ライフサイエンスコーパス: dentist

1 ation products or under the supervision of a dentist.

2 ive births and were less likely to visit the dentist.

3 or adolescent covered by Medicaid had seen a dentist.

4 trials, one randomized by patient and one by dentist.

5 eagues: six physicians, 12 surgeons, and one dentist.

6 ready perform close to the level of a junior dentist.

7 he combined efforts of the physician and the dentist.

8 observation rather than that reported by the dentist.

9 ers systematically referred the patient to a dentist.

10 alcohol intake from either the hygienist or dentist.

11 ment outcomes compare with children visiting dentists.

12 as technically competent as that provided by dentists.

13 lesion sites that are oftentimes omitted by dentists.

14 ar positive attitude reported by parents and dentists.

15 stated that they never referred patients to dentists.

16 ed 45 periodontal patients referred by three dentists.

17 with oral antibiotics commonly prescribed by dentists.

18 e dental scaling task, were higher among the dentists.

19 n the degree of trust and rapport with their dentists.

20 with conflicting recommendations from OS and dentists.

21 low and did not vary greatly among the three dentists.

22 ny of the antibiotics commonly prescribed by dentists.

23 ers' database, which includes 205 762 active dentists.

24 hly accurate, performing similarly to expert dentists.

25 erventions in reducing opioid prescribing by dentists.

26 ghest increase, followed by specialists, and dentists.

27 in the duration of opioid prescriptions from dentists.

28 e oral examination by trained and calibrated dentists.

29 ires were completed by children, parents and dentists.

30 n by dental nurses or hygienists rather than dentists.

31 uction in the antibiotic prescribing rate of dentists.

32 mendations from orthopedic surgeons (OS) and dentists.

33 urses (37.70%), 4910 physicians (28.0%), 267 dentists (1.52%), and 5744 laboratory personnel and othe

34 ntibiotic prescribing rate (practices = 316; dentists = 1,001); or (2) individualised graphical A&F p

35 tists = 438) and 609 intervention practices (dentists = 1,550).

36 or A&F intervention group (practices = 632; dentists = 1,999).

37 e 533 participants in this study (14.8% male dentists; 13.7% male non-dentist health care professiona

38 eak pinch force (35.7 +/- 3.8 N) compared to dentists (24.5 +/- 4.1 N) (P = 0.001).

39 Thirty-one dentists (29 men and two women) who had identified the d

40 practices and 778 patients (Patient RCT = 37 dentists/300 patients; Cluster RCT = 50 dentists/478 pat

41 ers OPG was more commonly ordered by general dentists (31%) followed by prosthodontists (30%), wherea

42 contemplated, 44% (n = 74) reported seeing a dentist, 43% (n = 73) took an analgesic or antibiotic me

43 ata was available for 152 control practices (dentists = 438) and 609 intervention practices (dentists

44 n compound in April 1993 were compared to 47 dentists (45 men and two women) who lived in the area bu

45 = 37 dentists/300 patients; Cluster RCT = 50 dentists/478 patients).

46 randomised to the control (practices = 163; dentists = 567) or A&F intervention group (practices = 6

47 gists, 183 (7.9%) administrators, 154 (6.7%) dentists, 75 (3.2%) social workers, 64 (2.8%) nutritioni

48 tal antibiotic prescribing (practices = 316; dentists = 998).

49 ears) were also referred and screened by the dentists a clinic.

50 gh presurgical evaluation by the restorative dentist, a template and heat-cured/metal-reinforced prov

51 s study tested the hypothesis that informing dentists about patients' dental anxiety prior to commenc

52 ists (Medicaid, 39%; CHIP, 40%), while urban dentists accounted for most of the dentist population (u

53 r in the proportions of children attending a dentist after screening between the control group and th

54 orced appliances fabricated by the referring dentists after 3 to 4 months of healing.

55 Physicians and dentists alike must become increasingly aware of impaire

56 y questionnaire provides information for the dentist and may also confer a psychological benefit on p

57 Analysis was based on 133 dentists and 2833 children.

58 s could improve future training programs for dentists and dental students.

