ライフサイエンスコーパス: emergency surgery

1 ure, inability to consent for themselves, or emergency surgery.

2 years (2002-2015) who had major elective or emergency surgery.

3 pment of complications and avoid the risk of emergency surgery.

4 terations of the mortality rates of ELHR and emergency surgery.

5 hemoglobin <12 mg/dl, vascular surgery, and emergency surgery.

6 congestive heart failure were predictive of emergency surgery.

7 cer cohorts, however, evidence is lacking in emergency surgery.

8 ridge to surgery, offering an alternative to emergency surgery.

9 ed risk of complications but not death after emergency surgery.

10 iately after, and on the first day following emergency surgery.

11 l mortality, new pulmonary embolism (PE), or emergency surgery.

12 s of the stent group are similar to those of emergency surgery.

13 w guidelines for quicker and safer access to emergency surgery.

14 he practice of elective colectomy to prevent emergency surgery.

15 ain effectiveness at reducing recurrence and emergency surgery.

16 een patients admitted following elective and emergency surgery.

17 of bronchoaspiration in patients undergoing emergency surgery.

18 90, respectively) and poorer calibration for emergency surgery.

19 plications associated with GI-PTLD requiring emergency surgery.

20 c dissection is a lethal condition requiring emergency surgery.

21 pecialty of trauma and critical care include emergency surgery.

22 This correlation was higher in emergency surgery.

23 and often result in incidental detection at emergency surgery.

24 otic cover, return to work and activity, and emergency surgery.

25 and older (10.5% vs 8.4%; P < 0.001) but not emergency surgery (1.8% vs 2.0%; P = 0.52).

26 hospitals (91%) reported capacity to perform emergency surgery, 1 in 6 hospitals (16%) reported havin

27 ht patients were evaluated: 1,053 acute care emergency surgery, 1,964 general surgery, 1,491 transpla

28 care emergency surgery patients: acute care emergency surgery 10.8% versus general surgery 4.3%, tra

29 engths of stay than other groups: acute care emergency surgery (13.5 +/- 17.4 d) versus general surge

30 lished studies overestimate the mortality of emergency surgery (17% vs. 5.4%).

31 ation the day after the procedure and needed emergency surgery (3,6%).

32 urred in 18% (mortality: 9.8%; new PE: 8.3%; emergency surgery: 3.1%).

33 s were more likely than controls to have had emergency surgery (33 percent vs. 7 percent, P<0.001) or

34 2%; P < 0.001), as well as increased risk of emergency surgery (4.3% vs 1.4%, P < 0.001).

35 ients in the prehabilitation group underwent emergency surgery (5 vs 1) or dropped out of the program

36 care emergency surgery patients: acute care emergency surgery 73.4% versus general surgery 64.9%, tr

37 ere significant reductions in utilization of emergency surgery (8.8% vs 14.9%; P < 0.0001), 30-day (5

38 rgery (95% CI, 13.3-15.3) and 7.3 months for emergency surgery (95% CI, 6.8-7.8).

39 outcome was the global incidence of delayed emergency surgery across 3 predefined organizational pat

40 those with a prior cardiovascular event for emergency surgery (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.35; 95% CI,

41 ther determinants of adverse outcome include emergency surgery, advanced age, and cardiovascular dise

42 , peripheral vascular surgery, neck surgery, emergency surgery, albumin level less than 30 g/L, blood

43 etermines whether the patient should undergo emergency surgery, an endovascular intervention, or rece

44 The other 3 included both emergency surgery and a private elective component.

45 y stent placement, MACE were associated with emergency surgery and advanced cardiac disease but not s

46 regional referral hospital with capacity for emergency surgery and blood transfusion.

47 omorbidities were similar between acute care emergency surgery and general surgery, whereas transplan

48 ricans should focus on reducing the need for emergency surgery and improving perioperative management

49 cans were younger but more likely to undergo emergency surgery and present with hypertension, dyspnea

50 ilar to those for younger patients with age, emergency surgery and prior CABG being the powerful pred

51 ncluded 2764 pregnant women (50.5% underwent emergency surgery) and 516,705 nonpregnant women (13.2%

52 incidence was 9.0% for readmission, 1.9% for emergency surgery, and 14.1% for all-cause mortality.

