etween patients with different severities of coronary artery stenosis.

5 artifacts may hinder estimation of degree of coronary artery stenosis.

6 risk with significant unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis.

7 ularization method for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis.

8 aring PCI and CABG for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis.

9 to ischemia in myocardium subject to severe coronary artery stenosis.

10 nostic accuracy for functional assessment of coronary artery stenosis.

11 nostic accuracy for functional assessment of coronary artery stenosis.

12 cardial ischemia at rest secondary to severe coronary artery stenosis.

13 was determined by the presence and extent of coronary artery stenosis.

14 e alternative to ICA to rule out obstructive coronary artery stenosis.

15 d for detection and exclusion of obstructive coronary artery stenosis.

16 (PES) or sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) for coronary artery stenosis.

17 significantly underestimate the severity of coronary artery stenosis.

18 onary atherosclerotic plaque and significant coronary artery stenosis.

19 ver, may be useful for reliable exclusion of coronary artery stenosis.

20 underwent 90% proximal left circumflex (LCx) coronary artery stenosis.

21 and systolic thickening in the presence of a coronary artery stenosis.

22 the absence of angiographically significant coronary artery stenosis.

23 Thus, it may reflect the severity of the coronary artery stenosis.

24 lters coronary perfusion in canine models of coronary artery stenosis.

25 al region during exercise in the presence of coronary artery stenosis.

26 women with chest pain but without epicardial coronary artery stenosis.

27 rmal value, and is independent of epicardial coronary artery stenosis.

28 erial inflow or when flow is restricted by a coronary artery stenosis.

29 ften occur at sites of angiographically mild coronary-artery stenosis.

30 ) is an index used to assess the severity of coronary-artery stenosis.

31 Both the absence of significant coronary artery stenosis (73 of 103 patients) and nonsig

32 lar sensitivity for left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis (88%, 79% and 100%, respectivel

33 exercise in the presence of a flow-limiting coronary artery stenosis, acts to counterbalance vascula

34 infused during exercise in the presence of a coronary artery stenosis after LNNA administration, idaz

35 ECT currently has a limited role in clinical coronary artery stenosis and atherosclerosis imaging.

36 The detection and characterization of coronary artery stenosis and atherosclerosis using imagi

37 ied in an open-chest dog model with critical coronary artery stenosis and deep vessel wall injury.

38 anatomy, and techniques of assessing native coronary artery stenosis and flow are close to being cli

39 It is a disease that occurs as a result of coronary artery stenosis and is caused by the lack of ox

40 clinical significance of CACS in predicting coronary artery stenosis and its severity.

41 am, the presence of NAFLD is associated with coronary artery stenosis and need for coronary intervent

42 -146e; n=9 critical left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis), and hemodynamic responses wer

43 99.9%, and 99.9% for any plaque, obstructive coronary artery stenosis, and the composite outcome of a

44 efined by intimal thickness (ultrasound) and coronary artery stenosis (angiographic); and incidence a

45 ams, more physiological methods of assessing coronary artery stenosis are being investigated.

46 CT technology yields only modest accuracy of coronary artery stenosis assessment in severely calcifie

47 ring treadmill exercise in the presence of a coronary artery stenosis before and during infusion of t

48 te prognostic value for the determination of coronary artery stenosis but not for discriminating betw

49 oes exert a flow-limiting effect distal to a coronary artery stenosis but that this action is counter

50 observed in 8 (53%) of 15 segments with >20% coronary artery stenosis by QCA but also in 12 (15%) of

51 Chronic coronary artery stenosis can lead to regional myocardial

52 data, PR (mean +/- SD) decreased stepwise as coronary artery stenosis (CAS) severity increased: 2.42

53 cardiac nerves on the response to 90-minute coronary artery stenosis (CAS), which reduced coronary b

54 For grading coronary artery stenosis, correlation was 0.64 for singl

55 Coronary artery stenosis defined by angiography was clas

56 s has confirmed the feasibility of real-time coronary artery stenosis detection supporting the decisi

57 d at confirming the feasibility of real-time coronary artery stenosis detection using deep learning m

58 Area under the curve for different levels of coronary artery stenosis did not have sufficient sensiti

59 after creation of a left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis, endothelial injury, thrombus f

60 T abnormalities were severity (p < 0.001) of coronary artery stenosis, followed by total exercise dur

61 They also had a greater prevalence of coronary artery stenosis greater than 50% (PR, 1.48 [CI,

62 tion series were independently evaluated for coronary artery stenosis greater than 50%, and their dia

63 evels were categorized as MINOCA (absence of coronary artery stenosis >50% and confirmed or suspected

64 the incidence of significant CAD defined as coronary artery stenosis >50% on angiography, abnormal c

65 r association with diagnostic test findings (coronary artery stenosis >50% on coronary computed tomog

66 lloon pump, prolonged bypass time, left main coronary artery stenosis >50%, and a surgeon's impressio

67 e-vessel disease, and 20 (30%) had left main coronary artery stenosis >50%.

