ライフサイエンスコーパス: diplopia

1 egistration (central-peripheral rivalry-type diplopia).

2 deviations, degree of muscle underaction and diplopia.

3 were primarily for acute- or subacute-onset diplopia.

4 st to characterize the type and cause of the diplopia.

5 function consisting of central nystagmus and diplopia.

6 necessary but is not sufficient for CPR-type diplopia.

7 may explain subjective reports of monocular diplopia.

8 ta) at distance and a phoria at near without diplopia.

9 were subjective and objective improvement of diplopia.

10 event long-term sequelae of enophthalmos and diplopia.

11 /12.5-20/50), and 34 patients (81%) reported diplopia.

12 table suture was performed to treat vertical diplopia.

13 ure was defined as worsening or no change in diplopia.

14 ltered consciousness followed by symptomatic diplopia.

15 c correction in adults based on the cause of diplopia.

16 a translocated inferiorly, causing binocular diplopia.

17 The patient also complained of diplopia.

18 potential cause of strabismus and binocular diplopia.

19 reased risk for postoperative strabismus and diplopia.

20 disruption of central fusion, and monocular diplopia.

21 even enhanced VFV may be inadequate to avert diplopia.

22 report of fusion, until the subject reported diplopia.

23 strabismus, ophthalmoplegia, and paradoxical diplopia.

24 tal septum intact can minimize postoperative diplopia.

25 gist and oculoplastic surgeon to correct the diplopia.

26 nt for 50% of patients (36/72) with baseline diplopia.

27 associated with increased odds of developing diplopia.

28 No patient had new-onset primary gaze diplopia.

29 positions, and development of postoperative diplopia.

30 seminoma presented with vertigo, ataxia, and diplopia.

31 tients (all Knosp 3-4) experienced transient diplopia.

32 ficulties, particularly due to the impact of diplopia.

33 rs to offer minimal long-term improvement in diplopia.

34 n for papilledema, visual field defects, and diplopia.

35 CPR-type diplopia and those without CPR-type diplopia.

36 %) had CPR-type diplopia and 37 (66%) had no diplopia.

37 56 patients were excluded for other types of diplopia.

38 nics to determine the prevalence of CPR-type diplopia.

39 tion when other causes did not fully explain diplopia.

40 etermine clinical associations with CPR-type diplopia.

41 e clinical findings associated with CPR-type diplopia.

42 M, 25 had symptomatic diplopia and 25 had no diplopia.

43 CI, 38.6%-77.7%) of ED visits, primarily for diplopia.

44 Frequency, type, and cause of diplopia.

45 plopia vs patients with ERM without CPR-type diplopia.

46 an epiretinal membrane (ERM) and presenting diplopia.

47 and where other causes did not fully explain diplopia.

48 mpleted the Diplopia Questionnaire to assess diplopia.

49 ared to have central-peripheral rivalry-type diplopia), 1 (4%) optical/refractive error (monocular di

50 ntraumatic and traumatic eye conditions were diplopia (11.69%) and closed fracture of the orbital flo

51 ad a relatively high incidence of persistent diplopia (12%) and corneal edema (20%), although half of

52 majority were myopic (157, 72%) and reported diplopia (176/219, 80.3%).

53 , 1 (4%) optical/refractive error (monocular diplopia), 2 (8%) mixed retinal misregistration (central

54 order of binocular vision (strabismus, 2.3%; diplopia, 2.2%; amblyopia, 0.9%; and nystagmus, 0.2%).

55 pecifically of pain and discomfort (65.12%), diplopia (22.09%), and drainage/discharge (18.60%).

56 Ataxia (45%) and diplopia (26%) were common manifestations.

57 either criteria (7 for social concern, 1 for diplopia, 4 for other reasons).

58 Unexpectedly, 15 of 25 patients without diplopia (60%) had evidence of retinal misregistration.

59 sole cause (central-peripheral rivalry-type diplopia), 7 (28%) strabismus (1 of 7 initally appeared

60 The majority of patients reported diplopia (85.9%).

61 Symptoms of diplopia, abnormal eyelid signs (retraction, ptosis, abs

62 onsidered in any patient with vision loss or diplopia accompanied by neurologic symptoms and in the a

63 8.1% (119/135) of patients with preoperative diplopia achieved single binocular vision.

