コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ghput in automated cryo-EM without degrading data quality.
2 nt and data analysis parameters for improved data quality.
3 erreporting of safety incidents and variable data quality.
4 ents 100-fold while maintaining or improving data quality.
5 used for sample delivery greatly affects the data quality.
6 work is essential to assure food composition data quality.
7 f complete features, limit of detection, and data quality.
8 or non-uniform coverage, reducing sequencing data quality.
9 C is a useful tool for controlling scRNA-seq data quality.
10 of the massive volume of data and imperfect data quality.
11 ction) may create substantial variability in data quality.
12 cilitates comparative assessment of tool and data quality.
13 and numeric anchors can combine to influence data quality.
14 , depending on sample complexity and initial data quality.
15 minate among surveys with excellent and poor data quality.
16 studies were analysed by study location and data quality.
17 as used as a parameter for the assessment of data quality.
18 reasing throughput while maintaining similar data quality.
19 QC, a program which provides key measures of data quality.
20 omplete, will monitor, evaluate, and improve data quality.
21 nts of a given reflection are used to assess data quality.
22 ortunities for process changes that improved data quality.
23 RE and identify design issues that impacted data quality.
24 rgy transfer (FRET), significantly improving data quality.
25 ple times without significantly compromising data quality.
26 in each group were excluded because of poor data quality.
27 ssing is a critical element that impacts the data quality.
28 high degree of replication and reported high data quality.
29 ensures scientific integrity, and maintains data quality.
30 ased optical biosensors while retaining high data quality.
31 on and observing significant improvements in data quality.
32 menting procedures that will broadly enhance data quality.
33 riate data, taking particular care to ensure data quality.
34 ion of the original method without a loss in data quality.
35 d low inter-plate variability while ensuring data quality.
36 e impact of various data processing steps on data quality.
37 , training, and consistent implementation in data quality.
38 ated quality control procedures for ensuring data quality.
39 re commonly used to reduce noise and improve data quality.
40 higher input amount, so generally has better data quality.
41 rom multiple sources with various degrees of data quality.
42 ation, provided a useful basis for assessing data quality.
43 he data easily but also serves as a test for data quality.
44 learning across datasets remarkably improves data quality.
45 be possible without concomitantly comprising data quality.
46 rent protocols, and having different overall data qualities.
47 illance systems are simplicity, flexibility, data quality, acceptability, sensitivity, predictive val
51 f genome sequencing projects, in addition to data quality analysis and data format conversions; (ii)
52 ographic peaks across all samples to confirm data quality and (ii) for a given sample set, integrates
54 n working towards improving food composition data quality and availability, including the development
56 ngly being recognized, including issues with data quality and biases caused by simplifying assumption
58 a of participation could be used to maximize data quality and breadth of participation across the lar
59 potential, enhanced the database profile and data quality and broadened the inter-relation of HbVar w
64 Adjusting for background noise improves PBM data quality and concordance with in vivo TF binding dat
66 rotein fused to histone 2B provides enhanced data quality and content over assays conducted without t
68 eral result, we find that the combination of data quality and data quantity of the text data is playi
69 eep-learning methods offer major advances in data quality and detail by allowing researchers to autom
74 e temporal variations, allowing us to assess data quality and homogeneity over the entire record, and
75 It generally is assumed that improvements in data quality and implementation of sophisticated tractog
76 me Project, estimates of protein interaction data quality and interactome size are crucial to establi
78 esolution is generally explained in terms of data quality and methodological issues, such as characte
81 c bias in mass measurement adversely affects data quality and negates the advantages of high precisio
87 lation scanning profile can be used to check data quality and refine the analysis of DNA copy number
88 cancer registries that are heterogeneous in data quality and registration methodology; many registri
89 We show that the handoff timing affects the data quality and repeatability of the electropherograms,
91 trategy significantly improves bioanalytical data quality and saves time, costs, and resources by avo
92 ore fundamental ones about the assessment of data quality and the design guidelines of taxon sampling
96 f standardized methods are needed to improve data quality and to encourage the use of passive samplin
98 showed how the method can be used to examine data quality and to obtain robust quantification of prot
100 orrect weighting factors on curve stability, data quality, and assay performance were thoroughly inve
102 t-flow, mass spectral data acquisition rate, data quality, and liquid microjunction sampling area.
