戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 icircles bearing guide RNAs (gRNAs) for mRNA editing.
2 ntaining minimal Cas9-independent off-target editing.
3 th in meiotic and post-meiotic germ cell RNA editing.
4 ibited normal expression patterns after gene editing.
5 ere modified, with no evidence of off-target editing.
6 otecting pre-mRNA upon KPAF3 displacement by editing.
7 ng including checkpoint inhibitors, and gene editing.
8 he arsenal of enzymes used in precise genome editing.
9  similar to known negative regulators of RNA editing.
10 A-mediated or Csy4-mediated multiplex genome editing.
11 e, constraining the sequences accessible for editing.
12 platform for eukaryotic genome and epigenome editing.
13 enough to be packaged into an AAV for genome editing.
14 ign of guide RNAs for ADAR-mediated RNA base editing.
15 ction, RNA interference and potentially gene editing.
16 ing corrected lines by genome- and epigenome-editing.
17 nal mapping, gene expression, silencing, and editing.
18 e, dogs, and human cells through CRISPR/Cas9 editing.
19 he proper use of CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing.
20 ibition, gene activation and programmed gene editing.
21 AR inhibitors and new tools for directed RNA editing.
22 f the MHC I-chaperone complex and to peptide editing.
23 anonical active sites for aminoacylation and editing.
24 ed pluripotent stem cells by CRISPR/Cas9gene editing.
25  DNA target site during genome and epigenome editing.
26 2) depends on adr-1, a gene important to RNA editing.
27 ns in Arabidopsis At2OGO by CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing.
28 to T*A, in cellular DNA for precision genome editing.
29 ble, drug loadable, and suitable for genetic editing.
30 significantly muffle the single-nucleic-acid editing ability of the dCas13a RNA-editing system.
31 king of edited cells (BAR-Seq) and show that editing activates p53, which substantially shrinks the H
32 shown to have reduced off-target RNA and DNA editing activities(5,6).
33 hes a critical role for ADAR1 and its A-to-I editing activity during cell fate transitions and deline
34 cer (CRC) cells, thus displaying high genome-editing activity in vitro.
35         Creating accurate maps of A-to-I RNA editing activity is vital to improving our understanding
36                Furthermore, loss of Adar RNA editing activity leads to innate immune induction, indic
37 plored many approaches to improve the genome editing activity of the CRISPR-Cas system and deliver it
38                    We propose that the cross-editing activity of ThrRS is evolutionarily conserved an
39 te that these ADAR2 variants lead to reduced editing activity on a known ADAR2 substrate.
40                                              Editing activity was sensitive to addition of zinc aceta
41 ning of Cas9 expression to achieve high gene editing activity without detectable toxicity.
42 eaminase domain which is important for ADAR1 editing activity.
43 rdant results for sites with high off-target editing activity.
44 rt palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-mediated gene editing and acetate supplementation of the culture media
45 and to identify potential targets for genome editing and breeding.
46 unintended consequences including off-target editing and chromosomal translocations.
47  reduced repertoire diversity, decreased BCR editing and developmental arrest of immature B cells, re
48           Here, we have combined CRISPR gene editing and engineered separation-of-function mutants to
49 his version does not include post-acceptance editing and formatting.
50 al dementia patient using CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing and homology-directed repair (HDR), resulting in
51 - and development-specific regulation of RNA editing and identify a molecular mechanism that regulate
52 dvances, such as the establishment of genome editing and improved phylogenetic resolution, are paving
53 ain proteins, ADAD1 and ADAD2, on testis RNA editing and male germ cell differentiation.
54                              CRISPR-Cas gene editing and messenger RNA-based protein replacement ther
55 s the recent applications of tRNAs in genome editing and microbiome sequencing.
56  from functional experiments, such as genome editing and reporter assays.
57 ts and a combination of CRISPR-mediated gene editing and RNAi-mediated gene silencing in human cells,
58            Using both locus-specific genetic editing and simultaneous epigenetic silencing of multipl
59  also discuss the importance of NMD for gene editing and tumor evolution, and how inhibiting NMD may
60 h 3' adenylation, uridine insertion/deletion editing, and 3' A/U-tailing.
