戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ondition as established by a board-certified dermatologist.
2 014, 8614 (2.2%) had 1 or more visits with a dermatologist.
3 s and severity of AD assessed by a pediatric dermatologist.
4 ween the teledermatologist and the in-person dermatologist.
5 ble to obtain an appointment with any listed dermatologist.
6 l condition that had not been evaluated by a dermatologist.
7 masked fashion by a dermatopathologist and a dermatologist.
8 kin lesion determined by an examination of a dermatologist.
9 ults with manually determined borders from a dermatologist.
10 before they received care from their current dermatologist.
11 teria and cutaneous lupus was diagnosed by a dermatologist.
12 atients diagnosed or surgically treated by a dermatologist.
13 e distinct perspectives of the allergist and dermatologist.
14 th reinforcement every 4 months by the study dermatologist.
15 imination of unnecessary appointments with a dermatologist.
16 s that have thus far evaded understanding by dermatologists.
17  border delineation is performed manually by dermatologists.
18 he nature and extent of industry payments to dermatologists.
19 xamination and pursue regular follow-up with dermatologists.
20 hen performed by experienced board-certified dermatologists.
21  on cosmetic dermatology, with a total of 23 dermatologists.
22  and physical examination by board-certified dermatologists.
23 cal plausibility that is likely to appeal to dermatologists.
24 inspection of the lesion skin by experienced dermatologists.
25 outinely by both primary care physicians and dermatologists.
26 ess sensitive than examinations performed by dermatologists.
27  A wide variety of RT services are billed by dermatologists.
28  as morphologically suspicious nevi by the 9 dermatologists.
29  pediatric dermatologists and 5 (35.7%) were dermatologists.
30 raised about the use of radiotherapy (RT) by dermatologists.
31 cer with a level of competence comparable to dermatologists.
32 quently request product recommendations from dermatologists.
33  the characteristics of industry payments to dermatologists.
34 ioners (NPs) (top-1 accuracy: 0.66 DLS, 0.63 dermatologists, 0.44 PCPs and 0.40 NPs).
35 ith aBCC, 16 with BCCNS) and 4 physicians (2 dermatologists, 1 Mohs surgeon, and 1 oncologist) in the
36                                    Among 183 dermatologists (102 [55.7%] women; mean [SD] age not col
37 %) of 511 human readers were board-certified dermatologists, 118 (23.1%) were dermatology residents,
38 referred patients were seen and treated by a dermatologist; 127 patients (50.2%) were not on prescrip
39 d with $11 105 for optometrists, $16 617 for dermatologists, $20 203 for otolaryngologists, and $23 8
40 re all pharmaceutical manufacturers and paid dermatologists $28.7 million, representing 81% of total
41                                   Forty-five dermatologists (29 male and 16 female) performed the eva
42       A total of 27 experts participated (14 dermatologists, 3 fellowship-trained dermatopathologists
43                                         Four dermatologists, 3 pulmonologists, and 4 rheumatologists
44  were significantly more often discharged by dermatologists (46.8% vs 39.1%) (P < 10(-4)).
45 ician diagnosis (including 8107 [35.3%] by a dermatologist), 4754 (20%) were self-diagnosed before th
46                Of all patients who visited a dermatologist, 48.5% received care via teledermatology.
47 ompared with 37.1% of optometrists, 50.2% of dermatologists, 54.5% of otolaryngologists, and 64.4% of
48                                         Nine dermatologists (6 of whom had >/=3 years of RCM experien
49                        The use of PDL offers dermatologists a new treatment modality for PPPs that is
50 e itch for several months, asked whether the dermatologist accepted the relevant plan, and asked for
51 tients had 1085985 claims related to AK, and dermatologists accounted for 71.0% of claims.
52                       Additionally, 3 expert dermatologists adjudicated participants' self-reported v
53 2 of 189 patients (32.8%) were referred to a dermatologist after 33 (53.2%) for presumptive skin canc
54 d signs of actinic skin damage identified by dermatologists), age, and sex compared with wild-type ca
55 lines, swirls, and whorls first noted by the dermatologist Alfred Blaschko.
