ライフサイエンスコーパス: coronary risk factor

1 with altered PAI-1 levels and proposed as a coronary risk factor.

2 up of 20 patients, 15 (75%) had at least one coronary risk factor.

3 ffee may lower the risk of diabetes, a major coronary risk factor.

4 se are associated with changes in modifiable coronary risk factors.

5 nd all-cause death compared with traditional coronary risk factors.

6 ot differ within subgroups of men defined by coronary risk factors.

7 ity is attenuated by associations with other coronary risk factors.

8 isk of CHD also extends to men with multiple coronary risk factors.

9 tivity with CHD risk and the impact of other coronary risk factors.

10 Little of this is explained by known coronary risk factors.

11 pulation in a manner independent of multiple coronary risk factors.

12 nt risk in asymptomatic adults with multiple coronary risk factors.

13 h preexisting heart disease or altered other coronary risk factors.

14 ckness and plaque score independent of known coronary risk factors.

15 ho had died suddenly and also analyzed their coronary risk factors.

16 rter of this gradient could be attributed to coronary risk factors.

17 aterially altered after control for nonlipid coronary risk factors.

18 show long-time effects of in utero smoke on coronary risk factors.

19 4.54 (95% CI, 1.65 to 12.44), independent of coronary risk factors.

20 increased risk of SCD after controlling for coronary risk factors.

21 lipid exposure after age 35 years and other coronary risk factors.

22 y heart disease independently of traditional coronary risk factors.

23 ngly related to CHD, mediated by established coronary risk factors.

24 incident CHD that is incremental to measured coronary risk factors.

25 e value for coronary outcomes above standard coronary risk factors.

26 ary calcification that were not explained by coronary risk factors.

27 vitamin B12 among women with CVD or > or =3 coronary risk factors.

28 significant after accounting for traditional coronary risk factors.

29 ine BP, as well as those with no traditional coronary risk factors.

30 ired in individuals with atherosclerosis and coronary risk factors.

31 erially changed after adjustment for several coronary risk factors.

32 rkers of inflammation, and with some classic coronary risk factors.

33 lso existed in patients without CAD but with coronary risk factors.

34 variate analysis adjusting for several other coronary risk factors (0.1 to 4.9 g/d: RR 0.72 [95% CI 0

35 nterval (CI) 0.49-1.42) after adjustment for coronary risk factors (1 cup = 237 ml).

36 10 years), women (84% versus 66%), had fewer coronary risk factors (1.1+/-1.0 versus 1.6+/-1.1), lowe

37 Current hormone users with coronary risk factors (69 percent of the women) had the

38 cholesterol >/= 160 mg/dL with fewer than 2 coronary risk factors, a low-density lipoprotein cholest

39 Changes in coronary risk factors accounted for 66% (95% confidence

40 Changes in modifiable coronary risk factors accounted for 66% of the decline i

41 We examined the relations of classic coronary risk factors, adiposity and its associated meta

42 g dipyridamole hyperemia in 36 patients with coronary risk factors (age, 55+/-10 years) and in 36 age

43 sociated low 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels with coronary risk factors and adverse cardiovascular outcome

44 lar relationships with regard to traditional coronary risk factors and angiographic CAD in premenopau

45 We undertook an analysis of weight cycling, coronary risk factors and angiographic coronary artery d

46 hetic stimulus is altered in the presence of coronary risk factors and CAD and appears to reflect end

47 C frequently coexist and are associated with coronary risk factors and CAD in the elderly.

48 f CVD (linear trend, P=0.049) independent of coronary risk factors and current DBP.

49 e older (63 years vs. 59 years) and had more coronary risk factors and evidence of coronary artery di

50 ired in individuals with atherosclerosis and coronary risk factors and improves with risk reduction t

51 0.75-1.64) after adjustment for some classic coronary risk factors and indicators of socioeconomic st

52 roportion of adults have multiple borderline coronary risk factors and may benefit from treatment.

53 d our control group as well as patients with coronary risk factors and normal perfusion demonstrated

54 After controlling for coronary risk factors and other fatty acids, including l

55 ssure elevation after age 35 years and other coronary risk factors and participant characteristics.