53 >=6.0 cm, an iliac artery aneurysm >=2.0 cm, emergency surgery, and a history of prior aortic surgery

54 awsuit risk and incidence in trauma surgery, emergency surgery, and elective surgery at a single acad

55 ed diverticulitis, a clinical indication for emergency surgery, and free air on an abdominal computed

56 emodynamically stable, had no indication for emergency surgery, and had an US scan followed by subxip

57 nvasion, and lymphangitis), stenotic lesion, emergency surgery, and palliative surgery.

58 essures, lung injury scores, elective versus emergency surgery, and presence or absence of pneumonia.

59 nemia, history of cerebral vascular disease, emergency surgery, and prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass

60 rgery (ACS, a combination of trauma surgery, emergency surgery, and surgical critical care) has been

61 arette smoking, chronic respiratory disease, emergency surgery, anesthetic time of 180 min or more, a

62 Absolute risks of readmission and emergency surgery are low after nonoperative management

63 Three included emergency surgery as part of their practice, but no priv

64 and critical care surgeons who had included emergency surgery but no private elective component had

65 throughout the 4 Eras, whereas the need for emergency surgery declined (p = 0.002).

66 esthesiologists physical status, sepsis, and emergency surgery demonstrated a positive association be

67 The addition of emergency surgery did not improve the financial viabilit

68 at the 23rd European Congress of Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ECTES), April 28-30, 2024, in Estoril

69 bridge to surgery (SBTS) compared to direct emergency surgery (ES) in patients with acute MCO.

70 rgency Surgery Risk (POTTER) tool in elderly emergency surgery (ES) patients.

71 o national estimates of the excess burden of emergency surgery exist.

72 725 patients had emergency surgery for acute cholecystitis, 195 were ASA1

73 H is high in patients undergoing elective or emergency surgery for colorectal diseases.

74 nsive care unit admission during management, emergency surgery for digestive necrosis, and treatment

75 e care unit admission during management, and emergency surgery for digestive necrosis.

76 to characterize the risks of readmission and emergency surgery for diverticulitis, accounting for dea

77 been suggested as a promising alternative to emergency surgery for left-sided malignant colonic obstr

78 ERAS outcomes in elderly patients undergoing emergency surgery for perforated peptic ulcer (PPU).

79 e procedure of choice for patients requiring emergency surgery for perforated peptic ulcer disease.

80 elderly patients (>= 60 years) who underwent emergency surgery for PPU from August 2020 to July 2024.

81 Emergency surgery for type A dissection in patients with

82 All consecutive adult patients admitted for emergency surgery from October 5 to 16, 2020, were inclu

83 ic surgery, abdominal surgery, neurosurgery, emergency surgery, general anesthesia, head and neck sur

84 , nonsurgical admission, and admission after emergency surgery had a greater impact on prognosis than

85 Emergency surgery has a higher cost and worse outcomes c

86 Emergency surgery has become a rare event after percutan

87 Traditionally, emergency surgery has been the standard treatment modali

88 Tamponade occurred in 16.6% and emergency surgery in 3.4% of cases.

89 this cohort study, the frequency of delayed emergency surgery in France was 32.5%.

90 bdominal pain and the most common reason for emergency surgery in several countries.

91 Patients requiring emergency surgery in the recent time periods had a highe

92 ry is considering combining SCC, trauma, and emergency surgery into "acute care surgery" fellowship t

93 MARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Mortality following emergency surgery is a key quality improvement metric in

94 medicine, care of the elderly, elective and emergency surgery), located in four NHS hospital organiz

95 ent, blood urea nitrogen level, transfusion, emergency surgery, long-term steroid use, smoking, and a

96 included patient-related factors (severity, emergency surgery, malignancy, Candida colonization, and

97 nt of care bundles to enhance recovery after emergency surgeries may allow better control of LOS redu

98 septal rupture must always be considered as emergency surgery may be life saving.

99 tion (n = 4), blood transfusion (n = 2), and emergency surgery (n = 1) and were reported by 1.1% (95%

100 the duration of ileus in patients undergoing emergency surgery, notably those with peritonitis.

101 ; 95% CI 1.08 to 2.96); operative variables: emergency surgery (odds ratio 2.12, 95% CI 1.01 to 4.51)

102 ed organs (odds ratio 2.13); admission after emergency surgery (odds ratio 3.08); and nonsurgical adm

103 es, overall nonadherence was associated with emergency surgery (odds ratio [OR], 1.35; 95% CI, 1.29-1

104 ospital mortality rate of 2.5% and a rate of emergency surgery of 4.3%.

