ライフサイエンスコーパス: dipstick

1 om 3-4 h (sandwich ELISA) to ~20 min (ICECEA-dipstick).

2 (-1) x 1.73 m(-2)) and proteinuria (positive dipstick).

3 s, total Ig levels (ELISA), and proteinuria (dipstick).

4 Gross proteinuria was determined using a dipstick.

5 the co-product on colorimetric lateral flow dipsticks.

6 Ghana were screened for malaria with OptiMAL dipsticks.

7 s an exemplar: 1) visually-read carbon black dipsticks; 2) spin-enhanced fluorescent nanodiamond dips

8 normal: >/=0.20 mg/mg); hematuria-spot urine dipstick (abnormal: 1+ or greater) confirmed by urine mi

9 : >10,000 red blood cells per milliliter) or dipstick (abnormal: 1+ or greater) on midstream urine sa

10 To assess the specificities of these dipsticks, an in-frame F1-deficient mutant of CO92 (Delt

11 More rapid techniques include dipstick analyses for the presence of leukocyte esterase

12 between proteinuria>or=1+, as determined by dipstick analysis (7 [7%] of 1012 subjects); creatinine

13 Urine NGAL was measured using the NGAL dipstick and a laboratory reference.

14 body transfer resulted in nephritic urine by dipstick and albuminuria by enzyme-linked immunosorbent

15 months from infusion, on the basis of urine dipstick and confirmed by a urine protein-to-creatinine

16 d 171/366 (46.7%) samples tested positive by dipstick and serology, respectively.

17 Dipsticks and lateral flow devices, which are simple and

18 onitoring these ions with the convenience of dipsticks and portable tools, such as cellphones, inform

19 sed by monitoring proteinuria (using a urine dipstick) and by immunohistochemical analysis of the kid

20 Women provided urine samples for culture, dipstick, and antibiotic susceptibility testing.

21 Particle agglutination, dipstick, and enzyme immunoassay (EIA) HBsAg screening d

22 , anti-serotype Typhi immunoglobulin M [IgM] dipstick, and IDeaL TUBEX).

23 lows are compatible with visual lateral flow dipsticks, and each takes less than 60 min from sample t

24 ndirect hemagglutination assay (IHA), an IgM dipstick assay (LDS), and an IgM dot-ELISA dipstick test

25 ams showed that the results of the PHAIA and dipstick assay were consistent, giving the same positive

26 of anatoxin-a were detected by the developed dipstick assay.

27 ly; and 0.77 for the anti-serotype Typhi IgM dipstick assay.

28 ses an immunochromatographic capillary flow (dipstick) assay and provides results in 10 min.

29 the first examples of the use of AgNP-based dipstick assays in the case of real clinical samples, (i

30 In real clinical samples, the AgNP-based dipstick assays showed impressive results: 100% specific

31 Dipstick assays using silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) stabi

32 hanism of paper-based diagnostics, including dipstick assays, lateral flow assays (LFAs), and microfl

33 POC testing for serum creatinine and urine dipstick at enrollment were utilized to classify these p

34 Additionally, the dipstick-based assay developed for ARGs detection can be

35 ification-based assay) Flu duplex test, is a dipstick-based molecular assay developed to provide a si

36 Research has focused on gold nanoparticle dipsticks, but these typically lack sensitivity in waste

37 sulfosalicylic acid testing and impregnated dipsticks (Chemstrips, Boehringer Mannheim).

38 min) malaria detection test which utilizes a dipstick coated with monoclonal antibodies against the i

39 tavidin-coated membranes attached to plastic dipsticks, complexing of anti-fluorescein-urease conjuga

40 a solution and on the surface of an antibody dipstick (d/Ab).

41 PCR reagents with rapid oligochromatographic dipstick detection of PCR products and is highly sensiti

42 ss surface to fabricate a simple solid-state dipstick device that can be used for the visual detectio

43 The herein reported device combines a dipstick EPRoC sensor with the enhanced sensitivity of f

44 on, history, physical examination, and urine dipstick examination.

45 ks; 2) spin-enhanced fluorescent nanodiamond dipsticks, exploiting selective separation from backgrou

46 The PHAIA was adapted to a dipstick format (limit of detection of 3.0ng/ml), and a

47 five clinical entities defined by the urine dipstick: glucosuria, ketonuria, proteinuria, hematuria

48 Both dipsticks had similar sensitivities, requiring a minimum

49 erotype Typhi LPS (ELISA) or whole bacteria (dipstick) had a significantly higher sensitivity than th

50 Phenotypes examined included dipstick hematuria, bilateral sensorineural hearing loss

51 rated the diagnostic potential of two plague dipsticks in detecting capsular-positive strains of Y. p

52 The SERS-LFT dipsticks, incorporating gold-silver core-shell nanopart

53 man immunodeficiency virus-type 1 (HIV-1) by dipstick is described.

54 Species-specific lateral flow dipstick (LFD) assays for the identification of Atlantic

55 illary electrophoresis (CE) and lateral flow dipstick (LFD).

56 ations in 1976 to 1980, with urinary protein dipstick measurements (n = 8786) or serum creatinine lev

57 rs in a set of 150 274 Icelanders with urine dipstick measurements.

58 cardiovascular mortality and in studies with dipstick measurements.

59 years) from seven studies with urine protein dipstick measurements.

60 ine osmolality, urine cloudiness, additional dipstick measures, ability to provide a urine sample, an

61 Urine dipstick (nitrite or leukocyte esterase) had low sensiti

62 Hematuria (by dipstick only) occurred in 25 (41%) of 61 AERAS-402 reci

63 hance findings from screening tests (urinary dipstick or blood tests), or when symptoms become severe

64 *Serion GmbH, Wurzburg, Germany), 48%; LEPTO Dipstick(Organon-Teknika, Ltd., Amsterdam, The Netherlan

65 tly only the less sensitive lateral flow and dipstick POC tests are implemented.

