ライフサイエンスコーパス: dinner

1 y 7: after breakfast; day 9: after lunch and dinner).

2 ucose elevations, especially after lunch and dinner.

3 o select 1 item they would like to order for dinner.

4 s, such as watching a movie or going out for dinner.

5 ividuals with higher SI at breakfast than at dinner.

6 igher (P < 0.01) at breakfast than lunch and dinner.

7 lower (P < 0.01) at breakfast than lunch and dinner.

8 her (P < 0.01) at breakfast than at lunch or dinner.

9 ction was lower (P < 0.01) at breakfast than dinner.

10 not adversely affect glycemia after lunch or dinner.

11 running for your life than running for your dinner.

12 ntrol was less effective after breakfast and dinner.

13 ted lunch and > 4 h later by a self-selected dinner.

14 roblems in adolescents that had fewer family dinners.

15 2 (95% CI: 0.19, 0.26), P< 0.0001, d = 0.76; dinner = 0.24 (95% CI: 0.19, 0.28), P< 0.0001, d = 0.71]

16 15.4% at breakfast, 36.6% at lunch, 34.9% at dinner, 12.4% at snacks; N.=24) distribution pattern.

17 15.4% at breakfast, 36.6% at lunch, 34.9% at dinner, 12.4% at snacks; N.=24) distribution pattern.

18 16.7% at breakfast, 32.8% at lunch, 31.3% at dinner, 19.2% at snacks; N.=23) or UNEVEN (15.4% at brea

19 16.7% at breakfast, 32.8% at lunch, 31.3% at dinner, 19.2% at snacks; N.=23) or UNEVEN (15.4% at brea

20 , 39 women were served breakfast, lunch, and dinner ad libitum.

21 breakfast (AB), after lunch (AL), and after dinner (AD) on day 3, and a fasting sample (FA) was obta

22 ion, one featured presentation, and an after-dinner address.

23 n of a bedtime snack, consumed >30 min after dinner and <2 h before bed and reported glycemic outcome

24 Dinner and an evening snack were sent home with children

25 gine U100 (3819 patients) once daily between dinner and bedtime in a double-blind, treat-to-target, e

26 preload was consumed, EAH was assessed after dinner and defined as the number of calories consumed fr

27 ues observed at 70 minutes after lunches and dinners and 50 minutes after breakfasts.

28 Meals (breakfast, lunch, dinner) and respective snacking episodes had the greates

29 nergy from main meals (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) and snacks (before breakfast, after dinner, and

30 orted number of meals (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) and snacks consumed per day during the second tr

31 ocial situations: a BBQ, a pub, a restaurant dinner, and a dinner party.

32 dinner) and snacks (before breakfast, after dinner, and after 2000 h), intermeal intervals, time of

33 During lunch, dinner, and an evening snack, subjects were given free a

34 The portion size of 3 entrees (lunch, dinner, and breakfast) and an afternoon snack served dur

35 oss conditions, entrees at breakfast, lunch, dinner, and evening snack were reduced in ED by increasi

36 ic resonance imaging brain scans, ad libitum dinner, and evening snacking.

37 st commercial infant-only vegetables, fruit, dinners, and cereals were low in sodium, contained no sa

38 ips for effective networking at conferences, dinners, and other events.

39 s were ingested during breakfast, lunch, and dinner at 0700, 1300, and 1900 h in randomized Latin squ

40 ls were ingested during breakfast, lunch, or dinner at 0700, 1300, and 1900 h in randomized Latin squ

41 For girls, having dinner at a regular time at ages 2y and 4y was associate

42 nts in a context; for example, a schema of a dinner at a restaurant.

43 P = 0.03), and lower likelihood of preparing dinner at home (Q4 odds ratio [OR] = 0.3 [95% CI 0.1-0.9

44 ffered a series of choice sets about a usual dinner at home and were asked to choose in each choice s

45 of peer support developed through an annual dinner at the American Society of Human Genetics meeting

46 Among 334 dinner attendees, 136 (41%) completed the web-based ques

47 adolescents and that the frequency of family dinners attenuate these associations.

48 was greater frequency of eating breakfast or dinner away from home.

49 as also seen for protein intake at lunch and dinner but not at breakfast.

50 ss conditions, siblings were served the same dinner, but 25 min before dinner, they either consumed i

51 reported a lower protein intake at lunch and dinner compared with those with normal ALMBMI [0.29 (95%

52 er before standardized breakfast, lunch, and dinner (CONTROL), 15 g MCT before breakfast and water be

53 studied during breakfast (B), lunch (L), and dinner (D) with identical mixed meals (75 g carbohydrate

54 a main meal at lunch (LM) or a main meal at dinner (DM) for 12 wk while in a weight-loss program.

55 , the circadian phase was delayed, and after-dinner energy intake and body weight increased versus ba

56 R groups, insufficient sleep increased after-dinner energy intake and body weight versus baseline.

57 y slept ~1.1 h more than baseline, and after-dinner energy intake decreased versus insufficient sleep

58 s, faculty, and guests who attended a formal dinner event in April 2013.

59 = 18.49, P < 0.0004, partial eta(2) = 0.493; dinner, F(1, 19) = 24.85, P < 0.0001, partial eta(2) = 0

60 mineral water, white wine, or red wine with dinner for 2 years.

