ライフサイエンスコーパス: digestive

1 ardiovascular (31.8%), genitourinary (8.7%), digestive (8.3%), endocrine, nutritional or metabolic (8

2 These results suggest that the digestive activity and organic compounds of watery saliv

3 soforms may compensate for the loss of CELA1 digestive activity in the human pancreas.

4 Consumption of OA results in a series of digestive ailments such as nausea and diarrhea.

5 nts (49.5% vs 31.8%, P < 0.001) and had more digestive anastomoses (89.4% vs 83.0%, P < 0.001).

6 SP IgGs in patients with different (cardiac, digestive and asymptomatic) chronic Chagas disease manif

7 to cope with continuous stress linked to its digestive and barrier functions.

8 rdio-Circulatory and Renal (37.1%); Nervous, Digestive and Circulatory (31.8%); and Cardio-Circulator

9 Moreover, host-encoded digestive and detoxification mechanisms likely render mi

10 arbohydrate metabolism, lipid metabolism and digestive and endocrine system pathways in the domestica

11 ter revealed that HSP-17 is expressed in the digestive and excretory organs, where its overexpression

12 partitioned the element predominantly within digestive and excretory tissues, including livers > meso

13 e. microbiomes) that play important roles in digestive and immune system functioning, yet cetacean mi

14 defenses on the fall armyworm on the insect digestive and immune system reduced growth and elevated

15 rain, peripheral contributions involving the digestive and immune systems are emerging as factors inv

16 L059842), National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (5T32DK07352), Natural Sci

17 on at the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) in Phoenix, Arizon

18 the NIH, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK); and the American

19 National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and National Heart, Lung,

20 National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and National Human Genome

21 ed by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and the National Cancer In

22 ed by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases brought together clinician

23 ed by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases brought together investiga

24 of Health/National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases established the Human Panc

25 edge, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the NIH sponsored the "

26 n the The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Repository and included in

27 nstitute, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institute on Agi

28 Aging and National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of He

29 97.FUNDINGNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, US Department of Agricult

30 dney is a National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases-led consortium to optimize

31 from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases-supported Childhood Liver

32 , and the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.

33 tute, and National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.

34 NIH National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.

35 Institutes of Health, National Institute of Digestive and Kidney Diseases.

36 on and US National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.

37 tute; and National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.

38 f Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.

39 ve any emergence of antibiotic resistance in digestive and nasal microbiological cultures.

40 me in wild versus captive populations due to digestive and other health issues.

41 nsferase 2 (FUT2) controls the production of digestive and respiratory epithelia of histo-blood group

42 3) and later morphogenesis of the definitive digestive and respiratory organs(4-6) have been investig

43 o a marked down-regulation of genes encoding digestive and xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes, and trans

44 es contributed, particularly, genitourinary, digestive, and endocrine, nutritional, and metabolic ill

45 cosa regulate feeding, gastrointestinal (GI) digestive, and immune functions.

46 cers in different organs of the respiratory, digestive, and urinary systems and the CNS.

47 to examine whether the improved outcome of a digestive cancer procedure in high-volume hospitals is s

48 is specific or correlates with that of other digestive cancer procedures, and determine if the discri

49 In digestive cancer surgery, the volume-POM relationship of

50 isk, may reduce the observed disparities for digestive cancers.

51 ney, was associated with higher risk of some digestive cancers.

52 t-parasite interaction were overexpressed in digestive cells compared with other tissues.

53 artially and fully engorged females; and (v) digestive cells from partially, and (vi) fully engorged

54 In LI individuals, LM and digestive comfort with lactose-containing milks was impr

55 ynamic in vitro system DiDGI(R), using three digestive compartments (stomach, duodenum, and jejunum +

56 t clinical properties including stability to digestive conditions and physicochemical treatments, a h

57 Following in vitro digestion simulating the digestive conditions of premature infant, bovine BCMs st

58 sive literature review of the in vivo infant digestive conditions, a gastrointestinal static in vitro

59 bility in vitro, especially under incomplete digestive conditions, i.e. under low digestive enzyme co

60 beta-carotene bioaccessibility depending on digestive conditions.