59 ements under careful calibration of multiple dentists and how the replicability can relate to their u

60 During the past two decades, dentists and microbiologists have relied on periodontal

61 Seventy percent of the dentists and nurses brushed at least twice a day compare

62 nd fear of lawsuits amongst private practice dentists and OS has not been addressed.

63 experience on how to engage private-practice dentists and OS in dental stewardship using a community-

64 experience on how to engage private practice dentists and OS in dental stewardship using a community-

65 Dentists and other health care professionals are familia

66 ent, "Periodontists' treatments help general dentists and other specialists increase successful thera

67 Dentists and physicians have long recognized variations

68 esigned originally as a standardized way for dentists and physicians to convey information about the

69 g the jaw but also a new partnership between dentists and radiologists.

70 anagement programs in the offices of general dentists and referral guidelines which limit referral of

71 Six dentists and six senior-year dental students were recrui

72 Dispensing of opioid prescriptions from dentists and surgeons more than 30 days after writing, o

73 safety associated with use of amoxicillin by dentists and the significantly worse rates of fatal and

74 ormed about their diagnosis by their general dentists and then referred to secondary care level.

75 s caries treatment thresholds among Japanese dentists and to identify characteristics associated with

76 This systematic review aimed to determine dentists' and therapists' current lesion threshold for c

77 t reported having rarely been evaluated by a dentist, and 59% had CP.

78 ide from a health professional, 5) visit the dentist, and 6) not have an employed adult in the househ

79 Two-thirds of the nurses, 56.3% dentists, and 36.4% other health professionals flossed a

80 de clinically relevant volume information to dentists, and can potentially be applied in dental clini

81 ns, oncology specialists, otolaryngologists, dentists, and other allied professionals.

82 g practicing and student physicians, nurses, dentists, and other health care professionals.

83 t were used by lawyers alongside physicians, dentists, and patients in elevating health care for blac

84 ed audit and feedback (A&F) interventions on dentists' antibiotic prescribing rates.

85 Moreover, three dentists are also invited to manually annotate the test

86 pplied under the idealized setting where the dentists are periodically recalibrated through group dis

87 tions were carried out by trained calibrated dentists at ages 2 and 3 years.

88 Lack of dentist availability for Medicaid- and CHIP-insured chil

89 ssive disorder that is mainly ascertained by dentists because of the severe periodontitis that afflic

90 This multicenter, block-randomized, dentist-blind, parallel-group study conducted in 8 sites

91 s for a high-caries-risk scenario, gender of dentist, city population, type of practice, conducting c

92 iteria can be quite robust to variation from dentists' clinical measurement differences, as seen from

93 The differences among the dentists' clinical measurements resulted in considerable

94 were included and divided into four groups: dentists, clinical (4th and 5th year) dental students, p

95 For 48 consenting patients, three dentists clinically examined each patient and recorded t

96 having spent >=3000 DKK (ca. 440 USD) at the dentist compared to controls.

97 In the UK, doctors, dentists, coroners, and pharmacists are allowed to repor

98 Dentists deal with oral infections on a regular basis.

99 irst study to examine demographic cue use in dentists' decision-making for pain.

100 Prior sealant need caused variability in dentists' decisions, depending on the child's age and pa

101 nts may not be able to access dental care if dentists decline to participate in Medicaid because of l

102 early preventive dental care, children with dentist-delivered preventive dental care more frequently

103 Dentist-delivered preventive dental care was associated

104 Ongoing collaboration among the dentist, dental specialist, and oncologist is essential

105 s, nurses, nurse practitioners, pharmacists, dentists, dental hygienists, occupational therapists, ph

106 ssessed periodontal disease and a measure of dentist-diagnosed disease as predictors.

107 Two questions aimed to assess "dentist-diagnosed periodontal disease" and two inquired

108 ntify opioid prescriptions from surgeons and dentists dispensed from 2014 through 2019.

