コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 t and liver cirrhosis, and three people with drug-induced liver injury).
2 RUCAM in retrospectively-identified cases of drug induced liver injury.
3 ome liabilities such as moderate potency and drug induced liver injury.
4 delivery with a possible triggering role of drug induced liver injury.
5 y these reactions, focusing on idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury.
6 offer better specificity in ruling out late drug-induced liver injury.
7 city (22.2 and 82.1%) for prediction of late drug-induced liver injury.
8 her sensitive nor specific for prediction of drug-induced liver injury.
9 iction of early and 22.2% and 63.7% for late drug-induced liver injury.
10 drug metabolism, drug-drug interaction, and drug-induced liver injury.
11 as sensitive and informative biomarkers for drug-induced liver injury.
12 lead the list of non-acetaminophen causes of drug-induced liver injury.
13 an important role in the protection against drug-induced liver injury.
14 e RUCAM is problematic for future studies of drug-induced liver injury.
15 fy the key publications of 2006 dealing with drug-induced liver injury.
16 disruption, and increased susceptibility to drug-induced liver injury.
17 tion of K8/18 is to protect hepatocytes from drug-induced liver injury.
18 iever but is also the most frequent cause of drug-induced liver injury.
19 a potential impact for pharmacokinetics and drug-induced liver injury.
20 3 inhibitors that could minimize the risk of drug-induced liver injury.
21 His liver histology was also consistent with drug-induced liver injury.
22 cholestasis, steatosis, viral hepatitis, and drug-induced liver injury.
23 drug reactions, with most attention paid to drug-induced liver injury.
24 portant therapeutic target for patients with drug-induced liver injury.
25 tabolic dysfunction predisposing patients to drug-induced liver injury.
26 ontributes to disease, such as silicosis and drug-induced liver injury.
27 lates what is believed to occur during human drug-induced liver injury.
28 engineering because of the high frequency of drug-induced liver injury.
29 s can cause severe, chronic liver disease or drug-induced liver injury.
30 based instruments for assessing causality in drug-induced liver injury.
31 amic behaviour in the biological response to drug-induced liver injury.
32 ies have evaluated the incidence of ALF from drug-induced liver injury.
33 y revealed signs of immune-mediated toxic or drug-induced liver injury.
34 cells in human leukocyte antigen-associated, drug-induced liver injury.
35 biopsy samples from patients suffering from drug-induced liver injury.
36 elevance for understanding the regulation of drug-induced liver injury.
38 8 patients included, and 21 (7.3%) developed drug-induced liver injury (57.1% "early" at 2 wk and 42.
39 edominant pathological features were that of drug induced liver injury, although an abnormal amount o
40 ug-related serious adverse events (potential drug-induced liver injury and depression or lipodystroph
41 -induced liver injury group compared with no drug-induced liver injury and late drug-induced liver in
42 entification of a subgroup who develop early drug-induced liver injury and may offer better specifici
43 ophen (APAP) overdose is a frequent cause of drug-induced liver injury and the most frequent cause of
44 udy: hospitalization, colitis, and potential drug-induced liver injury) and one of four patients had
45 restlessness, tendon disorder, and potential drug-induced liver injury) and one of four patients had
47 sts that many cases of serious idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury are mediated by the adaptive i
54 of metal transporters in cellular models of drug-induced liver injury caused by acetaminophen overdo
56 prospective study of patients with suspected drug-induced liver injury; clinical information and biol
57 29%), indeterminate ALF (23%), idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury DILI (22%), acute hepatitis B
64 blood biomarkers are suboptimal in detecting drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and predicting its outc
67 ic health concern in the United States, with drug-induced liver injury (DILI) being the single most c
71 hilia has been associated with incidences of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) for more than 50 years,
75 Under standard therapies, the incidence of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) in patients with tuberc
80 rition in drug discovery and development and drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a leading cause of p
108 nd important data published on idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) over the past 2 years i
113 ethnic cohort of patients with idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) to identify variants as
116 Hy's Law, which states that hepatocellular drug-induced liver injury (DILI) with jaundice indicates
117 (SMX) is an important cause of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI), but its genetic risk f
118 lay an important role in the pathogenesis of drug-induced liver injury (DILI), but supporting data ar
119 patients, but statins rarely lead to serious drug-induced liver injury (DILI), chronic liver disease,
131 e associated with positive rechallenge after drug-induced liver injury (DILI): antimicrobials; and ce
132 on tasks with distinct modalities: filtering drug-induced-liver-injury (DILI) literature with free-te
133 adults with nevirapine hypersensitivity (15 drug-induced liver injury [DILI], 33 SJS/TEN, 20 hyperse
138 chaemia, viral and autoimmune hepatitis, and drug-induced liver injury from prescription drugs, and h
140 individuals with HIV infection in the early drug-induced liver injury group compared with no drug-in
141 d with no drug-induced liver injury and late drug-induced liver injury groups (33% vs. 7.1% vs. 0%; P
147 ty to discuss challenges in the diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury in an era of increasing awaren
149 th it several reminders of the importance of drug-induced liver injury in the clinical trial as well
158 important element in assessing causality in drug-induced liver injury is whether the implicated agen
159 important feature of the normal response to drug-induced liver injury may be the increased expressio
160 However, the complexity of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury means that no current single-c
161 ize pathological levels of nitric oxide in a drug-induced liver injury model via deep tissue SWIR pho
163 rospective study of subjects enrolled in the Drug Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) from 2004 to 2
164 d 2012 in a prospective registry by the U.S. Drug Induced Liver Injury Network, 22 were attributed to
165 ses of patients with DILI (the United States Drug Induced Liver Injury Network, DILIGEN, and the Span
167 ght to improve the RUCAM using data from the Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) and the Spanis
174 mortality) for 306 patients enrolled in the Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network prospective study at I
176 Among 1,414 patients enrolled in the U.S. Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network who underwent formal c
177 terile inflammation (SI) is a key process in drug-induced liver injury, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis,
180 ment group (encephalopathy, hepatic failure, drug-induced liver injury, oesophageal varices haemorrha
181 levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) for drug-induced liver injury often assume that the biomarke
185 rt represents the second documented cases of drug-induced liver injury related to varenicline therapy
190 in the world and accounts for most cases of drug induced liver injury resulting in acute liver failu
191 pon admission before the start of treatment, drug-induced liver injury should be taken into considera
192 ng clinical evaluation and stopping rules of drug-induced liver injury signals, including Hy's Law ca
193 idrug and autoAbs has been observed in other drug-induced liver injury that is presumed to be immune
194 Conclusion: Telithromycin is a rare cause of drug-induced liver injury that may have a distinctive cl
196 al for chronic injury to develop after acute drug-induced liver injury was analyzed in a large Swedis
198 vents reporting and experience in evaluating drug-induced liver injury was formed, including members
203 acute liver failure in western countries is drug-induced liver injury, while it has rarely been repo
204 clinical features, and outcomes of cases of drug-induced liver injury with histologically proven bil