61 ty to one third (p < 0.001) under incomplete digestive conditions.

62 hance the stability of LDL-based nanogels in digestive conditions.

63 ponse of intake rate not directly related to digestive constraints may determine the dynamics of inta

64 mined whether there are distinct symptoms of digestive discomfort due to either lactose or differing

65 ut LM (NLDI) is characterized by early-onset digestive discomfort following milk ingestion, irrespect

66 ctose malabsorption (LM) is a major cause of digestive discomfort from dairy products.

67 LI subjects experienced prolonged digestive discomfort with CON milk.

68 Based on postchallenge LM and digestive discomfort, participants were classified as ei

69 Inverse associations were also observed for digestive disease mortality for men (HR, 0.41 [CI, 0.32

70 DK20579 (Diabetes Research Center), DK52574 (Digestive Disease Research Center), and RR024992 (Clinic

71 K20579 (Diabetes Research Center), DK052574 (Digestive Disease Research Center), and UL1TR002345 (Cli

72 utrition Obesity Research Center), DK052574 (Digestive Disease Research Center), RR024992 (Clinical a

73 GPCRs control digestion, mediate digestive diseases, and coordinate repair and growth.

74 Most frequent codiagnoses were digestive diseases, mainly intestinal obstruction.

75 followed by neoplasms, mental disorders, and digestive diseases.

76 ic drugs, including many drugs used to treat digestive diseases.

77 ignaling of GPCRs that control digestion and digestive diseases.

78 tory diseases; (4) respiratory diseases; (5) digestive diseases; (6) musculoskeletal and connective t

79 is accounted as the most etiologic agent for digestive disorders, in particular, the most important o

80 ory of traditional use to treat a variety of digestive disorders.

81 wn prebiotic and supports the alleviation of digestive disorders.

82 This may be a vital digestive enzyme adaptation allowing howler monkeys to s

83 The digestive enzyme chymotrypsin protects the pancreas agai

84 omplete digestive conditions, i.e. under low digestive enzyme concentrations.

85 This study investigated whether digestive enzyme expression in the duodenum and colon is

86 Digestive enzyme expression was only partially elevated

87 attributed to a profound down-regulation of digestive enzyme genes and trypsin activity, upon exposu

88 measured nitrogen isotope (delta(15) N) and digestive enzyme plasticity in four populations of sparr

89 ts increased after in vitro digestion due to digestive enzymes (4.6, 2.8 and 2.1, respectively).

90 ce of CpCP3, which was highly susceptible to digestive enzymes and did not alter zebrafish embryos' m

91 ine and endocrine cells control secretion of digestive enzymes and production of hormones to maintain

92 diverse ethnicity showed similar profiles of digestive enzymes and proteins involved in translation,

93 ity of Lf is limited as it is susceptible to digestive enzymes in gastrointestinal tract.

94 Premature activation of digestive enzymes in the pancreas has been linked to dev

95 Additionally, the presence of digestive enzymes positively contributed to antioxidant

96 r cell homeostasis required for secretion of digestive enzymes relies on SNARE-mediated exocytosis.

97 e starch and proteins limiting the access of digestive enzymes to their substrates.

98 ioxidant capacities and abilities to inhibit digestive enzymes were characterized.

99 h an animal gut (replete with its associated digestive enzymes) to disrupt the barrier and permit ger

100 perty of flavonoids against mammalian starch digestive enzymes, because flavonoids interfere with com

101 incorporation into mixed micelles, requiring digestive enzymes, gastric peristalsis, bile, and dietar

102 As non-interacting size mimics of digestive enzymes, we investigated the diffusion of fluo

103 al delivery system of molecules sensitive to digestive enzymes.

