戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 hropogenic interferences (e.g., drainage and deforestation).
2 s for ecosystem services (e.g., avoidance of deforestation).
3 ce (i.e., fires, glaciation, hurricanes, and deforestation).
4 or their rosewood timber, along with general deforestation.
5 roperty rights, will be effective at curbing deforestation.
6 cent records show increased forest fires and deforestation.
7 rtified palm oil was associated with reduced deforestation.
8 climate benefits from reductions in tropical deforestation.
9  of above-ground biomass (AGB) stocks due to deforestation.
10 considered both on- and off-lease sources of deforestation.
11 mated annual carbon releases due to tropical deforestation.
12 hange may also provide opportunities to halt deforestation.
13 ing the environmental and social problems of deforestation.
14 minerals are critically important drivers of deforestation.
15 ional variation in the land uses that follow deforestation.
16 he spatial variability of impacts on avoided deforestation.
17 te change and requires their protection from deforestation.
18 use gas (GHG) emissions by sparing land from deforestation.
19 logical and social catastrophe attributed to deforestation.
20 hey effectively avoid degradation as well as deforestation.
21 line, as did a decline in the demand for new deforestation.
22 ltas, has been affected by river damming and deforestation.
23  forests and evaluated the relationship with deforestation.
24 d and protect their territories from illegal deforestation.
25 rea affected is now greater than that due to deforestation.
26 increasing pressure from land-use change and deforestation.
27 g in environmental degradation, particularly deforestation.
28         The recent significant reductions in deforestation-80% reduction in the Brazilian Amazon in t
29 ontributor of mercury (Hg) contamination and deforestation across the globe.
30  linked to one-fifth of all commodity-driven deforestation across the tropics.
31                 It is generally assumed that deforestation affects a species consistently across spac
32  major roadblock for predicting how tropical deforestation affects climate is the lack of baseline co
33  mostly located in the tropics, where recent deforestation, agricultural intensification, and/or expo
34         Humans homogenize landscapes through deforestation, agriculture, and burning and thereby migh
35 s than anticipated from models incorporating deforestation alone because some species will colonize h
36 dominantly on reducing carbon emissions from deforestation alone.
37 ttributed to climate change or human-induced deforestation alone.
38 rs of forest PAs are typically restricted to deforestation, although the extent of forest degradation
39 ding better monitoring to detect small-scale deforestation and a shift toward more incentive-based co
40 on deforestation, but a majority of Brazil's deforestation and agricultural expansion has occurred in
41  to high levels of pollutants resulting from deforestation and agricultural fires.
42 mmitted emissions, we estimate that stopping deforestation and allowing secondary forests to grow wou
43 ated landscape, heavily altered by extensive deforestation and anthropogenic burning.
44 edieval and Renaissance periods is caused by deforestation and associated biomass burning Hg emission
45 and palm oil is one of the primary causes of deforestation and biodiversity loss in some of the world
46 's biodiversity is notoriously threatened by deforestation and climate change.
47                          Increasing rates of deforestation and conversion to agriculture in the Basin
48 cal peatlands have experienced high rates of deforestation and conversion, which is often associated
49          CCs, state PAs, and ITs all avoided deforestation and degradation compared to analogous area
50 (iii) whether state PAs, CCs and ITs avoided deforestation and degradation compared with logging and
51                                         With deforestation and degradation taking place throughout th
52 nd private Conservation Concessions (CCs) on deforestation and degradation throughout the Peruvian Am
53 propensity-score matching to assess: (i) how deforestation and degradation varied across governance r
54 management and REDD+ (reduced emissions from deforestation and degradation).
55 ers with drastically different affinities to deforestation and document how thermal niche explains de
56 , to evaluate the impact of certification on deforestation and fire from 2001 to 2015.
57 egies to mitigate climate change by reducing deforestation and forest degradation (e.g. REDD+) requir
58                      Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) has gained
59                      Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) is a climat
60       The program on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) is one of t
61 d payments under the Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) mechanism t
62 mly in the agenda of reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) programs.
63                                              Deforestation and forest degradation around the world en
64                                     Reducing deforestation and forest degradation contributes to glob
65 ts for reduced greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in tropical countri
66 50% compared to the baseline scenario, i.e., deforestation and forest degradation without REDD+) by 2
67 ce policies, such as Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation.
68 ricultural census and remote-sensing data on deforestation and forest degradation.
69  in the tropics, where the imbalance between deforestation and forest regrowth has large consequences
70 opposing gross emissions and removals (e.g., deforestation and forest regrowth).
