コーパス検索結果 (left1)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 dUMP binding is similar in both proteins, except that th
2 The stronger binding of the close analog 5F-dUMP to ThyX and its inhibitory properties compared with
5 bited the highest level of cross-links to 5I-dUMP located exactly opposite the damaged nucleotide.
7 ive nucleotides containing an aryl azide (AB-dUMP), benzophenone (BP-dUMP), perfluorinated aryl azide
9 dCMP gave results comparable to that with AB-dUMP at proximal nucleotide positions and provided new e
10 g was made that contained a butyl chain (ABU-dUMP) to assess the effect of the chain's hydrophobicity
13 s of TS H199A/N229D in complex with dCMP and dUMP confirmed that the position and orientation of boun
16 3-MedUMP to wild type TS, both 3-MedUMP and dUMP showed similar Km values with the Asn 229 mutants,
17 ng site, the thymidylate analog [32P]5-azido-dUMP was specifically photocrosslinked to the active sit
21 ng an aryl azide (AB-dUMP), benzophenone (BP-dUMP), perfluorinated aryl azide (FAB-dUMP) or diazirine
22 o activity for the dehalogenation of 5-bromo-dUMP, which requires correct orientation of dUMP against
23 ate 10-propargyl-5,8-dideazafolate (CB3717), dUMP is covalently bound to the active site cysteine, as
24 ants, V3L and V3F, have strongly compromised dUMP binding, with K(m,app) values increased by factors
25 ovary (CHO) cells and HepG2 cells converted dUMP to dTMP in the presence of NADPH and serine, throug
26 nated aryl azide (FAB-dUMP) or diazirine (DB-dUMP) coupled to 5-aminoallyl deoxyuridine were incorpor
27 of the mutant enzymes for 2'-deoxyuridylate (dUMP) were 5-90 times higher, while K(m) values for 5,10
28 the nucleotide substrate, 2'-deoxyuridylate (dUMP), and that stabilize a beta-bulge in the protein.
30 steady-state intermediate-containing enzyme, dUMP, and cofactor accumulated with Tyr 146 mutants, and
32 ne (BP-dUMP), perfluorinated aryl azide (FAB-dUMP) or diazirine (DB-dUMP) coupled to 5-aminoallyl deo
34 MP2 peaks, indicating that binding the first dUMP pushes the enzyme ensemble to further conformationa
35 nd to the mechanism-based inhibitor 5-fluoro-dUMP (FdUMP) and methylenetetrahydrofolate (CH2THF) have
36 ntrast, the structure of D221N with 5-fluoro-dUMP and 5,10-methylene-5,6,7, 8-tetrahydrofolate shows
37 and in determining the binding affinity for dUMP (in contrast, the N229(177)V mutation in Lactobacil
38 Ligand binding studies revealed that Kds for dUMP binding to two defective mutants, Ala216 and Leu216
39 coli is reduced by 200-fold while the Km for dUMP is increased 200-fold and the Km for folate increas
41 TSs except Thr216 TS exhibited kcat/Kms for dUMP that are 10(3)-10(4) times lower, relative to that
49 In M. thermophila, the dTMP was formed from dUMP and [methylene-2H2]-5,10-methylenetetrahydrosarcina
50 nucleotide deoxythymidine monophosphate from dUMP, using methylenetetrahydrofolate as carbon donor an
53 With one analogous E. coli TS mutant, HETM-dUMP formation occurred upon occupancy of the first subu
54 te synthase, we found that the ratio of HETM-dUMP to dTMP varies as a function of CH(2)H(4)folate con
55 hree C-terminal mutants of L. casei TS, HETM-dUMP formation was consistent with a model in which prod
56 ine at this relative position is involved in dUMP binding; however, the data indicate that Ser216 has
57 his enzyme can singly catalyze both steps in dUMP biosynthesis, precluding the formation of free, mut
60 UTPases catalyze the hydrolysis of dUTP into dUMP and pyrophosphate to maintain the proper nucleotide
61 Using photoreactive DNA containing 5-iodo-dUMP in defined positions, XPC/Rad4 location on damaged
63 u mass increase of TS after inhibition by IP-dUMP with no mass difference being detected for the TS m
64 consistent with covalent modification by IP-dUMP, which was confirmed by proteolytic digestion of th
65 ropynyl-2'-deoxyuridine 5'-monophosphate (IP-dUMP) is a mechanism-based, irreversible inactivator of
66 proposed for the covalent modification of IP-dUMP by Tyr94, which, unlike an earlier proposal, does n
70 , where these hydrogen bonds cannot be made, dUMP binds in a misoriented or more disordered fashion.
73 late (methyleneTHF), a donor for methylating dUMP to dTMP in DNA synthesis, to 5-methyltetrahydrofola
74 imental evidence for a 5-exocyclic methylene-dUMP intermediate in the thymidylate synthase reaction w
75 ylation of 2'-deoxyuridine-5'-monophosphate (dUMP) by N(5),N(10)-methyhlenetetrahydrofolate, forming
80 h its substrate, deoxyuridine monophosphate (dUMP), and a cofactor mimic, CB3717, was determined.
