ライフサイエンスコーパス: drinking water

1 y PFAS (i.e., PFOA, PFHxS, and PFOS) through drinking water.

2 cterize microplastics in both wastewater and drinking water.

3 dispersed insoluble and soluble toxins from drinking water.

4 ormal chow, or zero-fiber diets, or SCFAs in drinking water.

5 which have been reported as contaminants in drinking water.

6 kout mice overloaded with indoxyl sulfate in drinking water.

7 ituting fructose and sucrose with NCS in the drinking water.

8 endoplasmic reticulum [ER] stress), via the drinking water.

9 d child care facilities test for Pb in their drinking water.

10 -1) for most of analytes in both surface and drinking water.

11 ed propionate (200 mmol/L) or control in the drinking water.

12 induced by administration of doxycycline in drinking water.

13 uch as trihalomethanes are commonly found in drinking water.

14 a health threat and operational challenge in drinking water.

15 communities reduce exposure to contaminated drinking water.

16 ing aquatic life and lowering the quality of drinking water.

17 le soluble lead concentrations in the city's drinking water.

18 tfeeding, and ingestion of PFAA-contaminated drinking water.

19 ericans depending on private wells for their drinking water.

20 or Se or 37% for Zn could be contributed via drinking water.

21 ine for the maximum concentration allowed in drinking water.

22 people rely on self-supplied groundwater for drinking water.

23 uncertainty in potential bromide effects on drinking water.

24 al and anthropogenic barriers, even reaching drinking water.

25 e risk to older, deeper groundwater used for drinking water.

26 he analysis of MC-LR at regulated levels for drinking water.

27 levels in rats that received vehicle in the drinking water.

28 al indicator bacteria in groundwater-derived drinking water.

29 ation infrastructure to separate sewage from drinking water.

30 F(-)) is one of the most harmful elements in drinking water.

31 quantitative measurement of aqueous lead in drinking water.

32 ally exposed to nicotine (100 mug/ml) in the drinking water.

33 ose of nitrate-depleted BRJ (BRJ-) or normal drinking water.

34 nganese) and lead and copper in point of use drinking water.

35 on by bacteria, but not bacterial growth, in drinking water.

36 ally harmful compounds in waste, surface and drinking waters.

37 NAC was added to the drinking water (1 g/kg) of the treatment cohorts from em

38 n in the galc gene were given fingolimod via drinking water (1 mg/kg/d).

39 compassing the current EPA limit for lead in drinking water (15 ppb).

40 centrations in both wastewater effluents and drinking water, (2) microplastic characteristics (i.e.,

41 across Germany and consequences for indirect drinking water abstraction from these streams.

42 ts to a stream that is subsequently used for drinking water abstraction has been previously referred

43 reuse conditions in surface waters used for drinking water abstraction.

44 onmental interventions that foster effective drinking water access, a concept that encompasses key el

45 water quality is regulated through the Safe Drinking Water Act, there are no drinking water standard

46 ted States respond to violations of the Safe Drinking Water Act, using consumer purchases of bottled

47 ater system that is regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act.

48 odium nitrite, or sodium chloride (1 g/L) in drinking water ad libitum for 7 d before killing.

49 effect level (NOAEL) via drinking water, or drinking water alone, provided to the dam from preconcep

50 ne of the dominant genera in the distributed drinking water, already occurred in the clean water rese

51 FAS accounted for about 50% of total PFAS in drinking water and 90% in serum.

52 ces, evaluated the microbiological safety of drinking water and associated health outcomes, and estim

53 dy, we aimed to describe the PFAS profile in drinking water and biological samples (paired serum and

54 hese materials maintain their performance in drinking water and can be thermally regenerated.

