ライフサイエンスコーパス: epiretinal membrane

1 Macular striae were seen in eyes with epiretinal membrane.

2 differentiate into myofibroblasts to form an epiretinal membrane.

3 d in 18 eyes (90%), and 14 eyes (75%) had an epiretinal membrane.

4 ic macular edema, retinal vein occlusion, or epiretinal membrane.

5 , vitreomacular interface abnormalities, and epiretinal membrane.

6 nal detachment at macula while the other, an epiretinal membrane.

7 tractive properties were termed conventional epiretinal membrane.

8 for FTMH width, vitreomacular adhesion, and epiretinal membrane.

9 cular pseudohole presented with conventional epiretinal membrane.

10 s with ocular pathologic features such as an epiretinal membrane.

11 logic features, primarily the presence of an epiretinal membrane.

12 opathy, 7 had retinal detachments, and 9 had epiretinal membranes.

13 promoted the development of dense, fibrotic epiretinal membranes.

14 as little or no HGFR was found in idiopathic epiretinal membranes.

15 oliferative vitreoretinopathy and idiopathic epiretinal membranes.

16 ysts, subretinal and intraretinal fluid, and epiretinal membranes.

17 ct the posterior hyaloid and widely adherent epiretinal membranes.

18 on and decreased alpha-SMA expression in the epiretinal membranes.

19 active properties than cells of conventional epiretinal membranes.

20 ommon complications were cataract (0.31/EY), epiretinal membrane (0.16/EY), and recurrent macular ede

21 interface disorders (either macular hole or epiretinal membrane), 1 patient had vitreous hemorrhage

22 At 1 year, epiretinal membrane (10.9%), mechanical lens complicatio

23 38(14.0%).Of these patients,15(39.4%) had an epiretinal membrane,10(26.3%) had age-related macular de

24 echiae (21.7%), cystoid macular edema (16%), epiretinal membrane (13.2%), glaucoma (11.3%), increased

25 acular edema [28 eyes, (17.4%)], followed by epiretinal membrane [17eye, (10.6%)].

26 er were diagnosed in 52 out of 264 eyes with epiretinal membranes (19.7%), of which 28 (55.0%) had co

27 macular adhesion, vitreomacular traction, or epiretinal membrane; (3) presence, location, and amount

28 l subfield thicknesses were: eyes without an epiretinal membrane, 338 +/- 23 mum; and eyes with an ep

29 roliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) (5), epiretinal membrane (4), vitreomacular traction syndrome

30 s of PR included vitreous hemorrhage (9.1%), epiretinal membrane (45.17%), proliferative vitreoretino

31 ntraocular pressure (IOP); (7) macula pucker/epiretinal membrane; (8) cataract; and (9) quality of li

32 %), and all other baseline parameters except epiretinal membrane (84.3%), which was detected at a sig

33 ting for vitreoretinal diseases including an epiretinal membrane, age-related macular degeneration, v

34 (aHR, 1.43) and >/=2+ (aHR, 1.59) vs. none; epiretinal membrane (aHR, 1.25); peripheral anterior syn

35 Nine subjects (26%) had epiretinal membrane and 6 (17%) had MH (mean diameter 18

36 inner nuclear layer in eyes with concomitant epiretinal membrane and glaucomatous optic neuropathy.

37 Epiretinal membrane and internal limiting membrane (ILM)

38 22-day delay, leading to significantly more epiretinal membrane and proliferative vitreoretinopathy

39 l membrane, 338 +/- 23 mum; and eyes with an epiretinal membrane and surface wrinkling, 405 +/- 22 mu

40 IDIOPATHIC EPIRETINAL MEMBRANE AND VITREOMACULAR TRACTION PREFERRED

41 R) GUIDELINES: New evidence-based Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane and Vitreomacular Traction Preferred

42 Epiretinal membrane and vitreomacular traction were the

43 Cells within epiretinal membranes and activated Muller cells were pre

44 HRPE cells in epiretinal membranes and in culture expressed c-Met.

45 In eyes with epiretinal membranes and retinal surface wrinkling, uvei

46 Eyes without epiretinal membranes and with epiretinal membranes witho

47 oid layer and was associated with tractional epiretinal membranes and/or vitreomacular traction.

