ライフサイエンスコーパス: discharge diagnosis

1 ith each other and with the final neurologic discharge diagnosis.

2 sonality disorder checklist and by DSM-III-R discharge diagnosis.

3 ermine how often mesenteric adenitis was the discharge diagnosis.

4 at previously estimated using only principal discharge diagnosis.

5 fection with a primary or secondary COVID-19 discharge diagnosis.

6 records from 2000 to 2010 with HF as primary discharge diagnosis.

7 404.x3, and 428.xx recorded as the principal discharge diagnosis.

8 r polymerase chain reaction and received any discharge diagnosis.

9 al Modification code 427.31 as the principal discharge diagnosis.

10 art failure and those with another principal discharge diagnosis.

11 ased on the location of heart failure in the discharge diagnosis.

12 ne of the following: (1) 1 primary inpatient discharge diagnosis, (2) 2 outpatient diagnoses, (3) 3 s

13 primary care-treatable diagnosis based on ED discharge diagnosis, a substantial proportion required i

14 Among 19450 hospitalizations with an ARFI discharge diagnosis (across 25 site-specific study seaso

15 hospitalizations (with at least 1 ID-related discharge diagnosis) among total hospitalizations during

16 unknown), including 65 357 with a principal discharge diagnosis and 222 635 with a secondary dischar

17 s with a primary inflammatory skin condition discharge diagnosis and 647 patients with primary inflam

18 e fee-for-service beneficiaries by principal discharge diagnosis and classified hospitals as PCI- or

19 ve primary care-treatable diagnoses based on discharge diagnosis and our modification of the algorith

20 d Measures: Heart failure diagnosis based on discharge diagnosis and physician review of sampled medi

21 alizations with hepatitis A as the principal discharge diagnosis and rates of secondary discharge dia

22 n case acuity, duration of surgery, hospital discharge diagnosis, and patient characteristics.

23 iagnosis, and results were compared with the discharge diagnosis: AR, n=15; chronic rejection (CR), n

24 spitalizations (8 464 037 with an ID-related discharge diagnosis as the principal discharge diagnosis

25 nts with longer AKI duration and those whose discharge diagnosis at index AKI hospitalization include

26 The final discharge diagnosis, based on multiparametric items, was

27 ed for review within 6 strata defined by ICD discharge diagnosis (both with and without sepsis diagno

28 of receiving a test related to the principal discharge diagnosis by race and ethnicity, controlling f

29 bjects with penicillin "allergy" to 2 unique discharge diagnosis category-matched, sex-matched, age-m

30 ratory-based Acute Physiology Score [mLAPS], discharge diagnosis, Charlson Comorbidity Index, frailty

31 For each visit with a discharge diagnosis classified as primary care treatable

32 all hospital discharges with any ID-related discharge diagnosis code during 1985-2010.

33 n International Classification of Diseases-9 discharge diagnosis code for HF (primary position) and s

34 lized between 1998 and 2008 with a principal discharge diagnosis code for HF.

35 D-10 NIHSS scores were derived from hospital discharge diagnosis code R29.7xx, with the latter 2 digi

36 Using inpatient discharge diagnosis codes (1993-2008), we determined tha

37 ons with >=1 acute respiratory illness (ARI) discharge diagnosis codes and molecular testing for infl

38 above baseline and in the Medicare cohort by discharge diagnosis codes and the use of dialysis.

39 Patients were identified using discharge diagnosis codes and then geocoded to their hom

40 An algorithm using primary discharge diagnosis codes for acute ischemic or hemorrha

41 fication of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) discharge diagnosis codes in adults hospitalized with se

42 inth Revision, Clinical Modification primary discharge diagnosis codes in each calendar year from 200

43 tify bronchiolitis encounters using hospital discharge diagnosis codes in Ontario, Canada.

44 iseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification discharge diagnosis codes into diagnoses and disease cat

45 evision, Clinical Modification and ICD-10-CM discharge diagnosis codes or by reason-for-visit (RFV) c

46 intentional self-harm were identified using discharge diagnosis codes or reason-for-visit codes.

47 Use of only hospital discharge diagnosis codes plus pharmacy dispensing data

48 sease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification discharge diagnosis codes were used to compare first-yea

49 om study electrocardiograms, hospitalization discharge diagnosis codes, and Medicare claims diagnosis

50 ng clinic visit electrocardiograms, hospital discharge diagnosis codes, death certificates, and Medic

51 -specific hospitalization rates by principal discharge diagnosis codes, grouped into 283 disease cate

52 national classification of diseases hospital discharge diagnosis codes.

53 and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision discharge diagnosis codes.

54 edure-related complications) based on ICD-10 discharge diagnosis codes.

55 3.2-42.1) and 99.5% (95% CI: 98.8-100) using discharge diagnosis codes.

