戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 al and Laboratory Standard Institute by disk diffusion method.
2 ing was performed using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method.
3 ibility testing was performed using the disc diffusion method.
4 ibacterial activity using Nathan's Agar Well-Diffusion method.
5 ity testing (AST) using the Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method.
6 al susceptibility using the Kirby-Bauer disk-diffusion method.
7 microorganisms was assessed by the agar well-diffusion method.
8 of Salmonella isolates was performed by disk diffusion method.
9 lly to well below 1 mum using the surfactant diffusion method.
10 erns of the isolates were determined by disk diffusion method.
11 ntimicrobials by broth dilution and the disc diffusion method.
12 ing the agar overlay technique and agar well diffusion method.
13  for antimicrobial activity by the agar disc diffusion method.
14 bitory effect was checked with the agar well diffusion method.
15 only used antibiotics using Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method.
16 rriers (NLC) were prepared using the solvent diffusion method.
17 tibiotic susceptibility was verified by disc diffusion method.
18 lates of Candida spp. by the CLSI M44-A disk diffusion method.
19 olates were identified by the oxacillin disk-diffusion method.
20 inical yeast isolates by the CLSI M44-A disk diffusion method.
21 ates by the CLSI (formerly NCCLS) M44-A disk diffusion method.
22 were confirmed by referencing to a capillary diffusion method.
23 o those generated by the Etest agar gradient diffusion method.
24 ceptibility tests were performed by the disk diffusion method.
25 cting fluconazole-resistant yeasts by a disk diffusion method.
26 both thin-layer chromatography and the fluor diffusion method.
27 mV zeta-potential at pH 6) using an emulsion-diffusion method.
28 iotic resistance was assessed using the disk diffusion method.
29 onvolution and Perona-Malik (PM) anisotropic diffusion methods.
30 plet evaporation method and novel surfactant diffusion methods.
31 ere encountered with both automated and disk diffusion methods.
32 eptibility testing criteria for MIC and disk diffusion methods.
33 l susceptibility tests were done by the disc diffusion method according to British Society of Antimic
34 ity test was done using the Kirby-Bauer Disk diffusion method according to the guidelines of Clinical
35 uNP-dyed cotton threads was examined by disc diffusion method against E. coli and S. aureus based on
36  7.2 against 43% of the isolates by the disk diffusion method and against 52% of the isolates by the
37 ssed for antibacterial activity via the disc diffusion method and antioxidant capacity by DPPH radica
38 crobial agents were determined using the K-B diffusion method and eTest.
39 for antimicrobial susceptibility by the disk-diffusion method and the Etest.
40 ently recommended CLSI (formerly NCCLS) disk diffusion method and the inoculum purity control method.
41 tibility to 11 antimicrobials using the disk diffusion method and validated using VITEK 2 (bioMerieux
42            RECENT FINDINGS: A flourishing of diffusion methods and models are bringing new solutions
43 penems (meropenem, imipenem) by MIC and disk diffusion methods and to compare disk diffusion test res
44  system against Escherichia coli by the disk diffusion method, and antitumor efficacy toward the HeLa
45 aCO(3) loaded with SN38, prepared by the gas diffusion method, and coated with a significant amount o
46 TT, nitric oxide inhibitory assay, agar disc diffusion method, and DPPH and ABTS assays.
47 nder submerged conditions, by the Franz cell diffusion method, and ex vivo utilizing a porcine dermis
48  of the isolates were determined by the disk diffusion method, and gas chromatography was used to stu
49 bial activity was evaluated by the agar disk diffusion method, and in vitro cytotoxic activity was ex
50       AMR profiles were assessed by the disc diffusion method, and trends over time were evaluated.
51 by the agar, microdilution, E test, and disk diffusion methods; and (iii) incubation in CO(2) led to
52                           Overall, both agar diffusion methods appear to be broadly acceptable for ro
53 d and present several variations on the disk diffusion method as applied to serum or urine, including
54 ithin and between two loci are obtained by a diffusion method assuming relatively strong selection.
55  E-test (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) and disk diffusion methods (both in CO(2)).
56 hen testing was performed by the E-test agar diffusion method, both RPMI 1640 medium and antibiotic m
57                             Use of this slow diffusion method combined with prediction of molecular s
58           We evaluated the CLSI M44ed3E disk diffusion method compared with the CLSI M27ed4 broth mic
59 vulanic acid (CA) effect by BMD and the disk diffusion method (confirmation tests).
