戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 regulatory elements to be identified through cross-species comparisons .
2 ovel genome-scale metric designed to support cross-species comparison.
3  neighborhood, advanced querying options and cross-species comparison.
4 functionally important 3' UTR motifs without cross-species comparison.
5  Barley1 exemplar sequences, thus, enhancing cross-species comparison.
6 ytical approach to gene recognition based on cross-species comparison.
7 such analyses and to examine the outcomes of cross-species comparison.
8  with annotated reference genomes to support cross species comparisons.
9 and M. musculus, 35 organs overlap, allowing cross-species comparisons.
10 robe differences between them would confound cross-species comparisons.
11  and most terrestrial arthropods-restricting cross-species comparisons.
12  will facilitate reverse genetics as well as cross-species comparisons.
13 ss species, making them reliable targets for cross-species comparisons.
14 s of teaching provides welcome reframing for cross-species comparisons.
15 Basic Local Alignment Search Tool search for cross-species comparisons.
16 mpt targeted analysis in model organisms and cross-species comparisons.
17 mouse forebrain sample specimen to allow for cross-species comparisons.
18 ion of features within a genomic region, and cross-species comparisons.
19 ll-defined ontologies that enable meaningful cross-species comparisons.
20 defined and therefore remain problematic for cross-species comparisons.
21 ded detection of micro-exons and human-mouse cross-species comparisons.
22 xa is critical to accurate and comprehensive cross-species comparisons.
23 of utilizing conserved human cDNA probes for cross-species comparisons.
24 five parasite species and provides tools for cross-species comparisons.
25 es offer a solution to facilitating reliable cross-species comparisons.
26 cs tools that facilitate gene prediction and cross- species comparisons.
27 tems following the time-honored tradition of cross-species comparisons.(6)(,)(7) The C. elegans conne
28  Coupled with these gene expression studies, cross-species comparison (a technique used to search for
29 t updates to BRM for miRNA data analysis and cross-species comparisons across datasets.
30                                              Cross-species comparisons allow for the identification o
31                                          Our cross-species comparisons among humans, monkeys, pigs an
32                            We demonstrate by cross-species comparison and by chromatin immunoprecipit
33                                              Cross-species comparison and prediction of gene expressi
34     Improved search and display tools, wider cross-species comparisons and extended ontologies are so
35 nhuman animals on cognitive tasks complicate cross-species comparisons and interpreting results on th
36  within extensive regions of DNA by means of cross-species comparison, and de novo determination of t
37         In particular the method facilitates cross-species comparisons, and enables the handling of n
38 level models, developing new tools, enabling cross-species comparisons, and fostering interdisciplina
39 ecies will facilitate hypothesis generation, cross-species comparisons, annotation of genomes, and an
40                                     However, cross-species comparisons are missing on site-specific e
41                       They can be applied to cross-species comparisons as well as to the study of chr
42  non-redundant Barley1 exemplar sequences or cross-species comparison at the genome level, respective
43                                     However, cross-species comparisons at single-cell resolution rema
44                                Finally, in a cross-species comparison between Ae. aegypti and Anophel
45                                We employed a cross-species comparison between boron stress-sensitive
46 and peptidome of human EECs and to provide a cross-species comparison between humans and mice.
47                                     Finally, cross-species comparisons between Ciona and the mouse ev
48 cribe a challenge to the animal model and to cross-species comparisons by considering the case of the
49 ly sequenced prokaryotic genomes facilitates cross-species comparisons by genomic annotation algorith
50 tes biological insight by enabling effective cross-species comparisons, by linking neural structure w
51 owed how integrating CRISPR-Cas9 system with cross-species comparison can help to uncover the functio
52                                              Cross-species comparisons can reveal both conserved func
53                                      We make cross-species comparisons, describe how the relevant cog
54  this claim and present arguments based upon cross-species comparisons, EEG findings, and development
55                                 We performed cross-species comparison, explored regulatory pathways,
56                                              Cross-species comparisons focusing on individual organs
57 ges in RNA abundance on the proteome, and by cross-species comparison for identifying conserved or un
58                                          The cross-species comparison has facilitated the identificat
59  (AS) is pervasive in mammalian genomes, yet cross-species comparisons have been largely restricted t
60 hron progenitor and precursor cells, whereas cross-species comparisons have markedly enhanced our und
61                                            A cross-species comparison identified deeply conserved ste
62                      Microarray analysis and cross-species comparisons identified two conserved gene
63  that p.N314D is a common human variant, and cross-species comparisons implicate D314 as the ancestra
64                   Reranking gene models with cross-species comparison improves gene prediction accura
65        This study also highlights the use of cross-species comparisons in genetic screens to interrog
66                                              Cross-species comparison indicates that 81 families are
67 s Lepidium (Brassicaceae) is well suited for cross-species comparisons investigating the origin of co
68                                              Cross-species comparisons narrowed the activity of the S
69 tivated research into network alignment: the cross-species comparison of conserved functional modules
70                                 We performed cross-species comparison of genetic requirements for sur
71  between human and murine DN, we performed a cross-species comparison of glomerular transcriptional n
72                                              Cross-species comparison of host cells uncovered Oculina
73                                            A cross-species comparison of open chromatin during preimp
74                                              Cross-species comparison of proteomes revealed higher mo
75 istics reported here permit the first direct cross-species comparison of putative homologous ganglion
76 umans and mice and applies this to achieve a cross-species comparison of SCD effects on the mammalian
77  variations among individual cells; however, cross-species comparison of scRNA-seq profiles is challe
78                                 To perform a cross-species comparison of selection on codon usage, wh
79             Similar to the way BLAST enables cross-species comparison of sequence data, tools that en
80              Icebear also facilitates direct cross-species comparison of single-cell expression profi
81                                              Cross-species comparison of Suv4-20h2-depleted murine or
82 d reciprocal BLAST, we conducted a fly-human cross-species comparison of the phosphoinositide-3-kinas
83 grams presages the possibility of systematic cross-species comparison of the two genomes as a powerfu
84                                            A cross-species comparison of this complex structure with
85                                              Cross-species comparison of transcriptomes is important
86 plant species permits detailed discovery and cross-species comparison of transposable elements (TEs)
87                                              Cross-species comparison of UVR-responsive differentiall
88                                              Cross-species comparison of zebrafish, mouse, and human
89 of the amygdala in emotional learning and in cross-species comparisons of emotional behavior.