104 for the body to excrete small molecules with digestive enzymes.

105 wall porosity, by controlling the passage of digestive enzymes.

106 e used to investigate their capacity against digestive enzymes.

107 resulted in reduced starch susceptibility to digestive enzymes.

108 erential rates of processing by lepidopteran digestive enzymes.

109 oactive peptides that are liberated by human digestive enzymes.

110 d prevented the activation of the cascade of digestive enzymes.

111 gh bioaccessibility with slight influence of digestive enzymes.

112 gement events that drive gut lengthening and digestive epithelial morphogenesis.

113 egypti against heme exposure, also acts as a digestive feature, being an essential adaptation to bloo

114 method that uses constant ratios of meal to digestive fluids and a constant pH for each step of dige

115 Digestive fluids and FM compounds significantly increase

116 tly different in patients with indeterminate/digestive form of Chagas disease (35.7%) compared with t

117 firmed the presence of both pulmonary and/or digestive forms of tuberculosis in > 50% of the examined

118 e in colobines, suggesting a novel, possibly digestive function.

119 These findings identify digestive functions and conserved molecular mechanisms i

120 The PM is responsible for multiple digestive functions, including reducing infections from

121 involved in immune defense, have evolved new digestive functions.

122 sue, representing an energy reserve) and the digestive gland (fast turnover rate organ, reflecting re

123 he ovary consistently resembled those of the digestive gland, with the similarity of fatty acids in t

124 Unfortunately, digestive health is difficult for farmers to routinely m

125 The digestive health of cows is one of the primary factors t

126 tem for on-farm, real time monitoring of the digestive health of individual animals, allowing early i

127 paper describes a novel means for monitoring digestive health via a low-cost and easy to use imaging

128 rons that coordinate functions necessary for digestive health.

129 Lymphatic vasculature is an integral part of digestive, immune and circulatory systems.

130 ction by the exocrine pancreas, resulting in digestive insufficiencies.

131 from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive Kidney Diseases repository and tested for seve

132 The impact of milk pasteurization digestive kinetics and disintegration was tested with th

133 ide interesting insights on the differential digestive kinetics of differently pasteurized HM.

134 of the gastric restructuring for the overall digestive mechanism and kinetics of food, in particular

135 lenging due to fluorescence quenching in the digestive microenvironment.

136 ategorized by site of origin within the aero-digestive mucosa, and the presence or absence of HPV inf

137 her organ systems, including diseases of the digestive, musculoskeletal, and genitourinary systems, r

138 n systems, including certain diseases of the digestive, musculoskeletal, and genitourinary systems; m

139 nal microflora; effects on the reproductive, digestive, or urinary tract; and safety in poor sanitary

140 The nucleolar factor, digestive organ expansion factor (DEF), has a key role i

141 Certain digestive organ symptoms were exhibited by 83% of patien

142 nown to target the skin, lungs, bladder, and digestive organs, but its role as a primary breast carci

143 m) with neuroendocrine liver metastases of a digestive origin underwent hybrid liver transplantation

144 uce from the in vivo experiments in pigs key digestive parameters such as gastric pH, stomach emptyin

145 complexes could be used in the prognosis of digestive pathologies of clinical forms of Chagas diseas

146 n with the humoral response in patients with digestive pathologies.

147 Moreover, in an in vitro digestive pepsin-trypsin treatment, 30% of quinoin is re

148 n) neurons are anatomically connected to the digestive periphery via cranial and spinal pathways; we

149 analyses revealed extensive conservation of digestive physiology and cell types with other animals,

150 's streamlined metabolic range can shape the digestive physiology and ecological opportunity of its h

151 Intestinal peristalsis is critical for digestive physiology and host defence, and is often dysr

152 ence of strong functional trade-offs and the digestive physiology of ruminants provide contexts under

153 expanding our view in relation to termites' digestive physiology.

154 ) to explore the relationship between IS and digestive plasticity.