56 ents, carotid IMT is associated with classic coronary risk factors and with nadir CD4 count < or =200

57 We also studied 15 control subjects with no coronary risk factors and/or unobstructed coronary arter

58 ealth behaviors, general physical condition, coronary risk factors, and dietary habits.

59 After adjustment for age, standard coronary risk factors, and dietary intake of linoleic ac

60 ychosocial work environment, social support, coronary risk factors, and physical height.

61 without CKD, which was matched for age, sex, coronary risk factors, and systemic hemodynamics (n = 42

62 prehypertension, its association with other coronary risk factors, and the risk for incident cardiov

63 potential confounders, including traditional coronary risk factors, anthropometric factors, dietary i

64 When coronary risk factors are also taken into consideration,

65 Adjustment for lipids and other coronary risk factors as well as randomized aspirin assi

66 We measured coronary risk factors at each survey and estimated the r

67 eased risk of future MI independent of other coronary risk factors, atherogenic factors such as lipid

68 effects of actual investments made to change coronary risk factors between 1981 and 1990, as well as

69 d in asymptomatic individuals with a greater coronary risk factor burden.

70 years of education explained by established coronary risk factors but not by job strain or social su

71 ls, and coronary vasomotion in patients with coronary risk factors but with angiographically normal c

72 t rest and during hyperemia in patients with coronary risk factors but without CAD.

73 or evidence of coronary disease, we assessed coronary risk factors, calculated Framingham risk of a c

74 er socioeconomic differences in a variety of coronary risk factors can be accounted for by change in

75 After adjustment for age, smoking, and other coronary risk factors, cataract extraction was significa

76 further benefits would result if the classic coronary risk factors could be reduced to primordial lev

77 ume, and fasting concentrations of metabolic coronary risk factors did not differ between the groups

78 Further adjustment for other coronary risk factors did not substantially modify the a

79 ed aspirin and beta carotene assignment, and coronary risk factors, dietary fish intake was associate

80 f their strong associations with established coronary risk factors, eg, high blood pressure and high

81 r multivariable adjustment for age, sex, and coronary risk factors, exercise-induced NSVT was not sig

82 are demonstrated in individuals with either coronary risk factors for coronary artery disease or dif

83 hird, a low HDL frequently accompanies other coronary risk factors (for example, insulin resistance,

84 Elderly patients with coronary risk factors frequently require treatment with

85 In others whose affected relative had coronary risk factors (group B, n=24), FMD was also only

86 Participants with at least 1 coronary risk factor (>45 years) underwent computed tomo

87 est-practice interventions to reduce classic coronary risk factors, if successfully implemented in bo

88 s aged >or=40 y (n = 5442) with CVD or >or=3 coronary risk factors in 1998 (after folic acid fortific

89 nary artery calcification is associated with coronary risk factors in older adults.

90 Coronary risk factors included drug-treated hypertension

91 ht loss of at least 10 lbs at least 3 times--coronary risk factors including core laboratory determin

92 ietary intervention trial, the Special Turku Coronary Risk Factor Intervention Project (STRIP), for d

93 longitudinal sample (from the Special Turku Coronary Risk Factor Intervention Project [STRIP] study)

94 The Special Turku Coronary Risk Factor Intervention Project for Children (

95 In the Special Turku Coronary Risk Factor Intervention Project for Children (

96 The Special Turku Coronary Risk Factor Intervention Project is a 20-year i

97 derived from the longitudinal Special Turku Coronary Risk Factor Intervention Project study.

98 k Development in Young Adults, Special Turku Coronary Risk Factor Intervention Project) from the Unit

99 hrough January 2018 within the Special Turku Coronary Risk Factor Intervention Project, a randomized,

100 neous adjustment for lipids and a variety of coronary risk factors, LDL particle diameter was no long

101 Height and standard coronary risk factors made smaller contributions.

102 Additional contributions were made by coronary risk factors--mainly smoking--and from factors

103 esting that immunodeficiency and traditional coronary risk factors may contribute to atherosclerosis.