109 their general practitioner rather than their dentist due to perceptions that a dentist is 'inaccessib

110 ery 6 months had better odds of visiting the dentist during pregnancy (P <0.001).

111 born women were 48% more likely to visit the dentist during pregnancy compared with non-Canadian coun

112 em (NVDRS) for 2003 to 2017 of physician and dentists dying by suicide.

113 , 1.20-1.74), and receiving education from a dentist (eg, risk factor knowledge: OR, 8.60; 95% CI, 7.

114 Dentists employing two hygienists were more likely to re

115 ws: female gender, practicing with one other dentist, employing two or more hygienists, and being >5

116 6,559 Yelp reviews were examined for general dentists, endodontists, pediatric dentists, oral surgeon

117 alth and pregnancy and those who visited the dentist every 6 months had better odds of visiting the d

118 Trained, standardized, and calibrated dentist examiners assessed 28 permanent teeth or tooth s

119 d at 4 time points by trained and calibrated dentist examiners using a standardized, national diagnos

120 one anatomy and quality and were restored by dentists familiar with the implant system.

121 8 413 opioid prescriptions from surgeons and dentists for 14 789 984 patients; 8 582 029 (58.0%) were

122 this condition becomes a concern of clinical dentists for predominantly the middle-aged and aging pat

123 The families were assessed by calibrated dentists for severity of caries at both time periods.

124 d the work of dental therapists with that of dentists found that they performed at least as well.

125 sectional study analyzed the availability of dentists from matching 3 data sets: the 2020 National Pl

126 male health professionals (58% of whom were dentists), from 40 to 75 years of age, who reported no d

127 ctors associated with it will assist general dentist (GD)-periodontist relationships and benefit pati

128 re more likely to refer patients compared to dentists geographically closer to a periodontist (P<0.02

129 to which periodontists' and general practice dentists' (GPs) behaviors and attitudes reflect current

130 r in their responses concerning how well the dentists had informed them about the procedure, they dif

131 Today, dentists have more options than ever before available to

132 opioid prescribing nationally, surgeons and dentists have not changed their prescribing habits.

133 s study (14.8% male dentists; 13.7% male non-dentist health care professionals; and 71.5% female nurs

134 One example of a good measure is, "Has any dentist/hygienist told you that you have deep pockets?",

135 bone combine to form the structure that most dentists identify as trabeculae on intraoral radiographs

136 rol and Prevention's (CDC) conclusion that a dentist in Florida transmitted human immunodeficiency vi

137 ity that children and adolescents had seen a dentist in the past 6 months as a function of the Medica

138 onfidence interval [CI], 53%-57%) had seen a dentist in the past 6 months than did uninsured children

139 Whether a child or adolescent had seen a dentist in the past 6 months.

140 inority female smokers who did not visit the dentist in the past year and reported the need for gum t

141 ercentage points; P = .04) and having seen a dentist in the previous year (11.4 percentage points, 95

142 line) with the highest odds of not seeing a dentist in the previous year.

143 ssociated with an increased rate of seeing a dentist in the prior year (12.4 percentage points; 95% C

144 nical effectiveness, and safety when used by dentists in a clinical setting.

145 plication compared with diagnosis by trained dentists in a screening clinic.

146 ptake are increased awareness of the role of dentists in diagnosing oral cancer, promotion of oral ca

147 tudy, the mean number of actively practicing dentists in England was 23,624.

148 Data on active dentists in most states (including the District of Colum

149 e patients and an equivalent alternative for dentists in nonsurgical periodontal therapy.

150 on of periodontal stage and grade by general dentists in primary care is critical for patient underst

151 e monthly antibiotic prescribing rate of all dentists in the health board; and (ii) delivered at 0 an

152 Dentists in the United States are under pressure from or

153 On March 16, 2020, 198,000 dentists in the United States closed their doors to pati

154 acculturation were 4% more likely to visit a dentist; individuals living in Chinatown were 45% less l

155 and were randomly allocated to intervention (dentist informed of MDAS score) and control (dentist not

156 h school education, and those who had seen a dentist infrequently and had subgingival calculus.