155 dative mechanisms could be involved with the digestive process in these animals.

156 C. cumulans gut, ensuring efficiency of the digestive process together with preservation of tissue h

157 ds present in broccoli are vulnerable to the digestive process, and encapsulation becomes an alternat

158 This allows the study of digestive processes and pancreatic enzyme replacement th

159 ng these fishes regarding their roles in the digestive processes of hosts feeding predominantly on po

160 food palatability or impairing the mayfly's digestive processes, or both.

161 we tested the hypothesis that the regulatory digestive protease chymotrypsin C (CTRC) mitigates the h

162 torage protein legumin was hydrolyzed by the digestive protease chymotrypsin.

163 atment of the compounds with chymotrypsin, a digestive protease, did not affect the induced B lymphoc

164 cation of mutations in genes involved in the digestive protease-antiprotease pathway has lent additio

165 that premature intrapancreatic activation of digestive proteases is critical in pancreatitis onset.

166 Digestibility results indicated that the digestive proteases used were efficient in hydrolyzing a

167 tall patches are not of significantly lower digestive quality than the pasture average.

168 bly facilitated by their symbionts' expanded digestive range, cassidines additionally endowed with rh

169 ethanolamine (PEA) play an important role in digestive regulation, and we hypothesized they would als

170 blaNDM-1Citrobacter amaloniticus in a 22-bed digestive rehabilitation center.

171 1Citrobacter amalonaticus strain in a 22-bed digestive rehabilitation center.

172 urvey; 72 (54%) patients underwent emergency digestive resection and in 99 (74%) patients underwent e

173 14 individual bones that houses parts of the digestive, respiratory, visual and olfactory systems.

174 Then, we compared digestive samples collected at fixed sampling times from

175 by transferring gastrointestinal fluids and digestive secretions at physiologically relevant time sc

176 by pressure is caused by an exposure of the digestive sites.

177 Risks of digestive, skin, and musculoskeletal complications also

178 o biological activities and gastrointestinal digestive stability and bioaccessibility.

179 ot obviously driven by phylogeny, body size, digestive strategy, or diet composition; however, domest

180 ctional changes in the skull co-varying with digestive strategy.

181 culminated in the differentiation of a novel digestive structure in jawed vertebrates, the stomach.

182 were selected with ICD10 codes of cancer and digestive surgery act-procedures from 2012 to 2016.

183 should be prescribed before major oncologic digestive surgery to decrease postoperative morbidity.

184 se of immunonutrition before major oncologic digestive surgery was not associated with any significan

185 HRQOL and symptom questionnaires, including: Digestive Symptom Questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QL

186 Subjective digestive symptoms and breath hydrogen (measuring LM) we

187 More than one-third of patients showed digestive symptoms at diagnosis, combinations of nausea,

188 orded regularly over 3 h, and further ad hoc digestive symptoms over 12 h.

189 Secondary endpoints were changes in other digestive symptoms, nutritional status, gastric emptying

190 l (GI) tract and is characterized by various digestive symptoms.

191 previous study, we used a dynamic artificial digestive system (DIDGI(R)) to investigate protein oxida

192 e radial nerve cords, circumoral nerve ring, digestive system (e.g., cardiac stomach) and body wall-a

193 s such as behavioral and neurological AE and digestive system AE.

194 absorption of mineral complexes by the human digestive system are complex and still under investigati

195 Proper function and repair of the digestive system are vital to most animals.

196 ion within Teredinidae, the reduction of its digestive system by comparison with other family members

197 Digestive system development is orchestrated by combinat

198 in addition to GERD, as a comorbidity of the digestive system in patients with asthma.

199 an-specific functions of SPs and KLFs in the digestive system including the oral cavity, esophagus, s

200 stive tract, develops before the rest of the digestive system is formed and blood feeding is initiate

201 e in hospital admissions for diseases of the digestive system on the same day in 2-pollutant models (

202 SNPs were associated with cardiovascular and digestive system phenotypes and disorders.

203 ented soymilk storage and after the in vitro digestive system simulation (DSS).