61 extends dCas9 residence times, delays genome editing, and alters the balance between indel formation
62 s9-dependent and -independent DNA off-target editing, and in transcriptome-wide RNA off-target editin
63  NNGG PAM, displays high activity for genome editing, and is compact enough to be packaged into an AA
64 er-free DNA in rice using CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing, and offer a promising strategy for genetic impr
65 mental immunology, genetic engineering, gene editing, and synthetic biology exponentially expand oppo
66       efSaCas9 can be broadly used in genome-editing applications that require high fidelity.
67 ion of regulatory regions and multiplex base editing applications.
68 system has been widely used for various gene editing applications.
69                   We show here, using a gene-editing approach, that a point mutation that eliminates
70 NPs, could not be reached with a single gene-editing approach.
71 This protocol thus expands CRISPR-based gene editing approaches beyond models of robust T cell activa
72       Future trials should use superior gene editing approaches to improve therapeutic efficacy.
73 ew focuses on new state-of-the-art epigenome editing approaches to modify the epigenome of neoplasms
74                  Using a combination of gene-editing approaches, quantitative imaging, and biochemica
75 d flexibility, assays to identify off-target editing are becoming more comprehensive and sensitive.
76 icipating and verifying the result of genome editing are essential for the success for all applicatio
77                             Advances in gene editing are leading to new medical interventions where p
78 requisites necessary for CRISPR/Cas-mediated editing as well as the current challenges.
79 argets of RNA-binding proteins identified by editing) as an approach to identify signaling pathways t
80 reased in adr-1 mutants due to deficient RNA editing at a single adenosine in their 3'-UTR.
81  discoveries illuminate base editing, enable editing at previously intractable targets, and provide n
82 e, this model is also not amenable to genome-editing based therapeutic approaches.
83  study reports widespread differences in RNA editing between epithelial and mesenchymal tumors and a
84 ing to as high as 50% and improves multiplex editing by 5- to 10-fold in E. coli, while PapRecT enabl
85  robust inhibition of SauCas9-induced genome editing by AcrIIA13 and moderate inhibition by AcrIIA14
86 nucleolytic processing by TREX1 and cytosine editing by APOBEC3B.
87                                       Genome editing by CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short
88 ng, and in transcriptome-wide RNA off-target editing can be ameliorated by the introduction of an add
89 l CRISPR-Cas9 homology-directed repair, base editing can correct point mutations without supplying a
90                                         Gene editing can rapidly improve a range of crop traits, incl
91 ions, and major efforts have broadened their editing capabilities, expanded their targeting scope and
92 , and provide new base editors with improved editing capabilities.
93 ed deaminase (AID) and apolipoprotein B mRNA editing catalytic polypeptide-like (APOBEC) mutagenesis
94                                        While editing concludes in the 5' region, KPAF1/2 dimer induce
95 roduction of this minor allele SNP by genome editing confirmed its functionality in depressing GATA6
96             Adenosine (A) to inosine (I) RNA editing contributes to transcript diversity and modulate
97 redited in thyroid tumors, and its levels of editing correlate with a worse progression-free survival
98              Using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing, coupled with endocrine cell differentiation str
99  editors are useful tools for precise genome editing, current base editors can only convert either ad
100 cyl flux around the phosphatidylcholine acyl editing cycle was the largest acyl flux reaction in wild
101 ucible conditional mice, or CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing decreased cell migration due to the longer durat
102               The oxidized Pol gamma becomes editing-deficient, displaying a 20-fold elevated mutatio
103 rkably, CRISPR/Cas9-guided single-nucleotide editing demonstrated the direct effect of rs7198799 on Z
104  mesenchymal tumors and a novel mechanism of editing-dependent regulation of mRNA abundance.