90 n analysis of human brain and the utility of cross-species comparisons of gene expression.
91 binding proteins of S. pneumoniae or in many cross-species comparisons of gene loci.
92                                              Cross-species comparisons of gene neighborhoods (also ca
93                                     To date, cross-species comparisons of genetic interactomes have b
94                                              Cross-species comparisons of genomes, transcriptomes and
95                                              Cross-species comparisons of integrated networks may pro
96 n the motor hierarchy.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Cross-species comparisons of motor system organization c
97 n new species, and expands opportunities for cross-species comparisons of nervous system development,
98 e neural development in vitro(3-5), although cross-species comparisons of organoids are complicated b
99 ebrafish and serve as an important basis for cross-species comparisons of PVN/NPO structure and funct
100                                              Cross-species comparisons of recent selective sweeps can
101         Here, using a novel tool that allows cross-species comparisons of regulatory elements between
102        These findings emphasize that further cross-species comparisons of the pharmacology of PPI are
103                 Recent studies have employed cross-species comparisons of transcription factor bindin
104                              We show this in cross-species comparisons of type 2 diabetes and substan
105                                     However, cross-species comparison often suffers from biological b
106                                              Cross-species comparison outlined an active 49-bp widely
107 nogaster demonstrate that reranking based on cross-species comparison outperforms the best gene model
108                                              Cross-species comparisons reveal pigs resemble humans mo
109                                              Cross-species comparisons reveal that human PSDs mature
110                   Bioinformatic analysis and cross-species comparisons revealed sequence conservation
111                                              Cross-species comparison reveals the LHX3b-specific doma
112 ted rabbit > human > porcine > bovine, and a cross-species comparison showed good Spearman's rho corr
113                                              Cross-species comparisons showed that the SvPRI1 homolog
114                   Importantly, the different cross-species comparisons showed varying sensitivities t
115                                              Cross-species comparison shows that core network nodes a
116                                 To develop a cross-species comparison strategy for identifying CRC ca
117                               We conducted a cross-species comparison study to better understand athe
118 e been proposed based on observations and/or cross-species comparisons that did not standardize for s
119                                           In cross-species comparisons, the results obtained by diffe
120 tion and myelination that were validated via cross-species comparison to Ts65Dn trisomy mice.
121  analysis of the human data, supplemented by cross-species comparisons to macaques, indicated that CT
122                              We suggest that cross species comparisons using large-scale genomic anal
123                              A bioinformatic cross-species comparison using a gene expression signatu
124 of Escherichia coli genes were identified by cross-species comparison using an extended Gibbs samplin
125                                      Initial cross-species comparison using Nanopore long-read sequen
126 idation showed the feasibility of performing cross-species comparison using SynTOF profiling.
127                                              Cross-species comparison was performed using the alcohol
128                               By launching a cross-species comparison, we unveiled a conserved transc
129                             To enable better cross-species comparisons, we developed methods for auto
130 ctions were also characterized to facilitate cross-species comparisons where possible.
131  we support our hypothesis with an extensive cross-species comparison, which suggests that elephants
132 tidomic profiles of human and mouse EECs and cross-species comparison will be valuable tools for drug
133                                              Cross-species comparison with an existing Arabidopsis GR
134 erations of the GATA1 transcriptome, we used cross-species comparison with genes regulated by GATA1 e
135 y expressed miRNA were further assessed by a cross-species comparison with human osteoblasts and OS c
136 f zebrafish bridging glia and then performed cross-species comparisons with mammalian glia.
137         Using single-cell RNA sequencing and cross-species comparisons with mouse, cynomolgus monkey
138                                 In addition, cross-species comparisons with phylogenetically distant
139                                              Cross-species comparison within a single MSY phylogeny e

 
Page Top