66 h CKD, even those with proteinuria below the dipstick positive level (approximately 300 mg/d or urine

67 ding CKD, the relatively small subgroup with dipstick-positive proteinuria did have worse outcomes.

68 At baseline, CKD was found in 58% and dipstick-positive proteinuria in 8% of patients.

69 Dipstick-positive proteinuria was independently associat

70 CKD was common and dipstick-positive proteinuria was infrequent in this sam

71 The increased risk of death associated with dipstick-positive proteinuria was similar for those with

72 CKD was defined as dipstick proteinuria >=1+ and/or estimated glomerular fi

73 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) plus ACR >/=300 mg/g or dipstick proteinuria 2+ or higher vs eGFR >/=90 mL/min p

74 cular disease or significant kidney disease, dipstick proteinuria and an eGFR value <60 ml/min per 1.

75 filtration rate (GFR) and semi-quantitative dipstick proteinuria measurements were obtained at one,

76 90 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) plus ACR <10 mg/g or dipstick proteinuria negative).

77 Predictors of ESRD were dipstick proteinuria of 1+ or > or =2+ (hazard ratio [HR

78 Dipstick proteinuria showed smaller improvement than ACR

79 Analyses of joint effects of eGFR and dipstick proteinuria showed that with the presence of pr

80 Dipstick proteinuria was also a significant predictor of

81 Blood pressure and dipstick proteinuria were assessed per protocol.

82 urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR), and dipstick proteinuria with the incidence of peripheral ar

83 common variables (age, sex, race, eGFR, and dipstick proteinuria) performed similarly to more comple

84 -creatinine ratio [ACR] or semi-quantitative dipstick proteinuria), or both.

85 estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), dipstick proteinuria, and interactive associations betwe

86 onset or worsening of existing hypertension, dipstick proteinuria, epigastric or right upper-quadrant

87 abdominal pain; systolic blood pressure; and dipstick proteinuria.

88 ted glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and by dipstick proteinuria.

89 s, and correlated results with urine protein dipstick readings and multiple other parameters.

90 a low pretest probability of UTI, a negative dipstick result for leukocyte esterase and nitrites excl

91 Proteinuria was identified using morning dipstick results (>/=30 mg/dL) at baseline and within th

92 Disease equation and proteinuria from urine dipstick results found in laboratory databases.

93 Dipstick sensitivity was calculated to be 84.8% (range b

94 Hospitalized children with a high-risk dipstick test (300ng/mL and more) had a 2.47-fold relati

95 M dipstick assay (LDS), and an IgM dot-ELISA dipstick test (DST).

96 hus, assessing proteinuria by a simple urine dipstick test could provide a useful adjunct to risk ass

97 s low risk if they had a negative urinalysis/dipstick test result, serum procalcitonin less than or e

98 Notably, a negative urine dipstick test screen maintained a high negative predicti

99 commercially available immunochromatographic dipstick test to detect Trypanosoma cruzi infection in 3

100 dney injury that has been adapted to a urine dipstick test.

101 etectable proteinuria (albuminuria) by urine dipstick testing but had 1,704+/-2,900 mg (mean+/-SD) of

102 Last, we showed that urine dipstick testing for leukocyte esterase was negative in

103 int-of-care (POC) serum creatinine and urine dipstick testing with an education and training program

104 ians should confirm heme-positive results of dipstick testing with microscopic urinalysis that demons

105 were trained to predict the need for urinary dipstick testing, electrocardiogram, abdominal ultrasono

106 ludes history, physical examination, urinary dipstick testing, urine cultures, and simple blood tests

107 cadaver kidney donors and is not detected by dipstick testing.

108 Urine dipstick tests are widely used in routine medical care t

109 UTI is easily performed in the clinic using dipstick tests.

110 e possibility of the development of urinary 'dipstick' tests to assess non-accessible mucosal immune

111 roscopy (SERS)-based lateral flow test (LFT) dipstick that integrates digital analysis for highly sen

112 t North Patagonian Icefield (NPI), serve as 'dipsticks' that allow us to reconstruct past changes in

113 Inspired by dipsticks to gauge content levels, mechanical informatio

114 geneous version, potentially applicable to a dipstick-type multianalyte point of care analytical devi

115 which are then easily read on a lateral flow dipstick, upon which these products are immobilized by a

116 ulture protocols contingent upon a screening dipstick urinalysis are a safe and effective platform fo

117 t, history taking, physical examination, and dipstick urinalysis are not able to reliably lower the p

118 istics of urine screening studies, including dipstick urinalysis for nitrite and leukocyte esterase a

119 ete blood counts (therapy-related leukemia), dipstick urinalysis for proteinuria and serum blood urea

120 A negative dipstick urinalysis had a negative predictive value of 9

121 A dipstick urinalysis was considered negative only if leuk

122 study of 58 098 urine cultures with a paired dipstick urinalysis with or without urine microscopy was

123 iagnostic benefit in samples with a negative dipstick urinalysis.

124 Dipstick urine for proteinuria, eGFR, and hematocrit wer

125 formation (force/extension) of a DNA hairpin dipstick was used to measure the single or few Hg(2+) io

126 Measured urine NGAL levels by the dipstick were strongly correlated with the standard enzy

127 ignals or positive readout of a lateral flow dipstick, which is as sensitive as conventional PCR-base

128 antigen capture-based immunochromatographic dipsticks, Yersinia Pestis (F1) Smart II and Plague BioT