56 Discharge diagnosis coding identified 128 (60.7%) of tot

57 The failure of discharge diagnosis coding to identify DUA-IE in 40% of

58 or substance use disorders related based on discharge diagnosis compared with 0.4% and 12.4%, respec

59 Discharge diagnosis count including trends from 2010 to

60 In 2010, the adjusted mean discharge diagnosis count was 7.52 for CAHs vs 8.53 for

61 Information on hospital discharge diagnosis, emigration, and mortality was obtai

62 ital admission based on primary or secondary discharge diagnosis for myocarditis or pericarditis from

63 Related Health Problems (ICD)-coded hospital discharge diagnosis for sepsis identification suffer fro

64 related discharge diagnosis as the principal discharge diagnosis for the hospitalization) among 98 11

65 ith a first-ever subdural hematoma principal discharge diagnosis from 2000 to 2015 matched by age, se

66 a retrospective analysis of patients with IE discharge diagnosis from an academic medical center, 201

67 (>/=18 years old) with PAH as the principal discharge diagnosis from January 1, 2001, through Decemb

68 itis (> or =15 years old) were identified by discharge diagnosis from the Swedish National Board of H

69 n, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) code 428 discharge diagnosis groups: 428 primary, 428 nonprimary,

70 diagnosis in 1996 to the top-ranked primary discharge diagnosis in 2010.

71 fic); a broader definition was based on a HF discharge diagnosis in any position (HHF-broad).

72 rial fibrillation or flutter was the primary discharge diagnosis in only 38.4% of cases.

73 The HHF outcome was defined as a HF discharge diagnosis in the primary position (HHF-specifi

74 NTS: We identified 1658 patients with an MMD discharge diagnosis in the Swedish Hospital Discharge Re

75 is the leading diagnosis-related group (DRG) discharge diagnosis in the United States and accounts fo

76 We investigated differences on discharge diagnosis, in-hospital examinations, treatment

77 dentified in the EMR using primary/secondary discharge diagnosis International Classification of Dise

78 ED visit claims using primary and secondary discharge diagnosis International Classification of Dise

79 and coding for beneficiaries with a hospital discharge diagnosis International Classification of Dise

80 Patients were identified through discharge diagnosis lists by using the International Cla

81 d as treated if there was documentation of a discharge diagnosis, medication prescribed for depressio

82 Incidence of CHF as ascertained by hospital discharge diagnosis (n = 208) and death certificates (n

83 In the inpatient setting, a primary discharge diagnosis of 691.8 had excellent PPV.

84 ry 2013 through December 2017 and received a discharge diagnosis of ACS.

85 ecords of patients 30 to 74 years old with a discharge diagnosis of acute CHD (ICD-9 codes 410 or 411

86 of all patients (N = 23,268) with a primary discharge diagnosis of acute embolism and thrombosis of

87 ed all beneficiaries admitted with a primary discharge diagnosis of acute hypertension on the basis o

88 ined as an inpatient or emergency department discharge diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI)

89 atients aged 65 to 86 years with the primary discharge diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction who w

90 all adult (age, >or=15 yrs) patients with a discharge diagnosis of acute verapamil or diltiazem over

91 hospitalizations with a primary or secondary discharge diagnosis of ADRD or PD.

92 Iowa, Wisconsin) with the confirmed primary discharge diagnosis of AMI in 4 periods: 1992-1993 (n=10

93 alized in the United States with a principal discharge diagnosis of AMI were identified through the u

94 uary 1994 and February 1996 with a principal discharge diagnosis of AMI, and were eligible for reperf

95 Hospitalisations with a discharge diagnosis of an acute ischaemic stroke were in

96 inding that patients with HL with a hospital discharge diagnosis of an AI have a substantially higher

97 he Swedish Twin Registry, who had a hospital discharge diagnosis of AN, or who had a cause-of-death c

98 The primary outcome variable was a discharge diagnosis of aspiration pneumonia.

99 all individuals (n = 92 531) with a hospital discharge diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity d

100 Overall we found persons with a hospital discharge diagnosis of CD to have a 5.35-fold (95% CI, 3

101 spitals between 2005 and 2011 with a primary discharge diagnosis of CD.

102 versity teaching hospital with a primary DRG discharge diagnosis of CHF.

103 y adult patients hospitalized with a primary discharge diagnosis of COVID-19 flagged as "present-on-a

104 To assess the impact of a discharge diagnosis of critical illness polyneuromyopath

105 Of 3,567 ICU patients with a discharge diagnosis of critical illness polyneuropathy a

106 nts to 3,436 ICU patients who did not have a discharge diagnosis of critical illness polyneuropathy a

107 dy demonstrates the clinical importance of a discharge diagnosis of critical illness polyneuropathy a

108 reexisting neuromuscular abnormalities and a discharge diagnosis of critical illness polyneuropathy a

109 hed analysis of a large national database, a discharge diagnosis of critical illness polyneuropathy a

110 Compared to patients without a discharge diagnosis of critical illness polyneuropathy a

111 yneuropathy and/or myopathy, patients with a discharge diagnosis of critical illness polyneuropathy a

112 Patients were grouped as with or without a discharge diagnosis of dementia by ICD-9-CM criteria.

113 We identified all patients with a hospital discharge diagnosis of diabetes between 1985 and 1990 us

114 agreement between drug treatment data and a discharge diagnosis of diabetes, considered whether agre

115 e 120 days before admission, and 16.3% had a discharge diagnosis of diabetes.