105                 The present CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing dogma for single guide RNA (sgRNA) delivery is b
106 genes, ribosomal protein S12 (RPS12), the 5' editing domain of NADH dehydrogenase subunit 7 (ND7 5'),
107 licing, while the second major mechanism-RNA editing due to post-transcriptional changes of individua
108 rus that significantly improve citrus genome editing efficacy.
109  programmable A*T to G*C point mutations but editing efficiencies can be low at challenging loci in p
110 in cells and allows for titratable levels of editing efficiency and spatial patterning via selective
111 cles with polyglutamic acid further improves editing efficiency by approximately twofold, reduces tox
112  are 46 RNA editing loci with an average RNA editing efficiency of 63%.
113 single gene, the lipoMSN achieved a 54% gene-editing efficiency, besting the state-of-art Lipofectami
114 be optimized, and challenges regarding their editing efficiency, specificity and immunogenicity must
115 , but this comes at the expense of on-target editing efficiency.
116 hat regulates ADAR substrate recognition and editing efficiency.
117  crRNA for Cas12a and obtained a much higher editing efficiency.
118 e for its cognate PAM promotes higher genome-editing efficiency.
119            These discoveries illuminate base editing, enable editing at previously intractable target
120                                        Prime editing enables diverse genomic alterations to be writte
121                             Apolipoprotein B editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide 3 (APOBEC3) family
122             DYW-deaminase domains act as the editing enzyme.
123                      In addition, the genome editing enzymes themselves need to be optimized, and cha
124                 Non-canonical and C-to-U RNA-editing events are enriched inside and/or adjacent to MN
125 djacent to MNRs, while all categories of RNA-editing events are under-represented in DNRs.
126                  However, elucidation of RNA editing events at transcriptome-wide level requires incr
127 discusses how to anticipate and detect those editing events by a combination of assays to capture all
128 he details of uridine insertion and deletion editing events upon the kDNA transcriptome.
129 scellaneous genomic features, especially RNA editing events.
130 is an important consideration for any genome editing experiment, and a number of Cas9 variants have b
131 SAMMI also offers a wide array of manual map editing features.
132 as) nucleases have revolutionized the genome editing field.
133 ation of MTV in 105 (76%) scans, with simple editing for a satisfactory result in additionally 20% of
134 ++) and HiFi-Sc(++) extend the use of CRISPR editing for diverse applications.
135 -cell RNA-sequencing and CRISPR-Cas9 barcode editing for elucidating developmental lineages at the wh
136  HSPCs as a feasible alternative to nuclease editing for HSC-targeted therapeutic genome modification
137 eptibility target has implications in genome editing for novel plant resistance against devastating H
138 tensive uridine insertion/deletion (U-indel) editing for their maturation.
139  therefore prove beneficial for ex vivo gene editing, for enhanced platelet production, and for the i
140 R33A]) that display comparable DNA on-target editing frequencies, whilst eliciting a 12- to 69-fold r
141 ted later and retained relatively higher RNA editing frequency.
142                                          RNA editing generates modifications to the RNA sequences, th
143 nCas9 mouse allows robust and tunable genome editing granting flexibility, speed and uniformity at le
144  transcriptase fusions programmed with prime editing guide RNAs (pegRNAs), can edit bases in mammalia
145 mutant jellyfish generated using CRISPR-Cas9 editing had severe defects in gamete development or in s
146 The clinical application of CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing has been eagerly awaited since the first descrip
147                                       Genome editing has powerful applications in research, healthcar
148                           CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing has revolutionized functional genomics in verteb
149                      Recent advances in gene editing have been enabled by programmable nucleases such
150       Although recent improvements in genome editing have made it possible to directly modify the tar
151  of the NANOS2 gene generated by CRISPR-Cas9 editing have testes that are germline ablated but otherw
152 recent advances, including CRISPR-based gene editing, have made possible systematic screens for synth
153      Proteomic analysis and CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing identified the inflammatory glycoprotein PTX3 en
154  that short guide RNAs can also support base editing if they contain cytosines within the deaminase a
155                         We found that A-to-I editing impedes MDA5 sensing and sequestration of dsRNAs
156 ation in the dimerization interface inhibits editing in an RNA substrate-dependent manner for both AD
157 t implications for the application of genome editing in both basic research and clinical practice.
