ライフサイエンスコーパス: denial

1 ; Opportunity: mobility; Motivation: symptom denial).

2 riers to accessing benefits in the past (eg, denial).

3 ibility, lack of trials/slots, and insurance denial.

4 d inspections, information sharing, and port denial.

5 n the 60 days following a medication fill or denial.

6 normal human tendencies toward optimism and denial.

7 maladaptation was a result of avoidance and denial.

8 t also address the social drivers of science denial.

9 er (p < 0.001) were associated with complete denial.

10 prescription and medical costs attributed to denials.

11 d and what factors are associated with these denials.

12 ot receive recommended care due to delays or denials.

13 enied, consisting mainly of specific benefit denials (0.67%; 95% CI, 0.66%-0.68%) and billing errors

14 usal to disclose reason (11%), and insurance denial (8%).

15 ern (frequently ascribed to minimization and denial) about behavioral outcomes that could potentially

16 uggest that although procedural prescription denials aimed to curb immediate drug costs, some denials

17 strategies of active acceptance rather than denial and avoidance in relation to bladder management.

18 dy limitations were dropout due to insurance denial and loss to follow-up after treatment, limiting t

19 Political ignorance, denial and obduracy (as with HIV/AIDS) further compound

20 nation, Holocaust denial, and climate change denial and whether they would take punitive action again

21 istrative staff, but the burden of insurance denials and appeals were on PHOs (35 of 53 respondents [

22 maternal vaccine or nirsevimab on admission denials and mortality.

23 Denials and terminations, although relatively common, do

24 care continuum, leading to the potential for denials and/or delays of diagnosis, treatment, or surviv

25 increase of one severe stressor, one unit of denial, and 5 mg/dl of cortisol.

26 election denial, antivaccination, Holocaust denial, and climate change denial and whether they would

27 ge stressful life events, coping by means of denial, and higher serum cortisol as well as with lower

28 ges facing the community and suggest stigma, denial, and lack of education as the primary reasons for

29 nted by organized campaigns to spread doubt, denial, and rejection of the scientific community's cons

30 f activities during pregnancy, more abortion denials, and more abortions after the first trimester.

31 eighted averages of charges, reimbursements, denials, and RCR across procedure categories and service

32 From vaccination refusal to climate change denial, antiscience views are threatening humanity.

33 e problematic social media posts on election denial, antivaccination, Holocaust denial, and climate c

34 where to go (AOR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.21-4.53), denial (AOR, 3.21; 95% CI, 1.24-6.43), and internalized

35 1648 [28.4%] requested help navigating claim denials, appeals, or health insurance), followed by fina

36 Despite observers identifying denial as less supportive than validation, those who obs

37 early coping strategies (eg, increased with denial: beta =.08; P =.005; and giving up: beta =.05; P

38 rvices across 5 categories: specific benefit denials, billing errors, coverage lapses, inadequate cov

39 107 patients (33.1%) experienced at least 1 denial by a center before being placed (32 of 55 patient

40 xual abuse by a male noncaretaker, emotional denial by a male caretaker, and inconsistent treatment b

41 nal vaccine or nirsevimab could have reduced denials by 677 (95% prediction interval 63 to 1347) and

42 ave led to increased procedural prescription denials by health plans.

43 Additionally, fear of insurer reimbursement denial can be a significant barrier to clinical trial pa

44 l depression, social support, and repression/denial can influence both cellular and humoral indicator

45 Resultant delays and denials can be particularly problematic for patients wit

46 Weighted averages for denials, charges, and reimbursements (adjusted for infla

47 tory findings revealed that those who viewed denial comments also judged the transgressor as less rac

48 m denials were measured based on payment and denial data.

49 neonaticide describes a pattern of pregnancy denial, dissociation, and ego disorganization.

50 Denial during the first half of a stance has a greater e

51 transplant patients and is often a cause for denial for access to transplantation.

52 The primary quantitative outcome was a denial for admission to an inpatient rehabilitation cent

53 Overall, PA denial for step therapy was 2.9% (65 of 2225) of request

54 litation centers, significant disparities in denials for admission were observed among survivors of v

55 primary outcome was the frequency of insurer denials for preventive services across 5 categories: spe

56 Less denial, greater trust in one's practitioner, and longer

57 xperiencing specific procedural prescription denials had a higher risk of physiologically related eme

58 Patients with at least 1 prescription denial in the study period were matched to those without

59 spitalizations compared with those without a denial in the subsequent 60 days (adjusted odds ratio, 1

60 racist, and expressed less support and more denial in their own comments.

61 Denials in 6 medication classes were associated with net

62 e study period were matched to those without denials in a given medication class, based on demographi

63 ents with payer-denied cases, most insurance denials in radiation oncology were ultimately approved o

64 Despite denials in the target article, the Distancing-Embracing

65 denied and the factors associated with that denial, information was collected on participants in the

66 This denial is typically supported on utilitarian grounds-act

67 oretically result in beneficial intervention denial, less research dollars, curbed therapeutic advanc

68 The claim denial likelihood for period 3 was significantly higher

69 progression (n=2), death (n=1), or insurance denial (n=1), such that 39 patients received treatment (

70 Claim denial occurred among 23.3% of the NGS claims in the sam

71 ater than 3 times the odds of experiencing a denial (odds ratio, 3.51; 95% CI, 1.93-6.48; P < .001).

72 licit a patient's vaping history as a simple denial of "smoking" can be misleading.

