コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 eptember 2006 in which revascularization was deferred.
2 owever, the diagnosis is sometimes extremely deferred.
3 iverticulitis episode, is being increasingly deferred.
4 til a dry macula was achieved, and treatment deferred.
5 cipients with a previous malignancy is often deferred 2 to 5 years after cancer treatment due to fear
6 to HCC therapy; however, DAA therapy can be deferred 4-6 months to confirm response to HCC therapy.
11 n group and 23 (27.7%) of 83 patients in the deferred ablation group (hazard ratio, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.6
13 ntive ablation strategy would be superior to deferred ablation strategy in the intention-to-treat pop
18 I included lack of physician recommendation, deferred action by survivor, cost, and absence of sympto
20 he physical and mental health effects of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) programme,
21 cision variable signal during decisions with deferred actions with and without foreknowledge of stimu
22 ed, and their dynamics during decisions with deferred actions with or without foreknowledge of stimul
23 nicians adopted strategies that specifically deferred admissions or affected mortality in the 30-day
25 , 123 (15.1%) had postoperative radiotherapy deferred, and 693 (84.9%) had postoperative radiotherapy
26 has been suspended, routine diagnostic work deferred, and only urgent symptomatic cases prioritised
27 f multiple S. salivarius strains by use of a deferred-antagonism test showed that S. salivarius strai
28 8 infection-unrelated) and 39 cancers in the deferred arm (23 infection-related and 16 infection-unre
30 of developing increased fibrosis scores than deferred arm participants (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.66; 95%
32 (+) cell count >500/microL, clinicians would defer ART if patients did not feel ready to initiate ART
34 d illness was lower with early ART than with deferred ART (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.41
35 ly assigned to one of four treatment groups: deferred ART (ART initiation according to WHO criteria),
36 of severe bacterial infection compared with deferred ART (hazard ratio [HR] 0.39, 95% CI 0.26-0.57,
37 y elevated with earlier ART as compared with deferred ART (hazard ratio, 3.87; 95% CI, 1.41 to 10.58;
38 ed to lower rates of severe illness than did deferred ART and no IPT, both overall and among patients
39 Patients were assigned to immediate versus deferred ART eligibility, as determined by a CD4 count <
40 ces in FEV1 slopes between the immediate and deferred ART groups either in smokers (difference of -3.
41 s resulted in higher mortality compared with deferred ART initiation (1-2 weeks vs 5 weeks postmening
42 nitiation was significantly higher than with deferred ART initiation (45% [40 of 88 patients] vs. 30%
44 o investigate the effect of immediate versus deferred ART on decline in lung function in HIV-positive
45 to quantify the effects of immediate versus deferred ART on the risk of severe bacterial infection i
46 (ART initiation according to WHO criteria), deferred ART plus IPT, early ART (immediate ART initiati
47 d to immediate ART for 96 weeks (ART-96W) or deferred ART until clinical or immunological progression
52 We examined the effect of immediate (versus deferred) ART on retention in care using a regression di
53 ional models to compare outcomes between the deferred-ART and early-ART strategies and between the IP
54 cantly between the earlier-ART group and the deferred-ART group (20% and 13%, respectively; P=0.32).
55 dical imaging examinations may be delayed or deferred as a consequence, resulting in a much greater r
56 ts, in which revascularization can be safely deferred, as opposed to those at high risk when ischemic
58 isons were made between trial arms (early vs deferred) at 1, 8, 14, and 21 days following meningitis
59 mester, but complete removal of the mass was deferred because of fears the pregnancy would be lost.
62 oncerns of adverse outcomes have resulted in deferred cancer surgeries with devastating consequences.