71 interviews, we quantify the impact of CAR on deforestation and forest restoration, investigating how
72 esult from forest growth; losses result from deforestation and from reductions in carbon density with
73 tive cloud formation driven by afforestation/deforestation and groundwater depletion projected to inc
74 atural (forest expansion) and anthropogenic (deforestation and human pressure) changes on the foragin
75             Although protected areas reduced deforestation and increased regrowth, these land cover c
76              Here we quantify mining-induced deforestation and investigate the aspects of mining oper
77                                              Deforestation and land use change are among the most pre
78 n underlying cause of this ambiguity is that deforestation and malaria influence each other in bidire
79 directional socioecological feedback between deforestation and malaria, which attenuates as land use
80 ntegrating bioclimatic models with projected deforestation and oil-palm agriculture suitability from
81 greatest threats to mangrove persistence are deforestation and other anthropogenic disturbances that
82 orest habitats due to commercially motivated deforestation and other economic activities.
83 ond new concessions (15.0% of emissions from deforestation and peat degradation) to also include exis
84 or both carbon emissions from gross tropical deforestation and reductions in those emissions - its sh
85 d alongside current efforts aimed at halting deforestation and restoring the integrity of forests glo
86 f malaria in recent decades paralleled rapid deforestation and settlement in the Amazon basin, yet ev
87 acerbated by rapid urbanization, accelerated deforestation and soil erosion since the 1980s.
88         The climate policy immediately stops deforestation and strongly increases afforestation, resu
89   Quantitative analysis of the nexus between deforestation and the emergence of Ebola virus disease (
90  reefs, this has resulted in widespread kelp deforestation and the formation of sea urchin barrens.
91                                              Deforestation and the introduction of agriculture during
92 projects would avoid 1.1 million hectares of deforestation and US$ 7.6 billion in wasted funding for
93 egative emissions if positive emissions from deforestation and wood harvest were eliminated.
94 etagrams, equivalent to 5-10 years of global deforestation, and an extinction debt of more than 140 b
95 th coastal communities experiencing mangrove deforestation are increasingly vulnerable to economic da
96                        Further reductions in deforestation are likely to be increasingly costly and r
97 tory summer daytime temperature responses to deforestation are reported between observations and clim
98 ring bat meat and living in areas undergoing deforestation are the most significant risk factors asso
99                                              Deforestation around this reserve has reduced the reserv
100        Forest conservation includes stemming deforestation as well as preserving its vegetation condi
101 h show that a reduction of hot extremes with deforestation - as simulated in a number of CMIP5 models
102  within such concessions are at high risk of deforestation, as there are normally no legal hurdles to
103  with ASGM in Peru, this research shows that deforestation associated with ASGM is an additional mech
104    This difference is explained by increased deforestation associated with increased beef consumption
105 ef consumption under the subsidy and reduced deforestation associated with reduced beef consumption u
106  annual carbon emissions from gross tropical deforestation at 2.270 Gt CO2 yr(-1).
107 de that there is no substantive evidence for deforestation at Chaco and no obvious indications that t
108 ta, we test the effect of property rights on deforestation between 1982 and 2016.
109            Almost half (36,158 km(2)) of the deforestation between 2004 and 2011 occurred in areas do
110 ng lease boundaries, causing 11,670 km(2) of deforestation between 2005 and 2015.
111 that are found in the South American 'arc of deforestation', but which have been neglected in the des
112  and policy in Brazil have focused on Amazon deforestation, but a majority of Brazil's deforestation
113       Halving carbon emissions from tropical deforestation by 2020 could help bring the international
114                        Certification lowered deforestation by 33% from a counterfactual of 9.8 to 6.6
115 ced under the revised law, could end illegal deforestation by greatly reducing the cost of monitoring
116  assumed to indicate extensive pre-Columbian deforestation by large populations.
117  still face a high risk of extinction unless deforestation can be controlled.
118 d tropical protected areas (PAs) that reduce deforestation can therefore play an important role in mi
119 re we show that tropical PAs overall reduced deforestation carbon emissions by 4.88 Pg, or around 29%
120                                Expansion and deforestation carried out by non-industrial producers is
121 oing an intense process of fragmentation and deforestation caused by human-made changes to the enviro
122 tional park over a decade (~70% reduction in deforestation compared to a synthetic control, permuted
123 93 billion USD yr(-1), with avoided tropical deforestation comprising 30-54% of total mitigation.