56  in 2 private consultant rooms of specialist dermatologists, all located in Sydney and Gosford, New S
57 s (AD) is a common skin condition treated by dermatologists, allergists, pediatricians, and primary c
58 lence of vitiligo diagnosed by physicians or dermatologists among the general population and in adult
59 re evaluated separately by both an in-person dermatologist and 2 independent teledermatologists.
60 ember 26, 2014, in the private practice of a dermatologist and a gynecologist in Sydney, Australia.
61 ect was carefully examined by an experienced dermatologist and stringent diagnostic criteria applied.
62 ial triage concordance between the in-person dermatologist and teledermatologists were 0.41 and 0.48.
63 tients included had psoriasis diagnosed by a dermatologist and were defined as having moderate to sev
64 re obtained in the office-based setting by a dermatologist and with an iPhone by the patient at basel
65                            Four observers (3 dermatologists and 1 dermatopathologist) blinded to the
66  development phase, 9 (64.3%) were pediatric dermatologists and 5 (35.7%) were dermatologists.
67 isparity in the perceptions of AD between US dermatologists and allergists and health care profession
68                               The efforts of dermatologists and cancer biologists to understand how U
69 dvocacy organizations in the CSD among Texas dermatologists and dermatology residents and patient reg
70 ng member organizations of the CSD and among dermatologists and dermatology residents in Texas from A
71 sociated basaloid neoplasms is important for dermatologists and dermatopathologists because many (alt
72 nts a transformative technology that impacts dermatologists and dermatopathologists from residency to
73 %, with a decrease from 48.9% to 41.0% among dermatologists and from 39.7% to 37.7% among internists
74 tis is a common disorder that has fascinated dermatologists and immunologists for decades.
75 y to expand the use of the CSAMI and SASI by dermatologists and nondermatologists in assessing cutane
76 s sarcoidosis outcome instruments for use by dermatologists and nondermatologists treating sarcoidosi
77                          Although the use of dermatologists and NPCs was similar regardless of clinic
78                Regular communication between dermatologists and oncologists will help facilitate the
79                      Opportunities exist for dermatologists and other physicians to influence occupat
80 cases of SCC were identified by a network of dermatologists and pathology laboratories.
81 ment and 10 years, patients were examined by dermatologists and rheumatologists.
82   The final instrument was evaluated by five dermatologists and six residents who scored nine patient
83 ndard, the DLS was non-inferior to six other dermatologists and superior to six primary care physicia
84 rm the reliability of the CLASI when used by dermatologists and support the CLASI as a reliable instr
85 ic images were evaluated by the office-based dermatologist, and mobile dermoscopic images were sent v
86 es were reviewed by a group of pathologists, dermatologists, and oncologists with expertise in cutane
87 tilized scoring of 60 test photographs by 10 dermatologists, and one with in-person evaluations on 85
88 ment by ophthalmologists, otolaryngologists, dermatologists, and oral medicine specialists.
89 s seen by general pediatricians, allergists, dermatologists, and other specialists.
90 soriasis, including primary care clinicians, dermatologists, and pediatric specialists.
91 racy of MA plan directories of participating dermatologists,and the appointment availability of liste
92  reflectance spectrophotometry compared with dermatologist- and participant-determined FST.
93 n performed by a primary care clinician vs a dermatologist; and whether its use leads to earlier dete
94 rveillance and early referral to a dedicated dermatologist are recommended.
95 pic images whose manually drawn borders by a dermatologist are used as the ground truth.
96  drugs available in the armamentarium of the dermatologists are either substrate, inducer, or inhibit
97                                              Dermatologists are frequently asked to see patients with
98                                Investigative dermatologists are needed to drive and orient this cross
99                                  Even though dermatologists are trained to recognize patterns of morp
100 linician (RR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.71-0.93) was a dermatologist as compared with a nondermatologist.