204 ssified as a sactipeptide, requires the host digestive system to become active against pathogenic Clo

205 unomodulation, and improving skin health and digestive system's function.

206 possibly contribute to the evolution of the digestive system, cranial appendages, immune system, met

207 ffect of microbial colonization in the mouse digestive system, through analysis of the chemodiversity

208 accumulate in the later compartments of the digestive system, triggers a functional switch between U

209 n radial nerve cords, circumoral nerve ring, digestive system, tube feet and innervation of interossi

210 Many defenses target the insect digestive system, with some altering the protective peri

211 capable of releasing high isoflavone in the digestive system.

212 B(6) in cereal-based baby foods an in vitro digestive system.

213 the morphogenesis of multiple organs in the digestive system.

214 techin added in all the matrices in in vitro digestive system.

215 ate normal functions and pathobiology in the digestive system.

216 strains could be discerned within the murine digestive system.

217 metabolic disorders and disturbances of the digestive system.

218 ound within the enteroendocrine cells of the digestive system; however, less is known about nutrient

219 lements of the circulatory, respiratory, and digestive systems are preserved, and they are essentiall

220 non-surgically inserted into a rodent lower digestive track to improve the imaging quality of deep-l

221 ach the region of interest through the lower digestive track, similar as a colonoscopy detector.

222 on sensitivity of deep-lying organs near the digestive track.

223 nge of histiocytic tumours which may involve digestive track.

224 In mammals, microbial colonization of the digestive tract (GIT) occurs right after birth by severa

225 both for HPEEs involving the respiratory or digestive tract [[Formula: see text] (95% CI: 1.22, 1.92

226 isetae) in a larval mosquito (Aedes aegypti) digestive tract affected microbiomes in larvae and newly

227 investment in muscularity, adiposity and the digestive tract allow for a larger brain.

228 nities along mucosal surfaces throughout the digestive tract are hypothesized as risk factors for imp

229 ound is being increasingly used to study the digestive tract because it has certain advantages over o

230 oven that subset(s) of patients with various digestive tract cancers are highly responsive to ICI-bas

231 Ready translocation in mice after digestive tract challenge demonstrates the potential of

232 The acquisition rate of digestive tract colonization during ICU stay was 7% (95%

233 we interpret as a lophophore, and a U-shaped digestive tract ending in a dorsolateral anus.

234 thelium is generated after the epidermis and digestive tract epithelia have matured, ensuring that bo

235 oxidation in the stomach was observed in the digestive tract even in conditions in which no nitrite w

236 opment and the normal characteristics of the digestive tract help in identifying, recognizing, and in

237 he indications for ultrasound studies of the digestive tract in children, the findings on these studi

238 imaging technique of choice for studying the digestive tract in pediatric patients from the neonatal

239 These vaccines are thought to establish a digestive tract infection conferring protection against

240 In most vertebrates, the upper digestive tract is composed of muscularized jaws linked

241 Microbial dysbiosis in the upper digestive tract is linked to an increased risk of esopha

242 The mucous barrier of our digestive tract is the first line of defense against pat

243 ration into the stomachs, separated from the digestive tract of a living rat.

244 nia pestis adopts a unique life stage in the digestive tract of its flea vector, characterized by rap

245 icrobial community that resides in the upper digestive tract of ruminant animals and is responsible f

246 ng, and kidney transplant recipients, and as digestive tract pathogens in liver transplant recipients

247 ogens in kidney transplant recipients and as digestive tract pathogens in liver transplant recipients

248 l infections, Candida spp (60%) prevailed as digestive tract pathogens in liver transplant recipients

249 anatomical asymmetry in other regions of the digestive tract remain unknown.

250 ith distinct sensory appendages, meal sizes, digestive tract targets, and metabolic fates.

