コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ondition as established by a board-certified dermatologist.
2 014, 8614 (2.2%) had 1 or more visits with a dermatologist.
3 s and severity of AD assessed by a pediatric dermatologist.
4 ween the teledermatologist and the in-person dermatologist.
5 ble to obtain an appointment with any listed dermatologist.
6 l condition that had not been evaluated by a dermatologist.
7 masked fashion by a dermatopathologist and a dermatologist.
8 kin lesion determined by an examination of a dermatologist.
9 ults with manually determined borders from a dermatologist.
10 before they received care from their current dermatologist.
11 teria and cutaneous lupus was diagnosed by a dermatologist.
12 atients diagnosed or surgically treated by a dermatologist.
13 e distinct perspectives of the allergist and dermatologist.
14 th reinforcement every 4 months by the study dermatologist.
15 imination of unnecessary appointments with a dermatologist.
16 s that have thus far evaded understanding by dermatologists.
17 border delineation is performed manually by dermatologists.
18 he nature and extent of industry payments to dermatologists.
19 xamination and pursue regular follow-up with dermatologists.
20 hen performed by experienced board-certified dermatologists.
21 on cosmetic dermatology, with a total of 23 dermatologists.
22 and physical examination by board-certified dermatologists.
23 cal plausibility that is likely to appeal to dermatologists.
24 inspection of the lesion skin by experienced dermatologists.
25 outinely by both primary care physicians and dermatologists.
26 ess sensitive than examinations performed by dermatologists.
27 A wide variety of RT services are billed by dermatologists.
28 as morphologically suspicious nevi by the 9 dermatologists.
29 pediatric dermatologists and 5 (35.7%) were dermatologists.
30 raised about the use of radiotherapy (RT) by dermatologists.
31 cer with a level of competence comparable to dermatologists.
32 quently request product recommendations from dermatologists.
33 the characteristics of industry payments to dermatologists.
35 ith aBCC, 16 with BCCNS) and 4 physicians (2 dermatologists, 1 Mohs surgeon, and 1 oncologist) in the
37 %) of 511 human readers were board-certified dermatologists, 118 (23.1%) were dermatology residents,
38 referred patients were seen and treated by a dermatologist; 127 patients (50.2%) were not on prescrip
39 d with $11 105 for optometrists, $16 617 for dermatologists, $20 203 for otolaryngologists, and $23 8
40 re all pharmaceutical manufacturers and paid dermatologists $28.7 million, representing 81% of total
45 ician diagnosis (including 8107 [35.3%] by a dermatologist), 4754 (20%) were self-diagnosed before th
47 ompared with 37.1% of optometrists, 50.2% of dermatologists, 54.5% of otolaryngologists, and 64.4% of
50 e itch for several months, asked whether the dermatologist accepted the relevant plan, and asked for
53 2 of 189 patients (32.8%) were referred to a dermatologist after 33 (53.2%) for presumptive skin canc
54 d signs of actinic skin damage identified by dermatologists), age, and sex compared with wild-type ca
56 in 2 private consultant rooms of specialist dermatologists, all located in Sydney and Gosford, New S
57 s (AD) is a common skin condition treated by dermatologists, allergists, pediatricians, and primary c
58 lence of vitiligo diagnosed by physicians or dermatologists among the general population and in adult
60 ember 26, 2014, in the private practice of a dermatologist and a gynecologist in Sydney, Australia.
61 ect was carefully examined by an experienced dermatologist and stringent diagnostic criteria applied.
62 ial triage concordance between the in-person dermatologist and teledermatologists were 0.41 and 0.48.
63 tients included had psoriasis diagnosed by a dermatologist and were defined as having moderate to sev
64 re obtained in the office-based setting by a dermatologist and with an iPhone by the patient at basel
67 isparity in the perceptions of AD between US dermatologists and allergists and health care profession
69 dvocacy organizations in the CSD among Texas dermatologists and dermatology residents and patient reg
70 ng member organizations of the CSD and among dermatologists and dermatology residents in Texas from A
71 sociated basaloid neoplasms is important for dermatologists and dermatopathologists because many (alt
72 nts a transformative technology that impacts dermatologists and dermatopathologists from residency to
73 %, with a decrease from 48.9% to 41.0% among dermatologists and from 39.7% to 37.7% among internists
75 y to expand the use of the CSAMI and SASI by dermatologists and nondermatologists in assessing cutane
76 s sarcoidosis outcome instruments for use by dermatologists and nondermatologists treating sarcoidosi
82 The final instrument was evaluated by five dermatologists and six residents who scored nine patient
83 ndard, the DLS was non-inferior to six other dermatologists and superior to six primary care physicia
84 rm the reliability of the CLASI when used by dermatologists and support the CLASI as a reliable instr
85 ic images were evaluated by the office-based dermatologist, and mobile dermoscopic images were sent v
86 es were reviewed by a group of pathologists, dermatologists, and oncologists with expertise in cutane
87 tilized scoring of 60 test photographs by 10 dermatologists, and one with in-person evaluations on 85
91 racy of MA plan directories of participating dermatologists,and the appointment availability of liste
93 n performed by a primary care clinician vs a dermatologist; and whether its use leads to earlier dete
96 drugs available in the armamentarium of the dermatologists are either substrate, inducer, or inhibit
101 exposure and investigated the association of dermatologist-assessed hair loss with prostate cancer-sp
102 ns clinically diagnosed by a board-certified dermatologist at a large tertiary referral center, where
103 ns clinically diagnosed by a board-certified dermatologist at a large tertiary referral center, where
105 s on the face and ears were counted by study dermatologists at enrollment and at study visits every 6
106 h in-person evaluations on 85 subjects by 12 dermatologists at the Foundation for Ichthyosis and Rela
107 commend specific software tools that can aid dermatologists at varying levels of computational litera
108 n diagnoses made by an independent pediatric dermatologist based on in-person examination and those b
110 macovigilance cohort (British Association of Dermatologists Biologic Interventions Register (BADBIR))
111 ients enrolled in the British Association of Dermatologists Biologic Interventions Register were incl
113 , 2010, and October 21, 2010, participanting dermatologists, blinded to histopathological diagnosis,
117 , patients and primary care providers sought dermatologists' care directly and asynchronously online.