101 exposure and investigated the association of dermatologist-assessed hair loss with prostate cancer-sp
102 ns clinically diagnosed by a board-certified dermatologist at a large tertiary referral center, where
103 ns clinically diagnosed by a board-certified dermatologist at a large tertiary referral center, where
104               Participants were evaluated by dermatologists at 3-month intervals for 18 months.
105 s on the face and ears were counted by study dermatologists at enrollment and at study visits every 6
106 h in-person evaluations on 85 subjects by 12 dermatologists at the Foundation for Ichthyosis and Rela
107 commend specific software tools that can aid dermatologists at varying levels of computational litera
108 n diagnoses made by an independent pediatric dermatologist based on in-person examination and those b
109                                              Dermatologists based in outpatient settings can find it
110 macovigilance cohort (British Association of Dermatologists Biologic Interventions Register (BADBIR))
111 ients enrolled in the British Association of Dermatologists Biologic Interventions Register were incl
112 l using data from the British Association of Dermatologists Biologic Interventions Register.
113 , 2010, and October 21, 2010, participanting dermatologists, blinded to histopathological diagnosis,
114                 As such, it is important for dermatologists, both researchers and clinicians, to unde
115                                              Dermatologists can discuss hair management strategies du
116                                              Dermatologists can identify patients with a high likelih
117 , patients and primary care providers sought dermatologists' care directly and asynchronously online.
118 are physicians, rhinologists, pediatricians, dermatologists, clinical immunologists, and pharmacists.
119                        Also at each visit, a dermatologist completed the Comprehensive Acne Severity
120                                        Study dermatologists conducted physical examinations at baseli
121 eas the proportion of this care delivered by dermatologists decreased from 39.6% to 37.9%.
122 re a rotating panel of three board-certified dermatologists defined the reference standard, the DLS w
123 osa are becoming more widely recognized, but dermatologists, dermatopathologists, and histopathologis
124                                A total of 22 dermatologists detected 228 suspect melanocytic lesions
125                                      Faculty dermatologists determined a rosacea score for each twin
126                                              Dermatologist-determined FST is more accurate than self-
127     Participant responses to tanning and the dermatologist-determined FST were not significantly corr
128     Participant responses to burning and the dermatologist-determined FST were significantly correlat
129       The spectrophotometry measurements for dermatologist-determined FST were significantly differen
130 accuracy of self-report of FST compared with dermatologist-determined FST.
131                                              Dermatologists diagnose and treat sexually transmitted i
132 ligence (AI) systems have been shown to help dermatologists diagnose melanoma more accurately, howeve
133 ses were limited to patients with a hospital dermatologist diagnosis of rosacea only, the adjusted HR
134 y for skin cancer or precancer compared with dermatologist diagnosis were assessed in screened patien
135 with vitiligo and/or AA were identified from dermatologist documentation and photographic evidence.
136                                     Based on dermatologist drawn ground truth skin lesion borders, th
137 ader-multiple-case study, 45 board-certified dermatologists each evaluated 60 clinical and dermoscopi