68 phy angiography (CTA) may be used to exclude coronary artery stenosis >=50% in patients with NSTEACS.

69 ly accurate for the exclusion of significant coronary artery stenosis (>50% luminal narrowing), with

70 f the -407G > C polymorphism had significant coronary artery stenosis (>75%) at a younger age than th

71 was the ability of coronary CTA to rule out coronary artery stenosis (>=50% stenosis) in the entire

72 nt of patients with significant (> or = 50%) coronary artery stenosis had SPECT abnormalities, wherea

73 Angiographic severity of coronary artery stenosis has historically been the prima

74 erize its capacity to assess the severity of coronary artery stenosis in a canine model in vivo and e

75 for the detection of significant obstructive coronary artery stenosis in a population with a high pre

76 remic physiologic marker for the severity of coronary artery stenosis in humans.

77 cular ischaemia, portal vein thrombosis, and coronary artery stenosis in one patient each.

78 maging have improved the ability to identify coronary artery stenosis in patients with KD, yet knowle

79 There was no increased incidence of right coronary artery stenosis in patients with paradoxical si

80 cardia oxygenation in the presence of severe coronary artery stenosis in swine.

81 Coronary artery stenosis increased quantitatively with a

82 Coronary artery stenosis is a narrowing of coronary lume

83 tudy sought to examine to what extent native coronary artery stenosis is accompanied by vessel wall t

84 cle, the region subtended by the most severe coronary artery stenosis (Isc), and remote myocardium su

85 ed thoracic aortitis with carotid occlusion, coronary artery stenosis, ischemic stroke, myocardial in

86 ed to assess the significance of a left main coronary artery stenosis (LMCS).

87 osis > or =70%), and 250 controls had normal coronary arteries (stenosis <10%).

88 wine with a chronic left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis (n=26).

89 tion of ISCAD with clinical outcomes-namely, coronary artery stenosis, obstructive coronary artery di

90 years) with severe stenosis of at least one coronary artery (stenosis of >70 percent of the vessel d

91 were associated with a greater prevalence of coronary artery stenosis of >/=50%.

92 orting angina at 1 year had a residual major coronary artery stenosis of >=70%.

93 were aged 18 years or older, had one or more coronary artery stenosis of 50% or greater in a native c

94 t of multivessel as opposed to single-vessel coronary artery stenosis on myocardial contrast defects

95 Patients with varying degrees of coronary artery stenosis on quantitative angiography und

96 en and women and those with either > or =50% coronary artery stenosis or no CAD.

97 ain and/or proximal left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.20-1.54) w

98 cantly different between different levels of coronary artery stenosis (P<0.001) and there was a signi

99 natinib because of cerebrovascular ischemia, coronary artery stenosis, persistent rash, elevated live

100 severity score (r=0.11, P<0.004) and maximum coronary artery stenosis (r=0.11, P<0.003).

101 ogs, a severe left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery stenosis resulted in a 54.3% mean flow r

102 specificity was 67% for detecting > or = 75% coronary artery stenosis (sensitivity was 44% and specif

103 specificity was 76% for detecting > or = 75% coronary artery stenosis (sensitivity was 53% and specif

104 erior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary artery stenosis, sensitivity was 84%, 86%, and

105 sk scores, coronary artery calcium score, or coronary artery stenosis severity.

106 nstriction restricted blood flow distal to a coronary artery stenosis that resulted in myocardial hyp

107 ng exercise in normal hearts and distal to a coronary artery stenosis that results in myocardial hypo

108 siology index used to assess the severity of coronary artery stenosis to guide revascularization.

109 ng a stent in a single, previously untreated coronary-artery stenosis (vessel diameter, 2.5 to 3.75 m

110 A left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis was created in 13 pigs and main

111 In nine pigs, a left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis was created to reduce flow rese

112 A severe left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis was created to reduce resting f

113 r discriminating between different levels of coronary artery stenosis was determined using receiver o

114 Coronary artery stenosis was estimated on ICAs based on

115 In protocol III, coronary artery stenosis was induced by a stenosis in th

116 Progressive left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis was induced by an ameroid occlu

117 Coronary artery stenosis was judged as obstructive when

118 tamine stress echocardiography when a single coronary artery stenosis was present (> or = 50% diamete

119 At 20 weeks, coronary artery stenosis was significantly greater in D-

120 ause patients with diabetes have more severe coronary artery stenosis, we hypothesized that graft pat

121 e test response for left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis were 36% and 51% for exercise c

122 The levels of coronary artery stenosis were determined in reference to

123 Individuals with >=50% epicardial coronary artery stenosis were excluded.

124 ion for physiologically guided assessment of coronary-artery stenosis were randomly assigned to under

125 ual autopsy diagnoses, including 32 cases of coronary artery stenosis, were identified solely by mult

126 th MBIR is valuable in detecting significant coronary artery stenosis with a solid reduction of radia

127 ated through severe left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis with coronary flow reductions o

128 symptomatic aortic stenosis and at least one coronary-artery stenosis with a fractional flow reserve