48 aretinal fluid, 4 eyes were found to have an epiretinal membrane, and 1 eye had optic nerve edema.

49 ma, retinal detachment, vitreous hemorrhage, epiretinal membrane, and band keratopathy), and visual o

50 the 2 groups, including ocular hypertension, epiretinal membrane, and cataract formation.

51 , cataract, vitritis, cystoid macular edema, epiretinal membrane, and disc edema may occur in patient

52 hage at baseline, increasing age, absence of epiretinal membrane, and glycated hemoglobin below 9 as

53 lar edema, posterior capsular opacification, epiretinal membrane, and intraocular lens subluxation.

54 mia, foveal hemorrhage, vitreous hemorrhage, epiretinal membrane, and retinal detachment.

55 erwent pars plana vitrectomy, removal of any epiretinal membranes, and gas tamponade, with or without

56 opathy, ophthalmological lesions (cataracts, epiretinal membranes, and retinal hamartomas), and cutan

57 Epiretinal membranes are associated with macular cysts,

58 Epiretinal membranes are commonly encountered in retinal

59 n of HGFR in human donor eyes and in several epiretinal membranes associated with proliferative vitre

60 n of HGFR in human donor eyes and in several epiretinal membranes associated with proliferative vitre

61 eadily detected in the cellular component of epiretinal membranes associated with PVR, whereas little

62 f small and medium FTMH, and in FTMH without epiretinal membrane at baseline.

63 absence of foveal detachment, lamellar hole, epiretinal membrane, choroidal neovascularization, inner

64 PR had a greater risk of epiretinal membrane compared with PRB and PFCL.

65 All six diabetic epiretinal membranes contained positively identified Mul

66 ular degeneration, glaucoma, Sicca syndrome, epiretinal membrane, cornea guttata, or amblyopia.

67 and PDGF, both of which are associated with epiretinal membrane development.

68 e had a higher growth rate than eyes without epiretinal membrane (difference, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.03-0.30

69 These factors include epiretinal membranes, edema, individual variation in fie

70 res more frequently seen in uveitis included epiretinal membrane (ERM) (82.6% vs. 44.2%, p < 0.001),

71 Surgical indications included epiretinal membrane (ERM) (n = 121), vitreous floaters (

72 Structurally, the presence of epiretinal membrane (ERM) (p < 0.007) and vitreo-macular

73 5, 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.19-11.8), epiretinal membrane (ERM) (RR, 4.1, CI, 2.63-6.19), hist

74 loped cystoid macular edema (CME) or macular epiretinal membrane (ERM) .

75 cular traction (VMT), macular hole (MH), and epiretinal membrane (ERM) according to the International

76 in patients with macular pathologies such as epiretinal membrane (ERM) and could influence the result

77 Epiretinal membrane (ERM) and cystoid macular edema (CME

78 Rates of epiretinal membrane (ERM) and cystoid macular edema (CME

79 00 (Carl Zeiss Meditech, Jena, Germany) with epiretinal membrane (ERM) and internal retinal membrane

80 ients admitted for surgical treatment of the epiretinal membrane (ERM) and macular hole (MH).

81 e the causes of diplopia in patients with an epiretinal membrane (ERM) and presenting diplopia.

82 VMI was evaluated for presence of epiretinal membrane (ERM) and thickened vitreous cortex

83 selected among 369 patients examined for an epiretinal membrane (ERM) by Cirrus spectral-domain OCT

84 Epiretinal membrane (ERM) can impair central vision by f

85 A stratified analysis showed that epiretinal membrane (ERM) decreased the risk of CME in R

86 factors for cystoid macular edema (CME) and epiretinal membrane (ERM) development after surgery for

87 , or vehicle, and at appropriate time points epiretinal membrane (ERM) formation and retinal detachme

88 nal reattachment rate, final VA, and rate of epiretinal membrane (ERM) formation at month 6.

