コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 displayed unique measured FVE radii for each electric field strength.
2 e is critical for increasing the current and electric field strength.
3 programmed based on the distribution of the electric field strength.
4 tes in these steps are minimally affected by electric field strength.
5 e time and directional bias as a function of electric field strength.
6 characteristic dependence of ion mobility on electric field strength.
7 and is found to be nonlinearly dependent on electric field strength.
8 on, as well as with cation concentration and electric field strength.
9 150 ps to many nanoseconds, depending on the electric field strength.
10 dependent on both exosome concentration and electric field strength.
11 ocess is only weakly affected by the applied electric field strength.
12 of rapid buffer exchange and an increase in electric field strength.
13 8-mm separation channel length under 30 V/cm electric field strength.
14 segment, the migration time, and the overall electric field strength.
15 ulled by a gradient force to regions of high electric field strength.
16 may be attained by simple adjustment of the electric field strength.
17 eorganization increased nonlinearly with the electric field strength.
18 ion relating imaging magnification change to electric-field strength.
19 factants are more vulnerable to IRE at lower electric field strengths.
20 f electrochemiluminescence at relatively low electric field strengths.
21 ssDNA at a range of Mg2+ concentrations and electric field strengths.
22 ight separation channel over a wide range of electric field strengths.
23 igned carbon nanotubes (CNTs), under varying electric field strengths.
24 be observed especially when operated at high electric field strengths.
26 ntrol of the cluster orientation at very low electric field strengths (0.18 V mum(-1) ) is achieved.
27 tion does not increase monotonously with the electric field strength above an optimum E(0), which is
28 a Stark shift ruler that enables mapping the electric field strength across the electric double layer
29 r ds-DNA fragments are stronger functions of electric field strength and buffer concentration than th
32 open segment with concomitant changes of the electric field strength and the flow velocity at the int
33 matography (CEC) have discontinuities of the electric field strength and the flow velocity at the int
34 l cross-sectional area determining the local electric field strength and, thus, the local interaction
35 ore, manipulate, and analyze ions under high electric field strengths and controlled ion-neutral reac
36 coefficients of the DNA at several different electric field strengths and extrapolating the results t
37 The effects of the liquid sheath flow rate, electric field strength, and integration time on sensiti
39 s longer surface propagation lengths, higher electric field strengths, and sharper angular resonance
41 eral hundred million volts per centimetre of electric-field strength are required to field-ionize gas
42 ase protein diameter and to E*, the critical electric field strength at which ion emission from dropl
43 his surface-specific method, comparing local electric field strengths at the air-water interface and
46 by three orders of magnitude as we tuned the electric field strength by a few percent across resonanc
47 We conclude that RH421 detects intramembrane electric field strength changes arising from charge tran
48 s by appropriately adjusting temperature and electric field strength could facilitate their applicati
49 nt primary alcohols characterized at reduced electric field strengths E/N of up to 120 Td with a wate
51 llows operation over a wide range of reduced electric field strengths E/N up to 120 Td, allowing sepa
52 r from the field to the material (for a peak electric field strength exceeding 2.5 volts per angstrom
53 oltage to several volts to induce sufficient electric field strength for efficient bacteria inactivat
57 The MIPEF processing variables studied were electric field strength (from 0.4 to 2.0kV/cm) and numbe
61 oard without amplification, producing modest electric field strengths in the nanochannels (0.2-2 kV/c
65 llular recording techniques, and the applied electric field strength is continuously updated using a
67 ening and enhance both the EDL potential and electric field strength, leading to a trigger in the net
72 Using a separation length of 22 cm and an electric field strength of 750 V/cm, analysis times were
73 -entrant resonant cavity that can achieve an electric field strength of more than 100 kV/m with an in
77 to characterize the effects of pressure and electric field strength on compensation voltage, ion tra
78 for treating grapes using moderate and high electric field strength on the enhancement of CI and TPI
79 ignificantly related to either the simulated electric field strength or the distance between the IRE
80 roplet size as the key parameter controlling electric field strength, product yield, and selectivity.
82 he advantage of highly focused and localized electric field strength provided by the micronozzle arra
83 in 3-10 min using broad-range ampholytes at electric field strengths ranging from 25 to 100 V/cm.
84 of IEF were completed in less than 25 min at electric field strengths ranging from 50 to 214 V/cm.
85 tration to width ratios as a function of the electric field strength ratio in the control channels an
90 ctor-metal homojunction with 50% decrease of electric field strength required in the derivation of st
91 bility of ablating large tumors, because the electric field strength required is often too high to be
93 itioned within a nanofunnel at sub-threshold electric field strengths, suggesting the utility of nano
94 ship of the proton transfer barrier with the electric field strength that explains the effectivity of
96 lectrochromatographic parameters such as the electric field strength, the potential drop, and the flo
97 re probed as they electromigrated at varying electric field strength through a crystalline array of s
98 FVE radii were associated with corresponding electric field strengths through the first-order vibrati
99 owing through different outlets to different electric field strength, thus resulting in different imp
100 arious conditions of electrophoresis such as electric field strength, time of electrophoresis, switch
103 using immersed electrodes are limited by low electric field strengths to avoid shorting, requiring to
105 Square waves applied to the device generated electric field strengths up to 1.3 x 10(5) V/cm at the t
106 osphorus donors in bulk silicon with various electric field strengths up to near avalanche breakdown
108 microfluidic channel and applying a range of electric field strengths, we produce protocells that exh
113 te, built-in sensor for measuring interlayer electric field strengths, which are exceedingly difficul
114 shifted with a magnitude proportional to the electric field strength (with red shifts >1 eV), and in
116 ates an ionic current with a greatly reduced electric field strength, with particular benefits for li