ライフサイエンスコーパス: emergency physician

1 e University of California, Berkeley, and an emergency physician.

2 The unit of analysis was the Emergency physician.

3 better education for primary healthcare and emergency physicians.

4 nurse practitioners was 91% and 88% for the emergency physicians.

5 hs between emergency nurse practitioners and emergency physicians.

6 ionnaire was filled from 2008 to 2010 by the emergency physicians.

7 able children (67.2%) for requests filled by emergency physicians.

8 ital-based attending physicians, including 6 emergency physicians, 13 hospitalists, and 8 intensivist

9 identified as men [71.7%]), 25 (54.3%) were emergency physicians, 17 (37.0%) were hospitalists, and

10 Twenty-four emergency physicians, 37 hospitalists, and 37 intensivis

11 % (95% confidence interval, 78%-85%); 17% of emergency physicians, 40% of neurologists, and 52% of ra

12 Of 569 computed tomography readings by emergency physicians, 67% were correct; of 435 readings

13 ency nurse practitioners was 85% and for the emergency physicians 91%.

14 lines." In response, the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) has developed a set of guide

15 Approximately 800,000 times a year, an emergency physician admits a patient with symptomatic he

16 One emergency physician and emergency nurse practitioner ind

17 The sensitivity and specificity of emergency physicians and emergency nurse practitioners w

18 l features for ICHs and fractures could help emergency physicians and radiologists improve their imag

19 ediatric critical care physicians, pediatric emergency physicians, and trainees in these subspecialti

20 intra intravenous fibrinolysis, even though emergency physicians are most commonly the first to eval

21 spitalization/discharge) were established by emergency physicians before and after CT scan results.

22 nline in a national convenience sample of 72 emergency physicians between January 1 and March 31, 202

23 29% by emergency medical technicians, 71% by emergency physicians) between December 2008 and December

24 al Care Medicine and the American College of Emergency Physicians convened a Task Force to understand

25 algorithm was created to help non-specialist emergency physicians diagnose posterior circulation stro

26 cancellation because of reinterpretation of emergency physicians' ECG (4.6%).

27 understanding the availability of pediatric emergency physicians (EPs) is important.

28 tivation by emergency medical technicians or emergency physicians has been shown to substantially red

29 NINDS-compliant strategy (ie, evaluation by emergency physician in less than 10 minutes, interpretat

30 ivation by emergency medical technicians and emergency physicians in a large group of hospitals organ

31 efore assessed anaphylactic patients seen by emergency physicians in the Berlin area covering 4 milli

32 (AI) system designed to aid radiologists and emergency physicians in the detection and localization o

33 ntially changed the malpractice standard for emergency physicians in three states had little effect o

34 on, such as infectious diseases specialists, emergency physicians, intensivists, internists, pediatri

35 ion such as infectious diseases specialists, emergency physicians, internists, pediatricians, family

36 on of thrombolytic drugs outside hospital by emergency physicians is becoming more common.

37 re and included heart failure cardiologists, emergency physicians, laboratory medicine specialists, n

38 of knowledge of ophthalmological diseases by emergency physicians, leading to unnecessary referrals t

39 Emergency physicians must determine both the location an

40 e was left to the discretion of the treating emergency physician (n = 303).

41 givers (n=24) and individual interviews with emergency physicians (n=23) and advanced practice nurses

42 In public health emergencies, physicians need to address the patient's ne

43 unravels a strong underuse of adrenaline by emergency physicians, not reflecting treatment protocols

44 working in 2020 (5% of all clinically active emergency physicians), of whom 1357 were women (56%) and

45 literature from the perspective of pediatric emergency physicians, offer suggestions for family membe

46 Intensivists and emergency physicians (p = 0.048) were more likely to adm

47 Six emergency nurse practitioners and ten emergency physicians participated.

48 ty-four readers (radiologists, orthopedists, emergency physicians, physician assistants, rheumatologi

49 l diagnostic ultrasonography performed by an emergency physician (point-of-care ultrasonography), ult

50 Emergency physicians practice in an information-poor, re

51 Emergency physicians prospectively completed data forms

52 orrhage prediction model in the decisions of emergency physicians regarding ordering head computed to

53 NICT referral rate of the initially assigned emergency physician relative to local peers within discr

54 then assessed by an experienced accident and emergency physician (research registrar) who completed a

55 In this quality improvement study, emergency physicians successfully adopted oral medicatio

56 ate the catheterization laboratory, allowing emergency physicians to activate the catheterization lab

57 ect the emergency medical services provider, emergency physician, trauma surgeon, and anesthesiologis

58 etween the emergency nurse practitioners and emergency physicians was 0.83.

59 Six radiologists and six emergency physicians were asked to detect and localize f

60 We found that emergency physicians were likely to accept AI based on h

61 Six hundred HCT requests filled by emergency physicians were randomly sampled to review the

62 y to create a route to CCM certification for emergency physicians who complete a critical care fellow

63 intervals, and triage decisions were made by emergency physicians who were unaware of point-of-care r

64 After identifying the emergency physicians within a hospital who cared for the

65 ating diversity and representation among the emergency physician workforce.