64 pain, upper eye lid swelling, proptosis and diplopia after a commercial flight.

65 However, diplopia after pterygium excision in primary position is

66 patients (mean age = 49 years) who developed diplopia after pterygium excision were included.

67 on and included 15 patients with restrictive diplopia after pterygium excision.

68 and without (n = 5222) visual symptoms (eg, diplopia, amaurosis fugax, vision loss).

69 Of 50 patients with ERM, 25 had symptomatic diplopia and 25 had no diplopia.

70 ations, 12 of 56 patients (21%) had CPR-type diplopia and 37 (66%) had no diplopia.

71 The prevalence of monocular diplopia and binocular diplopia unrelated to glaucoma su

72 Symptoms of diplopia and blurred vision were present in 35%.

73 Surgical intervention may alleviate diplopia and diminish psychosocial impact.

74 Monovision decreased the frequency of diplopia and improved subjects' quality of life.

75 s surgery in patients over 80 years resolves diplopia and improves binocular alignment and stereopsis

76 ptoms of tearing, lagophthalmos, ptosis, and diplopia and measured margin-to-reflex distance (MRD) 1

77 A 77-year-old female was referred because of diplopia and progressively worsening headaches.

78 tophobia accompanied by binocular horizontal diplopia and right gaze deviation.

79 ies showed a possible role for RT to improve diplopia and soft tissue signs.

80 nts had a monocular suppression or alternate diplopia and suppression at sensory tests (BSGs and WFDT

81 n patients with ERM associated with CPR-type diplopia and those without CPR-type diplopia.

82 characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of diplopia and/or strabismus following plaque brachytherap

83 egistration (central-peripheral rivalry-type diplopia) and strabismus, and for 4 (16%) diplopia cause

84 s of best-corrected visual acuity, monocular diplopia, and ghosting of images.

85 owest success rate was when combining motor, diplopia, and HRQOL criteria (50%).

86 To assess performance of motor, diplopia, and HRQOL criteria, success was defined a prio

87 of binocular vision (strabismus, amblyopia, diplopia, and nystagmus) may have on musculoskeletal inj

88 OM and two control patients with nystagmus, diplopia, and paraneoplastic brainstem dysfunction.

89 BFM-90 reduced the recurrence of strabismus, diplopia, and proptosis, but did not correct deficits in

90 spect to proptosis, Clinical Activity Score, diplopia, and quality of life than placebo; serious adve

91 outcomes included proptosis, CAS, subjective diplopia, and quality-of-life.

92 tropia, angles of deviation at near and far, diplopia, and stereopsis were evaluated.

93 njury (n = 2), and 1 case each for numbness, diplopia, and tooth loss during intubation.

94 After pterional craniotomy, ptosis, diplopia, and vertical gaze limitation can result from t

95 anial nerve [CN] III, IV, VI, and VII palsy; diplopia; and optic neuritis) and new diagnoses of other

96 c symptoms and signs such as vision loss and diplopia are common in patients with stroke, patients ar

97 evelop central-peripheral rivalry (CPR)-type diplopia are unknown.

98 symptoms (eg, isolated vertigo, dysarthria, diplopia) are not consistently classified as transient i

99 We defined the presence of diplopia as "sometimes," "often," or "always" in distanc

100 We defined central-peripheral rivalry-type diplopia as presenting symptomatic diplopia with evidenc

101 noptophore; CPR-type diplopia was defined as diplopia associated with evidence of retinal misregistra

102 counsel patients on the higher occurrence of diplopia associated with GDD surgery.

103 e was incidence/persistence of postoperative diplopia at >= 2 weeks.

104 21 patients had diplopia at presentation and all were improved after sur

105 0.05 to 1.1, P = .01) than patients without diplopia, but similar aniseikonia (Awaya new aniseikonia

106 e metamorphopsia than those without CPR-type diplopia, but there is considerable individual variabili

107 fy the efficacy of monovision correction for diplopia by measuring the functional impact on vision-sp

108 correction to restore binocularity in adult diplopia can be challenging.

109 ion (p = 0.06) and no predictive factors for diplopia can be identified.

110 ecent studies have shown that strabismus and diplopia can occur after refractive surgery.

