戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 uscular blockade, with the goal of achieving deep sedation.
2 tatus; and conditions potentially justifying deep sedation.
3  to generate sufficient ventilation, even in deep sedation.
4 sary to clarify the nature and parameters of deep sedation.
5 ts undergoing ERCP procedures under propofol deep sedation.
6     Each combination regimen was titrated to deep sedation.
7 ed to the hypnotic effects of anesthesia and deep sedation.
8 sing of speech remains resilient even during deep sedation.
9  performed safely while the patient is under deep sedation.
10 der to improve sedation practices and reduce deep sedation.
11 opy units, is there a better alternative for deep sedation?
12  3.5 mm Hg vs 10 +/- 3.5 mm Hg; P = .015) or deep sedation (12 +/- 4 mm Hg vs 10.5 +/- 4 mm Hg; P <.0
13 ed were cardiovascular instability (17%) and deep sedation (15%).
14 (9%), or left atrial tachycardia (10%) under deep sedation (53%) or general anesthesia (47%).
15 poor ventilator synchronization, unnecessary deep sedation, agitation, and an overall optimum sedatio
16 elirium, respectively, adjusting for time in deep sedation and a principal component score consisting
17 n and new reports describe the advantages of deep sedation and anesthesia over moderate sedation for
18               However, in more recent times, deep sedation and bed rest have been part of routine med
19                                              Deep sedation and delirium are common in the ICU.
20  various agents and techniques available for deep sedation and general anesthesia are reviewed.
21                   As the distinction between deep sedation and general anesthesia becomes less clear,
22                                   Similarly, deep sedation and immobility, so often used to keep pati
23 ically ventilated patients includes reducing deep sedation and increasing rehabilitation therapy and
24 ttentional states when awake than when under deep sedation and light anesthesia.
25 ntly in low tidal volume ventilation despite deep sedation and result in volumes substantially above
26 hesiologists considers that propofol implies deep sedation and should only be administered by anesthe
27 owing early diaphragmatic activation even in deep sedation and, 2) metabolic changes within the diaph
28 cted under general anesthesia, 6 (30%) under deep sedation, and 3 (15%) under light sedation.
29 pioids, the number of sedative classes used, deep sedation, and cardiothoracic surgery.
30 e/alert, drowsy/arousable, asleep/arousable, deep sedation, and general anesthesia.
31 resonance imaging during conscious baseline, deep sedation, and recovery.
32                                        Under deep sedation, anodal tDCS significantly altered brain p
33 ight sedation levels (including avoidance of deep sedation) are safe in critically ill patients with
34 ents (n = 65 in light sedation and n = 64 in deep sedation) available for analysis.
35 voidance of pain, agitation, and unnecessary deep sedation, but these outcomes are challenging to ach
36 ependent risk factor of delirium, as long as deep sedation can be avoided in these patients.
37 s for Medicare & Medicaid Services policy on deep sedation can be viewed as supporting an ongoing con
38 dicaid Services issued a policy stating that deep sedation can only be administered by an anesthesiol
39                             With both modes, deep sedation caused a significant increase in PaCO2, wh
40                            GABAergic-induced deep sedation days during mechanical ventilation was a b
41 ence and time to resolution of postcoma/post-deep sedation delirium.
42  lung injury are at especially high risk for deep sedation, delirium, and associated long-term physic
43                                              Deep sedation during mechanical ventilation with benzodi
44 f respondents reported targeting moderate to deep sedation following cannulation, with the use of sed
45 avenous etomidate was administered to induce deep sedation for defibrillation threshold testing.
46 r, few controlled studies on BPS targeted to deep sedation for diagnostic endoscopy were found.