158 ted miRNA-binding site by CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing in C. elegans We developed a multiplexed negativ
159 icism to levels that make single-step embryo editing in cattle commercially feasible.
160 increased the speed and precision of genetic editing in cells and animals.
161 escribe a platform for efficient Cas12a gene editing in Drosophila We show that Cas12a from Lachnospi
162 lopment and the first to interrogate U-indel editing in EMF and MCF life cycle stages.
163 d variants mediated indel formation and base editing in human cells and enabled A*T-to-G*C base editi
164 of human association analysis, CRISPR genome editing in mice, animal behavioural analysis and cell cu
165 ll as extremely efficient and precise genome editing in P patens Additionally, careful phylogenetic s
166 rmore, our highly efficient CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in primordial germ cells represents a substantia
167 ere we establish CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing in S. rosetta by engineering a selectable marker
168 stance conferred by precise CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in the chicken.
169 enario where levels of mature RNA species or editing in the single T. cruzi mitochondrion are linked
170 incorporated zebularine also did not disrupt editing in vitro, suggesting that PPR65 cannot bind modi
171 ogy for memory CD8 T cells to undertake gene editing in vivo, for the first time, to our knowledge.
172 idaminococcus spec., can mediate robust gene editing in vivo.
173 R/Cas9 has become a powerful tool for genome editing in zebrafish that permits the rapid generation o
174                              In vitro genome editing indicated that the SRF enhancer CArG box regulat
175 lian bloodstream forms (BSF) at the level of editing initiation and/or edited mRNA stability.
176                  CRISPR-Cas9-associated base editing is a promising tool to correct pathogenic single
177                       Within the testis, RNA editing is catalyzed by ADARB1 and is regulated in a cel
178                                       Genome editing is-or will soon be-in the clinic for several dis
179                               Impaired ADAR2 editing leads to early-onset epilepsy and premature deat
180 ells that loss of RAZUL by CRISPR-based gene editing leads to loss of E6AP at proteasomes.
181  papaya chloroplast genome, there are 46 RNA editing loci with an average RNA editing efficiency of 6
182  PTEN silencing with CRISPR/dCas9 epigenetic editing may provide a new option for promoting axon rege
183      Due to breakthroughs in RNAi and genome editing methods in the past decade, it is now easier tha
184                                 Using genome editing methods, we disrupt uridine monophosphate synthe
185 mapping-by-sequencing and CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing methods, we isolated EXCESSIVE NUMBER OF FLORAL
186 h the ability to precisely target by genomic editing most areas of the genome, is producing important
187 ding screens that harness CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing, natural genetic variation, proteomics, and tran
188 apeutics and the improvement of precise gene editing now pave the way to applications such as cardiac
189 vergence including alternative splicing, RNA editing, nuclear pore composition, RNA-binding protein m
190                                         Gene editing nuclease represented by Cas9 efficiently generat
191 AR substrates and the features governing RNA editing observed in our study will assist in the rationa
192 g in human cells and enabled A*T-to-G*C base editing of a sickle cell anemia mutation using a previou
193                                         Gene editing of a small deletion in the first coding exon sup
194  RNA libraries, which can be used for genome editing of coding and non-coding genomic regions effecti
195 pression in mouse cells and CRISPR/Cas9 base editing of endogenous AGS loci revealed causal roles of
196          Here, we describe CRISPR/Cas9-based editing of exon 1 of the HVT079 and HVT096 genes from th
197 esults demonstrate the potential of RNP base editing of human HSPCs as a feasible alternative to nucl
198 aced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-Cas9 editing of immune checkpoint genes could improve the eff
199                            Congruently, gene editing of LAYN in human CD8+ T cells reduced direct tum
200 ion processes has enabled precise, multiplex editing of microbial genomes and the construction of bil
201                                 Precise gene editing of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is essential for th
202                                       A-to-I editing of RNA is a widespread posttranscriptional proce
203 ADAR1), responsible for adenosine-to-inosine editing of RNA, is required for regulating the developme
204  few approaches have been developed for gene editing of these cell types, likely owing to their sensi
205 stence of fetal hemoglobin (HPFH) mutations, editing of transcriptional HbF repressors or their bindi
206 injection) to detect off-target mutations by editing one blastomere of two-cell mouse embryos using e
207 te whether a mutation has resulted from gene editing or from traditional breeding techniques; (ii) it
208 e with no signs of clonal deletion, receptor editing, or B cell anergy.
