ライフサイエンスコーパス: endotracheal intubation

1 ion devices and pulse oximetry values during endotracheal intubation.

2 e together with mechanical ventilation after endotracheal intubation.

3 ts on other outcomes, including the need for endotracheal intubation.

4 ch as non-invasive mechanical ventilation or endotracheal intubation.

5 The primary outcome was endotracheal intubation.

6 rapy for 4 hours or longer before undergoing endotracheal intubation.

7 the most common serious adverse event during endotracheal intubation.

8 R for SARS-CoV-2 requiring ICU admission and endotracheal intubation.

9 nce in patients with marked hypoxemia before endotracheal intubation.

10 Laryngoscopy following endotracheal intubation.

11 edures and requiring general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation.

12 deterioration and death during or soon after endotracheal intubation.

13 function undergoing general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation.

14 s with acute lung injury before the need for endotracheal intubation.

15 was the proportion of patients who required endotracheal intubation.

16 induction and 2 minutes after completion of endotracheal intubation.

17 direct laryngoscopy for the first attempt at endotracheal intubation.

18 uperior to direct laryngoscopy during urgent endotracheal intubation.

19 xposure to postnatal steroids, and prolonged endotracheal intubation.

20 -compromising sequelae in neonates following endotracheal intubation.

21 ry endpoint was the cumulative prevalence of endotracheal intubation.

22 formed on pigs under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation.

23 Regional anesthesia is preferred to endotracheal intubation.

24 were severe metabolic acidosis and need for endotracheal intubation.

25 y administration of epinephrine, and delayed endotracheal intubation.

26 r patients and families who choose to forego endotracheal intubation.

27 se of NPPV for patients who choose to forego endotracheal intubation.

28 rd against hypoxemia during laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation.

29 We enrolled 202 consecutive endotracheal intubations.

30 groups were similar with respect to need for endotracheal intubation (14.1% of subjects with intramus

31 outcomes were time from symptom onset to (1) endotracheal intubation, (2) tracheostomy; time from end

32 ertainty) were associated with lower risk of endotracheal intubation (25 studies [3804 patients]).

33 cluded respiratory failure as the reason for endotracheal intubation (4% survival), the presence of p

34 5 minutes [7.0-20.0], P=0.001), led to fewer endotracheal intubations (52% versus 85%, P<0.001), and

35 However, the observed success rates of endotracheal intubation (55.4% vs. 54.9%, p = 0.953) and

36 2, 1.2-4.2), as was the proportion requiring endotracheal intubation (66 of 439 for chlorpyrifos, 15.

37 e survival were significantly lower both for endotracheal intubation (adjusted OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.37

38 e survival were significantly lower both for endotracheal intubation (adjusted OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.37

39 irway management, including 41,972 (6%) with endotracheal intubation and 239,550 (37%) with use of su

40 understood patients' living wills regarding endotracheal intubation and cardiopulmonary rescuscitati

41 Primary outcomes: 28-day endotracheal intubation and death.

42 severe acute chest syndrome (ACS) requiring endotracheal intubation and erythrocytopheresis are at i

43 Endotracheal intubation and extracorporeal membrane oxyg

44 2D patients requiring oxygen administration, endotracheal intubation and ICU admission had significan

45 The need for endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation ("int

46 n-invasive respiratory support alone without endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation durin

47 dergo elective surgical procedures requiring endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation for a

48 of non-invasive respiratory support without endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation incre

49 t initiation of the protocol, ewes underwent endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation under

50 tients (23.9%) in the placebo group received endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation, comp

51 Among those who deceased following endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation, the

52 otal of 489,390 (12.1%) patients experienced endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation, with

53 re the two strongest factors associated with endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation.

54 and more effective than administration with endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation; howe

55 Bayesian meta-analyses were performed for endotracheal intubation and mortality outcomes.

56 using NPPV for patients who choose to forego endotracheal intubation and to examine the perspectives

57 Both endotracheal intubation and use of supraglottic airways

58 trauma patients frequently require prolonged endotracheal intubation and ventilator support.

