コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 2.1 +/- 9.3 years) underwent 48-h ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring.
2 and 2 h of reperfusion with hemodynamic and electrocardiographic monitoring.
3 s for transfer to an intensive care unit and electrocardiographic monitoring.
4 in the intensive care unit under continuous electrocardiographic monitoring.
5 potentials, echocardiography, and telemetric electrocardiographic monitoring.
6 on formulas should be considered for routine electrocardiographic monitoring.
8 rtery reactivity testing, resting/ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring and a variety of blood d
9 be initiated or reinitiated with continuous electrocardiographic monitoring and in the presence of t
10 rophysiology platform, MR-compatible 12-lead electrocardiographic monitoring and recording system, MR
11 l care, rapid identification of MI patients, electrocardiographic monitoring, and defibrillation as n
12 (AT), verified by monthly visits, ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring, and implantable loop re
13 echocardiography, optical mapping, telemetry electrocardiographic monitoring, and inducibility studie
14 5 days after surgery, as assessed by Holter electrocardiographic monitoring, and myocardial injury w
16 sly reported Electrophysiologic Study Versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring (ESVEM) trial, there wer
17 with the use of echocardiography, ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring, exercise stress testing
19 oke and no prior evidence of AF, implantable electrocardiographic monitoring for 12 months, compared
21 ommendations on indications and duration for electrocardiographic monitoring in accordance with the A
22 SCAF is frequently detected by continuous electrocardiographic monitoring in older patients withou
26 commendations for Indication and Duration of Electrocardiographic Monitoring presented by patient pop
28 the potential diagnostic yield of different electrocardiographic monitoring strategies for confirmin
30 y, including clinical laboratory changes and electrocardiographic monitoring, was assessed until appr
31 tter from evaluating patients with prolonged electrocardiographic monitoring with an external loop re
32 ants were randomly assigned 1:1 to prolonged electrocardiographic monitoring with either an implantab