ライフサイエンスコーパス: depersonalization

1 ions of experiencing emotional exhaustion or depersonalization.

2 ver or with nonpsychotic experiences such as depersonalization.

3 ems assessing flashbacks, derealization, and depersonalization.

4 dissociation, pathological dissociation, and depersonalization.

5 posture/facial expression and derealization/depersonalization.

6 none emerged as specifically related to the depersonalization.

7 reatest indirect and total coefficients with depersonalization (- 0.370 and - 0.588).

8 ly symptoms of emotional exhaustion (28%) or depersonalization (28%) or reported that their personal-

9 to 20.0; Delta = -6.8; 95% CI, -4.8 to -8.8; depersonalization, 8.4 to 5.9; Delta = -2.5; 95% CI, -1.

10 associated with having less exhaustion, less depersonalization, a greater sense of personal achieveme

11 p and sigh) was significantly shorter in the depersonalization and anxiety groups (1.6 seconds) than

12 were used to assess dissociative symptoms of depersonalization and derealization.

13 rofessional, emotional exhaustion, cynicism, depersonalization and internship and residency, housesta

14 rnout survey (occupational exhaustion 59.0%, depersonalization and loss of empathy 55.0, low level of

15 Higher scores of burnout on the depersonalization and loss of empathy domain were found

16 Specifically, depersonalization and personal accomplishment directly a

17 underlying some of the clinical features of depersonalization and/or derealization.

18 me is characterized by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and a diminished sense of personal ac

19 three burnout symptoms-emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and a low sense of personal accomplis

20 henomenon of emotional exhaustion, cynicism, depersonalization, and a sense of low personal accomplis

21 sed of three subscales-emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and achievement.

22 nout, characterized by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and decreased personal accomplishment

23 components of burnout-emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and low personal accomplishment-were

24 3 domains of burnout (emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment) and symp

25 Clinician burnout (emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment), confide

26 ) with increases in emotional exhaustion and depersonalization, and personal achievement decreases.

27 ed using subscales for emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal achievement from the Mas

28 ype 7-point subscales: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and professional accomplishment.

29 MCD did not mitigate emotional exhaustion or depersonalization, and reduced personal accomplishment i

30 of burnout, including emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced personal accomplishment,

31 nout, characterized by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced personal accomplishment,

32 Depersonalization appears to be associated with function

33 th the phenomenological conceptualization of depersonalization as a dissociation of perceptions as we

34 l, social capital, emotional exhaustion, and depersonalization as important predictors of nurse repor

35 of burnout than for emotional exhaustion or depersonalization, as well as for nurses with a college

36 1.54; 95% CI, 1.39-1.71; P < .001), and high depersonalization at baseline (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.21-1.

37 .59 [95% CI, 0.46 to 0.72]; P < .001), lower depersonalization (beta, 0.04 [95% CI, -0.07 to -0.01];

38 ality disorder (BPD), as increased levels of depersonalization, body image disturbances, and reduced

39 sonalization disorder and of scores denoting depersonalization but not of general dissociation scores

40 ituation, explaining how a single episode of depersonalization can lead to chronic DPD.

41 Depersonalization decreased by a mean (SE) of -1.66 (0.4

42 king, overvalued ideas, recurrent illusions, depersonalization, derealization, undue suspiciousness,

43 (1) the dimensional dissociation subtypes of depersonalization/derealization and partially-dissociate

44 hors' hypothesis, no evidence was found that depersonalization/derealization during panic attacks was

45 gnosis of panic disorder, those experiencing depersonalization/derealization during panic attacks wou

46 nts with (N=34) and without (N=40) prominent depersonalization/derealization during panic attacks.

47 unique connectivity markers associated with depersonalization/derealization in CEN and DN, to partia

48 peech, anxiety, other physical symptoms, and depersonalization/derealization) are not present in the

49 as significantly prolonged in the group with depersonalization disorder (3.01 seconds compared with 2

50 s was significantly reduced in patients with depersonalization disorder (magnitude of 0.017 micro sie

51 ctance responses of 15 patients with chronic depersonalization disorder according to DSM-IV, 15 contr

52 Fifty-three subjects with DSM-IV-defined depersonalization disorder and 22 healthy comparison sub

53 Forty-nine subjects with DSM-IV depersonalization disorder and 26 healthy comparison sub

54 significant predictor both of a diagnosis of depersonalization disorder and of scores denoting depers

55 was highly predictive of both a diagnosis of depersonalization disorder and of scores denoting dissoc

56 This study supports the conceptualization of depersonalization disorder as a distinct disorder with a

57 Subjects with depersonalization disorder demonstrated significantly gr

58 t in other dissociative disorders, DSM-III-R depersonalization disorder has not been thoroughly inves

59 Depersonalization disorder is characterized by a detachm

60 ive disorders, the relationship of trauma to depersonalization disorder is unknown.