55 ed organic matter (DOM) is ubiquitous in raw drinking water and can efficiently scavenge oxidants, su

56 lacement coupled with CCT for reducing Pb in drinking water and children's BLLs, and (2) in some age

57 ride, a cariostatic agent, has been added to drinking water and dental products to prevent caries and

58 Research has focused on PFAS exposure via drinking water and diet, and fewer studies have focused

59 s indicated that P. vindemmiae benefits from drinking water and from host-feeding on the water-rich h

60 a ubiquitous source of chemical exposure in drinking water and have been associated with serious hea

61 Unsafe drinking water and household air pollution (HAP) are maj

62 The presence of PFASs in drinking water and in the environment is an urgent globa

63 ) and household characteristics (ie, type of drinking water and sanitation facilities).

64 that poor housing, which includes inadequate drinking water and sanitation facility, is associated wi

65 areness was raised regarding chlorination of drinking water and sanitation measures in Hyderabad.

66 sia (e.g. India), still lack access to clean drinking water and sanitation.

67 evaluate the effect of wet FGD on downstream drinking water and the vulnerability of drinking water t

68 rganisms is a low-cost approach to disinfect drinking water and wastewater.

69 etermination of Al(3+) in real food samples, drinking waters and herbal teas, were employed.

70 ction agency limit of 2 parts per billion in drinking water) and 0.2 parts per billion in sea fish an

71 such as water used in medical applications, drinking water, and cooling water of industrial plants,

72 chloropropane, a haloalkane and pollutant of drinking water, and find these and other signatures in h

73 idespread disinfection by-products (DBPs) in drinking water, and long-term exposure has been consiste

74 el of <6 years, lack of routine treatment of drinking water, and unimproved sanitation were associate

75 s attributable to microbiologically improved drinking water are realized at the middle tier of perfor

76 nited States, nationwide estimates of public drinking water arsenic exposure are not readily availabl

77 These estimates of public drinking water arsenic exposure can enable further surve

78 n between reuse and drinking waters provides drinking water as a rational benchmark for water quality

79 n with S. mutans and received nitrite in the drinking water, as compared with animals that had a sing

80 riental reservoir was an important source of drinking water at Tikal during the Late Preclassic to La

81 Early life exposure to fluoridated drinking water attenuated the potential cariogenic effec

82 minants, and increases lead contamination of drinking water, but its effects are not well integrated

83 aintain low dissolved lead concentrations in drinking water, but PbO(2) can dissolve if a free chlori

84 proach for treating oxidized contaminants in drinking water, but scale-up has been limited by the cha

85 vels in North Carolina school and child care drinking water by building age, (ii) evaluate the effect

86 Decreased contamination of drinking water by C. jejuni and S. enterica was also obs

87 suggest new strategies to control Cr(VI) in drinking water by inhibiting Cr(0) reactivity.

88 ve indicates that they periodically obtained drinking water by using fire to melt cave ice, and sheds

89 local and residential water use conditions, drinking water can be the dominant exposure pathway.

90 rviewed and collected environmental samples (drinking water, caregiver hands, child hands, surfaces,

91 Interestingly, in control mice, acidified drinking water caused brain region-specific glial activa

92 umbing and generated distinctively different drinking water chemical and microbial quality profiles.

93 and chlorine radical decrease by 38-100% in drinking water compared to ultrapure water, which is pri

94 urces to provide spatially resolved crop and drinking water composition data, where combined informat

95 hat likely resulted from the impact of HM on drinking water composition.

96 anocomposite was evaluated for two realistic drinking water compositions.

97 iodination remained below 47% under typical drinking water conditions ([Cl(-)] <= 250 mg/L), implica

98 Drinking water containing no supplement or the PDK (pyru

99 r exposure to lead, a high-profile regulated drinking water contaminant.

100 Drinking-water contaminants pose a risk to public health

101 Drinking water contamination related to the use of aqueo

102 Fragmentation in responsibility for drinking water contributes to disparities in drought vul

103 rate that bromoacetic acid (BAA)-a regulated drinking water disinfection byproduct (DBP)-can stimulat

104 by harboring and shedding microbes into the drinking water distribution system.

105 Microbial presence and regrowth in drinking water distribution systems (DWDSs) is routinely

106 sion in contact with residual disinfectants, drinking water distribution systems have become potentia

107 uent antibiotic misuse; and (3) insufficient drinking water, drainage and sanitation infrastructure.