118 are physicians, rhinologists, pediatricians, dermatologists, clinical immunologists, and pharmacists.
122 re a rotating panel of three board-certified dermatologists defined the reference standard, the DLS w
123 osa are becoming more widely recognized, but dermatologists, dermatopathologists, and histopathologis
127 Participant responses to tanning and the dermatologist-determined FST were not significantly corr
128 Participant responses to burning and the dermatologist-determined FST were significantly correlat
132 ligence (AI) systems have been shown to help dermatologists diagnose melanoma more accurately, howeve
133 ses were limited to patients with a hospital dermatologist diagnosis of rosacea only, the adjusted HR
134 y for skin cancer or precancer compared with dermatologist diagnosis were assessed in screened patien
135 with vitiligo and/or AA were identified from dermatologist documentation and photographic evidence.
137 ader-multiple-case study, 45 board-certified dermatologists each evaluated 60 clinical and dermoscopi
140 ory asynchronously to dermatologists online; dermatologists evaluated the clinical information, provi
141 diagnosed as having cellulitis by PCPs, but dermatologist evaluation determined that 6 (67%) of thes
145 oup comprised of 10,714 patients who visited dermatologists, family physicians, or allergy specialist
146 patients who received a prescription from a dermatologist for a primary initial diagnosis of acne vu
148 ends the image directly to a board-certified dermatologist for analysis; the lowest, for applications
149 Of 376 patients, two were referred to a dermatologist for evaluation, but neither had signs indi
150 n of all races, >/=18 years) presenting to 1 dermatologist for melanoma and/or skin cancer screening
151 n patients with indemnity insurance to see a dermatologist for skin problems, and it was predicted th
152 53 referrals from primary care clinicians to dermatologists for acne from January 2014 through March
153 omen), were randomly presented to the same 9 dermatologists for blinded assessment from September 22,
154 dance was moderate between ED physicians and dermatologists for specialist consultation within 24 hou
155 ies reporting accuracy matching or exceeding dermatologists for the diagnosis of skin lesions from cl
158 undergone periodic physical examinations by dermatologists from 4 months to 3 years of age (Cohort 1
160 creening [LDS]) were screened by a team of 6 dermatologists from March 14 to 18, 2014, for TSBE and A
161 creening [LDS]) were screened by a team of 6 dermatologists from March 14 to 18, 2014, for TSBE and A
162 st, the offices of nationally representative dermatologists from the National Disease and Therapeutic
164 In our secondary analysis, 2 independent dermatologists graded these photographs using 4 validate
166 anomas that underwent biopsy and excision by dermatologists had the lowest likelihood of delay (proba
167 adership required that young German-speaking dermatologists had to seek additional training in the Un
168 ach participant was clinically examined by 2 dermatologists, had laboratory studies performed, was ad
169 provision of samples with a prescription by dermatologists has been increasing over time, and this i
172 ave largely been agreed upon, allergists and dermatologists have similar and divergent approaches to
173 se patients undergoing biopsy and surgery by dermatologists have the lowest risk for delay, highlight
174 ermatology, including triage for referral to dermatologists; (ii) augmenting clinical assessment duri
175 y a pigmented lesion suggestive of melanoma, dermatologists improved their mean biopsy sensitivity fr
176 dy using questionnaires and evaluations by a dermatologist in adults with atopic dermatitis (n = 261)
178 chniques for skin lesion segmentation assist dermatologists in early detection and ongoing monitoring
180 d tumors, highlighting an important role for dermatologists in identifying and screening patients wit
182 t with past satisfaction studies and may aid dermatologists in optimizing the patient care experience
183 omponents of diagnostic procedures to assist dermatologists in their medical decision-making processe
187 ntage of patients with at least 1 visit to a dermatologist (including in-person and teledermatology v
188 eledermatology visits) and total visits with dermatologists (including in-person and teledermatology
189 considered, however, the number of visits to dermatologists increased from the 1989 level, reaching a
193 ion, and SF-36 scores did not correlate with dermatologists' judgments about the severity of skin dis
194 dermatologist preparedness for bioterrorism, dermatologist knowledge regarding smallpox vaccination h
195 y 0.1% to 0.4% of new patients presenting to dermatologists, large-scale population-based studies est
197 cripted telephone calls were placed to every dermatologist listed in directories for the largest MA p