89 study was to study the prevalence of macular epiretinal membrane (ERM) formation for retinal tears tr

90 , the intraretinal glial response results in epiretinal membrane (ERM) formation, a proliferative and

91 cataract development, retinal redetachment, epiretinal membrane (ERM) formation, and single-surgery

92 More epiretinal membrane (ERM) formations occurred postoperat

93 osed a deep learning model that can identify epiretinal membrane (ERM) in OCT with ophthalmologist-le

94 (SRF) height, intraretinal cysts (IRC), and epiretinal membrane (ERM) on post-operative best-correct

95 ic lenses or contact lenses), a MIN lens, or epiretinal membrane (ERM) peeling (alone or in any combi

96 are functional and anatomical outcomes after epiretinal membrane (ERM) peeling with internal limiting

97 rol group was selected to determine relative epiretinal membrane (ERM) prevalence.

98 ne (ILM) peeling after idiopathic unilateral epiretinal membrane (ERM) removal and to compare outcome

99 ing the postoperative outcomes of idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery based on preoperative

100 of exogenous cells into the vitreous to form epiretinal membrane (ERM) which does not recapitulate a

101 e and clinical associations of patients with epiretinal membrane (ERM) who develop central-peripheral

102 (PPV): 6 for vitreous hemorrhage (VH), 1 for epiretinal membrane (ERM), and an additional 8 for tract

103 criteria included FTMH >400 mum, presence of epiretinal membrane (ERM), and aphakia in the study eye.

104 eter and presence of vitreomacular traction, epiretinal membrane (ERM), and cystoid macular edema (CM

105 ndergoing pars plana vitrectomy to remove an epiretinal membrane (ERM), and test subjects (n = 7) wit

106 esolution of CME, OCT characteristics of CME/epiretinal membrane (ERM), type of surgery, and treatmen

107 reous fluids were obtained from 19 eyes with epiretinal membrane (ERM), which were used as control sa

108 ickness macular hole (FTMH), and presence of epiretinal membrane (ERM).

109 hacoemulsification for macular hole (MH) and epiretinal membrane (ERM).

110 nction after vitrectomy surgery in eyes with epiretinal membrane (ERM).

111 sculature and disease severity of idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM).

112 predicts postoperative visual outcome in the epiretinal membrane (ERM).

113 e of parafoveal cysts or schisis mainly from epiretinal membrane (ERM).

114 epiretinal proliferation (LHEP) and standard epiretinal membrane (ERM).

115 hment (RD), cystoid macular edema (CME), and epiretinal membrane (ERM).

116 , and fibroblasts (the cell types crucial in epiretinal membrane [ERM] formation) under identical mic

117 ectopic inner foveal layers associated with epiretinal membranes (ERMs) and to present a new optical

118 The development of symptoms in patients with epiretinal membranes (ERMs) often corresponds with the a

119 Epiretinal membranes (ERMs) were present in 71% of eyes

120 ns of the central bouquet (CB) in idiopathic epiretinal membranes (ERMs).

121 n younger patients (<65 years), eyes without epiretinal membrane, eyes with FTMH, phakic eyes, and ey

122 ing/other changes, macular atrophy/puckering/epiretinal membranes, FAF findings such as a central hyp

123 Patients who had an epiretinal membrane for more than 18 months had signific

124 ), whereas hypotony (3% vs. 13%, P = 0.038), epiretinal membrane formation (2% vs. 8%; P = 0.028), an

125 current retinal detachment (4.7% vs 19%) and epiretinal membrane formation (7% vs 19%).

126 hment (RD), cystoid macular edema (CME), and epiretinal membrane formation (ERM).