108 Lead and manganese are regulated in drinking water due to their neurotoxicity.

109 tion of water isotopes has been monitored in drinking water (DW; deltaD = -36.59 +/- 10.64 per mille

110 (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) in drinking water established by the U.S.

111 ggest that corticosterone, delivered through drinking water even 24 h after acute stress, is capable

112 t Americans and discuss strategies to reduce drinking water exposure to lead, a high-profile regulate

113 0.93%, respectively, per month of cumulative drinking water exposure.

114 Future evaluation of drinking water exposures should incorporate emerging PFA

115 carbon nanotubes, with applications such as drinking water filtration, wastewater treatment, and con

116 s of 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU) in their drinking water, followed by chase periods without BrdU,

117 is study used data on fecal contamination of drinking water, food, soil, hands, and objects and secon

118 nd female mice were exposed to Cd-containing drinking water for >2 weeks before breeding.

119 days ad libitum (colitis group), followed by drinking water for 10 days (DSS recovery group).

120 n paid to Pb in private wells, which provide drinking water for 13% of the US population.

121 nistered either vehicle or IAP (100 U/ml) in drinking water for 14 days in C57BL/6 mice.

122 Mice were given Cd or saline in drinking water for 28 days.

123 ice were exposed to 5 ppm ( ~ 65 muM) iAs in drinking water for 3 months.

124 We administered L. reuteri in drinking water for 4 weeks to wild type or Rag knockout

125 ce were administered estradiol or vehicle in drinking water for 6 weeks.

126 g (n = 8) mice were treated with 2.5% DSS in drinking water for 7 days ad libitum (colitis group), fo

127 en sulfide (NaHS), a H(2)S donor (30 uM), in drinking water for 8 weeks.

128 We obtained data on microbial content of drinking water for all participants; 585 children were r

129 ffects households' access to clean, reliable drinking water for basic needs is through the organizati

130 ce treated with deferiprone (1 or 3 mg/mL in drinking water) for 26 weeks was reversed.

131 iated with arsenic concentration measured in drinking water ([Formula: see text]).

132 and school classrooms in Ireland, along with drinking water from homes and offices.

133 Drinking water from tube wells, compared to other source

134 threatens the availability of safe and clean drinking water globally.

135 e 0.1-0.2 mg L(-1) World Health Organization drinking water guidelines in all regimes, and inorganic

136 ze groundwater As treatment to meet relevant drinking water guidelines, while considering the As upta

137 and quantitatively measuring aqueous lead in drinking water has been developed.

138 k place in Uppsala County, Sweden, where the drinking water has been historically contaminated with p

139 ce of many of these compounds in surface and drinking water has been reported in screening studies, b

140 rs, environmental lead (Pb) exposure through drinking water has resulted in community public health c

141 on comparing improved housing (with improved drinking water, improved sanitation, sufficient living a

142 d recent annual mean THM levels in municipal drinking water in 28 European countries (EU28) from rout

143 and recognition of the health importance of drinking water in lieu of sugar-sweetened beverages, hav

144 pheric water capture (AWC) can provide clean drinking water in locations not connected to the central

145 that between ~ 2185 and 965 cal yr B.P. the drinking water in the Corriental reservoir water was fil

146 We assessed THM levels in drinking water in the European Union as a marker of DBP

147 nificantly with increasing bacterial load in drinking water in the first year of life (0.79 [0.70,0.8

148 anoparticles were an important form of Pb in drinking water in the Pequannock water quality zone of N

149 aters were elevated compared to conventional drinking waters in high-income countries and more closel

150 Drinking water, in an attempt to release it, led to a to

151 as well as several other divalent metals in drinking water including copper, zinc, iron, and mangane

152 rved samples every 6 h for 68.75 days over a drinking water intake.

