ライフサイエンスコーパス: esophageal mucosa

1 cted to superior endoscopy (with biopsies of esophageal mucosa).

2 No eosinophils were found in the esophageal mucosa.

3 oE), an allergic inflammatory disease of the esophageal mucosa.

4 sin B activity across normal and tumor human esophageal mucosa.

5 normal, inflamed, metaplastic, and malignant esophageal mucosa.

6 le 1, 29 patients (81%) had no cancer in the esophageal mucosa.

7 tly increased ERK2 phosphorylation levels in esophageal mucosa.

8 without acid is not sufficient to damage the esophageal mucosa.

9 extensive expansion involving up to 17 cm of esophageal mucosa.

10 s that cause an eosinophilic infiltration of esophageal mucosa.

11 ly compatible system for manufacturing human esophageal mucosa.

12 may cause irritation and inflammation of the esophageal mucosa.

13 esponse to food antigens in contact with the esophageal mucosa.

14 ach, or the infrequent methylation of normal esophageal mucosa accompanied by methylation in all norm

15 with the aim to achieve a barrier to protect esophageal mucosa against reflux damages and neutralizat

16 e and protein expression of ASIC1 and 3 from esophageal mucosa and dorsal root ganglia (DRG) neurons

17 rade IIa display internal enhancement of the esophageal mucosa and enhancement of the outer wall conf

18 y significant cis-eQTLs in FAM120AOS in both esophageal mucosa and esophageal muscularis tissue.

19 ) was found in the basal layer of the normal esophageal mucosa and in IEUs and cytomegalovirus ulcera

20 system, we show comprehensive microscopy of esophageal mucosa and of coronary arteries in vivo.

21 A, MGMT, and TIMP3) of methylation in normal esophageal mucosa and stomach, or the infrequent methyla

22 led to esophagitis, marked thickening of the esophageal mucosa, and enhanced expression of COX-2.

23 s of RE and NERD were similarly increased in esophageal mucosa as well as T3-T5 DRG neurons compared

24 ncreatic enzymes in gastric contents damages esophageal mucosa, causing inflammation and increased pa

25 the evaluation of the macroscopic aspects of esophageal mucosa during EGD.

26 geal involvement and several biopsies of the esophageal mucosa for histopathologic confirmation of Eo

27 We performed bulk RNA-sequencing on esophageal mucosa from 14 achalasia and 8 healthy subjec

28 Esophageal mucosa from 3 patients whose ulcers healed or

29 We used electron microscopy on esophageal mucosa from an affected family member carryin

30 issues and in 96% (96/100) of distant normal esophageal mucosa from cancer specimens.

31 xeno-free, scalable strategy for generating esophageal mucosa from human pluripotent stem cells (hPS

32 e level of TNF-alpha messenger RNA (mRNA) in esophageal mucosa from patients with cytomegalovirus-ass

33 Electron microscopy of squamous esophageal mucosa harboring the S631G variant revealed d

34 gus (BE) and malignant transformation of the esophageal mucosa in mice.

35 Long-term systematic follow-up of the esophageal mucosa including multistaged biopsies is requ

36 ether an esophageal prick test, in which the esophageal mucosa is challenged by local injection of al

37 he biofilm microorganisms suggested that the esophageal mucosa is more permissive to invasion than th

38 We profile 421,312 individual cells from the esophageal mucosa of 7 healthy and 15 EoE participants,

39 ressed genes (DEGs) were found in the distal esophageal mucosa of achalasia subjects and 120 DEGs wer

40 stological changes have been reported in the esophageal mucosa of achalasia, suggesting its involveme

41 not differ significantly between the distal esophageal mucosa of controls (median, 25.5 cell layers

42 oglobulin G4 (IgG4) and food proteins in the esophageal mucosa of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) pati

43 pression of mediators of inflammation in the esophageal mucosa of patients with different GERD endosc

44 ucosa of patients with NERD, from the distal esophageal mucosa of patients with ERD, and the distal-m

45 tions as dilated intercellular spaces in the esophageal mucosa of patients with GERD compared to cont

46 Proximal and distal esophageal mucosa of patients with NERD have more superf

47 s were obtained from the proximal and distal esophageal mucosa of patients with NERD, from the distal

48 pithelium lining the upper two-thirds of the esophageal mucosa possess a non-neuronal cholinergic sys

49 ith extensive alterations of the lingual and esophageal mucosa that were absent in mice given the hwp

50 Exposure of the esophageal mucosa to food allergens can cause acute muco

51 ial and the sensitivity or resistance of the esophageal mucosa to the reflux material are important f

52 The epithelial turnover time of the healthy esophageal mucosa was approximately 11 days (twice that

53 Biopsies of esophageal mucosa were taken from the (1) proximal esoph

54 to be a poor substitute for tissue biopsy of esophageal mucosa when evaluating microflora patterns.

55 We then treated ex vivo human esophageal mucosa with a cytokine cocktail to closely mi

56 lammatory mediators S100a8 and S100a9 in the esophageal mucosa with accompanying esophageal epithelia

57 Contact of esophageal mucosa with acid, before inducing heartburn,