201 tire was preferred for family physicians and dermatologists (mean [SD] preference indexes, 1.6 [2.3]
206 a primary diagnosis of rosacea by a hospital dermatologist (n = 5964), the adjusted incidence rate ra
207 atosis (SK), and benign nevi by a consultant dermatologist (n=87) were imaged by high-resolution ultr
213 nty (DOH Miami-Dade) was notified by a local dermatologist of 3 patients with suspected nontuberculou
214 spective study in a clinical practice of one dermatologist of biopsy data of all skin lesions from on
215 t its performance against 21 board-certified dermatologists on biopsy-proven clinical images with two
217 rototypes of the dominance of German-trained dermatologists on the specialty in the US that persisted
219 linical images and history asynchronously to dermatologists online; dermatologists evaluated the clin
221 ess frequently in direct consultation with a dermatologist or regular screening for skin cancer.
224 encountered in pure forms by allergists and dermatologists, patients with AD often present with incr
225 ical procedures including those performed by dermatologists, plastic surgeons, and general surgeons.
226 and monkeypox demonstrate the importance of dermatologist preparedness for bioterrorism, dermatologi
228 bility of free prescription drug samples and dermatologists' prescribing patterns on a national scale
235 decisions were as follows: if the in-person dermatologist recommended the patient be seen the same d
237 ounce on the basis of marketing claims (eg, dermatologist recommended, fragrance free, hypoallergeni
240 tive effort by groups of rheumatologists and dermatologists regarding development of screening questi
250 he years 1990-1992 to examine utilization of dermatologist services over a period in which managed ca
252 ble comparison data on moisturizer efficacy, dermatologists should balance consumer preference, price
256 lose interdisciplinary collaboration between dermatologists, skin biologists, neuroendocrinologists,
258 nizing that a cure lies in timely detection, dermatologists strive to diagnose malignant melanoma (MM
259 linical response as assessed by the treating dermatologist, subjective quality of life as reported by
260 ssifiers rely both on features used by human dermatologists, such as lesional pigmentation patterns,
262 d AD were significantly less likely to see a dermatologist than white children with similarly poorly
263 s likely to have their skin care provided by dermatologists than patients with commercial insurance (
264 ation; percentage of patients evaluated by a dermatologist through either teledermatology or in-perso
265 nts (120 of 144 [83.3%]) were evaluated by a dermatologist through either teledermatology or in-perso
266 s over time, representing an opportunity for dermatologists to evaluate performance and validate prac
267 tforms provide elaborate and timely data for dermatologists to garner insight into their patients' ex
268 lth care, it is important for clinicians and dermatologists to have a basic understanding of how thes
273 patic manifestation of NASH should sensitize dermatologists to the screening and the management of fa
274 atology may provide a valuable mechanism for dermatologists to triage inpatient consultations and inc
276 hat grew out of efforts by immunologists and dermatologists to understand immune regulation by UV rad
277 tion and should be of continuous concern for dermatologists, transplant physicians, and patients.
280 cordance between primary care clinicians and dermatologists, treatment at the time of referral, and t
281 rease in the fraction of patients visiting a dermatologist (vs 20.5% in other practices; P < .01).
284 12, on the basis of an initial report from a dermatologist, we began to investigate an outbreak of ta
285 environment has resulted in fewer visits to dermatologists, we used National Ambulatory Medical Care
286 at the time of referral, and treatment by a dermatologist were ascertained, and we modeled 2 treatme
288 uries, American physicians wishing to become dermatologists were highly dependent on training in Euro
290 5 of 7287 visits [46.7%]), whereas in-person dermatologists were more likely to care for psoriasis an
291 ed cross-sectional screenings by a team of 6 dermatologists were organized in 2 sociodemographically
292 n by a gynecologist; patients were seen by a dermatologist when there were cutaneous and/or mucous le
295 public and other medical specialties expect dermatologists who offer cosmetic dermatology services t
296 ed from the influx of several stellar Jewish dermatologists who were major contributors to the subseq
297 independently evaluated by 2 board-certified dermatologists, who provided diagnoses and treatment pla
298 ges of all nevi of each patient shown to the dermatologists, who were asked to identify ugly duckling
299 as well as neurologist, ophthalmologist, and dermatologist, will provide a global spectrum of care fo
300 sification relative to three board certified dermatologists with different levels of experience.