124  this policy using annual nationwide data on deforestation, concession licenses, and potential agricu
125                                           If deforestation continues to increase at its current expon
126 and 2012, when compared to expected rates of deforestation controlling for spatial variation in defor
127 turbance in the Amazon occurs in the form of deforestation (conversion of forest to non-forest land c
128     Complementary policies to directly limit deforestation could help limit these effects.
129          We demonstrate that efforts to halt deforestation could mediate some orang-utan habitat loss
130 he largest landholders (>2,500 ha) to annual deforestation decreased over time (63% decrease between
131  time series analysis of Landsat data to map deforestation, degradation, and natural disturbance in t
132                             Carbon loss from deforestation, degradation, harvesting and peat fires is
133 r the regeneration of these species, whereas deforestation degrades landscapes.
134 ive anthropogenic degradation in the form of deforestation, drainage and fire are converting it into
135 ement in the Amazon basin, yet evidence of a deforestation-driven increase in malaria remains equivoc
136 ionally traded commodity that is the primary deforestation driver in Guyana.
137 tC by 2100) but also indirectly through less deforestation due to higher crop yields (16 GtC by 2100)
138 d near-ground insectivores in the absence of deforestation, edge effects or other direct anthropogeni
139 re and edge varies across Brazil, suggesting deforestation effects on communities, and hence the most
140  recently available forest loss data to test deforestation effects on International Union for Conserv
141 s to vary greatly, even from "leakage," more deforestation elsewhere, to "blockage," less deforestati
142 deforestation elsewhere, to "blockage," less deforestation elsewhere.
143 stimated their role in offsetting old-growth deforestation emissions since 1985.
144 multaneous regrowth, the net contribution of deforestation emissions to rising atmospheric CO2 concen
145  dioxide have been far less significant than deforestation, even when accounting for inter-annual var
146                                            A deforestation event today leads to a time-delayed future
147 reak occurring in a site is linked to recent deforestation events, and that preventing the loss of fo
148                                              Deforestation exacerbates this process, increasing the p
149 mely, temperature increase of 4 degrees C or deforestation exceeding 40% of the forest area.
150 e satellite-based datasets and climate model deforestation experiments.
151                 In the absence of widespread deforestation, exploitation of forest products shaped a
152 e of recent societies, linked to large-scale deforestation, extensive and intensive agriculture, reso
153            In Brazil's Amazon, mining drives deforestation far beyond operational lease boundaries, y
154                          The consequences of deforestation for aboveground biodiversity have been a s
155  of a nonforest edge, a consequence of rapid deforestation for agriculture.
156 rgest decreasing trend because of continuous deforestation for charcoals.
157                                     Tropical deforestation for the establishment of tree cash crop pl
158                        Our study showed that deforestation for tree plantations decreased SOC stocks
159 f the forest area in the Amazon Ecoregion as deforestation from 1995 to 2017.
160 es of alternative policies aimed at limiting deforestation from oil palm expansion in M&I.
161 s that are rapidly succumbing to encroaching deforestation frontiers.
162 t forests from defaunation fronts as well as deforestation fronts.
163                         We show that even if deforestation had completely halted in 2010, time lags e
164 palities across 13 y (2003 to 2015) and show deforestation has a strong positive effect on malaria in
165   While the effectiveness of PAs in reducing deforestation has been estimated, the impact on global c
166                                     Tropical deforestation has caused a significant share of carbon e
167 n relatively intact landscapes; even minimal deforestation has had severe consequences for vertebrate
168       Combined effects of climate change and deforestation have altered precipitation patterns in the
169                            Reforestation and deforestation have been critical aspects of LUCC over th
170 ing positive incentives for farmers to forgo deforestation have been designed but not fully implement
171                    Territorial approaches to deforestation have been effective and could consolidate
172 ear to what extent emissions from old-growth deforestation have been offset by secondary forest growt
173 watershed in Madre de Dios, Peru, mining and deforestation have increased exponentially since the 198
174 ferences in land-use policies, resulting in "deforestation havens." We analyze the determinants of in
175 Chiquitano, a region that has become the new deforestation "hot spot" in South America.
176 and control measures on larger properties in deforestation hotspots, may be increasingly limited in t
177 sis to understand the impacts of large-scale deforestation in India on monsoon precipitation and foun
178 e most prominent proximate cause of tropical deforestation in Latin America, a region characterized b
179 roduction or consumption is unlikely to halt deforestation in M&I in the absence of active forest con
180 reasing carbon emissions from gross tropical deforestation in many other tropical countries that, fro
181      However, the effect of certification on deforestation in oil palm plantations remains unclear.
182 rs (i.e., replacement land uses) of mangrove deforestation in Southeast Asia between 2000 and 2012.