60                                     The disk diffusion method correlated well (zone diameter versus M
61 d into silver-based volume holograms using a diffusion method coupled with a holographic recording us
62 re transformed into volume holograms using a diffusion method coupled with holographic recording, usi
63 re transformed into volume holograms using a diffusion method coupled with holographic recording, usi
64 ur objective was to compare cefiderocol disk diffusion methods (DD) to broth microdilution (BMD) for
65                                     The disk diffusion method detected all ESBL-producing isolates, t
66 the performance of a commercialized gradient diffusion method (Etest method) as an alternative to BMD
67 st results determined by the CLSI M44-A disk diffusion method for 11,240 isolates of noncandidal yeas
68 n Food Safety Authority and Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method for detection of the bacteria, and anti
69 ed to evaluate the reproducibility of a disk diffusion method for testing isolates of N. meningitidis
70 standardized agar dilution and the agar disk diffusion methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testi
71 r isolates were tested by standard CLSI disk diffusion methods for detecting extended-spectrum beta-l
72                            In addition, disk diffusion methods for determining Streptococcus pneumoni
73  between the microdilution, E-test, and disk diffusion methods for posaconazole against Candida spp.
74  were tested by broth microdilution and disk diffusion methods for susceptibility to trimethoprim (TM
75   The performances of the Etest and the disk diffusion methods for testing of the susceptibilities of
76 of these alternative broth dilution and agar diffusion methods for testing posaconazole and amphoteri
77 ce M27-A2 broth microdilution and M44-A disk diffusion methods for testing susceptibilities of 110 is
78 reference M38-A broth microdilution and disk diffusion methods for testing the susceptibility of 183
79 ibility (77 K) are fabricated by the solvent diffusion method from chiral Schiff base, S(R)-4-bromo-2
80  activity of AgNPs was evaluated by the well-diffusion method, growth kinetics and MIC determination.
81           Broth microdilution (BMD) and disk diffusion methods have been developed to determine in vi
82 e evaluated the NCCLS M44-P fluconazole disk diffusion method in comparison with the NCCLS M27-A2 bro
83 tibility test, performed by Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method in conformity with the CLSI guideline.
84 ility tested by broth microdilution and disk diffusion methods in 3 laboratories.
85                                          The diffusion method is able extract diverse and meaningful
86                                       A disc diffusion method is used in the United Kingdom, whereas
87   Although there are limitations to the disk diffusion method, its low cost, ease of use, and ability
88 ast isolates by recently endorsed NCCLS disk diffusion method M44-P.
89 nd Candida krusei ATCC 6258 by the CLSI disk diffusion method (M51-A document).
90  8), major (n = 4), and, along with the disk diffusion method, minor (n = 6) errors.
91 d used individually in the conventional disc-diffusion method of antibiotic susceptibility determinat
92                                The agar disk diffusion method of the essential oil was effective agai
93  CLSI reference broth microdilution and disk diffusion methods on a collection of genetically charact
94 les and to test the hypotheses that the disc diffusion method overscores resistance and that isolates
95                The agar-based Etest and disk diffusion methods performed well for the testing of both
96 s antimicrobial susceptibility (MIC and disk diffusion methods) quality control (QC) parameters for s
97                                        Also, diffusion methods recovered missing edges, even if all t
98 fied as azithromycin susceptible by the disk diffusion method, regardless of the medium pH.
99 ects by DPPH, ABTS, FRAP, ORAC and agar disc diffusion methods, respectively.
100        Meanwhile, inhibition tests using the diffusion method showed that the supernatant free of L.
101 microbial activity, evaluated using the disk diffusion method, showed that Ag/CH coatings demonstrate
102                          ETEST is a gradient diffusion method that represents a simple alternative to
103                          Etest is a gradient diffusion method that represents an alternative to broth
104                       ETEST(R) is a gradient diffusion method that represents an alternative to the m
105 ontinued serious testing error with the disk diffusion method, the possible need for breakpoint adjus
106 agar dilution, broth microdilution, and disk diffusion methods, the epsilometer test (E-test), and th
107        The potential for the use of the disk diffusion method to accurately predict penicillin MICs f
108 eveloped a sensitive and quantitative radial diffusion method to ascertain the susceptibility of six
109        Thor employs an anti-shrinking Markov diffusion method to infer single-cell spatial transcript
110 alysis patients reflect a failure of passive diffusion methods to duplicate the efficacy of clearance
111                                With the disk diffusion method using MH agar from BD and Oxoid, suscep
112                                     The disk diffusion method using Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented
113        Here, we present a simple solid state diffusion method utilizing atomic layer deposition to co
114                            The standard disk diffusion method was used to resolve discordant AST resu
115                           An antibiotic disc diffusion method was used to select mutants with wild-ty
116                         The Kirby Bauer disk diffusion method was used to test antimicrobial suscepti
117 rmined after either 48 or 72 h when the agar diffusion method was used.
118 tibility Testing (EUCAST) and the Etest agar diffusion method were compared with the Clinical and Lab
119 isolated strains was determined using a disc diffusion method, where the tested strains exhibited mul
120 ately 10(5) times compared with conventional diffusion methods while operating under relatively low-a
121 t our institution and that the standard disk diffusion method with cefpodoxime and the DD method with
122 tion with clavulanate; and the standard disk diffusion method with new breakpoints and standard conce
123                            Although the disk diffusion method with standard breakpoints identified 28

 
Page Top