209 typic penetrance due to the mosaic nature of editing outcomes after double strand break (DSB) repair.
210 y efficiencies, and suppression of imprecise editing outcomes at the on-target site as key design par
211 hes can be used to forecast CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing outcomes in Xenopus tropicalis, Xenopus laevis,
212               In this study, we analyzed the editing patterns of three putative dual-coding genes, ri
213         We briefly introduce three epigenome-editing platforms: zinc-finger proteins, transcriptional
214 or genotoxicity was associated with the gene editing process, paving the way for an alternative, yet
215 alternative to the most commonly used genome editing protein Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 (SpyCas9), w
216       Successful development of IVF and CCR5 editing protocols in MCM embryos lays a foundation for t
217                   We were able to achieve an editing rate of > 99% for multiple genes that functional
218  to produce an inconsistent range of genomic editing rates between 0.03-3%.
219  oligodeoxynucleotides mediated precise gene editing rates, and effectively reduces on-target inserti
220        An alternative is to introduce genome editing reagents and a homologous recombination (HR) don
221            Developmental regulators and gene-editing reagents are delivered to somatic cells of whole
222 ng computational algorithms to design genome editing reagents can mitigate off-target edits in plants
223                   Here, we introduced genome editing reagents into single-cell bovine embryos to comp
224 d the safety and efficacy concerns of genome editing remain.
225                               Efficient base editing requires cellular exposure to levels of base edi
226 ver, traditional CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing requires plant tissue culture that is both time-
227                However, CRISPR-mediated gene editing revealed that PKA and AMPK are not required for
228                         CRISPR-mediated gene editing shows promise to cure genetic pathologies, altho
229 uption of GAL5.1 in mice using CRISPR genome editing significantly reduced GAL expression in the amyg
230 esponse, epithelial-mesenchymal differential editing sites are enriched in genes involved in immune a
231 NA-seq) enables global identification of RNA-editing sites in biological systems and disease.
232  salient step in many studies is to identify editing sites that statistically associate with treatmen
233 1) in DLD-1 CRC cells using CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing; some cells were transfected with plasmids that
234  expanded their targeting scope and improved editing specificity.
235 formation to facilitate the design of genome-editing strategies, showcase the past and future transge
236 Here we show that a CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing strategy allows the precise correction of WAS mu
237  analyze differences between ADAR1 and ADAR2 editing substrates.
238 nosoma brucei possesses a highly complex RNA editing system that uses guide RNAs to direct the insert
239 leic-acid editing ability of the dCas13a RNA-editing system.
240 PR/dCas9-based enhancer-targeting epigenetic editing systems, enCRISPRa and enCRISPRi, for efficient
241 ced short palindromic repeats -based genetic editing systems, immunotherapy, microbiome restoration,
242  domains: vaccine research, viral transcript editing, T-cell effector response targeting including ch
243 -membrane-coating nanotechnology and genetic editing technique offers a safe and robust strategy in a
244                                         Gene-editing techniques are currently revolutionizing biology
245                Herein, we exploited spectral editing techniques to identify and quantify the lipid mo
246        SORT is compatible with multiple gene editing techniques, including mRNA, Cas9 mRNA/single gui
247 aracterizing new varieties generated by gene-editing techniques.
248     With the rapid development of new genome-editing technologies and the availability of increasing
249 S. viridis research, highly efficient genome editing technologies are needed to create genetic variat
250 uman beta-cell lines, and advances in genome-editing technologies coupled with improved protocols dif
251 emonstrations, and recent advances in genome editing technologies may enable the use of reporters in
252 me sequencing along with development of gene editing technologies.