64 w-income patients are particularly likely to defer care because of costs, suggesting that cost-of-car
65 edical bills (OR, 8.9; 95% CI, 4.4 to 18.0); deferring care for a medical problem (OR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1
66 on-unrelated); hazard ratios of immediate vs deferred cART initiation were 0.26 (95% confidence inter
69 nt in overall survival with immediate versus deferred chemotherapy after radical cystectomy and bilat
70 [high-dose MVAC], or MVAC) or six cycles of deferred chemotherapy at relapse, with stratification fo
71 of 68 patients who received treatment in the deferred chemotherapy group, neutropenia occurred in 49
73 0994 trial aimed to compare immediate versus deferred cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy after
74 itis, providing evidence for the practice of deferring colectomy for patients without persistent symp
75 OLD signals reflected two decision biases-to defer commitments to later, and to weight potential loss
77 o which ICU patients or surrogates support a deferred consent process for a minimal risk study withou
79 nstitutional Review Boards should consider a deferred consent process if the subject lacks capacity a
80 e most common reason given for endorsing the deferred consent process was the stress of the early ICU
81 -four of 60 individuals (73%) approached for deferred consent responded positively to the question "D
83 ator avoidance and growth in the short term, deferring costs to a period when they are less vulnerabl
84 rapy with liver resection or ablation should defer DAA therapy until after HCC treatment is completed
86 compared pretransplant DAA treatment versus deferred DAA treatment using a cost-effectiveness decisi
87 Nurses who attributed the responsibility deferred decisions about initiating ambulation to either
90 , this KD seems nutritionally safe and could defer dialysis initiation in some patients with CKD.
92 d day 7 postreperfusion, coinciding with the deferred edema wave, were similar to values measured by
93 of care increased adherence to practices for deferring elective cases; tiering urgent operations; fol
94 the COVID-19 pandemic, it is appropriate to defer enrollment in lung cancer screening and modify the
96 ice probing approach and the observation and deferred facility probing approach are successful and re
97 Eight participants in the observation and deferred facility probing group underwent facility probi
99 one eye for 3 (10%); in the observation and deferred facility probing group, treatment success occur
100 ants who received ranibizumab plus prompt or deferred focal/grid laser treatment vs 3.4% for the part
103 or for prevention of sudden cardiac death is deferred for 90 days after coronary revascularization, b
104 etic diversity among 390 volunteers who were deferred from enrollment in RV144 due to preexisting HIV
105 t-effective when less than 1 in 200 patients deferred from testing truly had an HSV CNS infection.
107 ively freezing all embryos and undertaking a deferred frozen embryo transfer might increase pregnancy
109 roup (1.2/100 person-years) versus 20 in the deferred group (9.0/100 person-years) despite 174 prescr
110 ediate group and in 73 of 479 (15.2%) in the deferred group (incidence rate, 15.03 and 14.93 events p
111 e group and 0.59 per 100 person-years in the deferred group (rate difference, 0.01; 95% CI, -0.94 to
112 riptions of post-exposure prophylaxis in the deferred group (relative reduction 86%, 90% CI 64-96, p=
114 en in the immediate group and 4 women in the deferred group died (incidence rate, 0.40 and 0.78 per 1
115 incidence in the immediate group than in the deferred group of an event included in the composite adv
116 ants (275 in the immediate group, 269 in the deferred group) between Nov 29, 2012, and April 30, 2014
120 (with resumption if worsening) and prompt or deferred (>/=24 weeks) focal/grid laser treatment.
121 orsening) and random assignment to prompt or deferred (>/=24 weeks) focal/grid laser treatment.