157 procedures was obtained through patient and dentist interviews.

158 than their dentist due to perceptions that a dentist is 'inaccessible' on a physical and psychologica

159 The degree of agreement among the dentists is described by the interrater agreement kappa

160 n between ophthalmologists, radiologists and dentists is necessary during the treatment of such orbit

161 duced by the dental remuneration system, and dentists' lack of awareness of evidence-based practice.

162 of access to trained therapists, as well as dentists' lack of training and time in providing such a

163 Come), including a lone dentist, Laudumiey, surgeon-dentist to His Majesty, Phil

164 were not significantly affected by pediatric dentists' level of experience (p = .13, 95% CI = 0.12 to

165 Dentists, masked to the rheumatologic diagnoses, perform

166 ine immersion prior to reimplantation by the dentist may be helpful in preventing external root resor

167 Findings suggest dentists may wish to assess familiarity of their patient

168 in Medicaid and CHIP was lowest among urban dentists (Medicaid, 26%; CHIP, 29%) and highest among ru

169 aid, 26%; CHIP, 29%) and highest among rural dentists (Medicaid, 39%; CHIP, 40%), while urban dentist

170 Thirty studies, mainly involving dentists, met the inclusion criteria.

171 To prevent HAS-ECC, dentists must partner with other health providers to dev

172 n=10), science educator (n=2), nurse (n=15), dentist (n=11), and paramedic (n=1).

173 octor (n=26), scientist (n=27), nurse (n=7), dentist (n=2), engineer (n=2), and magnetic resonance im

174 imately better patient care, researchers and dentists need to know how to accurately characterize the

175 dentist informed of MDAS score) and control (dentist not informed) groups.

176 ducators promoting health." Non-periodontist dentists (NPDs) ranked the statement, "Periodontists per

177 ations (advanced practice registered nurses, dentists, occupational therapists, pharmacists, physical

178 non-traditional sites such as coffee shops, dentists' offices, marketplaces, neighbourhood watch/sec

179 Despite clear clinical guidance, dentists often prescribe antibiotics inappropriately.

180 of toothbrushing and most recent visit to a dentist or dental hygienist were recorded using a questi

181 stratified according to appointment (with a dentist or hygienist).

182 ctive periodontal disease was diagnosed by a dentist or specialist were included in the study.

183 nts were carried out by specialist pediatric dentists or postgraduate trainees.

184 tal clinics, especially without expert-level dentists or radiologists.

185 > 1 preventive oral health visit from a PCP, dentist, or both before their third birthday.

186 en the provider of preventive services (PCP, dentist, or both) with Medicaid-enrolled children before

187 or general dentists, endodontists, pediatric dentists, oral surgeons, orthodontists, and periodontist

188 was no evidence of a preference for general dentists over specialists in pediatric dentistry.

189 people in the control group (Registered with dentist (p=0.44), routine check-up within last year (p=0

190 effects of VH patients' demographic cues on dentists' pain management decisions.

191 24 dentists participated in the clinical evaluation of the

192 Among 204 279 active dentists, participation in public insurance varied widel

193 menopausal females who regularly visit their dentist, particularly in those with more severe disease.

194 in dental care shortage areas (defined as <1 dentist per 5000 population).

195 A specially trained dentist performed clinical examinations: measurements in

196 A calibrated dentist performed dental examinations.

197 lled in the study and, in one appointment; a dentist performed the self-reported questionnaire and a

198 se of composite will continue to increase as dentists phase out dental amalgam.

199 ile urban dentists accounted for most of the dentist population (urban, 84%; rural, 5%).

200 rticularly important because the majority of dentists practice independently.

201 ations between the decision to intervene and dentist, practice, and patient characteristics were anal

202 survey was mailed to a random sample of 600 dentists practicing in the state of Virginia.