183                 Since the 1960s, large-scale deforestation in the Amazon Basin has contributed to ris
184      Our study supports the expectation that deforestation in the Amazon River floodplain affects not
185   Our study highlights frontiers of mangrove deforestation in the border states of Myanmar, on Borneo
186       This gap is partially due to decreased deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon during the early i
187                    The recent 70% decline in deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon suggests that it i
188 s increase in biomass burning emissions from deforestation in the Northern Hemisphere.
189 ind that the remote forcing from large-scale deforestation in the northern middle and high latitudes
190  represent up to 40% of the carbon loss from deforestation in the region.
191                                              Deforestation in the tropics is not only responsible for
192                       Achieving zero illegal deforestation in this context would require the private
193 iques to investigate the association between deforestation in time and space, with EVD outbreaks in C
194 es (involving, for example, afforestation or deforestation) in different geologic and climate regions
195  other in bidirectional causal relationships-deforestation increases malaria through ecological mecha
196                                         With deforestation increasing, and degradation/disturbance a
197  DIC became significantly more enriched with deforestation, indicating a shift in source and processe
198      To reduce greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation, Indonesia instituted a nationwide morator
199 er cent of delta growth can be attributed to deforestation-induced increases in fluvial sediment supp
200 ng land-atmosphere coupling, which can alter deforestation-induced temperature changes.
201 plemented, indigenous property rights reduce deforestation inside indigenous territories in the Amazo
202 ross all these tools, only federal PAs lower deforestation internally and nearby.
203                                     Tropical deforestation is a significant cause of global carbon em
204 model's near-surface temperature response to deforestation is consistent with recent observations, an
205                               Mining-induced deforestation is not unique to Brazil; to mitigate adver
206 sion, most oil palm expansion and associated deforestation is occurring outside large agro-industrial
207 ut 1 degrees C over the last 60 y, and total deforestation is reaching 20% of the forested area.
208                                     Tropical deforestation is responsible for around one tenth of tot
209 an, during drought, affect larger areas than deforestation itself.
210        Our results suggest a 10% increase in deforestation leads to a 3.3% increase in malaria incide
211                                     Avoiding deforestation leakage requires harmonizing deforestation
212 o forest margins fragmented and disturbed by deforestation may be particularly exposed to zoonotic in
213 its may be more cost effective, and mangrove deforestation more damaging, than previously thought.
214  be increasingly frequent because of ongoing deforestation of Indonesian peatlands.
215 tical turmoil are likely to have reduced the deforestation of subalpine environments and caused wides
216                                   Similarly, deforestation often does not result in the immediate los
217             In fact, the negative effects of deforestation on bird occurrences switched to positive i
218 wing a combined effect of climate change and deforestation on BVOC emission in Amazonia.
219                                   Effects of deforestation on carbon dynamics in remnant forests, and
220                       The impact of mangrove deforestation on carbon emissions has been reported on a
221                   To investigate the role of deforestation on dissolved organic and inorganic C (DOC
222  impact of land use changes and human driven deforestation on fire frequency and population exposure
223 t sequencing, we characterize the effects of deforestation on microbial communities across multiple b
224 te the biogeophysical effects of large-scale deforestation on monsoon regions.
225              NSMD governance regimes reduced deforestation on participating properties by 2-23%.
226                    We investigate impacts of deforestation on the South American monsoonal circulatio
227  of a dieback of the entire ecosystem due to deforestation only of parts of the rainforest.
228                  Abrupt land change, such as deforestation or agricultural intensification, is a key
229              Environmental disturbances like deforestation or climate change may influence lake therm
230 concessions (21.1% of emissions) and address deforestation outside of concessions and protected areas
231 2000 to 2010, then nationwide emissions from deforestation over that decade would have been 241-615 M
232  Mangrove forests have experienced extensive deforestation owing to global demand for commodities, an
233 and establish a domestic market for frontier deforestation permits.
234 obal commodity chains increasingly make zero-deforestation pledges.
235                    Our findings suggest that deforestation policies to date, which have been particul
236  For future land cover, we developed spatial deforestation predictions from 10 years of satellite dat
237 station controlling for spatial variation in deforestation pressure.
238 opulation growth in relation to the parallel deforestation process adopting a statistical point of vi
239 Amazonian climate, vegetation, fires and the deforestation process to help to support future research
240  has the potential to alter behavior on high-deforestation properties.
