戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  4 to 12 y old, who had no prior resin-based dental treatment.
2 nitor cells from patients undergoing routine dental treatment.
3 iated pain behaviors, as well as fears about dental treatment.
4  were euthanized at days 7, 15, and 30 after dental treatment.
5 erapy needed to be able to receive necessary dental treatment.
6 ety patients experience before attending for dental treatment.
7 of local anesthetic/vasoconstrictor prior to dental treatment.
8  experience short-term increases in BPA from dental treatment.
9 inations, questionnaires, and rehabilitative dental treatment.
10 lth-related quality-of-life scores following dental treatment.
11 on in oral tissues, and the implications for dental treatment.
12 s rare, despite kissing, aerosolization, and dental treatment.
13 sed systemic problems which can affect their dental treatment.
14 festations of the syndrome as they relate to dental treatment.
15 ith dental care use, and costs of associated dental treatment.
16 4 of 73 respondents (88%) required follow-up dental treatment.
17 nce oral complications requiring substantial dental treatment.
18 hildren from low-income families needing for dental treatment.
19 nslation of fundamental knowledge to improve dental treatments.
20 2%, and 62% of children had at least 1 minor dental treatment, 1 major treatment or extraction, and 1
21 ding the index date was classified as (1) no dental treatment, (2) no periodontal treatment, (3) one
22              Saliva, collected on the day of dental treatment and 3 and 7 days later, was analyzed us
23 pes simplex virus (HSV) infections following dental treatment and antiviral therapy.
24 ng to improve the efficacy and efficiency of dental treatment and digital dentistry.
25           Oral microbes are dispersed during dental treatment and reduction methods have been propose
26 o controls, IBD patients required more often dental treatment and spent more money; specifically, UC
27 ing natural steady-state CO(2) levels during dental treatments and experimental CO(2) concentration d
28 ramic radiographs (taken at the beginning of dental treatment), and cone-beam computed tomographic sc
29 ed patients attending their first session of dental treatment, and accumulating a score of 19 or abov
30 ed at baseline, 3-6 months after the initial dental treatment, and annually for 7 years of follow-up.
31 orm anyone giving them medical, surgical, or dental treatment, and the patients must refrain from don
32 udy whether periodontitis or recent invasive dental treatments are associated with young-onset crypto
33  medwakh, or shisha, and non-smokers seeking dental treatment at the University Dental Hospital in Sh
34 is area to better understand whether and how dental treatments can improve overall health.
35                                              Dental treatment did not influence asymptomatic viral sh
36                                              Dental treatment does not seem to be a risk factor for i
37 ate urgency, not only for safe resumption of dental treatment during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, b
38 ture yielded no studies assessing the chosen dental treatment following surgical closure of oroantral
39 udy looked at the effectiveness of a special dental treatment for elderly nursing home residents with
40                 There are limited reports of dental treatment for patients with this syndrome, and no
41                                       Today, dental treatment for the population with a positive HIV
42                Children who received a minor dental treatment had higher reading and math scores by 1
43                          Patients undergoing dental treatment have an uncertain understanding about d
44 e transmission and barrier techniques during dental treatment have been areas of recent concern in de
45             The association between invasive dental treatments (IDTs) and a short-term risk of myocar
46 ncreased in the first 4 weeks after invasive dental treatment (incidence ratio, 1.50 [95% CI, 1.09 to
47 rinses and intraoral high-volume evacuation, dental treatment is not a factor in increasing the risk
48                     One of the main goals of dental treatment is to mimic teeth and design smiles in
49                                     Invasive dental treatment may be associated with a transient incr
50 rivate medical insurers do not reimburse for dental treatment, more comprehensive coverage deserves p
51  treatments (mostly surface fillings), major dental treatments (mostly crowns and pulpotomy) or extra
52  health measures were examined: having minor dental treatments (mostly surface fillings), major denta
53        The present case report describes the dental treatment of a patient with Glanzmann's thrombast
54                                              Dental treatment of ONJ should be conservative and provi
55 d on these findings, recommendations for the dental treatment of patients with CMD are provided.
56     Power to examine the effects of invasive dental treatment on stroke and myocardial infarction sep
57 study evaluated the effect of rehabilitative dental treatment on the oral-health-related quality of l
58 platelet or salicylate drugs before invasive dental treatment or by the use of nonsteroidal anti-infl
59                     Children who had a major dental treatment or extraction had lower reading and mat
60 teeth twice a day (p=0.68), requiring urgent dental treatment (p=0.11).
61                                     Invasive dental treatments performed within 3 mo prestroke were a
62  endosseous implants is an integral facet of dental treatment plans.
63 s and dental anxiety (state, responding to a dental treatment scenario).
64 in the general population, and it influences dental treatment-seeking behavior and oral and systemic
65 s (avoidance, physiological arousal, fear of dental treatment-specific stimuli), adjusting for age, s
66 ergoing treatment for HNC required extensive dental treatment throughout cancer treatment; this treat
67 t of discount eligibility was significant on dental treatment visits (odds ratio [OR], 1.36; 95% CI,
68  age of child, greater weight-for-age, fewer dental treatment visits, higher baseline caries levels o
69 checkup visits appears to be higher than for dental treatment visits.
70                           Ophthalmologic and dental treatment was applied simultaneously.
71 rction in periods immediately after invasive dental treatment was compared with the incidence in all
72 drawn and the diabetes was controlled before dental treatment was initiated.
73               During the preceding 3 months, dental treatment was no more frequent among case-patient
74 phic characteristics, host risk factors, and dental treatment was obtained from structured telephone
75         Association between CIS and invasive dental treatments was especially strong among those with
76      Adult subjects in need of comprehensive dental treatment were recruited.
77                    Those who completed their dental treatment were twice as likely to achieve a favor
78 , seeking dental prophylaxis, and undergoing dental treatment-were assessed by self-report.
79 nt to which children are exposed to BPA from dental treatment with bisGMA materials, by amount of tre
80                    Routine, standard-of-care dental treatment, with one group receiving amalgam resto