59 6 hours showed a high probability of reduced endotracheal intubation and/or death over a wide range o

60 ess in the future, possibly exceeding 48,000 endotracheal intubations and mechanical ventilation acro

61 on across the country in a month and 100,000 endotracheal intubations and mechanical ventilation in t

62 ber 2020 to January 2021, a total of 104,750 endotracheal intubations and mechanical ventilation occu

63 ntilation), followed by January 2021 (47,100 endotracheal intubations and mechanical ventilation) and

64 with the highest peak in August 2021 (48,735 endotracheal intubations and mechanical ventilation), fo

65 nical ventilation) and December 2021 (43,835 endotracheal intubations and mechanical ventilation).

66 erwent early tracheostomy (within 10 days of endotracheal intubation) and 49 days in those who underw

67 patients and families have decided to forego endotracheal intubation, and 3) NPPV as a palliative mea

68 After induction of anesthesia, endotracheal intubation, and mechanical ventilation, lun

69 -cause in-hospital-mortality, ICU admission, endotracheal intubation, and oxygen administration.

70 biotic exposure, presence of a central line, endotracheal intubation, and prior fungal colonization r

71 y develop acute respiratory failure, require endotracheal intubation, and survive to be extubated are

72 No patient died before endotracheal intubation, and the severity of respiratory

73 Repeated attempts at endotracheal intubation are associated with increased ad

74 ne positioning, did not significantly reduce endotracheal intubation at 30 days.

75 Among infants undergoing endotracheal intubation at two Australian tertiary neona

76 lemental oxygen) in neonates undergoing oral endotracheal intubation at two Australian tertiary neona

77 a videolaryngoscope in the ICU on the first endotracheal intubation attempt and intubation-related c

78 2 prespecified secondary outcomes, including endotracheal intubation, barotrauma, skin pressure injur

79 In the critically ill undergoing urgent endotracheal intubation by direct laryngoscopy, multiple

80 rrective actions taken during the process of endotracheal intubation by paramedics.

81 s, clinicians attempt to minimize the use of endotracheal intubation by the early introduction of les

82 Direct laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation can often safely be accomplished

83 sed the number of attempts needed to achieve endotracheal intubation compared with direct laryngoscop

84 Awake prone positioning reduced the risk of endotracheal intubation compared with usual care (crude

85 69 years; 272 men [71.6%]; 379 [99.7%] with endotracheal intubation) completed the study.

86 moglobin level, arterial pH, and presence of endotracheal intubation during hyperbaric treatment.

87 g (intervention group) or after conventional endotracheal intubation during mechanical ventilation (c

88 of patients requiring extended durations of endotracheal intubation during recovery for critical ill

89 continuous NMBA during the first 48 hours of endotracheal intubation (early NMBA) and those without.

90 ts with a diagnosis of achalasia may receive endotracheal intubation (EI) to reduce the risk of aspir

91 need regular clinical experience to perform endotracheal intubation (ETI) in a safe and effective ma

92 Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is widely used for airway

93 vanced airway management with either initial endotracheal intubation (ETI) or initial supraglottic ai

94 The rate of endotracheal intubation (ETI) was significantly lower in

95 uded supraglottic airway (SGA) device use or endotracheal intubation (ETI).

96 rative study of commercial devices to detect endotracheal intubation exists, the syringe device (Tube

97 and tracheal abnormalities are common after endotracheal intubation followed by PDT.

98 n a rat model of laryngeal injury induced by endotracheal intubation for 1 h.

99 (control group) within the first 24 h after endotracheal intubation for acute respiratory failure.

100 oronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), required endotracheal intubation for at least 7 days, and experie

101 urgical procedures who required single-lumen endotracheal intubation for general anesthesia, hyperang

102 urgical procedures who required single-lumen endotracheal intubation for general anesthesia.

