コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 lanar imaging, and three-dimensional [3D] SE echo-planar imaging).
2 Whole-brain DTI was acquired using echo planar imaging.
3 ere rated higher than the standard spin-echo echo-planar imaging.
4 r application in fast imaging sequences like echo-planar imaging.
5 t-segmented (96%) than for single-shot (90%) echo-planar imaging.
7 e area under the curve for readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (0.981) was significantly larger tha
8 Electric, Milwaukee, WI) with gradient echo, echo planar imaging (3/1 mm; repetition time, 3000 ms; e
9 DTI was acquired at 3.0 T using single-shot echo-planar imaging (55 axial slices, 3 mm thick, 1.5 mm
10 using a Siemens Prisma (3T) and single-shot echo-planar imaging, 64 directions, 2.5 mm(3) with 4 ave
11 smell underwent multisection, gradient-echo, echo-planar imaging according to a blood-oxygen-level-de
13 mbining data acquisition with multiecho (ME) echo planar imaging and analysis with spatial independen
14 studies, motion estimates were obtained from echo planar imaging and cloverleaf navigator sequences e
15 MS imaging scored 1.31 points higher than SE echo-planar imaging and 0.74 points higher than RS echo-
16 red and compared by using inversion-recovery echo-planar imaging and autoradiographic phosphor imagin
17 alternatives include readout-segmented (RS) echo-planar imaging and axially reformatted (AR)-simulta
18 s by using combined rs-EPI readout-segmented echo-planar imaging and parallel imaging with 0.9 x 0.9
19 n all patients, DW imaging, with single-shot echo-planar imaging and readout-segmented echo-planar im
20 ho-planar imaging ( rs-EPI readout-segmented echo-planar imaging ) and single-shot echo-planar imagin
21 ion-weighted imaging with ss-EPI single-shot echo-planar imaging , and it improved image quality from
22 adient-echo [GRE] imaging, 2D spin-echo [SE] echo-planar imaging, and three-dimensional [3D] SE echo-
26 as repeatedly measured at inversion-recovery echo-planar imaging before and for 1 hour after the admi
27 lity and lesion conspicuity than single-shot echo-planar imaging by reducing geometric distortions, i
30 resonance imaging techniques: (a) high-speed echo planar imaging combined with a bolus of magnetic su
31 ction-flow products were calculated with the echo-planar imaging data and were correlated with histol
32 could be reported) and collected whole-brain echo-planar imaging data from 12 listeners using sparse
33 resolution and image quality of standard SE echo-planar imaging DWI with two high-spatial-resolution
34 n coefficient (ADC) using diffusion-weighted echo planar imaging (DWI) over a poststimulus period of
35 sition methods was used: gradient-echo (GRE) echo-planar imaging (echo time [TE], 30 msec; flip angle
37 ans in combination with a dual-echo gradient echo planar imaging (EPI) paradigm designed to ensure si
38 ghted single-shot fast spin-echo (SSFSE) and echo-planar imaging (EPI) fluid-attenuated inversion rec
39 nt-recalled echo (GRE) and 2D spin-echo (SE) echo-planar imaging (EPI) magnetic resonance (MR) elasto
41 diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) techniques (echo-planar imaging [EPI] and on-echo-planar imaging [no
42 ted imaging and gradient-recalled echo [GRE]-echo-planar imaging [EPI]) between June 2017 and October
46 techniques (echo-planar imaging [EPI] and on-echo-planar imaging [non-EPI]) in the diagnosis of chole
48 from two vendors using single-shot spin-echo echo-planar imaging or twice-refocused, bipolar gradient
54 arallel imaging and rs-EPI readout-segmented echo-planar imaging reduced artifacts (ie, blurring and
56 ization and comparisons of readout-segmented echo-planar imaging ( rs-EPI readout-segmented echo-plan
57 ere acquired at 3.0 T, including standard SE echo-planar imaging, RS echo-planar imaging with five se
58 gher than RS echo-planar imaging, whereas RS echo-planar imaging scored 0.57 points higher than SE ec
59 tate functional MRI data using a novel multi-echo planar imaging sequence and independent components
60 uence was selected for high RF power, and an echo planar imaging sequence was selected for its high h
61 participants at 3.0 T by using a single-shot echo-planar imaging sequence (repetition time msec/echo
62 lication of a gradient-echo spin-echo (GESE) echo-planar imaging sequence for dynamic and quantitativ
63 ed with images from a T2*-weighted segmented echo-planar imaging sequence performed during contrast m
68 mented echo-planar imaging ) and single-shot echo-planar imaging ( ss-EPI single-shot echo-planar ima
71 , 90 degrees ; n = 10), small-flip-angle GRE echo-planar imaging (TE, 54 msec; flip angle, 35 degrees
77 r time-independent artifact suppression, and echo-planar imaging was used for rapid data sampling.
79 adiabatic inversion pulses and ramp-sampled echo-planar imaging were performed to acquire 19 contigu
80 cuity and image quality of readout-segmented echo-planar imaging were rated superior to those of sing
81 lanar imaging and 0.74 points higher than RS echo-planar imaging, whereas RS echo-planar imaging scor
82 has been accelerated by the introduction of echo-planar imaging, which allows for the very fast acqu
83 d in a single shot using inversion-recovery, echo-planar imaging with a nominal in-plane resolution o
84 ot echo-planar imaging and readout-segmented echo-planar imaging with comparable imaging parameters,
85 enerated with diffusion tensor data by using echo-planar imaging with diffusion gradient encoding in
86 ncluding standard SE echo-planar imaging, RS echo-planar imaging with five segments, and AR-SMS imagi
87 hot echo-planar imaging ( ss-EPI single-shot echo-planar imaging ) with or without parallel imaging w