203 erstanding of these will improve the general dentist practitioner and periodontal specialist relation

204 of side effects; the probing depth; and the dentists' preference and their evaluations of handling/a

205 The present study showed that general dentists preferred OPG and CBCT compared to other dental

206 Dentists prescribe 10% of all outpatient antibiotic pres

207 Dentists prescribe a large portion of all oral antibioti

208 Dentists prescribe approximately 10% of antibiotics disp

209 (-5.7%; 95% CI -10.2% to -1.1%; p = 0.01) in dentists' prescribing rate in the intervention group rel

210 ciation (ADA) studies on the distribution of dentists provides information on the evolving number of

211 ciation (ADA) studies on the distribution of dentists provides information on the evolving numbers of

212 ntal Practice-based Research Networks, using dentist questionnaires and patient interviews for collec

213 Analyses revealed that dentists rated pain intensity higher and were more willi

214 to 2 wk, pound 13.55 to have treatment by a dentist rather than a therapist, pound 41.66 to change f

215 ucation, and were less likely to have seen a dentist recently.

216 and completed behavioral questionnaires, and dentists reported oral health status.

217 Approximately 50% of dentists reported up to 24 patients having received peri

218 ere 31%, 36%, and 38% less likely to visit a dentist, respectively.

219 vitality, and radiographs were taken at the dentist's discretion.

220 mprising a line graph plotting an individual dentist's monthly antibiotic prescribing rate (practices

221 Questions that cannot be answered in the dentist's office with conventional radiographs are now a

222 gingival margin according to the restorative dentist's specifications.

223 tivity analyses examined the impact of using dentist's time as measured by observation rather than th

224 ntrol study examined the association between dentist's visits and invasive dental procedures and risk

225 Studies measured what dentists said they would do rather than actually did.

226 Typically, nonspecialists such as dentists screen for oral cancer risk, and then they refe

227 Since dentists see thousands of patients during their careers,

228 Dentists should collaborate with physicians to minimize

229 In view of this, dentists should take careful medical histories, includin

230 alization and data collection, last visit to dentist, smoking habit, and present occupation, the asso

231 peri-implantitis; 2) information provided by dentists/specialists who perform the treatment; and 3) p

232 1), and the mean mercury level was higher in dentists than in nondentists (mean, 0.91 and 0.45 microg

233 By the time these children present to the dentist, the treatment options often become limited to s

234 A significant proportion of dentists/therapists said they would intervene invasively

235 dentin involvement, 12% (95% CI, 6%-22%) of dentists/therapists stated they would intervene, increas

236 % (95% confidence interval [CI], 15%-28%) of dentists/therapists would intervene invasively.

237 el-dentin junction, 48% (95% CI, 40%-56%) of dentists/therapists would intervene restoratively.

238 The extent that dentists' thresholds for intervening restoratively have

239 ental calculus) were evaluated by calibrated dentists through oral examinations.

240 The survey was mailed to 800 dentists throughout the state of Virginia.

241 female patient was referred from her general dentist to evaluate advanced periodontitis in the maxill

242 including a lone dentist, Laudumiey, surgeon-dentist to His Majesty, Philip V, King of Spain.

243 other, but with periodic conferences of the dentists to clarify general measurement criteria.

244 al caries observed could be used 1) to alert dentists to covert MA use in their patients and 2) as th

245 able after initial supervision by qualified dentists to perform oral cancer screening programs.

246 Evaluating the availability of dentists to provide dental care services to children is

247 reliabilities of these scales, when used by dentists to quantify the patient's pain, suggest that ne

248 eful tools that potentially could be used by dentists to screen for low BMD.

249 nt to identify innovative solutions enabling dentists to successfully perform standard clinic-based p

250 te- (percent receiving fluoridated water and dentist-to-population ratio) and individual-level mediat

251 cigarette smoking; infrequent visits to the dentist; tooth brushing less than once per day; older ag

252 the uncalibrated CPI, as measured by general dentists trained by periodontists in a large epidemiolog

253 nterviewed about tobacco use and examined by dentists trained to use standardized clinical criteria.