127 CI = 2.00-3.59, P < .001), and in eyes with epiretinal membrane formation (hazard ratio = 1.54, 95%

128 r edema (RR, 0.47 [0.25-0.88]; P = 0.02) and epiretinal membrane formation (RR, 0.70 [0.52-0.94]; P =

129 Optic disc edema and epiretinal membrane formation was found more frequently

130 sue formation at the disc area as well as an epiretinal membrane formation, for which she had pars pl

131 cluding postoperative cystoid macular edema, epiretinal membrane formation, macular folds, and, ultim

132 The incidence of epiretinal membrane formation, number of laser photocoag

133 ces (ECM) is important in the development of epiretinal membranes found in proliferative vitreoretino

134 Eyes with epiretinal membrane had a higher growth rate than eyes w

135 cular interface pathology such as idiopathic epiretinal membrane (iERM) (n = 4), vitreomacular tracti

136 ence of progression to surgery on idiopathic epiretinal membrane (iERM) and compared the results with

137 flammation in the pathogenesis of idiopathic epiretinal membrane (iERM) by evaluating blood-count-der

138 ile of cells growing out of human idiopathic epiretinal membranes (iERMs) and testing their prolifera

139 leptin and leptin receptor were localized in epiretinal membranes immunohistochemically.

140 native internal limiting membrane in 2 eyes, epiretinal membrane in 1 eye, and remnant cortical vitre

141 8 eyes (29%) and 6 eyes (38%) (P = .34), and epiretinal membrane in 5 eyes (20.8%) and 4 eyes (25%) (

142 cular edema in 8 of 20 patients (40.0%), and epiretinal membrane in 6 of 20 patients (30.0%).

143 Epiretinal membranes in group 1C demonstrated the greate

144 We observed retinal hamartomas and/or epiretinal membranes in nine patients from five families

145 Epiretinal membrane is a common complication of uveitis

146 .6 vs. 0.52); FTMH (kappa 0.9 vs. 0.78); and epiretinal membrane (kappa 0.65 vs. 0.45).

147 pathy, retinal vein occlusion, macular hole, epiretinal membrane, macular degeneration, retinal detac

148 cal changes in OCT in the macular region, as epiretinal membrane, macular edema, subretinal fluid or

149 e diabetic retinopathy, and the other 13 for epiretinal membrane, macular hole, vitreous opacities, o

150 ssing the presence of cystoid macular edema, epiretinal membrane, macular holes, and external limitin

151 A tangential traction from an epiretinal membrane may contribute to its genesis, but a

152 The development of epiretinal membranes may be associated with either vitre

153 n of the retinal inner layers (DRIL), cysts, epiretinal membranes, microaneurysms, subretinal fluid,

154 ), optic nerve abnormalities (n = 2 [1.9%]), epiretinal membrane (n = 2 [1.9%]), and drusen (n = 2 [1

155 Surgical indications included epiretinal membrane (n = 26), diabetic tractional retina

156 fluid (n = 6), subretinal exudation (n = 6), epiretinal membrane (n = 3), retinal hemorrhage (n = 2),

157 s" at distance and/or for reading) caused by epiretinal membrane (n = 44) or other retinal disorders

158 cyclitic membrane (n = 18, 69%), neoplastic epiretinal membrane (n = 6, 23%), and persistent hyaloid

159 he RPE monolayer in human donor eyes, and in epiretinal membranes obtained from patients with PVR.

160 ptin receptor were detected in fibrovascular epiretinal membrane of patients with diabetes.

161 eas myofibroblasts dominated in conventional epiretinal membranes of macular pseudoholes.

162 eptors (PDGFRs) are present and activated in epiretinal membranes of patient donors, and they are ess

163 Seventy-two eyes of 59 patients had an epiretinal membrane on presentation.

164 The finding of an epiretinal membrane on spectral-domain OCT and a corresp

165 Epiretinal membranes on OCT were associated with a lower

166 Despite the absence of contractive epiretinal membranes on optical coherence tomography, we

167 Contractile epiretinal membranes on the inner retinal surface that c

168 All surgical procedures for an epiretinal membrane or a macular hole performed in Franc

169 ionally underwent pars plana vitrectomy with epiretinal membrane or ILM peel within 1 month of random

170 reous opacities code exclusively, and not to epiretinal membrane or macular hole codes.

171 naive wet AMD group (group 3, n = 10) and an epiretinal membrane or macular hole group (group 4, n =

172 ohorts with wet AMD and a control group with epiretinal membrane or macular hole.