116 ersity of Pennsylvania (Penn) with a primary discharge diagnosis of heart failure (n=657) and (2) pat

117 e compared between patients with a principal discharge diagnosis of heart failure and those with anot

118 udied patients hospitalized with a principal discharge diagnosis of heart failure between January 200

119 admissions at a single center with a primary discharge diagnosis of heart failure were reviewed (N =

120 Consecutive hospitalizations with a discharge diagnosis of heart failure were reviewed.

121 ospitalizations of patients with a principal discharge diagnosis of heart failure, acute myocardial i

122 AHF-type if they met the following criteria: discharge diagnosis of heart failure, systolic blood pre

123 f these hospitalizations, 6549 (13.9%) had a discharge diagnosis of heart failure.

124 lized between 2011 and 2013 with a principle discharge diagnosis of heart failure.

125 ged after hospitalization with the principal discharge diagnosis of heart failure.

126 of 58 042 admissions (88.8%) with a primary discharge diagnosis of HF and 62 764 admissions (28.2%)

127 of age who were hospitalized with a primary discharge diagnosis of HF between April 1998 and March 1

128 om Kaiser Permanente Colorado with a primary discharge diagnosis of HF between January 1, 2001, and D

129 eneficiaries hospitalized with the principal discharge diagnosis of HF in acute-care nongovernmental

130 d 62 764 admissions (28.2%) with a secondary discharge diagnosis of HF met the prespecified diagnosti

131 spital claim with a principal (first-listed) discharge diagnosis of HF using the International Classi

132 ospital stays (n = 1,686,089) with a primary discharge diagnosis of HF were identified from National

133 2 patients from 271 hospitals with a primary discharge diagnosis of HF, initiation of angiotensin-con

134 ospital admission or ED visit with a primary discharge diagnosis of HF.

135 harge diagnosis and 222 635 with a secondary discharge diagnosis of HF.

136 ple of patients 4 to 48 months of age with a discharge diagnosis of ileocolic intussusception who und

137 s used to identify patients with a principal discharge diagnosis of inferior vena cava thrombosis (In

138 al influenza diagnosis, was defined as (1) a discharge diagnosis of influenza, (2) a prescription of

139 ith an acute care encounter with a principal discharge diagnosis of interest were included.

140 21 to 64 years hospitalized with a principal discharge diagnosis of ischemic heart disease before (No

141 CT use for adult inpatients with a principal discharge diagnosis of major depression, recurrent.

142 erized hospital discharge data set who had a discharge diagnosis of meningococcal disease.

143 ns of a separate group of 18 patients with a discharge diagnosis of mesenteric adenitis were reviewed

144 an admission diagnosis of appendicitis had a discharge diagnosis of mesenteric adenitis.

145 A total of 6804 patients with a primary discharge diagnosis of MI at 28 Baylor Scott & White Hea

146 2046 patients (1312 white; 734 black) with a discharge diagnosis of MM and MGUS, respectively.

147 our patients with an inpatient or outpatient discharge diagnosis of MMD developed cancer during postd

148 Eligible patients had an admission or discharge diagnosis of opioid use disorder or opioid poi

149 children 18 years of age and younger with a discharge diagnosis of pancreatitis identified 135 patie

150 period, 1836 and 889 hospitalizations with a discharge diagnosis of pneumonia and meningitis, respect

151 ed with laboratory-confirmed influenza and a discharge diagnosis of pneumonia over 7 influenza season

152 rs hospital in fiscal years 2002-2012 with a discharge diagnosis of pneumonia.

153 italization for both a primary and secondary discharge diagnosis of psychoses (ICD-9 codes 290.x-299.

154 ons in 7178 children (age 0-22 years) with a discharge diagnosis of SCD and either ACS or pneumonia.

155 Primary discharge diagnosis of sepsis with and without atrial fi

156 ld at discharge and were not neonatal with a discharge diagnosis of sepsis.

157 Diseases, 9th Edition, Clinical Modification discharge diagnosis of stroke admitted through the emerg

158 e patients admitted in 1995 with a principal discharge diagnosis of unstable angina or chest pain.

159 d from all infants <2 years old and having a discharge diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia or ventri

160 The primary discharge diagnosis often failed to reflect the reason f

161 efined as the first occurrence of 1 hospital discharge diagnosis or 2 outpatient diagnoses for ascite

162 d for incident dementia (defined by hospital discharge diagnosis or acetylcholinesterase inhibitor us

163 ardiogram at ARIC follow-up visits, hospital discharge diagnosis, or death certificates through 2011.

164 psychologists, or neurologists; (2) hospital discharge diagnosis; or (3) registered as a chronic diag

165 Controls were matched to cases on primary discharge diagnosis related group (DRG), age, sex, acuit

166 ng cancer, 58 hospitalized with at least one discharge diagnosis that coded to benign neoplasia (Inte

167 on hospitalizations with ID as the principal discharge diagnosis, the signal remained significant but

168 ys were compared together and with the final discharge diagnosis used as the reference standard.

169 s with a primary inflammatory skin condition discharge diagnosis were 61.0% female and had a mean (SD