ライフサイエンスコーパス: diverticular

1 vs 668.1 per 100 000 admissions; P < .001), diverticular abscess (12.0% vs 9.7%; P < .001), and cole

2 n related to rituximab administration, and a diverticular abscess, each in single patients.

3 We speculate that a distinctly unique, "diverticular autoimmunity" against the embryonic cecal-

4 ltivariable HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.40-2.11) and diverticular bleeding (multivariable HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1

5 We identified men with diverticulitis or diverticular bleeding based on responses to biennial and

6 his group (29 percent) were presumed to have diverticular bleeding because although they had no stigm

7 erticulitis and 3.19 (95% CI, 1.45-7.00) for diverticular bleeding compared with men with a BMI of <2

8 of diverticulitis and 383 incident cases of diverticular bleeding during 18 years of follow-up.

9 939 cases of diverticulitis and 256 cases of diverticular bleeding during a 22-year period of follow-

10 and NSAID use on risk of diverticulitis and diverticular bleeding in a large prospective cohort.

11 etween nut, corn, or popcorn consumption and diverticular bleeding or uncomplicated diverticulosis.

12 the first 73 patients, those with continued diverticular bleeding underwent hemicolectomy.

13 tis and a HR of 1.70 (95% CI, 1.21-2.39) for diverticular bleeding, compared with nonusers of aspirin

14 with an increased risk of diverticulitis and diverticular bleeding.

15 nd waist-to-hip ratio and diverticulitis and diverticular bleeding.

16 erticulitis and 1.91 (95% CI, 1.26-2.90) for diverticular bleeding.

17 erticulitis and 1.96 (95% CI, 1.30-2.97) for diverticular bleeding.

18 ly increased the risks of diverticulitis and diverticular bleeding.

19 of diverticulitis and 383 incident cases of diverticular bleeding.

20 agnosis of diverticulitis, diverticulosis or diverticular bleeding; death; or December 31, 2012.

21 a papillary orifice less than 2 cm from the diverticular border; type IV: unclassified papilla, with

22 Studies of obesity and diverticular complications are limited.

23 commendation to avoid these foods to prevent diverticular complications should be reconsidered.

24 Patients at risk of diverticular complications should carefully consider the

25 p ratio was also associated with the risk of diverticular complications when the highest and lowest q

26 , including aspirin, have been implicated in diverticular complications.

27 d not increase the risk of diverticulosis or diverticular complications.

28 However, in other diverticular conditions, such as diverticulosis, methano

29 S) of 15,220 Icelanders for association with diverticular disease (5,426 cases) and its more severe f

30 p symptomatic diverticulosis, termed colonic diverticular disease (also known as diverticular disease

31 .0001), with upregulation of M3 receptors in diverticular disease (diverticular disease 7.8% [1.9-20.

32 emia (HR per 1 SD, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.84-0.98), diverticular disease (HR per 1 SD, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.90-0.

33 acetylcholine was increased in patients with diverticular disease (mean -log EC(50) 5.6 [SD 0.3]) com

34 nsferase activity was lower in patients with diverticular disease (median 19.5%, range 12.0-30.0) tha

35 lon at CT colonography, representing chronic diverticular disease (n = 97) or sigmoid carcinoma (n =

36 oing aneurysm repair (n=21) or colectomy for diverticular disease (n=13, control).

37 Symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease (SUDD) is a recognized clinical con

38 e in severity from symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease (SUDD) to symptomatic disease with

39 de inflammation in symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease (SUDD), and the role of anti-inflam

40 wel disease 34%, cancer 18%, polyps 17%, and diverticular disease 13%.

41 ion of M3 receptors in diverticular disease (diverticular disease 7.8% [1.9-20.4], controls 1.7% [0.8

42 e area was 13.2% (6.0-23.3) in patients with diverticular disease and 2.5% (1.6-3.7) in controls (p<0

43 was 17.5% (range 10.0-37.0) in patients with diverticular disease and 47.0% (29.0-54.0) in controls (

44 rs7609897-T: P=1.5 x 10(-10), OR=0.87) with diverticular disease and in FAM155A (family with sequenc

45 cohort study using patients with perforated diverticular disease and population controls identified

46 ons of sigmoid colons from ten patients with diverticular disease and ten controls, after resections

47 Patients with diverticular disease are frequently advised to avoid eat

48 rcinoma is best differentiated from masslike diverticular disease by the absence of diverticula in th

49 Diverticular disease can range in severity from symptoma

50 nd pain in the left quadrant of the abdomen, diverticular disease causing mortality and morbidity doe

51 receptors were upregulated in patients with diverticular disease compared with controls: the median

52 s infectious events, and two (10%) developed diverticular disease complications, leading to trial wit

53 of laparoscopy in the elective treatment of diverticular disease decreases rates of complications co

54 ies, we identified 142,123 incident cases of diverticular disease diagnosed at a hospitalization (197

55 n of heritable factors to the development of diverticular disease diagnosed at a hospitalization or o

56 atients who underwent elective surgeries for diverticular disease from 2005 to 2008.

57 The incidence of perforated diverticular disease has doubled over the period of the

58 Much of our previous understanding of diverticular disease has recently been challenged.

59 Diverticular disease imposes an impressive clinical burd

60 n's disease in 95, ulcerative colitis in 18, diverticular disease in 17, carcinoma in 25 (16 after ra

61 essionals (40-75 years old) who were free of diverticular disease in 1986 (baseline) was performed.