61 gh not highly traumatized, the subjects with depersonalization disorder reported significantly more c

62 The fact that patients with depersonalization disorder respond earlier to a startlin

63 The subjects with depersonalization disorder showed a distinct cognitive p

64 pared to the healthy subjects, subjects with depersonalization disorder showed significantly lower me

65 nship may exist between childhood trauma and depersonalization disorder that merits further investiga

66 The mean age at onset of depersonalization disorder was 16.1 years (SD = 5.2).

67 Fifteen patients with depersonalization disorder were compared to 15 matched n

68 etic resonance images of eight subjects with depersonalization disorder were compared to those of 24

69 rsonalization scores among the subjects with depersonalization disorder were significantly positively

70 In depersonalization disorder, autonomic response to unplea

71 Within the group of subjects with depersonalization disorder, dissociation scores signific

72 al stimuli would be reduced in patients with depersonalization disorder.

73 abuse may play a role in the pathogenesis of depersonalization disorder.

74 he role of childhood interpersonal trauma in depersonalization disorder.

75 s as well as with the subjective symptoms of depersonalization disorder.

76 ion measures and clinical symptoms in DSM-IV depersonalization disorder.

77 similar precipitants and symptoms, including depersonalization, dissociative hallucinations, and inte

78 urned out on the emotional exhaustion and/or depersonalization domain of Maslach Burnout Inventory (A

79 Depersonalization (DP) was most strongly associated with

80 Burnout is a work-related syndrome of depersonalization (DP), emotional exhaustion (EE), and l

81 Burnout is a syndrome of depersonalization, emotional exhaustion, and a sense of

82 wing 3 months (P=.001, P<.001, and P=.02 for depersonalization, emotional exhaustion, and lower perso

83 3 months, and the Maslach Burnout Inventory (depersonalization, emotional exhaustion, and personal ac

84 Depersonalization had been typically treatment refractor

85 Participants experiencing relatively higher depersonalization induced by 0.5 mg/kg of ketamine showe

86 The authors propose that depersonalization involves alterations in the attentiona

87 ere significantly more likely to report high depersonalization (odds ratio [OR], 5.50; 95% CI, 1.38-2

88 d was defined as experiencing any symptom of depersonalization or emotional exhaustion at least weekl

89 high range for medical professionals on the depersonalization or emotional exhaustion subscales.

90 ociated with burnout (ORs per 1-unit change: depersonalization OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.05-1.12; P < .001;

91 ncrease, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.10-1.16; P < .001), depersonalization (OR per 1-point increase, 1.10; 95% CI

92 l MCD did not affect emotional exhaustion or depersonalization, or the team climate.

93 ess, i.e., emotional exhaustion (p = 0.751), depersonalization (p = 0.701), and personal accomplishme

94 of psychosocial risk (emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, perceived stress, depressive symptoms

95 mes extracted for emotional exhaustion (EE), depersonalization, personal accomplishment (PA), and sin

96 Secondary outcomes were depersonalization, personal accomplishment, and burnout.

97 and positively experienced derealization and depersonalization phenomena.

98 No statistically significant differences in depersonalization, professional accomplishment, or moral

99 depression (PHQ-9), dissociation (Cambridge Depersonalization Scale, CDS), alexithymia (TAS-20), cam

100 Each one point increase in depersonalization (scale range, 0-33) was associated wit

101 The mean depersonalization score was higher (3.2 vs 2.0, P = 0.04

102 Dissociation and depersonalization scores among the subjects with deperso

103 roviding futile care rarely also had a lower depersonalization scores; job satisfaction was independe

104 .46 [CI, -1.28 to 0.35], very low certainty; depersonalization SMD, -0.09 [CI, -0.30 to 0.12], modera

105 [95% CI, -0.62 to -0.13], low certainty; and depersonalization SMD, -0.30 [CI, -0.42 to -0.19], moder

106 SMD, -0.40 [-0.65 to -0.16], low certainty; depersonalization SMD, -0.36 [CI, -0.58 to -0.14], low c

107 ut on the "exhaustion" subscale, 44% on the "depersonalization" subscale, and 26% on the "achievement

108 igher scores on the emotional exhaustion and depersonalization subscales and lower scores on the prof

109 ut is a syndrome of emotional exhaustion and depersonalization that leads to decreased effectiveness

110 ancholic symptoms, retardation, suicidality, depersonalization, typical diurnal variation (mornings w

111 evaluated separately, only a high score for depersonalization was associated with self-reported subo

112 Depersonalization was higher for second year fellows (be

113 Emotional exhaustion and depersonalization were reported by 28.0% and 14.4% of th

114 and high levels of emotional exhaustion and depersonalization were reported by 8343 of 16,192 (51.5%