111 pe diplopia) and strabismus, and for 4 (16%) diplopia cause was indeterminate.

112 Clinical symptoms of gait ataxia, diplopia, cognitive impairment, and facial paraesthesia

113 surgeons treating esotropia or exotropia for diplopia control or reconstructive goals were collected.

114 the highest success rate was for motor plus diplopia criteria (67%) and the lowest success rate was

115 defining success as either meeting motor and diplopia criteria or showing improvement in HRQOL beyond

116 Motor and diplopia criteria were applied to classify outcomes (suc

117 Combining diplopia criteria with motor criteria provides a more cl

118 s rates were 90% for motor criteria, 74% for diplopia criteria, and 60% for HRQOL criteria.

119 opters by simultaneous prism cover test; (2) diplopia criteria, none or only rare in primary distance

120 18%) were classified as failure by motor and diplopia criteria, with 39 of 40 able to exceed Adult St

121 Ptosis and diplopia developed in 2 patients despite Medpor titanium

122 ifests at an older age than KSS (p = 0.003), diplopia does not correlate with disease duration (p = 0

123 acquired during childhood do not experience diplopia (double vision).

124 type of strabismus associated with binocular diplopia due to glaucoma surgery was hypertropia (10/11

125 Binocular diplopia due to the glaucoma procedure was present in 11

126 e vision is restored after decompensation to diplopia, during vergence range assessment.

127 alysis with prominent bulbar palsies such as diplopia, dysarthria, dysphonia, and dysphagia that woul

128 frequency): hemiparesis, vertigo/dizziness, diplopia, dysarthria, nystagmus, nausea/vomiting, head p

129 (15 of 23) of our patients had ptosis and/or diplopia, each present in 11 individuals.

130 Clinical improvement in diplopia, enophthalmos, and extraocular motility was var

131 tal reconstruction in an effort to alleviate diplopia, enophthalmos, orbital dystopia, and extraocula

132 again to an outside emergency department for diplopia evaluation.

133 Dizziness, nausea, somnolence, diplopia, fatigue, and rash were each reported in at lea

134 The causes of diplopia following cataract extraction and LASIK include

135 icle is to report the incidence and cause of diplopia following cataract surgery and laser in-situ ke

136 here are small case series, the incidence of diplopia following LASIK has not been reported.

137 lculator for the prediction of postoperative diplopia following OFR.

138 tically decrease the incidence of unexpected diplopia following refractive procedures.

139 The leading cause for diplopia following retrobulbar anesthesia for cataract e

140 st patients requiring surgery for strabismic diplopia following teprotumumab achieve good outcomes wi

141 Sixteen (57%) patients were diplopia-free after 1 surgery.

142 Main outcome measurements were diplopia frequency, evaluated using the Diplopia Questio

143 reconstructive surgery and for treatment of diplopia from esotropia.

144 than near viewing characterized treatment of diplopia from esotropia.

145 ot statistically different, for treatment of diplopia from exotropia (64%, 95% CI 43%-80%; P = .184).

146 of dichoptic training with the computer game Diplopia Game (Vivid Vision) run in the Oculus Rift OC D

147 Diagnosis rates of CN VII palsy, diplopia, glaucoma, and cataract decreased from the pre-

148 Patients with CPR-type diplopia had better worse-eye visual acuity (mean differ

149 nd orbital blowout fractures associated with diplopia had the lowest satisfaction rates, 55 and 8%, r

150 On average, patients with CPR-type diplopia have better visual acuity and more metamorphops

151 Long-term diplopia, however, is seen in 5% to 25% of patients.

152 dache, numbness, weakness, vertigo, syncope, diplopia, hypotension, floaters, other).

153 s with binocular vision will be sensitive to diplopia in any gaze direction; in such cases, the conse

154 To report the prevalence, type, and cause of diplopia in medically and surgically treated patients wi

155 d this suggests a mechanism that can explain diplopia in patients made exotropic after surgery for es

156 To describe the causes of diplopia in patients with an epiretinal membrane (ERM) a

157 omes were as follows: prevalence of CPR-type diplopia in patients with ERM seen in retinal disease cl

158 The frequency of each cause of diplopia in patients with ERM was determined.

159 Ground-in or Fresnel prism may alleviate diplopia in relatively small vertical deviation; however

160 To determine the prevalence of CPR-type diplopia in retinal disease clinic patients with ERM and

161 e most common diagnosis in both settings was diplopia (International Classification of Diseases, Nint

162 Restrictive diplopia is a potential complication after pterygium exc

163 Diplopia is believed to be a common eye-related symptom.

164 d for LASIK procedures, the leading cause of diplopia is decompensation of pre-existing strabismus.