153 ncrease bromide concentrations at downstream drinking water intakes, leading to increased formation o

154 Lack of access to safe drinking water is a global problem, and methods to relia

155 Batten disease patients, and that the pH of drinking water is a major environmental factor that stro

156 Access to clean and safe drinking water is a perpetual concern in Arctic communit

157 Access to clean drinking water is a recognized societal need that touche

158 until centralized, or decentralized, treated drinking water is available; displacing biomass use for

159 levant concentrations of NAs in contaminated drinking water is likely negligible.

160 The data reveal that ClO(4)(-) pollution in drinking water is more dangerous than previously thought

161 In high-income countries, drinking water is often neglected as a possible source o

162 ribe US regulations that seek to ensure that drinking water is safe to consume for most Americans and

163 l of completely faecal-pollution free, clean drinking water is yet to be achieved.

164 ng need in view of increasingly stringent As drinking water limits in some US states and European cou

165 sis renewed concerns about lead (Pb) in city drinking water, little attention has been paid to Pb in

166 e routes, for example, dermal absorption and drinking water, make a relatively small contribution to

167 ata suggest that Pu concentrations above the drinking water Maximum Contaminant Levels (0.56 Bq/L) ma

168 icroplastic inhalation and how the source of drinking water may affect microplastic consumption were

169 Treatment of drinking water may decrease microbial exposure.

170 ection Agency's lifetime health advisory for drinking water may or may not be protective of vegetable

171 The co-occurrence of contaminants in drinking water may pose enhanced risks to health beyond

172 High commensal bacterial content in drinking water may protect against allergic diseases.

173 of microbial exposure (bacterial load in the drinking water measured during the child's first year of

174 There was a dominant seasonal effect on the drinking water microbiomes at all three locations.

175 ed significant correlations between the milk-drinking water, milk-forage, and milk-soil.

176 d aged + ovariectomy + 10% fructose (OVF) in drinking water (n = 8-16/group) to induce weight gain.

177 d receiving VPA/hydralazine administered via drinking water: no adverse health effects were detected.

178 SCFA supplementation in the drinking water of male mice significantly improved recov

179 When we added indoxyl sulfate to the drinking water of rats fed an adenine-rich diet, we foun

180 saccharides, with or without pyridoxamine in drinking water, or a normal chow diet (controls) for 6 w

181 no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) via drinking water, or drinking water alone, provided to the

182 Following a pH reduction in their drinking water over a span of more than 20 years, the Ci

183 reuse waters can approach or exceed that of drinking waters, particularly when they are chloraminate

184 ntial impacts on blood Pb levels (BLLs) from drinking water Pb reduction actions (i.e., combinations

185 When mice received acidified drinking water (pH 2.5-2.9) instead of normal tap water

186 tions relevant to chloramine disinfection of drinking water (pH 6-9 and carbonate-buffered) was devel

187 tely undocumented source of Ag-b-NPs: copper drinking water pipes.

188 ortant to OGW-impacted source waters because drinking water plants with high-bromide source waters ma

189 Due to changing conditions and seasonality, drinking water production underestimated the population

190 g/L range after the chlorination step during drinking water production, all tap waters samples, and t

191 s used to train three linear models based on drinking water production, electricity consumption and o

192 ers samples, and two surface waters used for drinking water production.

193 tic ecosystems and poses a major problem for drinking water production.

194 ses ultimately depends on the access to safe drinking water, properly managed sanitation, and hygiene

195 weighted DBP concentration between reuse and drinking waters provides drinking water as a rational be

196 Research on the local political economy of drinking water provision reveals the constraints on comm

197 In contrast, drinking water quality guidelines are defined: water mus

198 ent of the impact of Hurricane Maria (HM) on drinking water quality in Puerto Rico (PR) by integratin

199 terial communities in biofilters can improve drinking water quality through the biodegradation of dis

200 The results indicate that point of use drinking water quality was impacted by conditions in the

201 outcomes) and patterns of intervention use, drinking water quality, and air quality.