138                                The patient's dermatologist elected to change antibiotics.
139                                          Ten dermatologists evaluated 14 patients with DM using the C
140 ory asynchronously to dermatologists online; dermatologists evaluated the clinical information, provi
141  diagnosed as having cellulitis by PCPs, but dermatologist evaluation determined that 6 (67%) of thes
142                                 Two academic dermatologists examined clinical notes, pathology report
143                           The scores from 12 dermatologists experienced in PASI evaluation were used
144                                        Three dermatologists familiar with immunobullous diseases and
145 oup comprised of 10,714 patients who visited dermatologists, family physicians, or allergy specialist
146  patients who received a prescription from a dermatologist for a primary initial diagnosis of acne vu
147                Each section is examined by a dermatologist for abrupt cutoff and scored accordingly,
148 ends the image directly to a board-certified dermatologist for analysis; the lowest, for applications
149      Of 376 patients, two were referred to a dermatologist for evaluation, but neither had signs indi
150 n of all races, >/=18 years) presenting to 1 dermatologist for melanoma and/or skin cancer screening
151 n patients with indemnity insurance to see a dermatologist for skin problems, and it was predicted th
152 53 referrals from primary care clinicians to dermatologists for acne from January 2014 through March
153 omen), were randomly presented to the same 9 dermatologists for blinded assessment from September 22,
154 dance was moderate between ED physicians and dermatologists for specialist consultation within 24 hou
155 ies reporting accuracy matching or exceeding dermatologists for the diagnosis of skin lesions from cl
156                                              Dermatologists frequently encounter patients of advanced
157           A total of 43 hair loss specialist dermatologists from 12 countries participated in a modif
158  undergone periodic physical examinations by dermatologists from 4 months to 3 years of age (Cohort 1
159                              All payments to dermatologists from companies making products reimbursed
160 creening [LDS]) were screened by a team of 6 dermatologists from March 14 to 18, 2014, for TSBE and A
161 creening [LDS]) were screened by a team of 6 dermatologists from March 14 to 18, 2014, for TSBE and A
162 st, the offices of nationally representative dermatologists from the National Disease and Therapeutic
163                                   Surveys of dermatologists, gastroenterologists, and ophthalmologist
164     In our secondary analysis, 2 independent dermatologists graded these photographs using 4 validate
165              Compared with PCPs, experienced dermatologists had 13.3-fold higher odds of accurate dia
166 anomas that underwent biopsy and excision by dermatologists had the lowest likelihood of delay (proba
167 adership required that young German-speaking dermatologists had to seek additional training in the Un
168 ach participant was clinically examined by 2 dermatologists, had laboratory studies performed, was ad
169  provision of samples with a prescription by dermatologists has been increasing over time, and this i
170 ity of this test in biopsy decisions made by dermatologists has not been evaluated.
171 e; low awareness and patient referrals among dermatologists have presented an obstacle to this.
172 ave largely been agreed upon, allergists and dermatologists have similar and divergent approaches to
173 se patients undergoing biopsy and surgery by dermatologists have the lowest risk for delay, highlight
174 ermatology, including triage for referral to dermatologists; (ii) augmenting clinical assessment duri
175 y a pigmented lesion suggestive of melanoma, dermatologists improved their mean biopsy sensitivity fr
176 dy using questionnaires and evaluations by a dermatologist in adults with atopic dermatitis (n = 261)
177                Although the leading roles of dermatologists in diagnosing recent outbreaks of cutaneo
178 chniques for skin lesion segmentation assist dermatologists in early detection and ongoing monitoring
179                     These results might help dermatologists in guiding therapeutic decisions, especia
180 d tumors, highlighting an important role for dermatologists in identifying and screening patients wit
181 ents preferred professional attire for their dermatologists in most settings.
182 t with past satisfaction studies and may aid dermatologists in optimizing the patient care experience
183 omponents of diagnostic procedures to assist dermatologists in their medical decision-making processe
184     In the in-person group, patients visited dermatologists in their offices for follow-up care.
185  consumer sunscreen preferences would inform dermatologists in their own recommendations.
186                    Across both cohorts of 11 dermatologists in total, the intraclass correlation coef
187 ntage of patients with at least 1 visit to a dermatologist (including in-person and teledermatology v
188 eledermatology visits) and total visits with dermatologists (including in-person and teledermatology
189 considered, however, the number of visits to dermatologists increased from the 1989 level, reaching a
190                                        Three dermatologists independently rated all 3 indexes for eac
191                     Awareness of VEXAS among dermatologists is critical to facilitate early diagnosis
192                Access to specialists such as dermatologists is often limited for Medicaid enrollees.
193 ion, and SF-36 scores did not correlate with dermatologists' judgments about the severity of skin dis
194 dermatologist preparedness for bioterrorism, dermatologist knowledge regarding smallpox vaccination h
195 y 0.1% to 0.4% of new patients presenting to dermatologists, large-scale population-based studies est
196                            When performed by dermatologists, LDS is an acceptable alternative screeni
197 cripted telephone calls were placed to every dermatologist listed in directories for the largest MA p
198                                  Many of the dermatologists listed had incorrect contact information,
199                    Optimizing referrals to a dermatologist may reduce patient wait times.
200                  We illustrate the bias that dermatologists may have in exclusively associating patie
201 tire was preferred for family physicians and dermatologists (mean [SD] preference indexes, 1.6 [2.3]
202                               A total of 370 dermatologists (mean [SD] years in practice, 22.3 [11.1]
203                      In 201 patients seen by dermatologists, mean scale scores (+/-SD) ranged from 14
204                     Because of a shortage of dermatologists, most cases are seen instead by general p
205 udy using questionnaires and evaluation by a dermatologist (n = 265).