241 matic and highly significant increase in the deforestation rate for the majority of these areas and t
242                          Recent increases in deforestation rate since 2014 will enhance such degradat
243 protect intact forests are necessary to slow deforestation rates and to avert a new wave of global ex
244 tablishment, we show that protection reduces deforestation rates by 150% relative to unprotected port
245 or logging in Indonesia increased site-level deforestation rates by 17-127%, 44-129%, or 3.1-11.1%, r
246                     However, although annual deforestation rates fell during this period by 68-85% fo
247                                              Deforestation rates have declined substantially across t
248                                     Although deforestation rates in the Brazilian Amazon are well kno
249                                       Annual deforestation rates in the Brazilian Amazon fell by 77%
250 ng to pay US$250 million to Guyana if annual deforestation rates remained below 0.056% from 2010 to 2
251  in Latin America, a region characterized by deforestation rates substantially above the world averag
252 Registered properties initially showed lower deforestation rates than unregistered ones, but these di
253 sing aerosol and carbon dioxide emissions on deforestation rates, without accounting for forest degra
254  could alter cropland requirements and hence deforestation rates.
255                                 Centuries of deforestation reduced numbers to a few hundred individua
256                                              Deforestation reduces abundance and biomass in lowland c
257 e aforementioned feedback, which occurs when deforestation reduces transpiration to a point where the
258 In this pantropic study, conducted in active deforestation regions of Indonesia, Cameroon, and Peru,
259 g deforestation leakage requires harmonizing deforestation regulations across regions and commodities
260  the availability of cheap forestland, lower deforestation regulations attract investments by compani
261                          With more stringent deforestation regulations in some countries, we ask whet
262                                     However, deforestation-related cloud and radiation effects manife
263                                We found that deforestation results in weakening of the ISMR because o
264 e-associated deforestation, to estimate the "deforestation risk" (in hectares/year) of each supply ch
265 ecedented insight into the global trade of a deforestation-risk commodity and demonstrate the potenti
266                             In addition, the deforestation share attributable to remote areas increas
267 carbon capture and storage and afforestation/deforestation, showed that all NETs have significant lim
268 t these were linked to the highest levels of deforestation since 2008.
269 edge, of actor-specific contributions to the deforestation slowdown by linking agricultural census an
270                                 As expected, deforestation substantially increased the odds of a spec
271 editing baselines assume consistently higher deforestation than counterfactual forest loss in synthet
272 rest loss during this time and 12 times more deforestation than occurred within mining leases alone.
273 esis is that federal PAs avoid more internal deforestation than state PAs since federal agencies cons
274 alysis support a decoupling between fire and deforestation that has exacerbated forest degradation in
275 in conservation biology because of the rapid deforestation that has occurred over the last 50 years.
276 nnual rates and spatial patterns of tropical deforestation that occurred between 1950 and 2009 in the
277 ropland expansion is a significant driver of deforestation, these results have important implications
278 gh ecological mechanisms and malaria reduces deforestation through socioeconomic mechanisms-and that
279 und no evidence that enrollees shifted their deforestation to nearby land.
280 spatially explicit data on cattle-associated deforestation, to estimate the "deforestation risk" (in
281                       A new study shows that deforestation today leaves a carbon and biodiversity deb
282 tion and document how thermal niche explains deforestation tolerance.
283 Further, in laboratory experiments, the more deforestation-tolerant species has critical thermal limi
284                                     The more deforestation-tolerant species is associated with warmer
285                                         Kelp deforestation triggered mass (80%) abalone mortality (20
286 onse to increased forest loss at the "Arc of Deforestation." Tropical forests, which have adapted to
287  therefore not have necessitated large-scale deforestation using stone tools.
288              We estimated that 27.4 km(2) of deforestation was averted in the national park over a de
289                 Outside the region's "arc of deforestation," we confirm little internal impact and sh
290 d species, populations are more sensitive to deforestation when near their range edge.
291 xpansion of woody vegetation prior to modern deforestation, which could help inform conservation and
292 ve and could consolidate progress in slowing deforestation while providing a framework for addressing
293 operty rights show a significant decrease in deforestation, while the effect does not exist in territ
294 of these patterns allows us to predict where deforestation will have the strongest effects on soil bi
295       The loss of biodiversity and continued deforestation will lead to high risks of irreversible ch
296 erences in LULC between 1987 and 2005 showed deforestation with conversion of forest land to crop lan
297 ipitation changes depends on the location of deforestation, with remote effects showing a larger infl
298 52% increase in the probability of per-pixel deforestation within parks for 2018.
299 cement, extensive road paving, and increased deforestation) would substantially mitigate the effects
300 tween indigenous land management and avoided deforestation, yet few have accounted for forest degrada

 
Page Top