108 is-to-trans ratio of contacts, and the broad data quality as reflected by the proportion of mappable
109 an research require careful consideration of data quality as well as the general research and reporti
110 as been structured to check three particular data quality aspects: (i) data formatting, (ii) quality
113 ic data quality that must be regarded during data quality assessment and how these impacts can be des
116 or pre-processing, expression estimation and data quality assessment of high-throughput sequencing tr
118 encompasses significant aspects ranging from data quality assessment, assay characterization includin
122 from array data, the inherent challenges in data quality associated with most hybridization techniqu
126 We derived 6 indicators of anthropometric data quality at the survey level, including 1) date of b
127 form to facilitate comparisons and maintain data quality based on an international panel of SJS/TEN
128 The first approach consists of assessing data quality based on systematic characterization of MFA
130 protocols necessitates careful assessment of data quality before biological conclusions can be drawn.
132 sizes and/or fail to address differences in data quality between those with autism spectrum disorder
133 sensitivity by at least 4-fold and improves data quality by minimizing formation of a deleterious by
134 t the algorithm is robust to fluctuations in data quality by successfully clustering data with a desi
135 , with unconstrained annotation, can improve data quality; care should be taken when exploring such p
143 are evaluated and categorized using proposed data quality (confidence) criteria derived from the stan
146 essed included questions of study design and data quality control (QC), genotype imputation to augmen
149 e iPlant image, including tools for ChIP-seq data quality control and evaluation adapted from the hum
152 tomates data downloading, data organization, data quality control assesment, differential gene expres
154 bundled with the tools needed for MALD, from data quality control through mapping of and visualizatio
155 O through diverse examples, ranging from NGS data quality control to characterization of enhancer reg
157 rease the speed and efficiency of performing data quality control, annotation, and association analys
163 ools for enabling smooth, secure transfer of data, quality control information, and analyses between
164 It provides comprehensive access to sequence data, quality control results, annotations, and many oth
165 nterpretation; archiving and distribution of data; quality control; and imaging-associated risks and
167 s (e.g., data processing, data availability, data quality, data costs) and the specific challenges of
168 ial improvements and updates in the areas of data quality, data coverage, statistical algorithms and
170 an visualise experimental annotation, assess data quality, download and share data via a web-based ex
171 DP-SPME significantly improved precision and data quality due to decreased intersample variation.
172 requency and B0 shim changes, and effects on data quality during real-time-corrected three-dimensiona
173 with new and improved data sources, refining data quality, enhancing website usability, and increasin
175 Methodologic characteristics and overall data quality for all 200 highly cited studies were asses
176 data calculated without ISs exhibited a poor data quality for both QCs and patients' concentrations.
