コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 the hospitalization rates ranged from 6.2% (dose-dense AC + P) to 10.0% (TAC), and those who receive
2 than age 65 years, all regimens (aside from dose-dense AC + P) were associated with a higher risk of
4 r toxicity and dose-delivery were similar to dose-dense AC --> paclitaxel in Cancer and Leukemia Grou
11 end point has already been reported.Although dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy administered once every
12 Objective: To determine whether tailored dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy improves the outcomes o
14 cycles of leukocyte nadir-based tailored and dose-dense adjuvant epirubicin and cyclophosphamide ever
15 Salvage chemotherapy regimens integrating dose dense and vertical dose intensification strategies
17 d by HDC with AHPCS or to receive sequential dose-dense and dose-escalated chemotherapy with doxorubi
18 e feasibility and efficacy of giving uniform dose-dense and dose-intense cytoreductive chemotherapy a
19 s the use up-front of all active agents in a dose-dense and dose-intense fashion, as practiced in Tot
20 a comprehensive 2-step protocol encompassing dose-dense and dose-intense second-line chemotherapy, fo
22 erging evidence that other therapies such as dose-dense and metronomic temozolomide regimens, targete
25 -cell transplant was used in 8% in the Unfav-dose-dense arm and 17% in the Unfav-BEP arm (P = .035).
26 survival (PFS) rates were 58.9% in the Unfav-dose-dense arm and 46.7% in the Unfav-BEP arm (hazard ra
27 progression-free survival (6.6 months in the dose-dense arm and 5.0 months in the metronomic arm).
28 The 1-year survival rate was 80% for the dose-dense arm and 69% for the metronomic arm; median OS
30 rably, with only three patients in the Unfav-dose-dense arm reporting grade 3 motor neurotoxicity at
32 and Drug Administration and the benefits of dose-dense breast cancer chemotherapy, especially for ho
33 y is to establish the safety and activity of dose-dense brentuximab vedotin combined with ifosfamide,
34 a single-arm, open-label, phase 1/2 study of dose-dense BV-ICE at the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, U
36 g N0-1 RS12-25 without ET response) received dose-dense chemotherapy (CT) followed by ET in the CT tr
37 c, but also predicted improved outcomes from dose-dense chemotherapy (interaction P = .0998 for DFS;
38 likely a result of the reported benefits of dose-dense chemotherapy and the ease of pegfilgrastim ad
40 isk early breast cancer, the use of tailored dose-dense chemotherapy compared with standard adjuvant
41 rian cancer, we found that first-line weekly dose-dense chemotherapy did not improve overall or progr
42 the sustained long-term benefit of adjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer.
44 addition of recommendations against routine dose-dense chemotherapy in lymphoma and in favor of high
45 r women with HR-positive tumors treated with dose-dense chemotherapy is estimated to be $38.8 million
47 were randomly assigned 1:1 to two different dose-dense chemotherapy regimens and 2:1 to ibandronate
48 ing a subset of trials comparing intensified/dose-dense chemotherapy versus standard-dose regimens (D
49 ts with ER+ breast cancer who benefited from dose-dense chemotherapy, and specifically, this benefit
50 rly HR-positive patients do not benefit from dose-dense chemotherapy, limiting pegfilgrastim use woul
51 nscriptional activity predicted benefit from dose-dense chemotherapy, whereas tumor burden and prolif
58 l doses) and 55 received a dose-intensified, dose-dense concomitant regimen of epirubicin + cyclophos
59 sequential cyclophosphamide administration, dose-dense consolidation, late intensification, CNS prop
64 ery 2 weeks followed by 4 cycles of tailored dose-dense docetaxel every 2 weeks, or to standard-inter
65 rogenitor cell support (AHPCS) with a modern dose-dense dose-escalated (nonstandard) regimen includin
67 axel + trastuzumab + pertuzumab (THP) versus dose-dense doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide (ddAC) followe
70 ntial CT consisting of either four cycles of dose-dense doxorubicin at 60 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks follo
71 was 50 (44-58) years, all were treated with dose-dense doxorubicin, and 48 patients underwent breast
74 to 65 years of age who completed 4 cycles of dose-dense doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide for stage I-III
75 tim use during the paclitaxel portion of the dose-dense doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide-paclitaxel regim
76 hamide) to (1) enhance treatment efficacy by dose-dense drug delivery and (2) reduce risk of long-ter
77 Efficient induction of early response by dose-dense drug delivery supported an early-response-ada
78 pothesized that 3 months of paclitaxel after dose-dense EC (EC/T) would be superior to CEF or AC/T.
83 17 randomized patients (1006 in the tailored dose-dense group and 1011 in the control group; median [
84 FS events were reported, 118 in the tailored dose-dense group and 151 in the control group (HR, 0.79;
85 s required in six (6%) patients in the Unfav-dose-dense group and 16 (16%) in the Unfav-BEP group.
86 ects occurred in 527 (52.6%) in the tailored dose-dense group and 366 (36.6%) in the control group.
89 nd haematotoxic events occurred in the Unfav-dose-dense group compared with in the Unfav-BEP group; t
91 survival was 59% (95% CI 49-68) in the Unfav-dose-dense group versus 48% (38-59) in the Unfav-BEP gro
92 av-BEP group) or a dose-dense regimen (Unfav-dose-dense group), consisting of intravenous paclitaxel
98 ch centers and received either six cycles of dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and c
99 n advanced urothelial cancer, treatment with dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and c
100 ily, 5 days per week for up to 6.5 weeks) or dose-dense oral temozolomide (75 mg/m(2) once daily for
101 In phase I, treatment was initiated with dose-dense paclitaxel (P) 70 mg/m(2) once daily on days
102 Omission of routine peg-filgrastim during dose-dense paclitaxel according to a prespecified algori
106 to receive either BEP (Unfav-BEP group) or a dose-dense regimen (Unfav-dose-dense group), consisting
107 eated with three BEP (Unfav-BEP) cycles or a dose-dense regimen (Unfav-dose-dense; two cycles of pacl
109 e first trial that confirms the benefit of a dose-dense regimen over a control regimen containing doc
114 ve migrated from a focus on dose-intense and dose-dense regimens, to the use of maintenance therapies
116 tine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin with dose-dense rituximab (SC-EPOCH-RR) in newly diagnosed HI
117 e every 3 weeks, with tailored dosing at the dose-dense schedule according to hematologic toxicity.
121 ve-year DFS was 80% (95% CI, 76% to 85%) for dose-dense therapy and 75% (95% CI, 69% to 80%) for tran
122 d 5-year OS was 88% (95% CI, 84% to 92%) for dose-dense therapy and 84% (95% CI, 79% to 88%) for tran
123 .80 [95% CI, 0.67 to 0.95]); the benefits of dose-dense therapy were seen for ER+ and ER-negative sub
124 determine the safety and feasibility of this dose-dense treatment and to estimate the disease-free an
125 ic therapy with taxanes, platinum agents, or dose-dense treatment can be safely given during pregnanc
126 ompared with standard adjuvant chemotherapy, dose-dense treatment improved breast cancer recurrence-f
128 v-BEP) cycles or a dose-dense regimen (Unfav-dose-dense; two cycles of paclitaxel-BEP-oxaliplatin + t
129 to evaluate differences between treatments (dose-dense v standard-dose) on NCB measures from baselin
132 n progression-free and overall survival with dose-dense weekly paclitaxel and 3-weekly (ie, once ever
133 n progression-free and overall survival with dose-dense weekly paclitaxel and 3-weekly carboplatin.
135 aimed to compare efficacy and safety of two dose-dense weekly regimens to standard 3-weekly chemothe