62 e are the first loci shown to associate with diverticular disease in a genome-wide study.

63 The RR of diverticular disease in one twin when the other had dive

64 The RR for diverticular disease in siblings of index cases was 2.92

65 Risk factors for diverticular disease include age older than 65 years, ge

66 Treatments for diverticular disease include dietary fibre, pharmacologi

67 Diverticular disease is characterized by pouches (that i

68 Diverticular disease is commonly associated with the old

69 he use of laparoscopy in colon resection for diverticular disease is feasible and results in fewer co

70 The pathogenesis of diverticular disease is likely multifactorial and comple

71 Diverticular disease is the most commonly reported findi

72 oline did not differ between the two groups (diverticular disease mean 5.6% [SD 0.3], controls 5.2% [

73 gy, clinical presentation, and management of diverticular disease of the colon and its complications.

74 Men reporting newly diagnosed diverticular disease on biennial follow-up questionnaire

75 ned as surgical intervention at any time for diverticular disease or presence of computed tomography

76 Diagnosis of diverticular disease relies on imaging approaches, such

77 Perforated diverticular disease represents the most serious complic

78 t 53% (95% CI, 45%-61%) of susceptibility to diverticular disease results from genetic factors.

79 y, 16 sequence variants are followed up in a diverticular disease sample from Denmark (5,970 cases, 3

80 This SNP may be a marker of diverticular disease severity that might assist in surgi

81 laboratory investigations into the causes of diverticular disease suggests that disturbances in choli

82 acetyltransferase was lower in patients with diverticular disease than in controls: median percentage

83 cular disease in one twin when the other had diverticular disease was 14.5 (95% CI, 8.9-23) for monoz

84 Patients with diverticular disease were identified by International Cl

85 colonic diverticular disease (also known as diverticular disease).

86 ad surgery for colorectal cancer, 14,019 for diverticular disease, and 7222 for inflammatory bowel di

87 th or without epidural analgesia for cancer, diverticular disease, and benign polyps.

88 nts with primary diagnoses for colon cancer, diverticular disease, benign colonic neoplasm, and ulcer

89 represents the most serious complication of diverticular disease, but little is known regarding its

90 is of CD, UC, malignancy, or benign disease (diverticular disease, Clostridium difficile) undergoing

91 The use of laparoscopy for treating diverticular disease, in the absence of absolute contrai

92 arge, prospective study of men without known diverticular disease, nut, corn, and popcorn consumption

93 d/or rectal resection for colorectal cancer, diverticular disease, or inflammatory bowel disease.

94 colorectal resection for colorectal cancer, diverticular disease, or inflammatory bowel disease.

95 gastritis, gastric cancer, diarrhea, colonic diverticular disease, polyps, cancer, liver disease incl

96 of the pathophysiology of diverticulosis and diverticular disease, which encompasses genetic alterati

97 be the main drivers of colonic resection for diverticular disease.

98 harmacological abnormalities associated with diverticular disease.

99 f fiber in the pathogenesis and treatment of diverticular disease.

100 d with a greater and not lower prevalence of diverticular disease.

101 nary evidence that it might be effective for diverticular disease.

102 ctors appear to contribute to development of diverticular disease.

103 known about the role of heritable factors in diverticular disease.

104 matory bowel disease, pouchitis, and colonic diverticular disease.

105 comitant rise in the number of patients with diverticular disease.

106 potentially lethal complication of duodenal diverticular disease.

107 orifice inside the diverticulum; type IIIB: diverticular-diverticular border type, with a papillary

108 omplications such as acute diverticulitis or diverticular haemorrhage.

109 linical syndromes, mainly diverticulitis and diverticular haemorrhage.

110 ients, 10 (21 percent) had definite signs of diverticular hemorrhage (active bleeding in 5, nonbleedi

111 ients, 17 (23 percent) had definite signs of diverticular hemorrhage (active bleeding in 6, nonbleedi

112 All 10 patients with definite diverticular hemorrhage were treated endoscopically; non

113 ing because although they had no stigmata of diverticular hemorrhage, no other source of bleeding was

114 rticulosis, at least one fifth have definite diverticular hemorrhage.

115 rged and bulging oral protrusion; type IIIA, diverticular-intradiverticular type, with a papillary or

116 In colitic and inflamed diverticular mucosa p27 was expressed in the base of the

117 ch a colectomy was performed for neoplastic, diverticular, or inflammatory bowel disease between 2008

118 tients experienced serious adverse events of diverticular perforation and asthma (not garadacimab-rel

119 the incidence and mortality associated with diverticular perforation and the influence of comorbidit

120 Patients with a contained duodenal diverticular perforation can be managed conservatively a

121 The early diagnosis of duodenal diverticular perforation is often complicated by inconcl

122 and sofosbuvir because of an adverse event (diverticular perforation), which was not considered trea

123 nal imaging led to the diagnosis of duodenal diverticular perforation.

124 Duodenal diverticular perforations are rare but life-threatening

125 e pressure therapy in patients with duodenal diverticular perforations upfront to surgery.

126 optimal strategy for selected patients with diverticular peritonitis as may represent a good comprom

127 n described for tackling using POEM, namely, diverticular POEM (D-POEM) and salvage POEM (S-POEM).

128 subcategory, C2b, specifically for mass-like diverticular strictures, which are likely benign.