181 ting black box technologies, assessing input data quality for training such models, and the risk of p
182 develop composite indices of anthropometric data quality for use in multisurvey analysis of child he
184 trics to rapidly and quantitatively evaluate data quality from structure probing experiments, demonst
185 ime and human resources but is essential for data quality; funders should support this step in future
186 of access to data, combined with inadequate data quality, has led to difficulties linking environmen
189 ades of methodological advances and improved data quality have facilitated the contribution of modell
191 europsychological profile, eye movements, or data quality; however, they were specifically impaired i
192 to account for variations in anthropometric data quality in multisurvey epidemiologic analyses of ch
194 ble patients, who met the CPRD threshold for data quality, in a GP practice defined by the CPRD as co
195 lactation and/or HMC; 3) considerations for data quality, including addressing sampling strategies a
196 dized analytical methods for CECs to improve data quality, increase comparability between studies, an
202 ule, ligand complex or sequence family using data-quality information from the wwPDB validation repor
203 formative, problems related to study design, data quality, integration, and reproducibility still nee
206 ing accurate, scalable algorithms to improve data quality is an important computational challenge ass
211 e groups using MULTI-seq barcode abundances, data quality is improved through doublet identification
216 al time series model, accounting for various data quality issues and assessing the uncertainty in sex
220 has a number of limitations, including poor data quality issues that reflected bias in the report of
221 o discover hidden data properties and detect data quality issues, e.g. data noise, inappropriately la
222 mates of under-five mortality rates, analyze data quality issues, note the relative effects of these
223 sed synthetic biology databases face similar data quality issues, we propose to visualize biobricks t
226 illustrate that greater degradation of input data quality leads to greater variability in the results
228 cused our efforts on data curation, improved data quality maintenance, new tool developments, and dat
229 and retaining only the datasets with highest data quality (measured soil bulk densities and external
231 Subjects include normalization, scaling and data quality measures, LOESS (local polynomial) smoothin
233 ns to visualize both pre- and post-alignment data quality metrics for cells from multiple experiments
238 set of model parameters to determine whether data quality needs to be improved, and to enhance interp
239 management framework was developed to assure data quality of food composition data, incorporating sev
241 CC* also can be used to assess model and data quality on the same scale, and this reveals when da
245 est potential improvements in anthropometric data quality over time, there continues to be substantia
247 ports of escaped farmed salmon requires high data quality, particularly since reports of farmed salmo
251 ovascular Data Registry (NCDR) developed the Data Quality Program to meet the objectives of ensuring
252 ns that included spectral acquisition rates, data quality, proteome coverage, and biological depth.
253 rching conclusions are apparent: first, that data quality, rather than the assembler itself, has a dr
254 ranked from highest to lowest anthropometric data quality relative to other surveys using the composi
256 Program consists of 3 main components: 1) a data quality report; 2) a set of internal quality assura
257 irst step in this direction, we investigated data quality requirements for an information system to m
258 in terms of application, data treatment, and data quality requirements should dictate the selection o
260 for varying portions of biomarker and intake data "qualities." RESULTS: With citrus intake, linear re
261 on that makes it easy and efficient to gauge data quality, screen for transcripts with high-quality i
262 r selectivity, quantitative performance, and data quality since the same ion from different samples m
263 nd the routine monitoring of key measures of data quality such as the number of alignable reads, dupl
265 onomic evaluation, outcome measures used and data quality support the need for further research.
266 microbial dynamics in streams with improved data quality than prior studies, (2) advances a stochast
268 sample, and with the potential for superior data quality, than the conventional methods used in most
269 ents have different impacts on the intrinsic data quality that must be regarded during data quality a
271 ion and using a variety of methods to assess data quality, the investigators address concerns about t
272 ance of using exploratory analyses to assess data quality, the strengths and limitations of commonly
273 k-space data, without a significant loss in data quality, thereby supporting clinical translation of
276 lots), which provide extra information about data quality unavailable in other microarray repositorie
277 data, including standardizing data, managing data quality, understanding data comparability, and ensu
278 se is expected to contribute to the improved data quality, usage, generation, publication and appreci
280 d independently by the 2 authors.We assessed data quality using the Jadad scoring system and used a r
286 ular brightness E = 100 kHz and higher, RICS data quality was sufficient using as little as 20 images
290 es for UPLC-MS analysis poses a challenge to data quality which has been recognized in the field.
291 opharmaceuticals could benefit from improved data quality, which can subsequently lead to improved dr
292 hat data processing significantly influences data quality, which provides an explanation for the conf
294 ized the role of clinical coders in ensuring data quality, which was at odds with the policy drive to
295 ely remove analytical errors and improve the data quality, which would make the DBS-based metabolomic
296 w improvement in statistical methodology and data quality will increase our understanding of SLE gene
297 could not observe systematic correlation of data quality with chemical similarity or proximity in re
298 ncipal limitation of our analysis is limited data quality, with cases not being entered into the data
299 dardised than surveys, resulting in variable data quality, with good validity for the best performing