251 uitoes host communities of microbes in their digestive tract that consist primarily of bacteria.

252 Then, the animals were sacrificed and their digestive tract tissues were analyzed.

253 d and produced significant contrast of upper digestive tract to enable in vivo swallowing evaluations

254 Mechanosensory feedback from the digestive tract to the brain is critical for limiting ex

255 rth edition of the WHO classification of the digestive tract tumors of 2010 the disease was grouped u

256 an increased incidence of hepatobiliary and digestive tract tumors.

257 taken along the longitudinal axis of the rat digestive tract were subjected to 16S rRNA gene sequenci

258 ion, associated with the colonization of the digestive tract with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-pr

259 us is a wood-feeding beetle that possesses a digestive tract with four main compartments, each of whi

260 in tumors and found that testis, brain, the digestive tract, and blood/spleen were the most prevalen

261 and argue that other tissues, including the digestive tract, could be a site for future coronavirus

262 esophageal gland, an accessory organ of the digestive tract, develops before the rest of the digesti

263 nsiderable carbonylation was observed in the digestive tract, especially under the acidic conditions

264 When limited to digestive tract, infection may resolve without IS reduct

265 X-RBD binds more extensively to cells of the digestive tract, urogenital tract, and kidneys.

266 f dephosphorylation of phytate in the animal digestive tract.

267 from mucosal keratinocytes of the upper aero-digestive tract.

268 m the mother's mammary gland to the infant's digestive tract.

269 athways involved in dietary Cu uptake in the digestive tract.

270 passing through the stomach to colonize the digestive tract.

271 thway that stimulates the development of the digestive tract.

272 to food and bacterial constituents from the digestive tract.

273 he peritrophic/mucous membrane in the larval digestive tract.

274 ies to treat diseases of the oral mucosa and digestive tract.

275 d under simulated in-vitro conditions of the digestive tract.

276 sensory signals across distinct parts of the digestive tract.

277 anosensory signals that arise from the upper digestive tract.

278 of intake behaviours upon distension of the digestive tract.

279 olved organs, rarely including peritoneum or digestive tract.

280 se mechanical cues to signal fullness of the digestive tract?

281 Resultantly, the molecular changes in the digestive tracts in post-weaning calves with ruminal aci

282 Stomachs and digestive tracts of 46 sharks of 4 species were examined

283 comprehensive assessment by examining whole digestive tracts of 50 individuals from 10 species whils

284 Given the similar digestive tracts of pigs and humans, our results suggest

285 exists in the Bt rice grains and S. zeamais digestive tracts, Bt rice is not harmful to the maize we

286 res may be most appropriately interpreted as digestive tracts, which would be, to date, the earliest-

287 l molecular signal for bacterial survival in digestive tracts.

288 eporters revealed that PI(3)P stabilizes the digestive vacuole (DV) under heat stress.

289 bservation of bromoquine distribution in the digestive vacuole and at its membrane surface, we deduce

290 orter (PfCRT), a transporter resident on the digestive vacuole membrane that in its variant forms can

291 This complex is driven toward the digestive vacuole membrane, increasing the chances of me

292 ulated by overexpression or mutations in the digestive vacuole membrane-bound ABC transporter PfMDR1

293 ly that traverses the membrane of the acidic digestive vacuole of the parasite(3-9).

294 Some, particularly the digestive vacuole plasmepsins, have been extensively cha

295 ts peptides from the lumen of the parasite's digestive vacuole to the cytosol, thereby providing a so

296 , we find that bromoquine accumulates in the digestive vacuole, reaching submillimolar concentration,

297 lay abnormal ER architecture and an enlarged digestive vacuole.

298 ake and trafficking of host cytoplasm to the digestive vacuole.

299 ion into inert hemozoin within the parasitic digestive vacuole.

300 amphipathic glycoside saponin and engenders digestive vacuoles (DVs) that are small and malformed.