104 th aggressive management of other modifiable coronary risk factors, may improve cardiovascular diseas

105 After adjusting for known coronary risk factors, MBF responses to CPT revealed a n

106 Subjects (197 men, 187 women) had coronary risk factors measured in childhood (mean age 15

107 resence of coronary artery calcification and coronary risk factors measured in childhood and young ad

108 Coronary risk factors measured in children and young adu

109 African Americans had more coronary risk factors, more markers of poor outcome afte

110 However, in normal controls without coronary risk factors (n = 22), the epicardial LA increa

111 +/- 23.5%) during CPT, whereas patients with coronary risk factors (n = 34) revealed a decrease of ep

112 o 73 years old (15 women, 14 men) who had no coronary risk factors, no history of coronary artery dis

113 that sex differences exist in the effect of coronary risk factors on vascular risk.

114 whether it could be explained by established coronary risk factors or psychosocial factors.

115 ein cholesterol >/= 130 mg/dL with 2 or more coronary risk factors, or with documented CAD were inclu

116 with no or one calcium deposit and no or one coronary risk factor other than diabetes, multiple (> or

117 of the coronary circulation associated with coronary risk factors, possibly reflecting developing co

118 vel was observed in patients with the fewest coronary risk factors present, suggesting that control o

119 The demographic characteristics and coronary risk factor profiles of persons with previously

120 We evaluated standard coronary risk factors, quantified coronary calcium mass

121 Each group was subdivided by coronary risk factors (RFs).

122 ic heart disease or diabetes plus additional coronary risk factor(s), in which effects on platelet re

123 y between blacks and whites, mean Framingham coronary risk factor scores were identical in black and

124 Three major coronary risk factors-serum cholesterol level, blood pre

125 d ischemic time, delayed graft function, and coronary risk factors showed that differences did not re

126 was reduced after adjustment for established coronary risk factors (smoking, body mass index, alcohol

127 diabetes had more severe chronic HF and more coronary risk factors than patients without diabetes.

128 ipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels were the coronary risk factors that showed the strongest associat

129 had antecedent exposure to one or more major coronary risk factors, that angiographic findings may va

130 Indications for TEE, coronary risk factors, the incidence of reduced left ven

131 After adjustment for the DHA level and coronary risk factors, the mercury levels in the patient

132 After adjustment for coronary risk factors, the multivariate odds ratios for

133 After adjustment for coronary risk factors, the relative risks of CVD were 0.

134 After adjustment for these and other coronary risk factors, the RR was 1.64 (95% CI, 0.97 to

135 In fully adjusted models for coronary risk factors, the RRs and 95% CIs were 1.00, 1.

136 Finally, among men with multiple coronary risk factors, those expending >/=4,200 kJ/wk ha

137 sectional population study of 485 women with coronary risk factors undergoing coronary angiography fo

138 Although the prevalence of most of the coronary risk factors varied significantly between black

139 ing for age, smoking, and a variety of other coronary risk factors, vitamin C supplement use was asso

140 rolling for current blood pressure and other coronary risk factors, we found that previous 2-year cha

141 gnment, antihypertensive medication use, and coronary risk factors, we found that systolic blood pres

142 ent for age, smoking, and a variety of other coronary risk factors, we observed a modest significant

143 sted for age, smoking, and other established coronary risk factors were 0.70 (0.48 to 1.03) for fish

144 ve protein levels were measured and baseline coronary risk factors were collected.

145 Coronary artery calcification and coronary risk factors were compared in 199 type 1 diabet

146 Standard coronary risk factors were generally related to both CAC

147 Coronary risk factors were measured in a subset of 2003

148 f age with cardiovascular disease or > or =3 coronary risk factors were randomized.

149 deposits with diabetes or multiple (> or =2) coronary risk factors were significantly associated with

150 r, with either a history of CVD or 3 or more coronary risk factors, were enrolled in a randomized, do

151 existing cardiovascular disease or 3 or more coronary risk factors, were randomly assigned to receive

152 Patients without coronary risk factors who comprised our control group as

153 laboratories in 95 premenopausal women with coronary risk factors who were enrolled in the National

154 ercholesterolemia, 8 smokers, and 22 without coronary risk factors) with normal coronary angiograms w

155 es, 30 asymptomatic subjects with comparable coronary risk factors without CAD or a family history of