105 ot impact on survival in patients undergoing emergency surgery of the aorta and support the concept t

106 We studied 122 patients who underwent emergency surgery of the aorta between January 1982 and

107 had minimally invasive surgery; 52 [8%] had emergency surgery), of which 152 (23%) had a low level o

108 ics for labor and emergencies, in trauma for emergency surgeries or life-saving (resuscitative) situa

109 ck, or occur secondary to treatments such as emergency surgery or blood transfusions, and ultimately

110 farction patients with successful PCI and no emergency surgery or Q-wave myocardial infarction were f

111 nternational normalized ratio; redo surgery; emergency surgery or surgery outside of regular working

112 ce that age, dementia, hypertension, pre-ICU emergency surgery or trauma, Acute Physiology and Chroni

113 stics (ICU admission after elective surgery, emergency surgery, or medical admission; Simplified Acut

114 : OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.30-1.45; P < .001; and emergency surgery: OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.55-1.76; P < .001

115 : OR, 2.32; 95% CI, 2.00-2.68; P < .001; and emergency surgery: OR, 2.91; 95% CI, 2.48-3.41; P < .001

116 d the association of surgeon experience with emergency surgery outcomes at 5 US academic level 1 trau

117 Previous studies comparing emergency surgery outcomes with surgeon experience have

118 Emergency surgery patients are at high risk for retained

119 Acute care emergency surgery patients had statistically significant

120 The greater complexity of emergency surgery patients may bias outcome comparisons

121 Acute care emergency surgery patients were more likely interhospita

122 approaches to perioperative care in elderly emergency surgery patients.

123 vice, was significantly higher in acute care emergency surgery patients: acute care emergency surgery

124 ion, was significantly higher for acute care emergency surgery patients: acute care emergency surgery

125 tis more than doubled, without a decrease in emergency surgery, percutaneous interventions, or admiss

126 for the resuscitation of patients coming for emergency surgery procedures.

127 acute procedural success to 98%, reduced the emergency surgery rate to 0.2%, and reduced the incidenc

128 ons on use of elective colectomy or rates of emergency surgery remains undetermined.

129 rformance of the Predictive OpTimal Trees in Emergency Surgery Risk (POTTER) tool in elderly emergenc

130 sed risk of retention of a foreign body were emergency surgery (risk ratio, 8.8 [95 percent confidenc

131 sion models were constructed controlling for Emergency Surgery Score, case complexity, preoperative t

132 ptic shock, acute kidney failure, and higher Emergency Surgery Scores.

133 l surgery patients admitted to an acute care emergency surgery service with other general surgery pat

134 Our Trauma and Emergency Surgery Services treated 228 patients with dog

135 Multivariate analysis showed that only emergency surgery status (OR 3.59, P < 0.01), redo CABG

136 o intraprocedural deaths, cardiac tamponade, emergency surgery, stroke, myocardial infarction, or maj

137 n is greater in patients admitted following "emergency" surgery than in patients admitted following "

138 ated hernia, which is more likely to require emergency surgery that precludes medical optimization.

139 ely perforated diverticulitis and undergoing emergency surgery, the use of laparoscopic lavage vs pri

140 Preventing emergency surgery through improved care coordination and

141 With the establishment of an Emergency Surgery Transport and Assessment Team, we were

142 entilation 24 hrs after admission, male sex, emergency surgery, trauma, presence of critical care fel

143 ographics, preoperative organ insufficiency, emergency surgery, type of surgical procedure, cardiopul

144 Patients undergoing emergency surgery typically require resuscitation, eithe

145 rolled clinical trial in patients undergoing emergency surgery under general anesthesia at Geneva Uni

146 using chest CT and RT-PCR before elective or emergency surgery under general anesthesia.

147 d 516,705 nonpregnant women (13.2% underwent emergency surgery) undergoing general surgery.

148 Hospital performance in emergency surgery was found to not depend on its share o

149 Emergency surgery was necessary in 16 and 13 patients, r

150 Emergency surgery was performed in 24 patients (20%) and

151 Emergency surgery was required in 3% of cases.

152 Emergency surgery was the only independent predictor of

153 Urgent or emergency surgery was undertaken in 17 patients (25%).

154 In this paper in The Lancet Series about emergency surgery we summarise the available data on acu

155 20 published studies, while those for WW and emergency surgery were derived from the 1997 HCUP-NIS da

156 ility of developing acute symptoms requiring emergency surgery with the WW strategy was 1.1%.

157 hospital capable of providing essential and emergency surgery) within 2 h was assessed by determinin

158 sions were associated with increased risk of emergency surgery, yet age less than 50 years was not.