202 ments partitioned among 6 EH topic areas: a) drinking water quality, b) wastewater management, c) hea

203 OCs) poses a risk for aquatic ecosystems and drinking water quality.

204 able regrowth conditions affecting the final drinking water quality.

205 o show that adding Pseudomonas aeruginosa to drinking water quickly leads to tick death.

206 bution to BLLs from ingestion of residential drinking water ranged from ~10 to 80%, with the highest

207 otensin receptor blocker losartan to mice in drinking water reduced both allodynia and muscle fibrosi

208 shed the Final Arsenic Rule (FAR) for public drinking water, reducing the maximum contaminant level (

209 Inadequate access to safe drinking water remains a global health problem, particul

210 Germany's largest drinking water reservoir was sampled for 1 year, and DOM

211 erage recovery was 78 and 80% in surface and drinking water, respectively.

212 costerone, given 1 day after acute stress in drinking water, reversed enhanced anxiety-like behavior

213 Ensuring urban areas have access to clean drinking water, safe food supply, and uncontaminated wat

214 om subsample of households, we tested stored drinking water samples for Escherichia coli, concurrentl

215 ducted cross-sectional surveys and collected drinking water samples from 1,033 rural households in Gu

216 Drinking water samples from each household of cases and

217 Most households contributing two or more drinking water samples had detectable E. coli in some (4

218 applied to the determination of arsenate in drinking water samples in the mug L(-1) concentration ra

219 Drinking water samples were analyzed for F(-), and the r

220 ) and were detected in authentic disinfected drinking water samples.

221 ermination of 23 target PMOCs in surface and drinking water samples.

222 g in water, sediment, wildlife, seafood, and drinking water samples.

223 We hypothesized that drinking water, sanitation, handwashing (WSH), and nutri

224 The results utilizing a large drinking water sequential sampling data set from 15 citi

225 Our findings provide new evidence that drinking water should be given increased attention as a

226 The presence of bromide in drinking water significantly accelerated Cr(VI) release

227 ured indicators and pathogen genes in stored drinking water, soil, and on mother and child hands.

228 Drinking water source and sanitation facility alone were

229 s (PFAS) to the Cape Fear River, the primary drinking water source for Wilmington, North Carolina, re

230 ssions of polar micropollutants in a natural drinking water source were investigated by nontarget scr

231 hese biofilms were grown from groundwater (a drinking water source), and this groundwater was amended

232 ns between children's blood Pb and household drinking water source.

233 f fecal waste from open-defecation to nearby drinking water sources severely endanger public health.

234 l influences, such as soil chemistry and the drinking water sources to provide spatially resolved cro

235 tion of natural organic matter found in many drinking water sources.

236 e = 0.010-0.51 Bq/L) exceeded the 0.185 Bq/L drinking-water standard in 18% of the wells (not drinkin

237 gh the Safe Drinking Water Act, there are no drinking water standards for nonpublic water well qualit

238 regional groundwater uranium exceedances of drinking water standards, 30 mug L(-1), are dependent on

239 t that the periodic removal of sediment from drinking water storage facilities is desirable to remove

240 Household drinking water storage is commonly practiced in rural In

241 d free chlorine into a 2 cm (20000 mum) deep drinking water storage tank sediment using microelectrod

242 pplied for the quantification of BPA present drinking water stored in the plastic bottles.

243 Addition of inorganic salts to drinking water such as KH(2)PO(4) + NaCl+KNO(3) resulted

244 thesis, we administered pregnant C57BL6 mice drinking water supplemented with 0, 50, 100 or 200 mug/m

245 s, mice exposed chronically to As (10 ppb in drinking water supplied by ATO) exhibited greater vascul

246 In low-income countries, monitoring all drinking water supplies is impractical because financial

247 d perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in public drinking water supplies serving at least six million ind

248 i/L (picocuries per liter), respectively, in drinking-water supplies may pose human-health concerns.

249 When groundwater-based drinking water supply becomes contaminated, the timing a

250 ter for potable reuse significantly enhances drinking water supply in drought-stricken regions worldw

251 implemented, but severely under-researched, drinking water supply intervention in humanitarian respo

252 en wastewater effluent is a component of any drinking water supply.