61 ant reduction in food intake was observed at dinner for both formulations compared with the control f

62 Subjects did not compensate at dinner for this reduction in lunch intake.

63 supported by Aidsfonds, Stichting Amsterdam Dinner Foundation, Bristol-Myers Squibb International Co

64 love, parental authoritativeness and family dinner frequency) and various subsequent offspring psych

65 who infrequently recorded information about dinner had smaller variations than those of other subjec

66 elational, these results suggest that family dinners (ie, family contact and communication) are benef

67 iation of high ALMBMI with protein intake at dinner in particular, this was not independent from tota

68 fast and 213 (28.4%) of 750 reported missing dinner in the food-secure group, 438 (47.2%) of 928 repo

69 fast and 426 (45.6%) of 934 reported missing dinner in the moderately food-insecure group, and 956 (7

70 mentioned breakfast, lunch (women only), and dinner in the recall (P </= 0.04).

71 ast and 951 (74.8%) of 1272 reported missing dinner in the severely food-insecure group.

72 Dinner input frequency was the most important factor for

73 gher energy intake at lunch compared with at dinner may result in favorable changes in weight loss in

74 fore breakfast and 10 g WPI before lunch and dinner (MCT + WPI).

75 before breakfast and water before lunch and dinner (MCT), or 15 g MCT before breakfast and 10 g WPI

76 07 +/- 0.00) and any plant protein intake at dinner (MDI = 0.05 +/- 0.00).

77 sulin concentrations decreased following the dinner meal and waned throughout the night, despite the

78 nd insulin concentrations increased with the dinner meal with peak concentrations being higher in OB+

79 fasting glucose levels (OB+IFG), following a dinner meal, glucose concentrations started to rise and

80 the OB and Non-Ob individuals following the dinner meal, no increase in glucose concentrations occur

81 Typical breakfast, lunch, and dinner meals are difficult to distinguish because skippi

82 , liver, luncheon meat, margarine, meat-free dinner, milk, pizza, poultry, salmon, sausage, shrimp, s

83 core at age 2y [-0.03(-0.05,-0.004)]; having dinners more times per week with family at age 2y was as

84 0 g at breakfast, 20 g at lunch, and 60 g at dinner; n = 20) or even (30 g each at breakfast, lunch,

85 or even (30 g each at breakfast, lunch, and dinner; n = 21) distribution pattern.

86 Morbidity was associated with eating dinner on 22 September (odds ratio, 8.1; 95% confidence

87 feeding also decreased in response to a late dinner on the first nightshift.

88 epared in a metabolic kitchen; breakfast and dinner on weekdays were eaten on site.

89 of high energy intake at lunch with that at dinner on weight loss and cardiometabolic risk factors i

90 igh energy intakes at lunch compared with at dinner on weight loss in overweight and obese subjects.

91 ns of cyberbullying victimization and family dinners on the rates of mental health and substance use

92 The energy contribution of dinner or its reported time did not differ.

93 ns: a BBQ, a pub, a restaurant dinner, and a dinner party.

94 After arrival the children ate dinner, played table games or watched television, and we

95 lso associated with selecting larger virtual dinner portions only when expecting to consume a large v

96 nt where participants selected ideal virtual dinner portions while expecting to consume a large or sm

97 mulated day (including breakfast, lunch, and dinner preparation interspersed by cleaning activities)

98 rs, suggesting a thermal version of the life-dinner principle-stronger selection on running for your

99 nergy from protein), with the same lunch and dinner provided.

100 nd reduced energy expenditure in response to dinner represent contributing mechanisms by which humans

101 ively): a breakfast skipping day (BSD) and a dinner skipping day (DSD) separated by a conventional 3-

102 Intake was measured at lunch, dinner, snack, and breakfast.

103 In this after-dinner speech, a somewhat light-hearted attempt is made

104 Our dinner table is a trophic level we share with the microb

105 greater and more prolonged after lunches and dinners than after breakfasts, with peak values observed

106 re served the same dinner, but 25 min before dinner, they either consumed in full or did not consume

107 (EI) measured at lunch, afternoon snack, and dinner.Thirteen participants completed the 4 infusion da

108 cts enhanced human activity during lunch and dinner time (i.e., cooking) and possibly more cleaning a

109 than those of other subjects (betafreq.users dinner*time = 0.007, p-value < 0.001).

110 ating the midway point between breakfast and dinner times, and dietary composition was determined fro

111 pancreas (AP) that can be worn at home from dinner to waking up in the morning might be safe and eff

112 randomly assigned to 2 months of AP use from dinner to waking up plus SAP use during the day versus 2

113 nse over 3 hours after breakfast, lunch, and dinner was assessed using continuous glucose monitoring

114 That evening, a dinner was given in Dr. Olch's honor, and the entire vis

115 fect was still present when energy intake at dinner was included (P < or = 0.022).

116 The protein intake at dinner was positively associated with ALMBMI [B = 0.14 (

117 er, energy intake--especially at night after dinner--was in excess of energy needed to maintain energ

118 arental authoritativeness and regular family dinner were also associated with greater offspring emoti

119 Breakfast and dinner were standard meals.

120 yond the 3 main meals (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) were associated with increased T2D risk, but the

121 Three meals (breakfast, lunch, dinner) were given at 5-hr intervals, beginning either 0

122 ation of a traditional American Thanksgiving dinner, which required the use of a gas stove and oven a

123 itum energy intake was assessed at lunch and dinner with subjective appetite and resting metabolism a

124 Premeal hunger was lower before dinner with the LCBF than with the GLBF (P-interaction =

125 the late postprandial period after lunch and dinner, with differences of up to 4.6 (95% CI, 1.6-7.6)

126 eeding days to consume breakfast, lunch, and dinner, with unobtrusive weighing of foods and beverages