81 eotide dTMP from deoxyuridine monophosphate (dUMP), making the enzyme necessary for DNA replication a
82 e utilization of deoxyuridine monophosphate (dUMP)/deoxy-5-fluorouridine monophosphate (5-FdUMP) as a
85 is present, in addition to the nucleotides (dUMP, FdUMP, or dGMP), a Td of 72 degrees C is achieved
87 In the presence of increasing amounts of dUMP progressive changes in the size of each peak occur,
88 ssful synthesis of a variety of analogues of dUMP is described in which the substituents are introduc
89 ogen bond between His 196 and the O4 atom of dUMP and repositioning of the side chain of Tyr 94 by ab
91 modynamic dissection of multisite binding of dUMP to E. coli TSase shows the nucleotide binds to the
92 ay crystal structures of binary complexes of dUMP or dCMP with the Lactobacillus caseiTS mutant N229D
93 (hydroxymethyl)uracil (H) as consequences of dUMP misincorporation or thymine oxidation, respectively
94 C 2.1.1.45) (TS) catalyzes the conversion of dUMP to dTMP and is therefore indispensable for DNA repl
96 sn 229 mutants shows that the active form of dUMP involves the neutral pyrimidine base and that ioniz
97 myces cerevisiae to dissect the influence of dUMP misincorporation into DNA as a contributing mechani
100 thase catalyzes the reductive methylation of dUMP to dTMP and is essential for the synthesis of DNA.
101 e synthase (TS) catalyzes the methylation of dUMP to dTMP and is the target for the widely used chemo
102 ylate synthase (TS) catalyzes methylation of dUMP to dTMP and is the target of cancer chemotherapeuti
103 ly mechanism is the deficient methylation of dUMP to dTMP and subsequent incorporation of uracil into
104 which catalyzes the reductive methylation of dUMP to dTMP using (R)-N(5),N(10)-methylene-5,6,7,8-tetr
105 which catalyzes the reductive methylation of dUMP to form dTMP and is essential for DNA replication d
106 at for wild type TS-catalyzed methylation of dUMP, and some mutants (N229C and -A) catalyze methylati
108 amination of cytosine or misincorporation of dUMP instead of dTMP [4] [5], and it is the primary acti
109 uracil (HmU) whereas the misincorporation of dUMP into DNA generates uracil (U), replacing the methyl
114 hydrogen bonds constrain the orientation of dUMP in binary complexes with dUMP, and in ternary compl
115 s of R178 substitution on the orientation of dUMP; 10-15-fold increases in for R23I and R178T reflect
116 yme is thermally unfolded in the presence of dUMP, two separate temperature transitions are evident,
121 ics and determined the crystal structures of dUMP complexes of three of the most active, uncharged si
122 ion of bound dCMP closely approaches that of dUMP in wild-type TS, whereas dUMP was displaced from th
124 e used to characterize the thermodynamics of dUMP binding, with a focus on quantification of cooperat
133 toward the inactive conformation; subsequent dUMP binding reverses the equilibrium toward the active
136 chanism where binding of the first substrate dUMP at high temperature stabilizes the enzyme in a conf
137 ed how ThyX recognizes the natural substrate dUMP in the N3-ionized form using an arginine, Arg199, i
138 f the mutants bound the nucleotide substrate dUMP with only moderate loss of binding affinity, indica
140 ic dimer with two molecules of the substrate dUMP bound yet only one molecule of cofactor analogue bo
143 f TS from P. carinii bound to its substrate, dUMP, and a cofactor mimic, CB3717, was determined to 2.
144 the nucleophilic cysteine to the substrate, dUMP, at one active site, PcTS undergoes a conformationa
145 drugs, which are analogs of its substrates, dUMP and CH(2)H(4)folate, and bind in the active site, p
152 that Tyr-261 forms a hydrogen bond with the dUMP 3'-O, we hypothesized that this interaction would b
155 e binding of the folate analogue, CB3717, to dUMP binary complexes of mutant enzymes was characterize
157 minase, catalyzing the conversion of dCMP to dUMP, is an important enzyme in the de novo synthesis of
162 urther demonstrated that 2-OH-NQ, similar to dUMP, binds to ThyX in the ionized form, and the strong
163 ism is ordered in the following manner, TS + dUMP --> TS x dUMP + (6R)-5,10-CH2-H4folate --> TS x dUM
164 of the complex between recombinant human TS, dUMP, and raltitrexed has been determined at 1.9 A resol
168 the hydrogen-bonding network between water, dUMP and side-chains in the active-site cavity contribut
169 least 1 kcal/mol for each mutant, even when dUMP orientation and mobility in the crystal structure i
170 zes the active site in a configuration where dUMP closely interacts with the flavin cofactor and very
171 oaches that of dUMP in wild-type TS, whereas dUMP was displaced from the optimal catalytic binding si
172 and its inhibitory properties compared with dUMP were explained by the stronger acidity of the uraci
173 ex with dUMP and CB3717, and in complex with dUMP alone are determined at 2.4 A, and 2.5 A resolution
174 tal structures of N229(177)A in complex with dUMP and CB3717, and in complex with dUMP alone are dete
176 rat thymidylate synthase (TS) complexed with dUMP and the anticancer drug Tomudex (ZD1694) have been
177 is mutant Escherichia coli TS complexed with dUMP and the folate analogue 10-propargyl-5,8-dideazafol
179 xes with dUMP, and in ternary complexes with dUMP and the TS cofactor, 5,10-methylene-5,6,7,8-tetrahy
180 orientation of dUMP in binary complexes with dUMP, and in ternary complexes with dUMP and the TS cofa
182 the Escherichia coli TS mutant E60(58)Q with dUMP and the cofactor analog CB3717 and have determined
183 in the following manner, TS + dUMP --> TS x dUMP + (6R)-5,10-CH2-H4folate --> TS x dUMP x (6R)-5,10-
184 kinetically identifiable reaction step, TS x dUMP x (6R)-5,10-CH2H4folate --> (TS x dUMP x (6R)-5,10-
185 TS x dUMP + (6R)-5,10-CH2-H4folate --> TS x dUMP x (6R)-5,10-CH2H4folate --> TS x dTMP x H2folate --
186 TS x dUMP x (6R)-5,10-CH2H4folate --> (TS x dUMP x (6R)-5,10-CH2H4folate)*, likely represents reorie