122 g of intravitreal ranibizumab with prompt or deferred (>/=24 weeks) laser, or 4 mg of intravitreal tr
123 was 6.9%; patients in whom all lesions were deferred had a lower MACE rate (5.3%) than those with at
126 ors have proposed and validated criteria for deferring HSV PCR testing of CSF in immunocompetent host
128 vere disease, valve procedures can safely be deferred if patients experience no symptoms and have nor
129 for incisional ventral hernias but is often deferred if the perceived risk of elective operation is
130 likely to display sequential memory during a deferred imitation memory task (P-trend = 0.048), and to
134 hile safely allowing revascularization to be deferred in low-risk lesions, resulting in a decrease in
137 ronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection should be deferred, including from otherwise medically eligible do
138 ed estimates of the effect of immediate with deferred initiation of antiretroviral therapy in individ
139 s is mechanistically twofold, resulting from deferred initiation of axonal WD and reduced PI3K/Draper
140 -years), as compared with 96 patients in the deferred-initiation group (4.1%; 1.38 events per 100 per
142 nswered and recommended that patients in the deferred-initiation group be offered antiretroviral ther
143 infections (immediate-initiation group n=34, deferred-initiation group n=86; median 2.8 years of foll
145 tios (HRs) from Cox models were obtained for deferred/intermittent ART versus immediate/continuous AR
146 Pooled HRs (95% confidence interval) of deferred/intermittent ART versus immediate/continuous AR
148 SMART and START trials were used to compare deferred/intermittent versus immediate/continuous antire
150 value only when acceptance or rejection was deferred into the future, suggesting a role in integrati
152 why cholera vaccination campaigns have been deferred is plausible, we believe that the biggest barri
153 mediately (immediate-initiation group) or to defer it until the CD4+ count decreased to 350 cells per
155 er scores from baseline in the ranibizumab + deferred laser (N = 111), ranibizumab + prompt laser (N
156 pt laser (P = .25), 7% with ranibizumab with deferred laser (P = .001), and 37% with triamcinolone wi
157 terval) in mean change between ranibizumab + deferred laser and laser/very deferred ranibizumab and t
158 aser group compared with +9.8 letters in the deferred laser group (mean difference, -2.6 letters; 95%
159 At the 5-year visit in the prompt versus deferred laser groups, there was vision loss of >/=10 le
160 reated with ranibizumab and either prompt or deferred laser maintain vision gains obtained by the fir
161 f phakic patients with DME, ranibizumab with deferred laser provided an additional 6 letters correct
162 ed data from the ranibizumab plus prompt and deferred laser treatment arms of the Diabetic Retinopath
163 zumab (0.5 mg) with either (1) prompt or (2) deferred laser; (3) sham injection + prompt laser; or (4
164 f intravitreal ranibizumab is no better than deferring laser treatment for >/=24 weeks in eyes with D
165 and possibly worse, for vision outcomes than deferring laser treatment for 24 weeks or more in eyes w
166 rs of target lesion revascularization in the deferred lesions were proximal location of the lesion, B
167 vaccination highlights the potential need to defer live virus vaccines for at least 6 months in expos
169 han half of eyes in which laser treatment is deferred may avoid laser for at least 5 years, such eyes
173 duction is a manifestation of practices that defer or avoid hospitalizations beyond the 30-day period
176 option for women at high risk of OC/FTC who defer or decline RRSO, given its high sensitivity and si
178 of cardiovascular conditions may be delayed, deferred, or abbreviated during the COVID-19 pandemic.
182 ed chemicals either for biomonitoring, to be deferred pending additional data, or as low priority for
183 -six were recommended for biomonitoring, 108 deferred pending additional research, and 11 as low prio
186 April 2015, they also 1) applied oxygen but deferred positive pressure ventilation several minutes,
187 ed to compare prophylactic radiotherapy with deferred radiotherapy (given only when a PTM developed)
189 thin 42 days of the pleural intervention) or deferred radiotherapy (same dose given within 35 days of
190 grade 2 in two [40%] of five patients in the deferred radiotherapy group who received radiotherapy fo
191 diate radiotherapy group vs two [40%] in the deferred radiotherapy group) within 3 months of receivin
192 s seen in PTM incidence in the immediate and deferred radiotherapy groups (nine [9%] vs 16 [16%]; odd
193 ab (N = 198), and triamcinolone + laser/very deferred ranibizumab (N = 125) groups were 10 +/- 13, 8
194 bizumab + prompt laser (N = 124), laser/very deferred ranibizumab (N = 198), and triamcinolone + lase
195 ranibizumab + deferred laser and laser/very deferred ranibizumab and triamcinolone + laser/very defe
196 er or triamcinolone + laser followed by very deferred ranibizumab for persistent thickening and visio
197 d ranibizumab and triamcinolone + laser/very deferred ranibizumab was 4.4 (1.2-7.6, P = .001) and 2.8
198 hospitalizations over 6 months could also be deferred, reducing costs associated with screening.
200 can engage in capital breeding and need not defer reproduction to forage; low reproductive overheads
201 coronary intervention for revascularization, deferred revascularization remained associated with a hi
202 mplications regarding the ability to realize deferred rewards, is associated with loss and risk avers
203 extent to which people can expect to realise deferred rewards, leading to more present-oriented behav
204 dent controls caused lethality in cells with deferred S phase, accompanied by Rad52 foci and chromoso
206 This study sought to evaluate the effect of deferred stent implantation on infarct size, myocardial
208 cardiac magnetic resonance substudy, routine deferred stenting did not reduce infarct size or MVO and
209 salvage index at 6 months was greater in the deferred stenting group (68 [IQR: 54% to 82%] vs. 56 [IQ
211 ecurrent STEMI occurred in 2 patients in the deferred stenting group before the second procedure.