73 Our results demonstrate that denial of a unified visual signal derived from binocular

74 Denial of abortion care has substantial consequences for

75 experiencing mental health sequelae from the denial of abortion care.

76 Denial of abortion is linked with heightened stress and

77 dical personnel, facilities, and transports, denial of access to medical services, and misuse of medi

78 based case management and concern about the denial of ACT on account of negative RDT results.

79 r were more likely to be concerned about the denial of ACT to their RDT-negative children.

80 M were less likely to be concerned about the denial of ACT to their test-negative children (O.R. 0.57

81 used to curb adolescents' agency, including denial of adolescents' rights to make decisions about wh

82 In addition, the denial of bulk viral siRNAs from effector complexes sugg

83 y might result in case selection bias and in denial of care to or out migration of high-risk patients

84 ing 2 patients for lack of weight record and denial of consent, 126 patients between July 1997 and Ju

85 tting that influences awareness of dying and denial of death as a possibility and avoidance of naming

86 tion; 2) disability leading to inability; 3) denial of disability experience; 4) invasion of privacy

87 known to be ascetic and able to sustain self-denial of food as well as most comforts and pleasures in

88 design of which can be regulated for safety; denial of gun ownership to those convicted of misdemeano

89 Our results indicate that denial of handgun purchase to violent misdemeanants is a

90 search returned 1562 cases: 290 involved the denial of insurance coverage for a transplant due to a p

91 ism in scientific funding and the widespread denial of its existence.

92 e of psychotropic medication (P = .009), and denial of life and health insurance (P < .001).

93 We included all cases that involved a denial of liver transplant candidacy in violation of con

94 ility experience; 4) invasion of privacy and denial of meaningful relationships; 5) being ignored and

95 called anosognosia for hemiplegia, i.e. the denial of motor deficits contralateral to a brain lesion

96 ed through responses to 3 GQ questions about denial of opportunities, offensive remarks or names, and

97 gement of its use for laboring women and the denial of payment to some anesthesiologists who use it.

98 lso makes it difficult to refute a country's denial of poaching problems.

99 er on the day of birth, is often preceded by denial of pregnancy.

100 D protocol being prone to reconnaissance and denial of service (DoS) attacks.

101 onization, replay, man-in-the-middle (MITM), denial of services (DoS), and jamming, ensures perfect f

102 rs may need to consider adopting a policy of denial of solid organ transplantation on the basis of va

103 ind is not accurate, and social psychology's denial of stereotype accuracy led us toward mindreading/

104 Denial of the benefits of NP monitoring potentially reta

105 s an anti-experimental pamphlet or as a flat denial of the existence of pro-social motives--which it

106 mfort about psychiatric diagnoses, including denial of the illness, problematic side effects, fears a

107 This occurred despite their explicit denial of the self-relevance of the former sentences.

108 dy weight or shape on self-evaluation," and "denial of the seriousness of low body weight" over neuro

109 ates have passed legislation prohibiting the denial of transplant listing solely based on cannabis us

110 tion of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, denial of valve replacement in patients with subacute ba

111 Denial of visual input during a stance prolongs this sta

112 Brief denial of visual input during a swing prolongs the next

113 Denials of coverage for treatment in a clinical trial li

114 trengthen opportunities for patients to have denials of coverage reconsidered by their health plans.

115 1 535 181 patients seeking preventive care, denials of insurance claims for preventive care were dis

116 ical effects on patients caused by insurance denials of RT is needed.

117 Here, we present a versatile denial-of-spread (DoS) strategy to target and eliminate

118 ffects of stress, depression, and repression/denial on onset and progression of AIDs and cancer is le

119 The effect of unresolved denials on chronic condition exacerbation and subsequent

120 strongest predictor of having experienced a denial or termination and of having neither an IPA nor a

121 Physicians experiencing a denial or termination had fewer capitated patients in th

122 effect of access restrictions due to permit denials or delays on all-cause mortality for patients wi

123 naging any concern or dispute about billing, denials, or an audit are subsequently addressed.

124 (eg, giving up: OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.27-2.20; denial: OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.07-1.64; and self-distractio

125 on, length of stay prediction, and insurance denial prediction.

126 als aimed to curb immediate drug costs, some denials prompted heightened acute care utilization and c

127 The least educated enrollees had a denial rate of 1.79% (95% CI, 1.76%-1.82%) compared with

128 The claim denial rate was 16.8% before the NCD, 20.3% after the im

129 Denial rates for Asian (2.72%; 95% CI, 2.55%-2.90%), His

130 NGS testing claims among Medicare enrollees, denial rates varied by testing type and testing site and

131 Part B data, controlling for year, charges, denials, reimbursement-to-charge ratio (RCR), service se

132 go, faced many challenges, including initial denial, resistance from communities, and prolonged regio

133 ortive than validation, those who observed a denial response showed less responsive attitudes toward

134 ents had 43.0% higher odds of experiencing a denial than the highest-income patients (odds ratio, 1.4

135 ests that even as observers negatively judge denial, their perceptions of the poster are nonetheless

136 d use of negative coping strategies, such as denial, venting and self-blame, were associated with hig

137 The likelihood of a claim denial was higher in both time periods after the origina

138 n the 60 days following a medication fill or denial were compared for the study period.

139 Claim denials were measured based on payment and denial data.

140 The effects of 300-400 ms of visual input denial, which typically prolonged stances and/or swings,

141 and administrative hurdles, including claim denials, which may exacerbate inequitable access to care

142 Association of these denials with changes in RT technique, dose, and time to