173 surgery involves pars plana vitrectomy with epiretinal membrane or proliferation and internal limiti

174 lysis of patients with a diagnosis of either epiretinal membrane or vitreous opacities, there was no

175 es of visual loss such as SO emulsification, epiretinal membranes or macular edema were excluded.

176 016, 152,034 macular surgical procedures for epiretinal membranes or macular holes were recorded in F

177 .75; 95% CI, 0.68-0.82), and macular hole or epiretinal membrane (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.48-0.65) were l

178 re categorized as having intraretinal fluid, epiretinal membrane, or optic nerve edema.

179 baseline VA (P < 0.001), the presence of an epiretinal membrane (P = 0.03), and the peeling of the i

180 < 0.001), but remained stable after PPV for epiretinal membrane (p = 0.555), macular hole (p = 0.695

181 3 months (20/94 vs 20/35 for eyes without an epiretinal membrane, P = .002) and at 6 months follow-up

182 llow-up (20/110 vs 20/36 for eyes without an epiretinal membrane, P = .02).

183 one oil removal in one patient, and combined epiretinal membrane peeling and silicone oil removal in

184 ma (PRB 28%, PR 39%, PFCL 46%, P = .003) and epiretinal membrane (PRB 64%, PR 90%, PFCL 61%, P < .001

185 ed include central subfield thickness (CST), epiretinal membrane presence, intraretinal and subretina

186 epiretinal proliferation, whereas tractional epiretinal membranes presenting contractive properties w

187 p visits revealed regressed mMNV with a taut epiretinal membrane, progressive worsening of outer MRS,

188 etinal Defect Associated With High Myopia or Epiretinal Membrane," published online January 22, 2015,

189 patients in the single-peeling group had an epiretinal membrane remaining in the central fovea posto

190 Subsequently, the silicone oil with epiretinal membrane removal was performed, and the patie

191 ucoma, age-related macular degeneration, and epiretinal membrane, require specific considerations for

192 These conditions include macular holes, epiretinal membranes, retinal detachments, and retinopat

193 lusion (RR 12.9), macular hole (RR 7.7), and epiretinal membrane (RR 5.7).

194 al [CI], 1.57-4.34), a previous diagnosis of epiretinal membrane (RR, 5.60; 95% CI, 3.45-9.07), uveit

195 ted internal limiting membrane specimens and epiretinal membrane specimens removed from 25 eyes of 25

196 r changes increased at advanced glaucoma and epiretinal membrane stages.

197 inal detachment was 2.37% overall, 1.95% for epiretinal membrane surgery, and 3.43% for macular hole

198 was higher for macular hole surgery than for epiretinal membrane surgery.

199 iferation is a distinct clinical entity from epiretinal membrane that classically is associated with

200 In eyes with epiretinal membranes, the largest single entity identifi

201 The extensive and adherent epiretinal membrane together with the mass lesion were r

202 retinoschisis, myopic traction maculopathy, epiretinal membrane, vitreoretinal traction, optic or sc

203 Extensive multilayered peripapillary epiretinal membrane was found covering the posterior pol

204 Epiretinal membrane was found in 7 eyes after endophthal

205 fects of "single peeling," in which only the epiretinal membrane was peeled, and "double peeling," in

206 embrane was removed in 25.7% (143 eyes), and epiretinal membrane was removed in 18.3% (102 eyes).

207 Epiretinal membrane was the most common complication.

208 ative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) and idiopathic epiretinal membranes was analyzed by immunohistochemistr

209 ue to undergo PPV for either macular hole or epiretinal membrane were recruited.

210 Epiretinal membranes were diagnosed when identified by 2

211 nsecutive patients diagnosed with idiopathic epiretinal membranes were reviewed and analyzed.

212 Sections of epiretinal membranes were stained immunohistochemically

213 Conversely, eyes with an epiretinal membrane with retinal surface wrinkling had a

214 Epiretinal membranes with high cellularity and glial cel

215 The immunostaining of patient epiretinal membranes with lineage markers confirms RPE i

216 er nuclear layer in patients with idiopathic epiretinal membranes, with and without glaucomatous opti

217 Eyes without epiretinal membranes and with epiretinal membranes without surface wrinkling were not