254 ource of medical care, and 85% had a regular dentist, up from 89% and 60%, respectively, at baseline.

255 The study found that dentists used demographic cues when making pain manageme

256 tal examinations by 3 trained and calibrated dentists using NHANES protocols.

257 Eighty-nine dentists viewed patients with different demographic cues

258 Eight dentists viewed standardized videotapes showing palpatio

259 = $172) and higher among children with only dentist visits (CRT = 1.48, payment = $234) and both PCP

260 CRT = 1.48, payment = $234) and both PCP and dentist visits (CRT = 1.52, payment = $273).

261 sted results indicated that children who had dentist visits (with or without PCP visits) had signific

262 may lead to a greater reduction in CRT than dentist visits alone.

263 ected more commonly in adults without recent dentist visits and in obese youth.

264 hibited lower rates of specialist visits and dentist visits compared to the indirect sector.

265 gnificant disruptions in GP, specialist, and dentist visits during the COVID-19 pandemic, although so

266 re adjusted for stroke risk factors, regular dentist visits, and patent foramen ovale (PFO) status.

267 For specialist visits and dentist visits, the increase was 3.41 (95% CI -5.87 to 1

268 ian visits, emergency department visits, and dentist visits; and whether the child had experienced un

269 ental care prior to age 2 years from PCPs or dentists vs no preventive dental care.

270 Overall, in this practice, the dentist was best placed to deliver the intervention rath

271 The dentist was not aware of GER status, and the gastroenter

272 The highest agreement for diagnosis among dentists was for severe periodontitis (88%) and the lowe

273 One of two dentists was randomly selected to examine and treat pati

274 The application of pinch force by dentists was related to the required scaling forces, whe

275 Those dentists who practiced with one other dentist were twice as likely to refer more frequently wh

276 hand carriage rates in patients, nurses, and dentists were 9.8%, 6.6%, and 5%.

277 Higher Medicaid payment levels to dentists were associated with higher rates of receipt of

278 4 452 opioid prescriptions from surgeons and dentists were dispensed more than 30 days after writing.

279 ldren with early preventive care visits from dentists were more likely to have subsequent dental care

280 Parents, children, and dentists were not blind to allocated arm.

281 General dentists were preferred to dentists with enhanced skills

282 provided may serve as a reference guide for dentists when making the decision to save or extract a c

283 30 CBCT scans were examined by two groups of dentists, where one group was aided by Diagnocat and the

284 es people to postpone or refuse to go to the dentist, which further negatively impacts their quality

285 examinations were performed by a calibrated dentist who was masked to the diabetic status of the pre

286 written behaviour change message relative to dentists who had not (95% CI -10.4% to -1.9%; p = 0.01).

287 uction in the antibiotic prescribing rate of dentists who had received the written behaviour change m

288 The proportion of dentists who indicated surgical intervention into enamel

289 r periodontal specialist and trained general dentists who measured CPIs in the main study of a nation

290 Those dentists who practiced with one other dentist were twice

291 -group difference in the prescribing rate of dentists who received a health board comparator relative

292 95% CI -8.6% to 0.1%; p = 0.06), nor between dentists who received A&F at 0 and 6 mo relative to thos

293 performed during pregnancy by two calibrated dentists who were unaware of the case-control status.

294 s well as other primary care specialists and dentists will need to advise patients as to whether they

295 vely at anomaly detection when compared to a dentist with 8 years of clinical experience.

296 Providing the dentist with information of the high level of a patient'

297 Seventy-two patients presenting to dentists with clinically significant erosive tooth wear

298 General dentists were preferred to dentists with enhanced skills, but there was no evidence

299 Approximately 60% of patients presenting to dentists with erosive tooth wear have significant gastro

300 l considerations, as well as their impact on dentists, with the objective of creating a backdrop for

301 rove the diagnostic performance and speed of dentists working from CBCT images, provide clinically re

302 n areas), and workforce variables (number of dentists working in the public health system per city/ye