165 Our findings suggest that CPR-type diplopia is not uncommon in patients with ERM.

166 The benefit is that diplopia is prevented, but the penalty is that the visua

167 Postoperative diplopia is the most common complication following orbit

168 in visual field defects, visual acuity, and diplopia is typically observed after emergent applicatio

169 % CI, 0.29-0.40), intermittent or inconstant diplopia/large proptosis (0.43; 95% CI, 0.36-0.49), no d

170 arge proptosis (0.43; 95% CI, 0.36-0.49), no diplopia/large proptosis (0.46; 95% CI, 0.40-0.52), and

171 d in the most severe disease state (constant diplopia/large proptosis) with 0.30 (95% CI, 0.24-0.36),

172 Three patients experienced diplopia lasting from 1 day to 6 months.

173 S) as the cause of chronic or acute acquired diplopia may avert neurologic evaluation and imaging in

174 CPR-type diplopia may be relieved in some patients using nonsurgi

175 Diplopia may be under-recognized in medically and surgic

176 Patients with ERM and presenting diplopia may have 1 of several causes of diplopia, most

177 Thirty-four patients with diplopia (median age 63, range 14-84 years) completed th

178 ts with retinal misregistration and CPR-type diplopia (minimum frequency of "sometimes" at distance a

179 ing diplopia may have 1 of several causes of diplopia, most commonly retinal misregistration (central

180 elevated intraocular pressure, tube erosion, diplopia, motility disturbances, and corneal decompensat

181 ), eye or orbital pain (n = 28 [17.3%]), and diplopia (n = 3 [1.9%]).

182 ted slurred speech, hemisensory tingling, or diplopia (n=8), and non-focal events (n=4).

183 Binocular diplopia not due to surgery was found in similar proport

184 imbal stem cell deficiency, symblepharon, or diplopia noted in either group.

185 ient or persistent monocular ghost images or diplopia occurred in 10 of 178 eyes (5.6%), sometimes re

186 Although transient diplopia occurred in 11.2% of patients, persistent diplo

187 Postoperative diplopia occurred in 38.9% of patients (146/375).

188 Among the 312 patients, persistent diplopia occurred in 6 patients (1.9%), including 1 who

189 ia occurred in 11.2% of patients, persistent diplopia occurred in only 1.9% of patients and was treat

190 nesthesia for cataract extraction to 5%, and diplopia occurs with an incidence of 0.21-0%.

191 of TED, including soft tissue inflammation, diplopia, ocular motility restriction, and appearance.

192 eek 24), a diplopia response (a reduction in diplopia of >=1 grade), and the mean change in overall s

193 cture (OR, 9.1; 95% CI, 2.8-30.0; P = .002), diplopia on primary gaze (OR, 6.7; 95% CI, 1.7-25.1; P =

194 Cases that experienced postoperative diplopia or a horizontal deviation greater than eight Pr

195 female, three male) presented with episodic diplopia or facial paresthesias with subsequent brainste

196 PD of orthophoria for vertical recti without diplopia or further surgery.

197 All patients had preoperative monocular diplopia or unstable vision attributable to the subluxat

198 loss (OR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.25-5.75; P = .01), diplopia (OR, 3.33; 95% CI, 1.00-10.29; P = .04), headac

199 Diplopia success was defined as no diplopia, or only rarely for distance straight ahead and

200 schwannomas that cause pain, disfigurement, diplopia, or optic neuropathy.

201 Other efferent symptoms include diplopia, oscillopsia, and vertigo.

202 ophthalmoplegia and nystagmus, resulting in diplopia, oscillopsia, blurred visual, loss of stereopsi

203 mptoms of new onset lid swelling (p < 0.01), diplopia (p < 0.01), flashing lights (p = 0.02), or droo

204 eported in the IIG group: 2% versus 10% with diplopia (P = 0.039) and 3% versus 10% with enophthalmos

205 served in younger patients and those without diplopia (p-values: 0.018 and 0.003).