206 a primary diagnosis of rosacea by a hospital dermatologist (n = 5964), the adjusted incidence rate ra
207 atosis (SK), and benign nevi by a consultant dermatologist (n=87) were imaged by high-resolution ultr
208  were rated with the CLASI by academic-based dermatologists (n = 5) and rheumatologists (n = 5).
209 .6% when skin examinations were performed by dermatologists (n = 7436).
210                               The top 10% of dermatologists (n = 833) received more than $31.2 millio
211                                              Dermatologists, nephrologists, and nephrologists at our
212                                    Care by a dermatologist (odds ratio [OR], 6.7; 95% CI, 5.2-8.6) pr
213 nty (DOH Miami-Dade) was notified by a local dermatologist of 3 patients with suspected nontuberculou
214 spective study in a clinical practice of one dermatologist of biopsy data of all skin lesions from on
215 t its performance against 21 board-certified dermatologists on biopsy-proven clinical images with two
216                   To assess the agreement of dermatologists on identification of the ugly duckling si
217 rototypes of the dominance of German-trained dermatologists on the specialty in the US that persisted
218                                              Dermatologists, oncologists, and nephrologists need to b
219 linical images and history asynchronously to dermatologists online; dermatologists evaluated the clin
220 xture, with regular long-term follow-up by a dermatologist or gynecologist.
221 ess frequently in direct consultation with a dermatologist or regular screening for skin cancer.
222 rolled in this program were either certified dermatologists or senior dermatology residents.
223  devices can potentially extend the reach of dermatologists outside of the clinic.
224  encountered in pure forms by allergists and dermatologists, patients with AD often present with incr
225 ical procedures including those performed by dermatologists, plastic surgeons, and general surgeons.
226  and monkeypox demonstrate the importance of dermatologist preparedness for bioterrorism, dermatologi
227                           National trends in dermatologist prescribing patterns, the degree of correl
228 bility of free prescription drug samples and dermatologists' prescribing patterns on a national scale
229                                  Importance: Dermatologists, pulmonologists, and rheumatologists stud
230                                  Two blinded dermatologists rated the sites at 12 weeks after the ini
231  75.7% (1474 of 1947) of those who visited a dermatologist received care via teledermatology.
232                     Results: A total of 8333 dermatologists received 208613 payments totaling more th
233                   Conclusions and Relevance: Dermatologists received substantial payments from the ph
234                             If the in-person dermatologist recommended a biopsy, the teledermatologis
235  decisions were as follows: if the in-person dermatologist recommended the patient be seen the same d
236                     Products with the claim "dermatologist recommended" had higher median price per o
237  ounce on the basis of marketing claims (eg, dermatologist recommended, fragrance free, hypoallergeni
238                                              Dermatologists recorded the mention of sunscreen the mos
239             A total of 158 123 patients with dermatologist-recorded psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, alo
240 tive effort by groups of rheumatologists and dermatologists regarding development of screening questi
241                      The agreement among the dermatologists regarding UDN was lower with dermoscopic
242                                    Access to dermatologists remains a nationwide challenge.
243                                     However, dermatologists reported mentioning sunscreen at only 1.6
244                                    With most dermatologists residing in metropolitan areas, telederma
245                              Based on expert dermatologist review of 113 photographs of participants
246                                The pediatric dermatologist's arsenal of topical anesthetic preparatio
247                          In the absence of a dermatologist's examination, no reliable tool exists to
248                                A group of 10 dermatologists scored 15 patients with pemphigus to esti
249                                  Two blinded dermatologists separately rated participants' acne scars
250 he years 1990-1992 to examine utilization of dermatologist services over a period in which managed ca
251  would result in a slowing in the demand for dermatologist services.