103 ng the use of invasive central catheters and endotracheal intubation for lower-risk patients, coupled

104 uld be achieved if every UK child who needed endotracheal intubation for more than 12-24 h were admit

105 agmatic trial in which 150 adults undergoing endotracheal intubation in a medical intensive care unit

106 compared with usual care reduces the risk of endotracheal intubation in adults with hypoxemic respira

107 uid and plasma were collected within 1 hr of endotracheal intubation in all patients.

108 asma samples were collected within 24 hrs of endotracheal intubation in all patients.

109 Among patients undergoing endotracheal intubation in an out-of-hospital emergency

110 With the exception of endotracheal intubation in children, secondary safety ou

111 racheostomy is often performed for prolonged endotracheal intubation in critically ill patients.

112 about the optimal preoxygenation method for endotracheal intubation in critically ill patients.

113 mask is relatively ineffective at preventing endotracheal intubation in patients with acute respirato

114 otension, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and endotracheal intubation in the catheterization laborator

115 dy included all adult patients who underwent endotracheal intubation in the emergency department or i

116 28 days, 75 of 159 patients (47.2%) required endotracheal intubation in the helmet noninvasive ventil

117 In search for safer approach to endotracheal intubation in this cohort of patients, we e

118 In those that have evaluated the use of endotracheal intubation in this setting, safety issues,

119 Consecutive endotracheal intubations in critically ill patients.

120 Except for endotracheal intubation (in adults only), circadian diff

121 versus attempting an advanced airway such as endotracheal intubation) in patients with out-of-hospita

122 roving to be a well-tolerated alternative to endotracheal intubation, in particular in those patients

123 rsely associated with oxygen administration, endotracheal intubation, intensive care and in-hospital

124 Endotracheal intubation is a critical medical procedure

125 Endotracheal intubation is associated with adverse effec

126 NPPV in patients who have decided to forego endotracheal intubation is controversial.

127 Endotracheal intubation is delayed, excessive ventilatio

128 Recognizing patients in whom endotracheal intubation is likely to be difficult can he

129 pediatric ALI/ARDS can be identified before endotracheal intubation is required.

130 at the main determinants of hypoxemia during endotracheal intubation may be related to critical illne

131 Moreover, a single CHX rinse prior to endotracheal intubation may have no effect on subglottic

132 nt therapy or persistent kidney dysfunction, endotracheal intubation, mechanical ventilation days, ex

133 lation, today best applied with sedation and endotracheal intubation, might be considered a prophylac

134 rial (n = 18) compared with those who needed endotracheal intubation (n = 12) (median [interquartile

135 predicting a higher likelihood of difficult endotracheal intubation, no clinical finding reliably ex

136 of benefit with awake prone positioning for endotracheal intubation (non-informative prior, mean rel

137 Neither endotracheal intubation nor seizure occurred in any grou

138 ort routine use of apneic oxygenation during endotracheal intubation of critically ill adults.

139 Hypoxemia is common during endotracheal intubation of critically ill patients and m

140 ase lowest arterial oxygen saturation during endotracheal intubation of critically ill patients compa

141 Neonatal endotracheal intubation often involves more than one att

142 Patients with laryngeal injury after endotracheal intubation often present long after initial

143 RT evaluated the effect of laryngeal tube vs endotracheal intubation on 72-hour survival.

144 hanical or cardiopulmonary resuscitation, or endotracheal intubation on the day of the IR procedure.

145 ence was noted in the complication rates for endotracheal intubation or central venous catheterizatio

146 The primary outcome of endotracheal intubation or death at 7 days occurred in 3

147 The primary outcome was endotracheal intubation or death within 7 days assessed

148 or noninferiority for the primary outcome of endotracheal intubation or death within 7 days in 4 of t

149 the 3 centers, there were no cases requiring endotracheal intubation or resulting in death, neurologi

150 ation of invasive mechanical ventilation via endotracheal intubation or tracheotomy.