206 ; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8-6.2) and diplopia (positive LR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.3-8.6).

207 (7 of 31; 95% CI, 10% to 41%), with CPR-type diplopia present in 16% (5 of 31; 95% CI, 5% to 34%).

208 To describe diplopia presentations in US ambulatory and emergency de

209 Numbers of ambulatory and ED diplopia presentations were estimated using weighted sam

210 Other common findings include diplopia, proptosis (which is generally minimal), conjun

211 with TED and clinical activity score >=4, +/-diplopia/proptosis) and refined using interviews with US

212 ated right retro-orbital pain and later with diplopia, ptosis, 6th nerve and pupil-sparing partial 3r

213 The validated and standardized Diplopia Questionnaire and Amblyopia and Strabismus Ques

214 as diplopia rated "never" or "rarely" on the diplopia questionnaire for reading and straight-ahead di

215 tionnaire (100-0, best to worst HRQOL) and a diplopia questionnaire in a clinical practice before pri

216 n of ascertaining patient symptoms using the Diplopia Questionnaire may be useful in these patients.

217 plopia was determined by patient history and diplopia questionnaire responses.

218 tically significant 58.6% improvement in the Diplopia Questionnaire score in our patients (P < .0001)

219 All patients completed the Diplopia Questionnaire to assess diplopia.

220 primary outcome: Based on the results of the Diplopia Questionnaire, 85% of patients experienced sign

221 diplopic for distance and reading, using the Diplopia Questionnaire, at an outcome examination as clo

222 were diplopia frequency, evaluated using the Diplopia Questionnaire.

223 e straight ahead or reading positions on the Diplopia Questionnaire.

224 Diplopia ranges in this group of patients from 0.23 to 0

225 Prism treatment success was defined as diplopia rated "never" or "rarely" on the diplopia quest

226 Most diplopia-related ambulatory visits were conducted by oph

227 ) ambulatory and 49790 (95% CI, 38318-61262) diplopia-related ED visits occurred annually; 12.3% of a

228 ambulatory setting, but approximately 16% of diplopia-related ED visits resulted in a stroke or trans

229 ears for ambulatory vs 48.1 (22.3) years for diplopia-related ED visits.

230 g but potentially life threatening in 16% of diplopia-related ED visits.

231 Diplopia resolved in 124 patients (75%) after the initia

232 Diplopia resolved spontaneously within 1 month in 18 pat

233 patients with a final CAS of 0 or 1, higher diplopia responder rate, and a larger improvement in the

234 change in proptosis (-2.82 mm vs. -0.54 mm), diplopia response (68% [19 of 28] vs. 29% [8 of 28]), an

235 al visits (from baseline through week 24), a diplopia response (a reduction in diplopia of >=1 grade)

236 Changes in proptosis by millimeter and diplopia response (percentage with >=1 grade reduction)

237 on (11 for proptosis change [n = 419], 4 for diplopia response [n = 125], and 2 teprotumumab [n = 79]

238 Secondary outcome was diplopia response.

239 se responders, proptosis, CAS of 0 or 1, and diplopia responses were maintained in 29 of 32 patients

240 Enophthalmos, diplopia resulting from extraocular muscle dysfunction,

241 e patient developed infectious scleritis and diplopia resulting from Tenon capsule scarring.

242 lides at 5 and 10 degrees), and cause of any diplopia (retinal misregistration vs strabismus vs optic

243 ifference was found in proptosis (P = 0.07), diplopia score (P = 0.4), or duration of TED (P = 0.4) b

244 Gorman diplopia score improved by at least 1 point for 50% of p

245 l activity score (CAS) reduction, and Gorman diplopia score improvement.

246 ivity score (CAS), proptosis, and the Gorman diplopia score were reviewed at baseline, at the end of

247 S, 2 +/- 4 mm for proptosis, and 1 +/- 1 for diplopia score.

248 Of patients with vertical diplopia, skew deviation and fourth nerve palsy have the

249 30 (95% CI, 0.24-0.36), followed by constant diplopia/small proptosis (0.34; 95% CI, 0.29-0.40), inte

250 , 0.40-0.52), and intermittent or inconstant diplopia/small proptosis (0.52; 95% CI, 0.45-0.58).