253 cal step in the future translation of genome editing technologies.
254                         The advent of genome editing technology provides new opportunities to correct
255 d BMI1 as the direct target of AR using gene-editing technology.
256         ADR-1 promotes SLO-2 function not by editing the transcripts of slo-2 but those of scyl-1, wh
257                     Using CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing, the enhancer cluster or parts thereof, Nppb and
258 ead to the ultimate realization of molecular editing: the freedom to modify organic molecules at any
259 osing organisms, designing robots capable of editing their own structure to more efficiently perform
260 development of efficient, combinatorial gene-editing therapeutics.
261 important in the development of directed RNA editing therapeutics.
262  been subjected to CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing, there is no evidence of success in genetic alte
263               With recent advances in genome editing, this type of genetic mutation can be precisely
264 ecT increases the efficiency of single-locus editing to as high as 50% and improves multiplex editing
265 ene-edited cell populations and expands gene editing to chromosomal tracts previously not possible to
266                                       Genome editing to correct a defective beta-globin gene or induc
267      This work establishes that precise gene editing to correct multiple distinct gene variants could
268                                 Using genome editing to delete candidate REs, we showed that a strong
269                           We then use genome editing to disrupt the coding sequence of a S. rosetta C
270                   Employing CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing to disrupt the Pdgfra gene in two different muri
271                            Using CRISPR/Cas9 editing to endogenously tag receptors with fluorescent p
272                           Here we use genome editing to engineer a general platform to improve the sa
273                               We used genome editing to generate a Gdf15 (nuGFP-CE) mouse line, remov
274                      The potential of genome editing to improve the agronomic performance of crops is
275                      We previously used gene editing to introduce a dual epitope tag into the endogen
276  cobalamin metabolic enzymes, we used genome editing to study the loss of mmachc function and to deve
277 chnological approaches, mainly based on gene editing, to produce allogeneic CAR T cells with limited
278 describe an optimized Cas9-AAV6-based genome editing tool platform for site-specific mutagenesis and
279         CRISPR/Cas9 is a programmable genome editing tool widely used for biological applications and
280       Thus, REPAIRx markedly expands the RNA editing toolkit and illustrates a novel strategy for bas
281     Here, we have developed multiplex genome editing toolkits for citrus including PEG-mediated proto
282           We have developed multiplex genome editing toolkits for citrus that significantly improve c
283     The development of new CRISPR-Cas genome editing tools continues to drive major advances in the l
284  the applicability of CRISPR-associated gene editing tools in vitro and in vivo.
285 ceosome, with potential applications as gene-editing tools.
286 tial for application as modulators of genome editing tools.
287 an steers a tapasin loop involved in peptide editing toward the binding groove.
288                                       Genome editing typically involves recombination between donor n
289 rt and promising perspective of in vivo gene editing using non-viral nano-vectors.
290                                       Genome editing using programmable nucleases is revolutionizing
291       Expressed from the P gene through mRNA editing, W shares a common N-terminus with P and V but h
292  combining quantitative genetics with genome editing, we show how multiple SVs that changed gene dosa
293                      With CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing, we validated Less Shattering1 (SvLes1) as a gen
294  levels of successful heritable plant genome editing were addressed using simple case studies in Arab
295  Ajugoideae, and are generally devoid of RNA editing, whereas moderately diverged genes accelerated l
296 ergence of high-throughput assays and genome editing, which are switching the paradigm from bottom-up
297 ominant Best disease iPSC-RPE models to gene editing, which produced premature stop codons specifical
298 y a homology-directed repair template during editing with Cascade-Cas3, but not Cas9.
299  Cas12i could potentially be used for genome editing with high specificity.
300 ation of ribonucleoprotein attenuates genome editing within cells and allows for titratable levels of
301 ) reveal a novel mechanism of stereochemical editing within peptidoglycan transpeptidation, (c) asses

 
Page Top