252 ble comparison data on moisturizer efficacy, dermatologists should balance consumer preference, price
253                                              Dermatologists should balance the importance of cosmetic
254                                              Dermatologists should be aware of this low-grade cutaneo
255                                              Dermatologists should be familiar with the severe varian
256 lose interdisciplinary collaboration between dermatologists, skin biologists, neuroendocrinologists,
257                                   Widespread dermatologist smallpox vaccination knowledge deficits pi
258 nizing that a cure lies in timely detection, dermatologists strive to diagnose malignant melanoma (MM
259 linical response as assessed by the treating dermatologist, subjective quality of life as reported by
260 ssifiers rely both on features used by human dermatologists, such as lesional pigmentation patterns,
261                                              Dermatologists, surgeons, and oncologists must rely on t
262 d AD were significantly less likely to see a dermatologist than white children with similarly poorly
263 s likely to have their skin care provided by dermatologists than patients with commercial insurance (
264 ation; percentage of patients evaluated by a dermatologist through either teledermatology or in-perso
265 nts (120 of 144 [83.3%]) were evaluated by a dermatologist through either teledermatology or in-perso
266 s over time, representing an opportunity for dermatologists to evaluate performance and validate prac
267 tforms provide elaborate and timely data for dermatologists to garner insight into their patients' ex
268 lth care, it is important for clinicians and dermatologists to have a basic understanding of how thes
269                               The ability of dermatologists to identify and direct patients with this
270              This stresses the necessity for dermatologists to perform comprehensive medical historie
271               It is important for practicing dermatologists to recognize patients who may be less lik
272                  The noninvasive PLA enables dermatologists to significantly improve biopsy specifici
273 patic manifestation of NASH should sensitize dermatologists to the screening and the management of fa
274 atology may provide a valuable mechanism for dermatologists to triage inpatient consultations and inc
275                          It is important for dermatologists to understand and recognize CRPS as a neu
276 hat grew out of efforts by immunologists and dermatologists to understand immune regulation by UV rad
277 tion and should be of continuous concern for dermatologists, transplant physicians, and patients.
278                                              Dermatologists treat actinic keratoses to prevent non-me
279                   In addition, the patient's dermatologist treated his palmoplantar keratoderma with
280 cordance between primary care clinicians and dermatologists, treatment at the time of referral, and t
281 rease in the fraction of patients visiting a dermatologist (vs 20.5% in other practices; P < .01).
282                 The median total payment per dermatologist was $298 with an interquartile range of $9
283       A reduction in the number of visits to dermatologists was observed among patients with HMO/prep
284 12, on the basis of an initial report from a dermatologist, we began to investigate an outbreak of ta
285  environment has resulted in fewer visits to dermatologists, we used National Ambulatory Medical Care
286  at the time of referral, and treatment by a dermatologist were ascertained, and we modeled 2 treatme
287 ns of the teledermatologist and office-based dermatologist were compared.
288 uries, American physicians wishing to become dermatologists were highly dependent on training in Euro
289 , 8444 dermatology APCs and 14 402 physician dermatologists were identified.
290 5 of 7287 visits [46.7%]), whereas in-person dermatologists were more likely to care for psoriasis an
291 ed cross-sectional screenings by a team of 6 dermatologists were organized in 2 sociodemographically
292 n by a gynecologist; patients were seen by a dermatologist when there were cutaneous and/or mucous le
293 went a complete skin examination by the same dermatologist who examined them initially.
294 ration and futility in both patients and the dermatologists who care for them.
295  public and other medical specialties expect dermatologists who offer cosmetic dermatology services t
296 ed from the influx of several stellar Jewish dermatologists who were major contributors to the subseq
297 independently evaluated by 2 board-certified dermatologists, who provided diagnoses and treatment pla
298 ges of all nevi of each patient shown to the dermatologists, who were asked to identify ugly duckling
299 as well as neurologist, ophthalmologist, and dermatologist, will provide a global spectrum of care fo
300 sification relative to three board certified dermatologists with different levels of experience.

 
Page Top