251 erved for the least severe disease state (no diplopia/small proptosis).

252 Complications such as hypotony, diplopia, strabismus, proptosis, tube erosion, failure,

253 e exposure (61.63%), infection (20.93%), and diplopia/strabismus (19.77%).

254 Diplopia success was also somewhat similar between 1- an

255 Diplopia success was defined as no diplopia, or only rar

256 Diplopia success was similar between 1- and 2-muscle sur

257 pen globes and open wounds of ocular adnexa, diplopia, superficial corneal and/or conjunctival injuri

258 rmance of activities at near after esotropia-diplopia surgery (odds ratio 3.0, 95% CI 1.5-6.4; P = .0

259 ients experienced significant improvement in diplopia symptoms after monovision correction.

260 -driven scoring algorithm for the DQ, rating diplopia symptoms from 0 to 100.

261 experienced occasional episodes of transient diplopia that developed while reading in the evening.

262 ival chemosis, pain on eye movement, minimal diplopia, the usual absence of proptosis, and general pr

263 The median time from onset of diplopia to diagnosis was 8 months (range, 1 month-25 ye

264 Diplopia typically lasted less than 6 months (58.2%; 85/

265 evalence of monocular diplopia and binocular diplopia unrelated to glaucoma surgery was similar among

266 Approximately 850000 diplopia visits occur in the United States annually; 95%

267 perceived visual quality and ocular injury, diplopia, visual performance, and blast exposure charact

268 fered between patients with ERM and CPR-type diplopia vs patients with ERM without CPR-type diplopia.

269 Before prism, diplopia was "sometimes" or worse for reading and/or str

270 The prevalence of any diplopia was 23% (7 of 31; 95% CI, 10% to 41%), with CPR

271 Mean time to diplopia was 6 months.

272 Diplopia was a common complication with the Baerveldt gl

273 Diplopia was corrected with 6-prism diopters base-out pr

274 totype-frame test and synoptophore; CPR-type diplopia was defined as diplopia associated with evidenc

275 sk model for the prediction of postoperative diplopia was derived using a development dataset (70% of

276 The presence of diplopia was determined by patient history and diplopia

277 Monocular diplopia was found in a similar proportion of medically

278 Esotropia was larger, and diplopia was less frequently recorded in Group A compare

279 Diplopia was more common with PTC-T (40.4% vs 20.1% for

280 Diplopia was more commonly seen after GDD than trabecule

281 eoperative visual acuity better than 20/400, diplopia was reported at the first postoperative visit b

282 Diplopia was reported in 41 of 195 medically and surgica

283 d 350 mm(2) models had similar outcomes, but diplopia was significantly associated with the 350 mm(2)

284 Diplopia was significantly associated with the use of 35

285 Diplopia was the primary complaint in 94% of patients, w

286 visits in the United States by patients with diplopia were analyzed in this prespecified secondary an

287 Twenty patients with symptomatic diplopia were enrolled in a prospective treatment trial

288 The factors that predicted postoperative diplopia were: age at injury, preoperative enophthalmos,

289 Adverse effects (including diplopia) were uncommon and of similar frequency between

290 approximately 80% of all adult patients with diplopia when combining the causes.

291 achusetts in the summer with acute binocular diplopia when looking down and to the left, which starte

292 All X(T) patients showed normal diplopia when the nonfoveal face was presented to nasal

293 However, 10 of 12 patients never experienced diplopia when the nonfoveal face was presented to tempor

294 or uveal melanoma carries a moderate risk of diplopia, which typically resolves on its own.

295 Our model rules out postoperative diplopia with a 100% sensitivity and negative predictive

296 Our predictive model rules out postoperative diplopia with an 87.9% sensitivity and a 95.8% NPV for a

297 alry-type diplopia as presenting symptomatic diplopia with evidence of retinal misregistration, and w

298 weeks is recommended in cases of symptomatic diplopia with positive forced ductions and evidence of o

299 Successful correction of diplopia with prism is associated with improvement in st

300 acture thought to be in need of repair, with diplopia within 30 degrees of primary gaze, and/or enoph