214 years; 69% male) were randomized (52 to the deferred stenting group, 49 to the immediate stenting).
216 se results do not support the use of routine deferred stenting in STEMI patients treated with primary
217 The aim of this study was to assess whether deferred stenting might reduce no-reflow and salvage myo
218 In patients with a stent length >/=24 mm, deferred stenting reduced the final infarct size (6% LV;
223 lieved to be appropriate to delay screening, defer surveillance imaging of lung nodules, and minimize
224 ned to undergo an immediate switch (IS) or a deferred switch (DS; at week 24) from an enfuvirtide-bas
228 (P < .001) improved both after immediate and deferred switching to DTG overall and regardless of base
231 resence of cheaters, and might allow them to defer the substantial metabolic cost of policing until c
233 ing by lowering the freezing temperature and deferring the growth of ice, are present at high levels
234 ocardial salvage when stent implantation was deferred, the DANAMI-3-DEFER (Third DANish Study of Opti
239 tent implantation was deferred, the DANAMI-3-DEFER (Third DANish Study of Optimal Acute Treatment of
240 institutions differ in their willingness to defer to a single, central institutional review board (I
241 e concentrated solutions, these interactions defer to an organized supramolecular assembly, leading t
242 It is sometimes ethically permissible to defer to family values regarding nondisclosure, but such
244 ate that in areas of ambiguity it is best to defer to parents' views, whereas others indicate concern
245 t the euthanasia review committees generally defer to the judgments of the physicians performing the
248 As a major portion of embryogenesis was deferred to postembryonic life with the evolution of hol
249 the other 84 patients, 28 (33%) had therapy deferred to postpartum; these patients were diagnosed at
251 olytic flux and ensures that glycerol uptake defers to other glycolytic substrates but not to glucone
252 ation for surgical airway, clinicians should defer tracheostomy placement for at least 2 wks followin
255 with immediate treatment when compared with deferred treatment (adjusted HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.56-1.08;
256 t exudative features at study entry received deferred treatment (after 1 month observation), when exu
257 ment (cardiac arrest) and three who received deferred treatment (aortic aneurysm, pneumonia, and unkn
258 nged progression-free survival compared with deferred treatment (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.4-0.73, p<0.0001),
260 phritis) and one during the placebo phase of deferred treatment (raised lipase concentration) were de
263 with grazoprevir and elbasvir (n=111) or the deferred treatment group (n=113), and 11 were assigned t
264 rences in aminotransferase elevations in the deferred treatment group compared with the immediate tre
265 rmacokinetic population and five (4%) in the deferred treatment group discontinued because of an adve
266 iate treatment group, and no patients in the deferred treatment group had total bilirubin elevations.
267 ate treatment group and placebo phase of the deferred treatment group have been reported previously.
268 16), unmasking occurred and patients in the deferred treatment group received grazoprevir and elbasv
271 efficacy data for the treatment phase of the deferred treatment group, as well as HRQOL assessed usin
277 ere compared between immediate treatment and deferred treatment groups using the stratified Miettinen
278 igned (141 to immediate treatment and 143 to deferred treatment), and followed up until the data cuto
279 rticipants (2,273 immediate treatment; 2,307 deferred treatment), the median age was 36 years, 26.9%
283 ution spontaneously before 12 months of age, deferring treatment until 12 to 18 months of age is a re
285 ed to the immediate-treatment group (ITG) or deferred-treatment group (DTG; placebo followed by activ
291 Services guidelines) either immediately, or deferred until CD4 T-cell counts decreased to 350 per mu
292 refore, cross-sectional chest imaging may be deferred until development of abdominal disease, with mi
293 to data, with the data curation and analysis deferred until later and delegated to those that access
296 2683 patients that compared the outcomes of deferred versus performed revascularization of coronary
299 fusion and dissipates at 24 h, followed by a deferred wave that initiates days after infarction, peak