47  the use of general anaesthesia and propofol deep sedation for patients undergoing endoscopic retrogr
48                   Mortality was 21.1% in the deep sedation group and 17.0% in the light sedation grou
49 unction (delirium and coma) was 68.4% in the deep sedation group and 55.6% in the light sedation grou
50 were 18.1 (10.8) in the emergency department deep sedation group compared to 20.0 (9.8) in the light
51 atic stress disorder symptoms (p = .07); the deep sedation group had more trouble remembering the eve
52       At the 4-wk follow-up, patients in the deep sedation group tended to have more posttraumatic st
53 gligible (from 5.9% to 7.6%, p = 0.97); with deep sedation, however, ineffective triggering index inc
54  Decades-old, common ICU practices including deep sedation, immobilization, and limited family access
55 ll with sedation scores during conscious and deep sedation in pediatric patients, and also with end-t
56                                              Deep sedation in the emergency department (ED) is common
57                                        Early deep sedation in the emergency department is common, car
58 nd was associated with a higher frequency of deep sedation in the ICU on day 1 (53.8% vs 20.3%; p < 0
59 ergency department (ED) is common, increases deep sedation in the ICU, and is negatively associated w
60 s infusion of cisatracurium with concomitant deep sedation (intervention group) or to a usual-care ap
61                       The use of moderate to deep sedation is becoming common in emergency medicine f
62                   Perioperative necessity of deep sedation is inevitably associated with diaphragmati
63         In mechanically ventilated patients, deep sedation is often assumed to induce "respirolysis,"
64  a significant shift in this geometry during deep sedation, marked by a transmodal-deficient geometry
65                                  Limiting ED deep sedation may, therefore, be a high-yield interventi
66 assigned to either the light (n = 69) or the deep sedation (n = 68) group.
67  who were under general anesthesia (n=15) or deep sedation (n=8) and were breathing spontaneously dur
68                                              Deep sedation occurred in 191 (76.1%) patients within 4
69 epression dismissed, and vigorous preemptive deep sedation or anesthesia provided.
70 nderwent pulmonary vein (PV) isolation under deep sedation or general anesthesia and returned for rem
71 in patients who received a low proportion of deep sedation (p = 0.95).
72 her light (patient awake and cooperative) or deep sedation (patient asleep, awakening upon physical s
73 ments in the first 48 hours in the light and deep sedation range.
74 sion to quantify relationships between early deep sedation (RASS, -3 to -5) and patients' outcomes.
75             Sedation levels varied from very deep sedation (SAS score = 1, BIS score = 43) to mild ag
76 ized system discriminated between light- and deep-sedation states with an average accuracy of 75%.
77 brane oxygenation support is associated with deep sedation, substantial sedative exposure, and increa
78 Sedation, ranging from minimal, moderate and deep sedation to general anesthesia, improves patient co
79 ure management after cardiac arrest requires deep sedation to prevent shivering and discomfort.
80                       The negative impact of deep sedation to the point of coma, even for brief perio
81 n patients who received a high proportion of deep sedation using benzodiazepine compared with propofo
82          Techniques vary from no sedation to deep sedation using drugs with a good safety profile and
83 rly use of vasopressors, and dialysis, early deep sedation was an independent predictor of time to ex
84 ereas a large observational study found that deep sedation was associated with decreased 180-day surv
85                                              Deep sedation was defined as a Richmond Agitation-Sedati
86                                              Deep sedation was defined as Richmond Agitation-Sedation
87     The proportion of GABAergic drug-induced deep sedation was defined as the ratio of days with a me
88                         Emergency department deep sedation was observed in 171 patients (52.8%), and
89                                       Though deep sedation was targeted, all cardiopulmonary complica
90 ients (74% male, 51.2% paroxysmal, and 58.5% deep sedation) were treated.
91 odifiable barriers for mobilization, such as deep sedation, will be important to increase mobilizatio
92 s sedation with combined hypnotic agents and deep sedation with etomidate is a safe and effective pro
93                                       During deep sedation with etomidate, episodes of apnea, hypoxia
94 s sedation with combined hypnotic agents and deep sedation with etomidate.
95  use of propofol by nonanesthesiologists for deep sedation with minimal adverse side effects, the ada
96 use of anesthesia assistance (AA) to achieve deep sedation with propofol during colonoscopy has signi
97                                              Deep sedation with propofol, administered by anaesthesia
98 upper endoscopy under general anaesthesia or deep sedation with propofol.