253 rs representing 60% of the volume pumped for drinking-water supply had final data for 21 hormones and

254 ultiple locations in a decentralized trucked drinking water system in Nunavut, Canada, over the cours

255 e elements have been reported to co-occur in drinking water systems, in accordance with the metal-sca

256 assessments that inform decisions involving drinking water systems.

257 d the need to achieve low nanogram per liter drinking water targets.

258 ons of PFHxA, PFHpA, and PFBS were higher in drinking water than in serum.

259 Classical transmission to humans occurs via drinking water that contains cyclopoid copepods infected

260 but important pathway of Cr(VI) formation in drinking water, that is, direct oxidation of Cr(0) by ch

261 ased reuse waters can readily exceed that of drinking waters, that of Ox/BAF/GAC-based reuse waters c

262 followed 24 h later by corticosterone in the drinking water, the surge in corticosterone was prevente

263 tural experiment whereby individuals receive drinking water through public mains supply or individual

264 ge with water from PND 14 to 21 and received drinking water till the time of sacrifice.

265 on the relative source contribution (RSC) of drinking water to human PFAS exposures.

266 ream drinking water and the vulnerability of drinking water to upstream discharges.

267 l technologies and processes for small-scale drinking water treatment according to a tiered system.

268 rocess (AOP) for micropollutant abatement in drinking water treatment and water reuse plants.

269 and highlight the need to carefully consider drinking water treatment choices when wastewater effluen

270 uced by permanganate oxidation under typical drinking water treatment conditions (6 muM, 1 h) to bulk

271 l generation for micropollutant abatement in drinking water treatment or potable water reuse.

272 Analysis of a full-scale drinking water treatment plant GAC filter influent, effl

273 water reuse facilities and one conventional drinking water treatment plant.

274 oundwater micropollutant posing problems for drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs) that depend on g

275 s evaluated at three full-scale chlorination drinking water treatment plants over different GAC servi

276 We use the example of pollutant removal in drinking water treatment plants, which can be achieved u

277 the life cycle environmental performance of drinking water treatment using LFMs under likely design

278 ate iodinated disinfection byproducts during drinking water treatment.

279 unlikely to prevent exposure to contaminated drinking water unless attention is also given to improvi

280 w-dose individual ABX or ABX cocktail in the drinking water until the time of sacrifice.

281 r bromide concentrations are challenging for drinking water utilities since bromide contributes to th

282 5b in drinking water was given to mice expressing wild-type hu

283 Cumulative bacterial load in drinking water was higher (median [IQR]: 6390 [4190-9550

284 Arsenic concentration in maternal drinking water was measured at enrollment.

285 monella from environmental samples including drinking water, wastewater, irrigation water, and surfac

286 e presence of this cyanotoxin in freshwater, drinking water, water reservoir supplies and food (veget

287 ation of dextran sodium sulfate (DSS) in the drinking water, we sought to characterize the short and

288 This multitool approach was applied to a drinking water well, where bentazon and dichlorprop cont

289 ifying the source and age of contaminants in drinking water wells by combining depth-specific samplin

290 In drinking water wells, where water is typically abstracte

291 king-water standard in 18% of the wells (not drinking-water wells).

292 l elephant food, soil from enclosure(s), and drinking water were also sampled.

293 s, wealth index, toilet types and sources of drinking water were the most significant contributors to

294 ceive chow diet, high fat diet with sugar in drinking water (Western diet- WD).

295 potential to displace other sources of safe drinking water, which could in turn hamper efforts in Ch

296 increase taste acceptability of chlorinated drinking water while still reducing the risk of diarrhoe

297 fluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) dominated air and drinking water, while perfluorobutane sulfonate (PFBS) d

298 Mice were given drinking water with ampicillin or without (controls).

299 Germ-free mice were given drinking water with TLR2 agonist or without (controls).

300 itored to assess the biological stability of drinking water without a residual disinfectant, but the