151 r whether advanced airway management such as endotracheal intubation or use of supraglottic airway de

152 e first serious asthma-related event (death, endotracheal intubation, or hospitalization), as assesse

153 e first serious asthma-related event (death, endotracheal intubation, or hospitalization).

154 y department diagnosis of organ dysfunction, endotracheal intubation, or systolic blood pressure less

155 single-dose etomidate (H0) for facilitating endotracheal intubation, patients without septic shock w

156 the first-attempt success rate during urgent endotracheal intubation performed by pulmonary and criti

157 omplications were available in all patients: endotracheal intubations, permanent neurologic injuries,

158 Endotracheal intubations, permanent neurologic injuries,

159 The endotracheal intubation rate and mortality at 28 and 90

160 Endotracheal intubation rates during in-hospital cardiac

161 The endotracheal intubation rates were 44%, 45%, and 46% ( p

162 Secondary outcomes included endotracheal intubation, recurrent seizures, and timing

163 ntensive-care-unit (ICU) admission, need for endotracheal intubation, renal replacement therapy and h

164 TICIPANTS: The Supraglottic Airway Device vs Endotracheal intubation (SAVE) trial was a multicenter c

165 reatening hypotension or cardiac arrhythmia, endotracheal intubation, seizure recurrence, and death.

166 Alternatives to endotracheal intubation show some promise in preventing

167 Endotracheal intubation success rates in the prehospital

168 ft with laryngeal functional impairment from endotracheal intubation that permanently limits their re

169 ag-mask ventilation, supraglottic airway, or endotracheal intubation), the training and retraining re

170 In group 2 aortic patients, endotracheal intubation time was 13 hours shorter and su

171 nterventions stage, and have longer pre-ECMO endotracheal intubation times (P<0.05 for all) than surv

172 nderwent tracheostomy, the average time from endotracheal intubation to tracheostomy was 19.7 days +/

173 racheostomy, 22.76 (8.84; 21) days; and from endotracheal intubation to tracheostomy, 12.23 (6.82; 12

174 heal intubation, (2) tracheostomy; time from endotracheal intubation to tracheostomy; time from trach

175 A secondary outcome was endotracheal intubation up to 30 days.

176 Pain, endotracheal intubation, vasoactive drips, or pharmacolo

177 developed severe episodes of ACS, leading to endotracheal intubation, ventilatory support for respira

178 In critically ill adults undergoing endotracheal intubation, video laryngoscopy improves glo

179 Among neonates undergoing urgent endotracheal intubation, video laryngoscopy resulted in

180 After induction of anesthesia, endotracheal intubation was followed by mechanical venti

181 dergoing mechanical ventilation at baseline, endotracheal intubation was performed in 40 of 222 (18.0

182 The rate of endotracheal intubation was significantly lower in the h

183 Endotracheal intubation was successful on the first atte

184 Minimal pulse oximetry value during endotracheal intubation was the primary endpoint.

185 am providing advanced care such as drugs and endotracheal intubation) was collected.

186 Patients undergoing urgent endotracheal intubation were randomized to Glidescope vi

187 inutes' duration with general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation who were admitted to hospital af

188 atients with laryngeal injury resulting from endotracheal intubation who were evaluated at a tertiary

189 n of the 371 critically ill adults requiring endotracheal intubation who were included in the MACMAN

190 prehospital airway management, specifically endotracheal intubation, will be discussed.

191 hypoxemic respiratory failure who underwent endotracheal intubation with a novel technique combining

192 iteria were age >/=18 years, aneurysmal SAH, endotracheal intubation with mechanical ventilation, and

193 uded the proportion of patients who required endotracheal intubation within 28 days from study enroll

194 The primary outcome was endotracheal intubation within 30 days of randomization.

195 ry is a recognized complication of prolonged endotracheal intubation, yet little attention has been p